Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Results of extralevator abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer including quality of life and long-term wound complications

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Extralevator abdominoperineal resection (APR) for low rectal cancer has been adopted by centers to improve oncological outcome. The present study aimed to investigate oncological results, wound complications, and quality of life (QoL).

Methods

Patients who underwent extralevator APR for rectal cancer between 2007 and 2011 were identified retrospectively. QoL status was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CR30 and CR29 questionnaires.

Results

Thirty laparoscopic (n = 7) or open (n = 23) extralevator APRs were performed in 17 male and 13 female patients. The mortality was zero; circumferential margin involvement occurred in two cases (6.7 %); and there was no bowel perforation. No local recurrence was noted after a median follow-up of 28.3 months; however, six patients died, and eight developed distant metastases. Perineal wound complications were found in 46.6 % of patients, and all were managed conservatively. Fifty percent of the patients reported persistent perineal pain at the follow-up exam. QoL was assessed 7 to 46 months after surgery, and the global health status (70.6) was comparable to the EORTC reference group and published conventional APR series. The QLQ-CR29 module revealed high mean symptom scores for urinary frequency (48.1), incontinence (30.5), and impotence (79.1).

Conclusions

Extralevator APR can control local recurrence but not distant metastases of low rectal cancer. The extended perineal resection appears not to decrease general QoL, but it results in a high rate of perineal wound complications. Genitourinary functions are often impaired, even in the long term, and further improvements to the technique must seek to reduce genitourinary harm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kapiteijn E, Putter H, van de Velde CJ (2002) Impact of the introduction and training of total mesorectal excision on recurrence and survival in rectal cancer in The Netherlands. Br J Surg 89:1142–1149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. MacFarlane JK, Ryall RD, Heald RJ (1993) Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 341:457–460

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Maurer CA, Renzulli P, Kull C, Kaser SA, Mazzucchelli L, Ulrich A, Buchler MW (2011) The impact of the introduction of total mesorectal excision on local recurrence rate and survival in rectal cancer: long-term results. Ann Surg Oncol 18:1899–1906

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Holm T (2011) Abdominoperineal resection revisited: is positioning an important issue? Dis Colon Rectum 54:921–922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Holm T, Ljung A, Haggmark T, Jurell G, Lagergren J (2007) Extended abdominoperineal resection with gluteus maximus flap reconstruction of the pelvic floor for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 94:232–238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. West NP, Anderin C, Smith KJ, Holm T, Quirke P (2010) Multicentre experience with extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 97:588–599

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. West NP, Finan PJ, Anderin C, Lindholm J, Holm T, Quirke P (2008) Evidence of the oncologic superiority of cylindrical abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:3517–3522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Martijnse IS, Dudink RL, West NP et al (2012) Focus on extralevator perineal dissection in supine position for low rectal cancer has led to better quality of surgery and oncologic outcome. Ann Surg Oncol 19:786–793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Messenger DE, Cohen Z, Kirsch R, O'Connor BI, Victor JC, Huang H, McLeod RS (2011) Favorable pathologic and long-term outcomes from the conventional approach to abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 54:793–802

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stelzner S, Hellmich G, Schubert C, Puffer E, Haroske G, Witzigmann H (2011) Short-term outcome of extra-levator abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 26:919–925

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tayyab M, Sharma A, Ragg JL, Macdonald AW, Gunn J, Hartley JE, Monson JR (2012) Evaluation of the impact of implementing the prone jackknife position for the perineal phase of abdominoperineal excision of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 55:316–321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cornish JA, Tilney HS, Heriot AG, Lavery IC, Fazio VW, Tekkis PP (2007) A meta-analysis of quality of life for abdominoperineal excision of rectum versus anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14:2056–2068

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. How P, Stelzner S, Branagan G, Bundy K, Chandrakumaran K, Heald RJ, Moran B (2012) Comparative quality of life in patients following abdominoperineal excision and low anterior resection for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 55:400–406

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kasparek MS, Hassan I, Cima RR, Larson DR, Gullerud RE, Wolff BG (2012) Long-term quality of life and sexual and urinary function after abdominoperineal resection for distal rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 55:147–154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B et al (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:365–376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fayers PM, Aaronson NK, Bjordal K, Groenvold M, Curran D, Bottomley A (2001) The EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual, 3rd edn. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  17. Whistance RN, Conroy T, Chie W et al (2009) Clinical and psychometric validation of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 questionnaire module to assess health-related quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 45:3017–3026

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Scott NW, Fayers PM, Aaronson NK et al EORTC QLQ-C30 Reference values. EORTC Quality of Life Group 2008; EORTC Headquarters, Belgium

  19. Vaughan-Shaw PG, King AT, Cheung T et al (2011) Early experience with laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision within an enhanced recovery setting: analysis of short-term outcomes and quality of life. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 93:451–459

