Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Varied parameters and utility of the anal position index: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The anal position index (API) was described in 1984 by Reisner et al. Since then, it has been measured in different ethnic populations and its utility in various medical conditions have been explored. We aimed to review the literature regarding the various values reported analytically.

Method

A Pubmed Search was carried out with the terms Anal Position Index. There were 158 articles hit by the search. The description of the API was uniform in all studies, described as ratio of anus–fourchette distance in girls and anus–scrotum distance in boys to the distance between coccyx and fourchette/scrotum. 18 relevant studies were included describing the values in different ethnic groups and describing its utility. One study was excluded from statistics due to different landmark for measurement. The studies were grouped into 4. Group A:B:C:D comprised of Newborns:Infants:All age groups:Constipated children. We carried out meta-analysis to estimate effect size (mean difference) using STATA software version 16.0.

Results

The different ethnic populations in which API were measured, and were Indian (2), Turkish (3), Israel (2), Taiwanese, Thai, Iranian, Spanish, Italian, and Mexican. The API was higher by 0.129 in boys. The mean API in males was 0.53:0.54:0.48:0.52 in Group A:B:C:D with an overall mean (SD) API of 0.51 (0.04). The mean API in females was 0.40:0.40:0.38:0.37 in Group A:B:C:D with an overall mean (SD) API of 0.40(0.03). Two studies were done in mice and showed the relation of API to intrauterine exposure to androgens. In children, API was mostly used to diagnose an anterior ectopic anus and see correlation with constipation. The abnormal values varied from less than 0.30–0.34 in girls and less than 0.41–0.46 in boys. The effect size by regions showed that the estimated effect size for all the regions were within 95% Confidence limits of overall estimate (0.13: 95% CI: 0.13–0.14). Therefore, it can be inferred that there was no significant ethnic variation in the study parameter. The anal position in relation to genitalia was measured in nulliparous women, menopause women, and women with levator deficiency. It was affected in vulvovaginal atrophy. Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene exposure during the first trimester of pregnancy was reported to alter the anal position in male infants.

Conclusion

The anteriorly positioned anus has been associated with constipation. API been measured in various ethnic populations with insignificant variations. The API is significantly (p < 0.05) higher in males. The presence of constipation does not seem to alter API. One should adopt a single method for measurement. API should not be considered at the sole indication for any surgical intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Leape LL, Ramenofsky ML (1978) Anterior ectopic anus: a common cause of constipation in children. J Pediatr Surg 13:627–630

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hendren WH (1978) Constipation caused by anterior location of the anus and its surgical correction. J Pediatr Surg 13:505–512

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Reisner SH, Sivan Y, Nitzan M, Merlob P (1984) Determination of anterior displacement of the anus in newborn infants and children. Pediatrics 73:216–217

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bar-Maor JA, Eitan A (1987) Determination of the normal position of the anus (with reference to idiopathic constipation). J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 6:559–561

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ertürk N, Kandemir Ö (2017) Determination of normal anal position index using a modified technique in Turkish neonates. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg 22(1):29–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Genc A, Taneli C, Tansug N, Kasirga E, Yilmaz D, Kucukoglu T et al (2002) Evaluation of the location of the anus by a modified technique in the neonate. J Pediatr Surg 37:80–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mohta A, Goel MR (2004) Determination of anal position index. Indian Pediatr 41:91–92

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Herek O, Polat A (2004) Incidence of anterior displacement of the anus and its relationship to constipation in children. Surg Today 34:190–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rerksuppaphol S, Rerksuppaphol L (2008) Normal anal position index in Thai newborns. J Med Assoc Thailand Chotmaihet Thangphaet 91(12):1839–1844

    Google Scholar 

  10. Davari HA, Hosseinpour M (1992) The anal position index: a simple method to define the normal position of the anus in neonate. Acta Paediatr (Oslo Norway 1992) 95(7):877–880

    Google Scholar 

  11. Patel JN, Kumar A, Yadav PS, Chadha R, Datta V, Roy Choudhury S (2018) The position of the anal dimple in newborns and infants with anorectal malformations and its correlation with the normal anal position. J Pediatr Surg 53:1560–1565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chan W-T, Lee H-C, Wang W-N, Yeung C-Y, Jiang C-B (2009) Determination of the normal position of the anus in Taiwanese infants. Pediatr Neonatol 50(4):158–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Núñez-Ramos R, González-Velasco M, Núñez Núñez R, Enriquez Zarabozo E, Vargas Muñoz I, Blesa Sánchez E (2011) Evaluation of the anal position in newborns and children with chronic constipation. Incidence of anterior ectopic anus. Cirugia Pediatrica Organo Oficial De La Sociedad Espanola De Cirugia Pediatrica 24(2):84–89

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Núñez-Ramos R, Fabbro MA, González-Velasco M, Núñez Núñez R, Romanato B, Vecchiato L et al (2011) Determination of the anal position in newborns and in children with chronic constipation: comparative study in two European healthcare centres. Pediatr Surg Int 27:1111–1115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Torres-Sanchez L, Zepeda M, Cebrián ME, Belkind-Gerson J, Garcia-Hernandez RM, Belkind-Valdovinos U et al (2008) Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene exposure during the first trimester of pregnancy alters the anal position in male infants. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1140:155–162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee D, Kim TH, Lee HH, Kim JM, Jeon DS, Kim YS (2015) A pilot study of the impacts of menopause on the anogenital distance. J Menopausal Med 21:41–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Domenici L, Musella A, Bracchi C, Lecce F, Schiavi MC, Colagiovanni V et al (2018) Comparison of anogenital distance and correlation with vulvo-vaginal atrophy: a pilot study on premenopausal and postmenopausal women. J Menopausal Med 24:108–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rizk DE, Thomas L (2000) Relationship between the length of the perineum and position of the anus and vaginal delivery in primigravidae. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 11:79–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bornman MS, Chevrier J, Rauch S, Crause M, Obida M, Sathyanarayana S et al (2016) Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane exposure and anogenital distance in the venda health examination of mothers, babies and their environment (VHEMBE) birth cohort study, South Africa. Andrology 4:608–615

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bill AH, Johnson RJ, Foster RA (1958) Anteriorly placed rectal opening in the perineum; “ectopic anus.” Ann Surg 147:173–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Upadhyaya P (1984) Mid-anal sphincteric malformation, cause of constipation in anterior perineal anus. J Pediatr Surg 19:183–186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ishitani MB, Rodgers BM (1991) Anteriorly displaced anus: an under-recognized cause of chronic constipation. Pediatr Surg Int 6:217–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Vandenbergh JG, Huggett CL (1995) The anogenital distance index, a predictor of the intrauterine position effects on reproduction in female house mice. Lab Anim Sci 45(5):567–573

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hotchkiss AK, Vandenbergh JG (2005) The anogenital distance index of mice (Mus musculus domesticus): An analysis. Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci 44:46–48

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shilpa Sharma.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharma, S., Perumal, V., Sharma, K. et al. Varied parameters and utility of the anal position index: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Surg Int 37, 469–477 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-020-04839-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-020-04839-1

Keywords

Navigation