Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ring drape do not protect against surgical site infections in colorectal surgery: a randomised controlled study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Surgical site infections (SSIs) remain a major problem in colorectal surgery.

Method

In this prospective, randomised study, we compared two kinds of wound protection, namely, “plastic ring drape” versus “standard cloth towels”. One hundred one patients were randomised to the control group (wet cloth towels) and 98 to the study cohort (ring drape). SSIs were classified according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations.

Discussion

In the control group, 30 patients had an SSI, whereas 20 did so in the study group. This difference was not significant (p = 0.131).

Conclusion

Plastic ring drape for wound protection does not guard against SSIs in colorectal surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig.2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Psaila JV, Wheeler MH, Crosby DL (1977) The role of plastic wound drapes in the prevention of wound infection following abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 64(10):729–732

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nyström PO, Broomé A, Höjer H, Ling L (1984) A controlled trial of a plastic wound ring drape to prevent contamination and infection in colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 27(7):451–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sookhai S, Redmond HP, Deasy JM (1999) Impervious wound-edge protector to reduce postoperative wound infection: a randomised, controlled trial. Lancet 353(9164):1585

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kercher KW, Nguyen TH, Harold KL, Poplin ME, Matthews BD, Sing RF, Heniford BT (2004) Plastic wound protectors do not affect wound infection rates following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy. Surg Endosc 18(1):148–151, Epub 2003 Nov 21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dhqp/pdf/guidelines/SSI.pdf

  6. Baier PK, Glück NC, Baumgartner U, Adam U, Fischer A, Hopt UT (2010) Subcutaneous Redon drains do not reduce the incidence of surgical site infections after laparotomy. A randomized controlled trial on 200 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 25(5):639–643

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nationales Referenzzentrum für Surveillance von nosokomialen Infektionen. http://www.nrz-hygiene.de/surveillance/kiss/op-kiss/

  8. Englesbe MJ, Brooks L, Kubus J, Luchtefeld M, Lynch J, Senagore A, Eggenberger JC, Velanovich V, Campbell DA Jr (2010) A statewide assessment of surgical site infection following colectomy: the role of oral antibiotics. Ann Surg 252(3):514–519

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. http://www.ecdc.europa.eu/IPSE/helicshome.htm

  10. Howard DD, White CQ, Harden TR, Ellis CN (2009) Incidence of surgical site infections postcolorectal resections without preoperative mechanical or antibiotic bowel preparation. Am Surg 75(8):659–663

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pena-Soria MJ, Mayol JM, Anula R, Arbeo-Escolar A, Fernandez-Represa JA (2008) Single-blinded randomized trial of mechanical bowel preparation for colon surgery with primary intraperitoneal anastomosis. J Gastrointest Surg 12(12):2103–2108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Itani KM, Jensen EH, Finn TS, Tomassini JE, Abramson MA (2008) Effect of body mass index and ertapenem versus cefotetan prophylaxis on surgical site infection in elective colorectal surgery. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 9(2):131–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Itani KM, Wilson SE, Awad SS, Jensen EH, Finn TS, Abramson MA (2007) Polyethylene glycol versus sodium phosphate mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery. Am J Surg 193(2):190–194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tanner J, Khan D, Aplin C, Ball J, Thomas M, Bankart J (2009) Post-discharge surveillance to identify colorectal surgical site infection rates and related costs. J Hosp Infect 72(3):243–250

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dindo D, Hahnloser D, Clavien PA (2010) Quality assessment in surgery: riding a lame horse. Ann Surg 251(4):766–771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Baier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baier, P., Kiesel, M., Kayser, C. et al. Ring drape do not protect against surgical site infections in colorectal surgery: a randomised controlled study. Int J Colorectal Dis 27, 1223–1228 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-012-1484-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-012-1484-9

Keywords

Navigation