Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Surgical approach to penile reconstruction for shaft skin excision from circumcision

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Circumcision is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures. Complications are infrequent, including bleeding, though can be significant such as shaft skin excision. The aim of this study was to identify mechanism of injury and reconstructive techniques for skin excision using a full thickness skin graft (FTSG) or with the novel application of tissue expanders (TE).

Methods

Patients who underwent penile reconstruction following shaft skin excision from an overzealous circumcision were retrospectively reviewed. The penis was covered using a FTSG, harvested from the groin/hip, or using TE, with expanders placed in residual shaft skin.

Results

Twelve patients experienced significant skin loss (range 65–95%) including 2 with partial glans loss. Ten were reconstructed using a FTSG and 2 with TE. Injury was most frequently from a Mogen clamp (n = 9), or from a Gomco clamp, Plastibell device, and electrocautery burns. Six FTSG patients experienced complications with lymphedema (n = 3) most common.

Conclusion

Shaft skin excision is a devastating complication with risk greatest from Mogen clamp use. TE is preferred as this avoids donor site morbidity which reassures parents but requires sufficient residual skin that can be expanded. Both techniques effectively provide soft tissue coverage with acceptable appearance and long-term function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability statement

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article (and its supplementary information files).

Abbreviations

PCTP:

Post circumcision trapped penis

LTR:

Local tissue rearrangement

TE:

Tissue expansion

EEC:

Exstrophy-epispadias complex

FTSG:

Full thickness skin graft

STSG:

Split thickness skin graft

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

References

  1. Wiswell TE, Tencer HL, Welch CA et al (1993) Circumcision in children beyond the neonatal period. Pediatrics 92:791–793. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.92.6.791

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Blalock HJ, Vemulakonda V, Ritchey ML et al (2003) Outpatient management of phimosis following newborn circumcision. J Urol 169:2332–2334. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000067602.42875.d8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Maizels M, Zaontz M, Donovan J et al (1986) Surgical correction of the buried penis: description of a classification system and a technique to correct the disorder. J Urol 136:268–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)44837-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Elbatarny A (2014) Surgical treatment of postcircumcision trapped penis. Ann Pediatr Surg 10:119–124. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.XPS.0000452067.16343.c0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Donahoe PK, Keating MA (1986) Preputial unfurling to correct the buried penis. J Pediatr Surg 21:1055–1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3468(86)90007-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Alter GJ, Ehrlich RM (1999) A new technique for correction of the hidden penis in children and adults. J Urol 161:455–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)61922-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vincent MP, Horton CE, Devine CJ Jr (1988) An evaluation of skin grafts for reconstruction of the penis and scrotum. Clin Plast Surg 15:411–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0094-1298(20)31418-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Harris TGW, Maruf M, Leto Barone AA et al (2020) Utility of skin grafting and tissue expansion in penile reconstruction for the exstrophy-epispadias complex. Urology 136:231–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2019.10.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Thompson JH, Zmaj P, Cummings JM et al (2006) An approach for using full thickness skin grafts for complex penile surgeries in children. J Urol 175:1869–1871. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00931-6. (Discussion 1871)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gillett MD, Rathbun SR, Husmann DA et al (2005) Split-thickness skin graft for the management of concealed penis. J Urol 173:579–582. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000149606.27158.fa

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rochlin DH, Zhang K, Gearhart JP et al (2014) Utility of tissue expansion in pediatric phallic reconstruction: a 10-year experience. J Pediatr Urol 10:142–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2013.07.015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Okeke LI, Asinobi AA, Ikuerowo OS (2006) Epidemiology of complications of male circumcision in Ibadan. Nigeria BMC Urol 6:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-6-21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Özdemir E (1987) Significantly increased complication risks with mass circumcisions. Br J Urol 80:136–139. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410x.1997.00218.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Palmer JS, Elder JS, Palmer LS (2005) The use of betamethasone to manage the trapped penis following neonatal circumcision. J Urol 174:1577–1578. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-200510020-00015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cecil AB (1946) Repair of hypospadias and urethral fistula. J Urol 56:237–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)69802-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Al-Hazmi H, Traby M, Al-Yami F et al (2018) Penile reconstruction in a newborn following complicated circumcision: a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 51:74–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2018.08.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Tasci AI, Danacioglu YO, Arikan Y et al (2020) Management of post-circumcision necrosis of the penis: the medicolegal aspect. Pediatr Surg Int 36:523–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-020-04630-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Corps BV (1969) The effect of graft thickness, donor site and graft bed on graft shrinkage in the hooded rat. Br J Plast Surg 22:125–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0007-1226(69)80063-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fam MM, Hanna MK (2017) Resurfacing the penis of complex hypospadias repair (“Hypospadias Cripples”). J Urol 197:859–864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.09.075

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Djordevic ML, Bumbasirevic MZ, Vukovic PM et al (2006) Musculocutaneous latissimus dorsi free transfer flap for total phalloplasty in children. J Pediatr Urol 2:333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2006.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Eroğlu E, Bastian OW, Ozkan HC et al (2009) Buried penis after newborn circumcision. J Urol 181:1841–1843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.12.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Reynolds RD (1996) Use of the Mogen clamp for neonatal circumcision. Am Fam Phys 54:177–182

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Salle JLP, Jesus LE, Lorenzo AJ et al (2013) Glans amputation during routine neonatal circumcision: mechanism of injury and strategy for prevention. J Pediatr Urol 9:763–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2012.09.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Strimling BS (1996) Partial amputation of glans penis during Mogen clamp circumcision. Pediatrics 97:906–907. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.97.6.906

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Patel HI, Moriarty KP, Brisson PA et al (2001) Genitourinary injuries in the newborn. J Pediatr Surg 36:235–239. https://doi.org/10.1053/jpsu.2001.20062

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ozkan S, Gürpinar T (1997) A serious circumcision complication: penile shaft amputation and a new reattachment technique with a successful outcome. J Urol 158:1946–1947. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)64187-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Morrison SD, Shakir A, Vyas KS et al (2017) Penile replantation: a retrospective analysis of outcomes and complications. J Reconstr Microsurg 33:227–232. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1597567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cook A, Khoury AE, Bagli DJ et al (2005) Use of buccal mucosa to stimulate the coronal sulcus after traumatic penile amputation. Urology 66:1109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2005.05.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gochenaur L, Osinski T, Wanderling C et al (2022) A case report of a proximal corporal cavernosa injury presenting with butterfly perineal ecchymosis. Urol Case Rep 40:101870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eucr.2021.101870

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Brisson PA, Patel HI, Feins NR (2002) Revision of circumcision in children: report of 56 cases. J Pediatr Surg 37:1343–1346. https://doi.org/10.1053/jpsu.2002.35005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TGWH and PK designed the study, performed chart reviews and wrote the main manuscript text. TGWH, WJW and AALB prepared figures 1-5. JPS, RJR and JPG managed patients in this series. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John P. Gearhart.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harris, T.G.W., Khandge, P., Wu, W.J. et al. Surgical approach to penile reconstruction for shaft skin excision from circumcision. Pediatr Surg Int 39, 138 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-023-05409-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-023-05409-x

Keywords

Navigation