Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Transanal endorectal or transabdominal pull-through for Hirschsprung’s disease; which is better? A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

Hesitations concerning the long-term results of transanal endorectal pull-through (TEPT) due to prolonged anal stretching and resultant stricture and continence problems has been started to be questioned. This meta-analysis intended to compare long-term results between TEPT and transabdominal (TAB) pull-through techniques in the surgical management of Hirschsprung’s disease.

Methods

All publications between the years 1998–2021 in the PubMed, Medline, Google Scholar, Cochrane databases were reviewed. Retrospective and prospective comparative studies for TEPT, TAB as well as Laparoscopic-assisted TEPT (LTEPT) were included. Data included age at operation, postoperative constipation, enterocolitis, incontinence, stricture, and soiling rates.

Results

Eighteen publications met the inclusion criteria for TAB and TEPT, and six for TEPT and LTEPT. Patients who underwent TEPT had significantly younger operation age than patients with TAB (SMD − 1.02, 95%Cl − 1.85 to − 0.18, p: 0.0168). Postoperative constipation (OR 0.39, 95% Cl 0.25–0.61 p < 0.0001) and enterocolitis (OR 0.65, 95% Cl 0.46–0.90, p: 0.0108) rates were significantly lower in TEPT groups. Postoperative incontinence (OR 1.06, 95% Cl 0.56–2.01, p: 0.8468), stricture (OR 1.97, 95% Cl 0.81–4.80, p: 0.1352) and soiling rates were similar between the two groups. Furthermore, when TEPT and LTEPT results were compared, incidence of incontinence (OR 7.01, 95% Cl 0.75–65.33, p: 0.0871), constipation (OR 1.95, 95% Cl 0.70–5.37, p: 0.199), enterocolitis (OR 3.16, 95% Cl 0.34–29.55 p: 0.3137), stricture (OR 1.33, 95% Cl 0.29–6.15, p: 0.7188) and soiling (OR 1.57, 95% Cl 0.57–4.31, p: 0.3778) were similar for both techniques.

Discussion

TEPT is superior to TAB in terms of constipation and enterocolitis. Contrary to concerns, postoperative incontinence rates are not statistically different. However, further publications about long-term LTEPT results are necessary for more reliable conclusions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Swenson O (2002) Hirschsprung’s disease: a review. Pediatrics 109:914–918. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.109.5.914

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Duhamel B (1960) A new operation for the treatment of hirschsprung’s disease. Arch Dis Child 35:38–39. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.35.179.38

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Soave F (1985) Endorectal pull-through: 20 years experience. Address of the guest speaker, APSA, 1984. J Pediatr Surg 20:568–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3468(85)80003-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boley SJ, Lafer DJ, Kleinhaus S, Cohn BD, Mestel ALKP (1968) Endorectal pull-through procedure for Hirschsprung’s disease with and without primary anastomosis. J Pediatr Surg 3:258–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. De La Torre-Mondragón L, Ortega-Salgado JA (1998) Transanal endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung’s disease. J Pediatr Surg 33:1283–1286. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3468(98)90169-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. De la Torre L, Ortega A (2000) Transanal versus open endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung’s disease. J Pediatr Surg 35:1630–1632. https://doi.org/10.1053/jpsu.2000.18338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stensrud KJ, Emblem R, Bjørnland K (2010) Functional outcome after operation for Hirschsprung disease-transanal vs transabdominal approach. J Pediatr Surg 45:1640–1644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.02.065

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stensrud KJ, Emblem R, Bjørnland K (2015) Anal endosonography and bowel function in patients undergoing different types of endorectal pull-through procedures for Hirschsprung disease. J Pediatr Surg 50:1341–1346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.12.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zakaria OM, El Labban GM, Shams ME (2012) Fecal incontinence after single-stage Soave’s pull-through: abdominal versus transanal endorectal pull-through. Ann Pediatr Surg 8:5–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.XPS.0000407759.30719.57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Georgeson KE, Cohen RD, Hebra A et al (1999) Primary laparoscopic-assisted endorectal colon pull-throughfor Hirschsprung's disease: a new gold standard. Ann Surg 229(5):678–82. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199905000-00010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Höllwarth ME, Rivosecchi M, Schleef J et al (2002) The role of transanal endorectal pull-through in the treatment of Hirschsprung’s disease—a multicenter experience. Pediatr Surg Int 18:344–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-002-0747-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Aslan MK, Karaman I, Karaman A et al (2007) Our experience with transanal endorectal pull-through in Hirschsprung’s disease. Eur J Pediatr Surg 17:335–339. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-965447

