Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Krukenberg tumors of colorectal origin: a dismal outcome—experience of a tertiary center

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Krukenberg tumor (KT) is described as metastases of the ovary usually from a tumor of gastric origin. As colorectal cancer (CRC) is now the most common cancer in Singapore, we are seeing more KT with colorectal origin.

Purpose

To determine the pattern of presentation of KT from CRC origin in terms of patient demographics, time of onset related to the diagnosis of CRC, presence of elevated serum tumor markers, carcinomatosis peritoneii, and survival of patients.

Methods

A retrospective database review of all patients diagnosed with KT from CRC treated in a specialized colorectal surgery department between August 1992 and March 2004.

Results

Twenty-five patients’ records were available for analysis. Median age at diagnosis was 53 years old (range: 38–79). Sixteen patients (64%) had ovarian metastasis at the time of diagnosis of the CRC. Eleven patients (44%) had unilateral ovarian involvement. Nineteen patients (76%) had carcinomatosis peritoneii. Serum Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) was available for 21 patients, 18 (86%) were raised; serum cancer antigen-125 (CA-125) was available for seven patients, five (71%) were raised. There were 11 mortalities (44%) and all died of the disease. Median time between diagnosis of KT and death was 19 months. The rest of the patients were alive with existence of disease at last follow-up.

Conclusion

KT is associated with a dismal outcome and poor prognosis. There was 0% disease-free survival. Serum CEA and CA-125 tend to rise in patients with KT. Patients investigated for elevated CA-125 and unilateral ovarian mass should have the diagnosis of colorectal cancer excluded before treatment of ovarian mass.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Young RH (2006) From Krukenberg to today: the ever present problems posed by metastatic tumors in the ovary: part I. Historical perspective, general principles, mucinous tumors including the Krukenberg tumor. Adv Anat Pathol 13(5):205–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Man M, Cazacu M, Oniu T (2007) Krukenberg tumors of gastric origin versus Krukenberg tumors of colorectal origin. Chirurgia(Bucur) 102(4):407–410

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McGill F, Ritter DB, Rickard C, Kaleya RN, Wadler S, Greston WM (1998) Management of Krukenberg tumors: an 11-year experience and review of the literature. Prim Care Update Ob Gyns 5(4):157–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. National Registry of Diseases Office (NRDO). Singapore Cancer Registry Interim Report: Trends in cancer incidence in Singapore 2002–2006. http://www.nrdo.gov.sg

  5. Gilliland R, Gill PJ (1992) Incidence and prognosis of Krukenberg tumour in Northern Ireland. Br J Surg 79(12):1364–1366

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mrad K, Morice P, Fabre A et al (2000) Krukenberg tumor: a clinico-pathological study of 15 cases. Ann Pathol 20(3):202–206

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sakakura C, Hagiwara A, Yamazaki J et al (2004) Management of postoperative follow-up and surgical treatment for Krukenberg tumor from colorectal cancers. Hepatogastroenterology 51(59):1350–1353

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Negishi Y, Iwabuchi H, Sakunaga H et al (1993) Serum and tissue measurements of CA72–4 in ovarian cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol 48(2):148–154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tottori K, Takeuchi S (1981) The clinical significances of carcinoembryonic proteins with ovarian carcinoma. Nippon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi 33(1):142–150

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ben Brahim E, Chatti S, Ayachi M et al (2007) Krukenberg tumour: a clinico-pathological study of 5 cases. Tunis Med 85(9):806–810

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Januszewska M, Emerich J, Dibniak J, Sliwinski W, Stukan M (2006) Clinical analysis of patients with Krukenberg tumor of the ovary. Ginekol Pol 77(3):203–208

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shan Y, Che X, Zhao DB, Bi JJ, Zhou ZX, Shao YF (2007) Surgical management of ovarian metastasis from colorectal cancer. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 10(2):146–148

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Miller BE, Pittman B, Jim Y, Fleming M (1997) Colon cancer with metastasis to the ovary at time of initial diagnosis. Gynecol Oncol 66(3):368–371

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Erroi F, Scarpa M, Angriman I et al (2007) Ovarian metastasis from colorectal cancer: prognostic value of radical oophorectomy. J Surg Oncol 96(2):113–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jit-Fong Lim.

Additional information

There was no financial support or sponsorship from any organization for this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tan, KL., Tan, WS., Lim, JF. et al. Krukenberg tumors of colorectal origin: a dismal outcome—experience of a tertiary center. Int J Colorectal Dis 25, 233–238 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-009-0796-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-009-0796-x

Keywords

Navigation