Skip to main content
Log in

Role of preoperative 3D CT reconstruction for evaluation of patients with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The role of preoperative contrast-enhanced computerized tomography (CT) of chest with three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions was evaluated in neonates with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula.

Methods

This was a prospective study which investigated 30 cases of esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula. All patients were evaluated preoperatively with contrast-enhanced spiral CT using a low-dose CT protocol. 3D CT reconstruction images were evaluated for the type of esophageal atresia, the distance between the upper and lower esophageal pouches, origin, level and position of the fistula, and the presence or absence of any other cardiac, pulmonary or mediastinal lesions and the findings were correlated with the findings at surgery. The radiation dose for each patient was calculated using the formula—Effective dose (E) = DLP × (E/DLP)age.

Results

All the 30 cases had type-C esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula as per Gross classification. The exact site of the fistula could be identified only in 26 (80 %) cases. The mean gap between the upper pouch and lower fistula was 0.95 ± 0.57 cm (range 0.2–2.8 cm) on CT scan and 1.38 ± 0.61 cm (range 0.5–3.2 cm) at surgery. On statistical analysis, the correlation was found to be significant (p < 0.0001). In addition, lung pathology (consolidation), cardiac pathology and vertebral anomaly were also detected on CT scan in some cases. The mean radiation dose for the neonates who underwent CT chest was calculated to be 1.79 mSv which is significantly high.

Conclusion

Though preoperative CT scan of chest has many advantages, it involves significant exposure to ionizing radiation and risk of radiation-induced cancer in the future. Additionally in 20 % of cases, the fistula could not be located on CT scan. The most common variety of esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula is Gross type C (86 %) that has low to intermediate gap (97 %) and can be anastomosed primarily. Thus, CT scan can provide good anatomical delineation, but may not help in surgical decision making. Hence, performing CT in these cases would unnecessarily expose the neonates to ionizing radiation. Therefore, there is no role for CT scan in the routine preoperative assessment of EA with distal TEF.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harmon CM, Coran AG (2006) Congenital anomalies of esophagus. In: Grosfeld JL, O’Neill JA, Fronkalsrud EW, Coran AG (eds) Pediatric surgery. Mosby-Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 1051–1082

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bax KN, Roskott AMC, Vander Zee DC (2008) Esophageal atresia without distal tracheoesophageal fistula: high incidence of proximal fistula. J Pedaitr Surg 43:522–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Guo W, Li Y, Jiao A, Peng Y, Hou D, Chen Y (2010) Tracheoesophageal fistula after primary repair of type C esophageal atresia in the neonatal period: recurrent or missed second congenital fistula. J Pediatr Surg 45:2351–2355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Islam S, Cavanaugh E, Honeke R, Hirschl RB (2004) Diagnosis of proximal tracheoesophageal fistula using three-dimensional CT scan: a case report. J Pediatr Surg 39(1):100–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gross RE (1953) The surgery of infancy and childhood. WB Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  6. Huda W (2007) Radiation doses and risks in chest computed tomography examinations. Proc Am Thorac Soc 4:316–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Lewis MA, Dunn M (2006) National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003. Br J Radiol 79:968–980

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chapple CL, Willis S, Frame J (2002) Effective dose in pediatric computed tomography. Phys Med Biol 47:107–115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Brown AK, Tam PK (1996) Measurement of gap length in esophageal atresia: a simple predictor of outcome. J Am Coll Surg 182:41–45

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Upadhyaya VD, Gangopadhyaya AN, Gupta DK, Sharma SP, Kumar V et al (2007) Prognosis of congenital tracheoesophageal fistula with esophageal atresia on the basis of gap length. Pediatr Surg Int 23:767–771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Van der Zee DC, Vieirra-Travassos D, De Jong JR, Tytgat SH (2008) A novel technique for risk calculation of anastomotic leakage after thoracoscopic repair for esophageal atresia with distal fistula. World J Surg 32:1396–1399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rossi C, Domini M, Aquino A, Pesico A, Lelli-Chiesa P (1998) A simple and safe method to visualize the inferior pouch in esophageal atresia without fistula. Pediatr Surg Int 13:535–536

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Koplewitz BZ, Udassin R (2003) Radiographic assessment of the gap between oesophageal pouches in infants with oesophageal atresia without fistula. Eur J Pediatr 162:650–651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Atzori P, Iacobelli BD, Bottero S et al (2006) Preoperative tracheobronchoscopy in new borns with esophageal atresia: does it matter? J Pediatr Surg 41(6):1054–1056

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. de Blic J, Marchac V, Scheinmann P (2002) Complications of flexible bronchoscopy in children: prospective study in 1,328 procedures. Eur Respir J 20:1271–1276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ianolli ED, Litman RS (2002) Tension pneumothorax during flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy in a newborn. Anesth Analg 94:512–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Garcia NM, Thompson JW, Shaul DB (1998) Definitive localization of isolated tracheoesophageal fistula using bronchoscopy and esophagoscopy for guide wire placement. J Pediatr Surg 33:1645–1647

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Chang KL, Saing H (1995) Combined flexible endoscopy and fluoroscopy in assessment of gap between the two esophageal pouches in esophageal atresia without fistula. J Pediatr Surg 30(5):668–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Johnson JF, Sueoka BL, Mulligan ME, Lugo EJ (1985) Tracheoesophageal fistula: diagnosis with CT. Pediatr Radiol 15:134–135

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tam PKH, Chan FL, Saing H (1987) Diagnosis and evaluation of esophageal atresia by direct sagittal CT. Pediatr Radiol 17:68–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ratan SK, Varshney A, Sumita M, Saxena NC, Kakar S, Sodhi PK (2004) Evaluation of neonates with esophageal atresia using chest CT scan. Pediatr Surg Int 20:757–761

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lam WWK, Tam PKH, Chan FL, Chan KL, Cheng W (2000) Esophageal atresia and tracheal stenosis: use of three-dimensional CT and virtual bronchoscopy in neonate, infants and children. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:1009–1012

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fitoz S, Atasoy C, Yagmurlu A, Akyar S, Erden A, Dindar H (2000) Three-dimensional CT of congenital esophageal atresia and distal tracheoesophageal fistula in neonates: preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:1403–1407

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Beasley S (2009) Congenital malformation. In: Parikh DH, Crabbe DCG, Auldist AW, Rothenberg SS (eds) Pediatric thoracic surgery. Springer, London, pp 281–309

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. National Academy of Sciences Committee on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation (2005) Report VII (BEIR VII, Phase 2): health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation. National Research Council, Washington. http://books.nap.edu/catalog/11340.html

  26. Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ et al (2001) Estimated risks of radiation induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. Am J Roentgenol 176:289–296

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic radiation (UNSCEAR) (2000) Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. United Nations, New York

  28. Piccolo RL, Bongini U, Basile M, Savelli S et al (2012) Chest fast MRI: an imaging alternative on preoperative evaluation of pectus excavatum. J Pediatr Surg 47:485–489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. Dhananjay Vaze, senior registrar, Pediatric Surgery, PGIMER, Chandigarh, for his invaluable effort for helping in editing the manuscript and few vital suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Santosh Kumar Mahalik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mahalik, S.K., Sodhi, K.S., Narasimhan, K.L. et al. Role of preoperative 3D CT reconstruction for evaluation of patients with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula. Pediatr Surg Int 28, 961–966 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-012-3111-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-012-3111-9

Keywords

Navigation