Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnostic performance and role of the contrast enema for low intestinal obstruction in neonates

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We aim to evaluate the diagnostic performance and relationship between clinical characteristics, imaging findings, and final diagnosis for the neonatal contrast enema (CE).

Methods

Retrospective 10-year review of all neonatal CEs including imaging findings, clinical information, indication, and final diagnosis from discharge summaries, surgical reports, and pathology (reference standard). Two blinded pediatric radiologists reinterpreted 366 CEs for obstruction, microcolon, rectosigmoid index (RSI), serrations, meconium, ileal cut-off, transition zone, diagnosis, and level of confidence. CE diagnostic performance was calculated versus reference standard.

Results

Diagnoses included Hirschsprung disease (HD) (15.8%), small left colon syndrome (14.8%), small intestinal atresia/colonic atresia (SIA/CA) (12.6%), meconium ileus (MI) (4.4%), and normal (48.9%). CE had a moderate specificity (87.7%) and low sensitivity (65.5%) for HD; abnormal RSI and serrations showed high specificities (90.3%, 97.4%) but low sensitivities (46.6%, 17.2%). CE showed high specificity (97.4%) and low sensitivity (56.3%) for MI blinded to cystic fibrosis status. Microcolon was specific (96.6%) but not sensitive (68.8%) for MI. CE showed highest PPV (73.1%) (specificity 95.6%, sensitivity 82.6%) for SIA/CA. Microcolon with an abrupt cut-off was specific (99.1%) but not sensitive (41.3%) for atresias.

Conclusion

Neonatal CE demonstrates high specificities and low to moderate sensitivities across all diagnoses, with lowest performance in HD.

Clinical trial registration

None.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CE:

Contrast enema

RSI:

Ectosigmoid index

Z:

Transition zone

HD:

Hirschsprung disease

SLCS:

Small left colon syndrome

SIA:

Small intestinal atresia

CA:

Colonic atresia

MI:

Meconium ileus

CF:

Cystic fibrosis

References

  1. Alehossein M, Roohi A, Pourgholami M et al (2015) Diagnostic accuracy of radiologic scoring system for evaluation of suspicious hirschsprung disease in children. Iran J Radiol 12:e12451. https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.12451

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Putnam LR, John SD, Greenfield SA et al (2015) The utility of the contrast enema in neonates with suspected hirschsprung disease. J Pediatr Surg 50:963–966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.03.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Garcia R, Arcement C, Hormaza L et al (2007) Use of the recto-sigmoid index to diagnose hirschsprung’s disease. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 46:59–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0009922806289328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hwang TJ, Servaes S, Mattei P, Anupindi SA (2017) Radiologist performance in the interpretation of contrast enemas performed for hirschsprung’s disease in children >1 year of age. Clin Radiol 72:519.e11–519.e19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2017.01.007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Burge D, Drewett M (2004) Meconium plug obstruction. Pediatr Surg Int 20:108–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-003-1098-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ellis DG, William Clatworthy H (1966) The meconium plug syndrome revisited. J Pediatr Surg 1:54–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3468(66)90008-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Keckler SJ, St Peter SD, Spilde TL et al (2008) Current significance of meconium plug syndrome. J Pediatr Surg 43:896–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.12.035

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Cuenca AG, Ali AS, Kays DW, Islam S (2012) “Pulling the plug”—management of meconium plug syndrome in neonates. J Surg Res 175:e43–e46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2012.01.029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Amodio J, Berdon W, Abramson S, Stolar C (1986) Microcolon of prematurity: a form of functional obstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 146:239–244. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.146.2.239

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Berdon WE, Baker DH, Santulli TV et al (1968) Microcolon in newborn infants with intestinal obstruction. Its correlation with the level and time of onset of obstruction. Radiology 90:878–885. https://doi.org/10.1148/90.5.878

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Carroll AG, Kavanagh RG, Ni Leidhin C et al (2016) Comparative effectiveness of imaging modalities for the diagnosis of intestinal obstruction in neonates and infants: a critically appraised topic. Acad Radiol 23:559–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2015.12.014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Berrocal T, Lamas M, Gutieérrez J et al (1999) Congenital anomalies of the small intestine, colon, and rectum. Radiographics 19:1219–1236. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.19.5.g99se041219

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Escobar MA, Grosfeld JL, Burdick JJ et al (2005) Surgical considerations in cystic fibrosis: a 32-year evaluation of outcomes. Surgery 138:560–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2005.06.049 (discussion 571)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Carlyle BE, Borowitz DS, Glick PL (2012) A review of pathophysiology and management of fetuses and neonates with meconium ileus for the pediatric surgeon. J Pediatr Surg 47:772–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.02.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Farrell PM, Rosenstein BJ, White TB et al (2008) Guidelines for diagnosis of cystic fibrosis in newborns through older adults: cystic fibrosis foundation consensus report. J Pediatr 153:S4–S14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.05.005

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Fakhoury K, Durie PR, Levison H, Canny GJ (1992) Meconium ileus in the absence of cystic fibrosis. Arch Dis Child 67:1204–1206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. De Lorijn F, Reitsma JB, Voskuijl WP et al (2005) Diagnosis of hirschsprung’s disease: a prospective, comparative accuracy study of common tests. J Pediatr 146:787–792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.01.044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hope JW, Borns PF, Berg PK (1965) Roentgenologic manifestations of hirschsprung’s disease in infancy. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 95:217–229. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.95.1.217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. O’Donovan AN, Habra G, Somers S et al (1996) Diagnosis of Hirschsprung’s disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167:517–520. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.167.2.8686640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lewis NA, Levitt MA, Zallen GS et al (2003) Diagnosing Hirschsprung’s disease: increasing the odds of a positive rectal biopsy result. J Pediatr Surg 38:412–416. https://doi.org/10.1053/jpsu.2003.50070 (discussion 412)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Diamond IR, Casadiego G, Traubici J et al (2007) The contrast enema for hirschsprung disease: predictors of a false-positive result. J Pediatr Surg 42:792–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.12.031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Taxman TL, Yulish BS, Rothstein FC (1986) How useful is the barium enema in the diagnosis of infantile hirschsprung’s disease? Am J Dis Child 140:881–884

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Reid JR (2012) Practical imaging approach to bowel obstruction in neonates: a review and update. Semin Roentgenol 47:21–31. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ro.2011.07.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chandler NW, Zwiren GT (1970) Complete reflux of the small bowel in total colon hirschsprung’s disease. Radiology 94:335–339. https://doi.org/10.1148/94.2.335

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. De Campo JF, Mayne V, Boldt DW, De Campo M (1984) Radiological findings in total aganglionosis coli. Pediatr Radiol 14:205–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01042242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Stranzinger E, DiPietro MA, Teitelbaum DH, Strouse PJ (2008) Imaging of total colonic hirschsprung disease. Pediatr Radiol 38:1162–1170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-008-0952-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose. This project was completed without a specific funding source.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Dr. Reid conceptualized and designed the study, supervised data collection, and reviewed and revised the manuscript. Dr. Baad collected data, conducted the initial analysis, drafted the initial manuscript, and reviewed and revised the manuscript. Dr. Delgado conceptualized and designed the study, collected data, conducted statistical data analysis, and reviewed and revised the manuscript. Ms. Dayneka conducted data analysis and reviewed and revised the manuscript. Dr. Anupindi collected data and reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Baad.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the institutional review board of the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and is compliant with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments. This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board of the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and compliant with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act.

Informed consent

The requirement to obtain informed consent for this retrospective study was waived by our institutional review board.

Consent to participate

The requirement to obtain informed consent was waived.

Consent to publish

The requirement to obtain informed consent was waived.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baad, M., Delgado, J., Dayneka, J.S. et al. Diagnostic performance and role of the contrast enema for low intestinal obstruction in neonates. Pediatr Surg Int 36, 1093–1101 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-020-04701-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-020-04701-4

Keyword

Navigation