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vũ PA, Thiên HH, Hiêp PN (2010) Transanal one-stage endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung disease: experiences with 51 newborn patients. Pediatr Surg Int 26:589–592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-010-2599-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zakaria OM (2012) Bowel function and fecal continence after Soave’s trans-anal endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung’s disease: a local experience. Update Surg 64:113–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-012-0140-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lu C, Hou G, Liu C et al (2017) Single-stage transanal endorectal pull-through procedure for correction of Hirschsprung disease in neonates and nonneonates: a multicenter study. J Pediatr Surg 52:1102–1107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.01.061

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Van De Ven TJ, Sloots CEJ, Wijnen MHWA et al (2013) Transanal endorectal pull-through for classic segment Hirschsprung’s disease: with or without laparoscopic mobilization of the rectosigmoid? J Pediatr Surg 48:1914–1918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.04.025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bawazir OA (2020) Laparoscopic-assisted transanal pull-through in hirschsprung disease: does laparoscopic dissection minimize anal overstretching? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 30:338–343. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2019.0524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen Y, Nah SA, Laksmi NK et al (2013) Transanal endorectal pull-through versus transabdominal approach for Hirschsprung’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg 48:642–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.12.036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Guerra J, Wayne C, Musambe T, Nasr A (2016) Laparoscopic-assisted transanal pull-through (LATP) versus complete transanal pull-through (CTP) in the surgical management of Hirschsprung’s disease. J Pediatr Surg 51(5):770–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.02.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Miyano G, Koga H, Okawada M et al (2015) Rectal mucosal dissection commencing directly on the anorectal line versus commencing above the dentate line in laparoscopy-assisted transanal pull-through for Hirschsprung’s disease: prospective medium-term follow-up. J Pediatr Surg 50:2041–2043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.08.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. El-Sawaf MI, Drongowski RA, Chamberlain JN et al (2007) Are the long-term results of the transanal pull-through equal to those of the transabdominal pull-through? A comparison of the 2 approaches for Hirschsprung disease. J Pediatr Surg 42:41–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.09.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Van Tets WF, Kuijpers JHC, Tran K et al (1997) Influence of Parks’ anal retractor on anal sphincter pressures. Dis Colon Rectum 40:1042–1045. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050926

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Speakman CTM, Burnett SJD, Kamm MA, Bartram CI (1991) Sphincter injury after anal dilatation demonstrated by anal endosonography. Br J Surg 78:1429–1430. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800781206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Aworanti OM, Mcdowell DT, Martin IM et al (2012) Comparative review of functional outcomes post surgery for Hirschsprung’s disease utilizing the paediatric incontinence and constipation scoring system. Pediatr Surg Int 28:1071–1078

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim AC, Langer JC, Pastor AC et al (2010) Endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung’s disease-a multicenter, long-term comparison of results: transanal vs transabdominal approach. J Pediatr Surg 45:1213–1220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.02.087

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Romero P, Kroiss M, Chmelnik M et al (2011) Outcome of transanal endorectal vs. transabdominal pull-through in patients with Hirschsprung’s disease. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 396:1027–1033. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-011-0804-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Van Leeuwen K, Geiger JD, Barnett JL et al (2002) Stooling and manometric findings after primary pull-throughs in Hirschsprung’s disease: Perineal versus abdominal approaches. J Pediatr Surg 37:1321–1325. https://doi.org/10.1053/jpsu.2002.34999

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Georgeson KE (2002) Laparoscopic-assisted pull-through for Hirschsprung’s disease. Semin Pediatr Surg 11:205–210. https://doi.org/10.1053/spsu.2002.35350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bjørnland K, Pakarinen MP, Stenstrøm P et al (2017) A Nordic multicenter survey of long-term bowel function after transanal endorectal pull-through in 200 patients with rectosigmoid Hirschsprung disease. J Pediatr Surg 52:1458–1464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.01.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fosby MV, Stensrud KJ, Bjørnland K (2020) Bowel function after transanal endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung disease—does outcome improve over time? J Pediatr Surg 55:2375–2378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.04.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Peña A, Bischoff A (2015) Surgical treatment of colorectal problems in children. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Yan BL, Bi LW, Yang QY et al (2019) Transanal endorectal pull-through procedure versus transabdominal surgery for Hirschsprung disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (United States). https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016777

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Chatoorgoon K, Pena A, Lawal TA, Levitt M (2011) The problematic duhamel pouch in hirschsprungs disease: manifestations and treatment. Eur J Pediatr Surg 21:366–369. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1285875

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhong MY, Tao TS, Li S (2018) Duhamel operation vs. transanal endorectal pull-through procedure for Hirschsprung disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg 53:1710–1715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.10.047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Meinds RJ (2019) Hirschsprung's disease: early diagnosis and long-term outcomes. [Thesis fully internal (DIV), University of Groningen]. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen

  36. Catto-Smith AG, Trajanovska M, Taylor RG (2007) Long-term continence after surgery for Hirschsprung’s disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol (Australia) 22:2273–2282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1746.2006.04750.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Teitelbaum DH, Cilley RE, Sherman NJ et al (2000) A decade of experience with the primary pull-through for Hirschsprung disease in the newborn period: a multicenter analysis of outcomes. Ann Surg 232:372–380. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200009000-00009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Prato AP, Gentilino V, Giunta C et al (2008) Hirschsprung disease: do risk factors of poor surgical outcome exist? J Pediatr Surg 43:612–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.10.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ruttenstock E, Puri P (2010) Systematic review and meta-analysis of enterocolitis after one-stage transanal pull-through procedure for Hirschsprung’s disease. Pediatr Surg Int 26:1101–1105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-010-2695-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Zimmer J, Tomuschat C, Puri P (2016) Long-term results of transanal pull-through for Hirschsprung’s disease: a meta-analysis. Pediatr Surg Int 32:743–749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-016-3908-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Pratap A, Chandra Shakya V, Kumar Biswas B et al (2007) Single-stage transanal endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung’s disease: perspective from a developing country. J Pediatr Surg 42:532–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.10.049

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Obermayr F, Szavay P, Beschorner R, Fuchs J (2009) Outcome of transanal endorectal pull-through in patients with Hirschsprung’s disease. Eur J Pediatr Surg 19:220–223. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1220682

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Hadidi A (2003) Transanal endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung’s disease: a comparison with the open technique. Eur J Pediatr Surg 13:176–180

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Menezes M, Corbally M, Puri P (2006) Long-term results of bowel function after treatment for Hirschsprung’s disease: a 29-year review. Pediatr Surg Int 22:987–990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-006-1783-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Aslanabadi S, Ghalehgolab-Behbahan A, Zarrintan S et al (2008) Transanal one-stage endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung’s disease: a comparison with the staged procedures. Pediatr Surg Int 24:925–929. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-008-2186-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Gunnarsdóttir A, Larsson LT, Arnbjörnsson E (2010) Transanal endorectal vs. duhamel pull-through for Hirschsprung’s disease. Eur J Pediatr Surg 20:242–246. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1252006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Tannuri ACA, Tannuri U, Romão RLP (2009) Transanal endorectal pull-through in children with Hirschsprung’s disease-technical refinements and comparison of results with the Duhamel procedure. J Pediatr Surg 44:767–772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.08.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Ca S, Bj M (2011)Surgery for Hirschsprung’s disease: comparison between the Duhamel method and the transanal endorectal pull-through based on 59 patients and a review of the literature, SERVAL, https://serval.unil.ch/resource/serval:BIB_4101ACC38EB3.P001/REF

  49. Onishi S, Nakame K, Yamada K et al (2016) Long-term outcome of bowel function for 110 consecutive cases of Hirschsprung’s disease: Comparison of the abdominal approach with transanal approach more than 30 years in a single institution—is the transanal approach truly beneficial for bowel function? J Pediatr Surg 51:2010–2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.09.029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Tannuri ACA, Ferreira MAE, Mathias AL, Tannuri U (2017) Long-term results of the Duhamel technique are superior to those of the transanal pullthrough: a study of fecal continence and quality of life. J Pediatr Surg 52:449–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.10.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Gunadi KSM, Dwihantoro A (2018) Outcomes in patients with hirschsprung disease following definitive surgery. BMC Res Notes 11:644. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3751-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Fahmy M, Abd El Hamid S, Elsamahy O, Mohammed H (2019) Comparative study between transanalendorectal pull-through and modified Duhamel’s procedure in management of Hirshsprung’s disease. Egyptian J Hospital Med 74(3):679–683. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejhm.2019.23799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Dahal GR, Wang JX, Guo LH (2011) Long-term outcome of children after single-stage transanal endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung’s disease. World J Pediatr 7:65–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12519-011-0247-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Shawkat A, Elbarbary M, Saleh G et al (2020) Outcome of laparoscopic assisted endorectal pull through versus trans anal approach in management of hirshsprung disease. Indian J Public Health Res Develop 11(4):534–539

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A-C wrote the main manuscript B prepared the statistical analysis All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Orkan Ergün.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No conflicts of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Celtik, U., Yavuz, I. & Ergün, O. Transanal endorectal or transabdominal pull-through for Hirschsprung’s disease; which is better? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Surg Int 39, 89 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-023-05378-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-023-05378-1

Keywords

Navigation