Abstract
Background/purpose
Short segment Hirschsprung’s disease (HSCR) carries a better prognosis than long segment disease, but the definition of short is controversial. The objective of this study is to determine anatomically the extent of disease involvement that would be associated with a better functional outcome.
Methods
This is a retrospective multicenter (n = 3) study with patients (≥ 3 years) who had transanal pullthrough operation done for aganglionosis limited to the recto-sigmoid colon were reviewed. The extent of disease involvement and bowel resection was retrieved by reviewing the operative records as well as histopathological reports of the resected specimens. Clinical assessment was performed according to the criteria of a seven-itemed bowel function score (BFS) (maximum score = 20). Manometric assessment was performed with anorectal manometry.
Results
The study period started from 2003 to 45 patients were studied with median age at assessment = 52.0 months and operation = 3.0 months. The disease involvement was categorized into upper sigmoid-descending colon (DC) (n = 8), sigmoid colon (SC) (n = 12), upper rectum (UR) (n = 14) and lower rectum (LR) (n = 11) according to the level of normal biopsy result. There was no significant difference in the age of assessment between the four groups. The median BFSs in the DC, SC, UR and LR were 13, 15, 17 and 17, respectively (p = 0.01). Nine patients from the DC and SC groups reported soiling for more than twice per week. Sub-group analysis comparing patients with and without the entire sigmoid colon resected revealed worse functional outcomes in terms of the incidence of soiling (40.7 vs 22.2%, p = 0.05) and the BFS (14 vs 18, p = 0.04) in the former group. Anorectal manometry did not reveal any significant difference between the four groups, but a higher proportion of patients in the UR and LR groups appeared to have a normal sphincter resting pressure (DC vs SC vs UR vs LR = 62.5 vs 75.0 vs 85.7 vs 80.0%, p = 0.10).
Conclusion
Patients with short segment HSCR are not equal at all. HSCR patients with aganglionosis limited to the rectum without the need of removing the entire sigmoid colon have a better bowel control and overall functional score. Less bowel loss and colonic dissection maybe the underlying reasons. Although future studies with a larger sample size and a longer follow-up period are required to validate the results of this study, it has provided a new insight to the current understanding of short segment disease in HSCR.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Langer JC (2013) Hirschsprung disease. Curr Opin Pediatr 25(3):368–374. doi:10.1097/MOP.0b013e328360c2a0
Tam PK, Garcia-Barcelo M (2009) Genetic basis of Hirschsprung’s disease. Pediatr Surg Int 25(7):543–558. doi:10.1007/s00383-009-2402-2
Kenny SE, Tam PK, Garcia-Barcelo M (2010) Hirschsprung’s disease. Semin Pediatr Surg 19(3):194–200. doi:10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2010.03.004
Ambartsumyan L, Nurko S (2013) Review of organic causes of fecal incontinence in children: evaluation and treatment. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 7(7):657–667. doi:10.1586/17474124.2013.832500
Rintala RJ, Lindahl H (1995) Is normal bowel function possible after repair of intermediate and high anorectal malformations? J Pediatr Surg 30(3):491–494
Rintala RJ, Lindahl HG, Rasanen M (1997) Do children with repaired low anorectal malformations have normal bowel function? J Pediatr Surg 32(6):823–826
Jarvi K, Laitakari EM, Koivusalo A, Rintala RJ, Pakarinen MP (2010) Bowel function and gastrointestinal quality of life among adults operated for Hirschsprung disease during childhood: a population-based study. Ann Surg 252(6):977–981. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182018542
Kumar S, Ramadan S, Gupta V, Helmy S, Atta I, Alkholy A (2009) Manometric tests of anorectal function in 90 healthy children: a clinical study from Kuwait. J Pediatr Surg 44(9):1786–1790. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.01.008
Kyrklund K, Pakarinen MP, Rintala RJ (2017) Manometric findings in relation to functional outcomes in different types of anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 52(4):563–568. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.08.025
Barleben A, Mills S (2010) Anorectal anatomy and physiology. Surg Clin N Am 90(1):1–15. doi:10.1016/j.suc.2009.09.001 (Table of Contents)
Langer JC, Minkes RK, Mazziotti MV, Skinner MA, Winthrop AL (1999) Transanal one-stage Soave procedure for infants with Hirschsprung’s disease. J Pediatr Surg 34(1):148–151 (discussion 152)
Mattioli G, Pini Prato A, Giunta C, Avanzini S, Della Rocca M, Montobbio G, Parodi S, Rapuzzi G, Georgeson K, Jasonni V (2008) Outcome of primary endorectal pull-through for the treatment of classic Hirschsprung disease. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech Part A 18(6):869–874. doi:10.1089/lap.2007.0223
Zakaria OM (2012) Bowel function and fecal continence after Soave’s trans-anal endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung’s disease: a local experience. Updat Surg 64(2):113–118. doi:10.1007/s13304-012-0140-9
Huang Y, Zheng S, Xiao X (2008) A follow-up study on postoperative function after a transanal Soave 1-stage endorectal pull-through procedure for Hirschsprung’s disease. J Pediatr Surg 43(9):1691–1695. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.12.053
De la Torre-Mondragon L, Ortega-Salgado JA (1998) Transanal endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung’s disease. J Pediatr Surg 33(8):1283–1286
Tam PK (2016) Hirschsprung’s disease: a bridge for science and surgery. J Pediatr Surg 51(1):18–22. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.10.021
Zimmer J, Tomuschat C, Puri P (2016) Long-term results of transanal pull-through for Hirschsprung’s disease: a meta-analysis. Pediatr Surg Int 32(8):743–749. doi:10.1007/s00383-016-3908-z
Chumpitazi BP, Nurko S (2011) Defecation disorders in children after surgery for Hirschsprung disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 53(1):75–79. doi:10.1097/MPG.0b013e318212eb53
Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1997) Anatomy and physiology of the rectum and anus. Eur J Surg Acta chir 163(10):723–731
Till H, Heinrich M, Schuster T, D VS (2006) Is the anorectal sphincter damaged during a transanal endorectal pull-through (TERPT) for Hirschsprung’s disease? A 3-dimensional, vector manometric investigation. Eur J Pediatric Surg Zeitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie 16(3):188–191. doi:10.1055/s-2006-924220
Stensrud KJ, Emblem R, Bjornland K (2015) Anal endosonography and bowel function in patients undergoing different types of endorectal pull-through procedures for Hirschsprung disease. J Pediatr Surg 50(8):1341–1346. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.12.024
Bhat NA, Grover VP, Bhatnagar V (2004) Manometric evaluation of postoperative patients with anorectal anomalies. Indian J Gastroenterol 23(6):206–208
Acknowledgements
This study was supported in part by the Theme-based Research Scheme (TRS T12C-714/14-R) from the Hong Kong Research Grants Council to P.T.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest with respect to this manuscript.
Funding
Theme-based research scheme from the Hong Kong Research Grants Council (TRS Ref#: T12C-714/14-R) to Paul Tam.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chung, P.H.Y., Wong, K.K.Y., Tam, P.K.H. et al. Are all patients with short segment Hirschsprung’s disease equal? A retrospective multicenter study. Pediatr Surg Int 34, 47–53 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-017-4202-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-017-4202-4