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ulrich A, Schmidt J, Weitz J, Buchler MW (2005) Total mesorectal excision: the Heidelberg results after TME. Recent Results Cancer Res 165:112–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ulrich A, Weitz J, Slodczyk M, Koch M, Jaeger D, Munter M, Buchler MW (2009) Neoadjuvant treatment does not influence perioperative outcome in rectal cancer surgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 75:129–136

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Marr R, Birbeck K, Garvican J et al (2005) The modern abdominoperineal excision: the next challenge after total mesorectal excision. Ann Surg 242:74–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJ, Marijnen CA, van Krieken JH, Quirke P (2005) Low rectal cancer: a call for a change of approach in abdominoperineal resection. J Clin Oncol 23:9257–9264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. den Dulk M, Marijnen CA, Putter H et al (2007) Risk factors for adverse outcome in patients with rectal cancer treated with an abdominoperineal resection in the total mesorectal excision trial. Ann Surg 246:83–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Law WL, Chu KW (2004) Abdominoperineal resection is associated with poor oncological outcome. Br J Surg 91:1493–1499

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mulsow J, Winter DC (2010) Extralevator abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer: new direction or miles behind? Arch Surg 145:811–813

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yang Z, Xu H, Zhang W, Xu Y, Xu Z (2012) A retrospective analysis of ultralow anterior resection vs. abdomino-perineal resection for lower rectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 59

  28. Asplund D, Haglind E, Angenete E (2012) Outcome of extralevator abdominoperineal excision compared with standard surgery. Results from a single centre. Colorectal Dis

  29. Christensen HK, Nerstrom P, Tei T, Laurberg S (2011) Perineal repair after extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 54:711–717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Han JG, Wang ZJ, Gao ZG, Xu HM, Yang ZH, Jin ML (2010) Pelvic floor reconstruction using human acellular dermal matrix after cylindrical abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 53:219–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Peacock O, Pandya H, Sharp T, Hurst NG, Speake WJ, Tierney GM, Lund JN (2012) Biological mesh reconstruction of perineal wounds following enhanced abdominoperineal excision of rectum (APER). Int J Colorectal Dis 27:475–482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gujral S, Conroy T, Fleissner C et al (2007) Assessing quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer: an update of the EORTC quality of life questionnaire. Eur J Cancer 43:1564–1573

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Stelzner S, Holm T, Moran BJ, Heald RJ, Witzigmann H, Zorenkov D, Wedel T (2011) Deep pelvic anatomy revisited for a description of crucial steps in extralevator abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 54:947–957

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Vaughan-Shaw PG, Cheung T, Knight JS, Nichols PH, Pilkington SA, Mirnezami AH (2012) A prospective case–control study of extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) of the rectum versus conventional laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal excision: comparative analysis of short-term outcomes and quality of life. Tech Coloproctol

  35. Allal AS, Bieri S, Pelloni A et al (2000) Sphincter-sparing surgery after preoperative radiotherapy for low rectal cancers: feasibility, oncologic results and quality of life outcomes. Br J Cancer 82:1131–1137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Camilleri-Brennan J, Steele RJ (2002) Objective assessment of morbidity and quality of life after surgery for low rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 4:61–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Gosselink MP, Darby M, Zimmerman DD et al (2005) Long-term follow-up of retrograde colonic irrigation for defaecation disturbances. Colorectal Dis 7:65–69

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Grumann MM, Noack EM, Hoffmann IA, Schlag PM (2001) Comparison of quality of life in patients undergoing abdominoperineal extirpation or anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 233:149–156

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Guren MG, Eriksen MT, Wiig JN et al (2005) Quality of life and functional outcome following anterior or abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 31:735–742

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Schmidt CE, Bestmann B, Kuchler T, Longo WE, Kremer B (2005) Prospective evaluation of quality of life of patients receiving either abdominoperineal resection or sphincter-preserving procedure for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 12:117–123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sideris L, Zenasni F, Vernerey D et al (2005) Quality of life of patients operated on for low rectal cancer: impact of the type of surgery and patients’ characteristics. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2180–2191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany

    Thilo Welsch, Vyron Mategakis, Pietro Contin, Yakup Kulu, Markus W. Büchler & Alexis Ulrich

Authors
  1. Thilo Welsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vyron Mategakis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pietro Contin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yakup Kulu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Markus W. Büchler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Alexis Ulrich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexis Ulrich.

Additional information

Thilo Welsch and Vyron Mategakis contributed equally to this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Welsch, T., Mategakis, V., Contin, P. et al. Results of extralevator abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer including quality of life and long-term wound complications. Int J Colorectal Dis 28, 503–510 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-012-1611-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-012-1611-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation