Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Efficacy of mechanical bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol in prevention of postoperative complications in elective colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to estimate efficacy of mechanical bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol (PEG) in prevention of postoperative complications in elective colorectal surgery.

Method

A literature search of MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was done to identify randomized controlled trials involving comparison of postoperative complications after mechanical bowel preparation with PEG (PEG group) and no preparation (control group). A meta-analysis was set up to distinguish overall difference between the two groups.

Results

A total of five randomized controlled trials was identified according to our inclusion criteria. The use of PEG for mechanical bowel preparation did not significantly reduce the rate of surgical site infection (SSI; odds ratio (OR) 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.39 (0.85–2.25); P = 0.19) including incisional SSI (OR 95% CI, 1.44 (0.88–2.33); P = 0.15), organ/space SSI (OR 95% CI, 1.10 (0.43–2.78); P = 0.49), anastomotic leak (OR 95% CI,1.78 (0.95–3.33; P = 0.07), mortality (OR 95% CI, 1.24 (0.37–4.14; P = 0.73), infectious complications (OR 95% CI, 1.14 (0.62–2.08); P = 0.67), and hospital stay (weighted mean difference 95% CI, 2.17 (−2.90–7.25); P = 0.40) except main complications (OR 95% CI, 1.76 (1.09–2.85); P = 0.02), of which the rate increased significantly in the PEG group.

Conclusion

The use of mechanical bowel preparation with PEG does not significantly lower postoperative complications in elective colorectal surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blumetti J, Luu M, Sarosi G, Hartless K, McFarlin J, Parker B, Dineen S, Huerta S, Asolati M, Varela E, Anthony T (2007) Surgical site infections after colorectal surgery: do risk factors vary depending on the type of infection considered? Surgery 142:704–711

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Itani KM, Wilson SE, Awad SS, Jensen EH, Finn TS, Abramson MA (2006) Ertapenem versus cefotetan prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery. N Engl J Med 355:2640–2651

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kobayashi M, Mohri Y, Tonouchi H, Miki C, Nakai K, Kusunoki M (2007) Randomized clinical trial comparing intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis alone with oral and intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis for the prevention of a surgical site infection in colorectal cancer surgery. Surg Today 37:383–388

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Khan AA, Wheeler JM, Cunningham C, George B, Kettlewell M, Mortensen NJ (2007) The management and outcome of anastomotic leaks in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis

  5. Pronio A, Di Filippo A, Narilli P, Mancini B, Caporilli D, Piroli S, Vestri A, Montesani C (2007) Anastomotic dehiscence in colorectal surgery. Analysis of 1,290 patients. Chir Ital 59:599–609

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tytherleigh MG, Bokey L, Chapuis PH, Dent OF (2007) Is a minor clinical anastomotic leak clinically significant after resection of colorectal cancer? J Am Coll Surg 205:648–653

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bucher P, Gervaz P, Soravia C, Mermillod B, Erne M, Morel P (2005) Randomized clinical trial of mechanical bowel preparation versus no preparation before elective left-sided colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 92:409–414

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nichols RL, Condon RE (1971) Preoperative preparation of the colon. Surg Gynecol Obstet 132:323–337

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nichols RL, Gorbach SL, Condon RE (1971) Alteration of intestinal microflora following preoperative mechanical preparation of the colon. Dis Colon Rectum 14:123–127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stearns MW Jr, Schottenfeld D (1971) Techniques for the surgical management of colon cancer. Cancer 28:165–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zmora O, Wexner SD, Hajjar L, Park T, Efron JE, Nogueras JJ, Weiss EG (2003) Trends in preparation for colorectal surgery: survey of the members of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Am Surg 69:150–154

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Contant CM, Hop WC, van't Sant HP, Oostvogel HJ, Smeets HJ, Stassen LP, Neijenhuis PA, Idenburg FJ, Dijkhuis CM, Heres P, van Tets WF, Gerritsen JJ, Weidema WF (2007) Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 370:2112–2117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fa-Si-Oen P, Roumen R, Buitenweg J, van de Velde C, van Geldere D, Putter H, Verwaest C, Verhoef L, de Waard JW, Swank D, D'Hoore A, Croiset van Uchelen F (2005) Mechanical bowel preparation or not? Outcome of a multicenter, randomized trial in elective open colon surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1509–1516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Guenaga KF, Matos D, Castro AA, Atallah AN, Wille-Jorgensen P (2003) Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online):CD001544

  15. Guenaga KF, Matos D, Castro AA, Atallah AN, Wille-Jorgensen P (2005) Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. Cochrane database of systematic reviews (online):CD001544

  16. Pena-Soria MJ, Mayol JM, Anula-Fernandez R, Arbeo-Escolar A, Fernandez-Represa JA (2007) Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery with primary intraperitoneal anastomosis by a single surgeon: interim analysis of a prospective single-blinded randomized trial. J Gastrointest Surg 11:562–567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Slim K, Vicaut E, Panis Y, Chipponi J (2004) Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of colorectal surgery with or without mechanical bowel preparation. Br J Surg 91:1125–1130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Beck DE, Fazio VW (1990) Current preoperative bowel cleansing methods. Results of a survey. Dis Colon Rectum 33:12–15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Solla JA, Rothenberger DA (1990) Preoperative bowel preparation. A survey of colon and rectal surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum 33:154–159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Beck DE, Fazio VW, Jagelman DG (1986) Comparison of oral lavage methods for preoperative colonic cleansing. Dis Colon Rectum 29:699–703

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fleites RA, Marshall JB, Eckhauser ML, Mansour EG, Imbembo AL, McCullough AJ (1985) The efficacy of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution versus traditional mechanical bowel preparation for elective colonic surgery: a randomized, prospective, blinded clinical trial. Surgery 98:708–717

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wolff BG, Beart RW Jr, Dozois RR, Pemberton JH, Zinsmeister AR, Ready RL, Farnell MB, Washington JA 2nd, Heppell J (1988) A new bowel preparation for elective colon and rectal surgery. A prospective, randomized clinical trial. Arch Surg 123:895–900

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wolters U, Keller HW, Sorgatz S, Raab A, Pichlmaier H (1994) Prospective randomized study of preoperative bowel cleansing for patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 81:598–600

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17:1–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF (2000) Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. QUOROM Group. Br J Surg 87:1448–1454

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Miettinen RP, Laitinen ST, Makela JT, Paakkonen ME (2000) Bowel preparation with oral polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution vs. no preparation in elective open colorectal surgery: prospective, randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum 43:669–675, discussion 675-667

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zmora O, Mahajna A, Bar-Zakai B, Rosin D, Hershko D, Shabtai M, Krausz MM, Ayalon A (2003) Colon and rectal surgery without mechanical bowel preparation: a randomized prospective trial. Ann Surg 237:363–367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ambrose NS, Johnson M, Burdon DW, Keighley MR (1983) A physiological appraisal of polyethylene glycol and a balanced electrolyte solution as bowel preparation. Br J Surg 70:428–430

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bucher P, Gervaz P, Egger JF, Soravia C, Morel P (2006) Morphologic alterations associated with mechanical bowel preparation before elective colorectal surgery: a randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 49:109–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Itani KM, Wilson SE, Awad SS, Jensen EH, Finn TS, Abramson MA (2007) Polyethylene glycol versus sodium phosphate mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery. Am J Surg 193:190–194

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Oliveira L, Wexner SD, Daniel N, DeMarta D, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Bernstein M (1997) Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. A prospective, randomized, surgeon-blinded trial comparing sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol-based oral lavage solutions. Dis Colon Rectum 40:585–591

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Platell C, Barwood N, Makin G (2006) Randomized clinical trial of bowel preparation with a single phosphate enema or polyethylene glycol before elective colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 93:427–433

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR (1999) Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control 27:97–132, quiz 133–134; discussion 196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kale TI, Kuzu MA, Tekeli A, Tanik A, Aksoy M, Cete M (1998) Aggressive bowel preparation does not enhance bacterial translocation, provided the mucosal barrier is not disrupted: a prospective, randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum 41:636–641

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Poole GV (1991) Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis during bowel preparation: an example of clinical translocation. South Med J 84:1412–1413

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lieberman DA, Ghormley J, Flora K (1996) Effect of oral sodium phosphate colon preparation on serum electrolytes in patients with normal serum creatinine. Gastrointest Endosc 43:467–469

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical College, Wenzhou, 325003, Zhejiang, China

    Qian D. Zhu, Qi Y. Zhang, Qi Q. Zeng, Zheng P. Yu, Chong L. Tao & Wen J. Yang

Authors
  1. Qian D. Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qi Y. Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Qi Q. Zeng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zheng P. Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chong L. Tao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Wen J. Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qi Y. Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhu, Q.D., Zhang, Q.Y., Zeng, Q.Q. et al. Efficacy of mechanical bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol in prevention of postoperative complications in elective colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 25, 267–275 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-009-0834-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-009-0834-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation