Skip to main content
Log in

Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing drainage alone vs primary sphincter-cutting procedures for anorectal abscess–fistula

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aim

Concurrent definitive treatment of underlying fistulas from infected anal glands at the time when the anorectal abscesses are drained is controversial as this is associated with a higher incidence of faecal incontinence, failure and recurrence. This meta-analysis was conducted to determine the merits of drainage alone vs primary sphincter-cutting procedures (which includes fistulotomy and fistulectomy) for anorectal abscess–fistula.

Methods

Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials database searches identified all randomized controlled trials using the keywords: anorectal abscess, anal sepsis, drainage, fistulotomy, fistulectomy or surgery from 1966 to 2004. The outcome variables analysed were recurrence, faecal continence and wound-healing times.

Results

Five trials were considered suitable for the meta-analysis, with a total of 405 patients. Sphincter-cutting procedures for anorectal abscesses resulted in 83% reduction in recurrence rate [relative risk (RR) 0.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.09–0.32, p<0.001]. However, there was a tendency to a higher risk of faecal incontinence to flatus and soiling when primary sphincter-cutting procedure was performed (RR 2.46, 95% CI 0.75–8.06, p=0.140).

Conclusion

There is no conclusive evidence if simple drainage or sphincter-cutting procedure is better in the treatment of anorectal abscess–fistula.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eisenhammer S (1956) The internal anal sphincter and the anorectal abscess. Surg Gynecol Obstet 103:501–506

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Eisenhammer S (1961) The anorectal and anovulval fistulous abscess. Surg Gynecol Obstet 113:519–520

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Buchan R, Grace RH (1973) Anorectal suppuration: the results of treatment and the factors influencing the recurrence rate. Br J Surg 60:537–540

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chrabot CM, Prasad ML, Abcarian H (1983) Recurrent anorectal abscesses. Dis Colon Rectum 26:105–108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ramanujam PS, Prasad ML, Abcarian H, Tan AB (1984) Perianal abscesses and fistulas. A study of 1023 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 27:593–597

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Vasilevsky CA, Gordon PH (1984) The incidence of recurrent abscesses or fistula-in-ano following anorectal suppuration. Dis Colon Rectum 27:126–130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Seow-Choen F, Nicholls RJ (1992) Anal fistula. Br J Surg 79:197–205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF (1999) Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet 354:1896–1900

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG (2001) The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 357:1191–1194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]. Version 4.2.7 for Windows. Oxford, England: The Cochrane Collaboration, 2004

  11. Oliver I, Lacueva FJ, Perez Vicente F, Arroyo A, Ferrer R, Cansado P et al (2003) Randomized clinical trial comparing simple drainage of anorectal abscess with and without fistula track treatment. Int J Colorectal Dis 18:107–110

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ho YH, Tan M, Chui CH, Leong A, Eu KW, Seow-Choen F (1997) Randomized controlled trial of primary fistulotomy with drainage alone for perianal abscesses. Dis Colon Rectum 40:1435–1438

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tang CL, Chew SP, Seow-Choen F (1996) Prospective randomized trial of drainage alone vs. drainage and fistulotomy for acute perianal abscesses with proven internal opening. Dis Colon Rectum 39:1415–1417

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schouten WR, van Vroonhoven TJMV (1991) Treatment of anorectal abscess with or without primary fistulectomy. Results of a prospective randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 34:60–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hebjorn M, Olsen O, Haakansson T, Andersen B (1987) A randomized trial of fistulotomy in perianal abscess. Scand J Gastroenterol 22:174–176

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pescatori M, Anastasio G, Bottini C, Mentasti A (1992) New grading and scoring for anal incontinence. Evaluation of 335 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 35:482–487

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Winslett MC, Allan A, Ambrose NS (1988) Anorectal sepsis as a presentation of occult rectal and systemic disease. Dis Colon Rectum 31:597–600

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Eisenhammer S (1954) Advances in anorectal surgery with special reference to amulatory treatment. S Afr Med J 28:264

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Seow-Choen F (1996) Relation of abscess to fistula in anal fistula. In: Phillips RKS, Lunniss PJ (eds) Anal fistula. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 13–24

    Google Scholar 

  20. Eisenhammer S (1978) The final evaluation and classification of the surgical treatment of the primary anorectal cryptoglandular intermuscular (intersphincteric) fistulous abscess and fistula. Dis Colon Rectum 21:237–254

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Read DR, Abcarian H (1979) A prospective survey of 474 patients with anorectal abscess. Dis Colon Rectum 22:566–568

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Henrichsen S, Christiansen J (1986) Incidence of fistula-in-ano complicating anorectal sepsis: a prospective study. Br J Surg 73:371–372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Goligher JC, Ellis M, Pissidis AG (1967) A critique of anal glandular infection in the aetiology and treatment of idiopathic anorectal abscesses and fistulas. Br J Surg 54:977–983

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Seow-Choen F, Leong AF, Goh HS (1993) Results of a policy of selective immediate fistulotomy for primary anal abscess. Aust N Z J Surg 63:485–489

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. L. Tang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Quah, H.M., Tang, C.L., Eu, K.W. et al. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing drainage alone vs primary sphincter-cutting procedures for anorectal abscess–fistula. Int J Colorectal Dis 21, 602–609 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-005-0060-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-005-0060-y

Keywords

Navigation