Skip to main content
Log in

Practice variation and clinical confusion regarding undescended testes and retractile testes among primary care respondents: a multi-regional survey study in the United States

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Although previous studies have looked at referral patterns and indications for orchiopexy, this is the first attempt at quantifying the primary care provider knowledge base of cryptorchidism and its implications in a large multi-state setting in the United States.

Methods

Primary care providers (PCPs) (n = 3,000) were invited to complete a web-based survey regarding cryptorchidism. We evaluated: practice setting; training; knowledge of cryptorchidism; relationship to pediatric urologists and surgeons; understanding of the relationship between cryptorchidism, infertility and testis cancer.

Results

Seventeen percent (n = 453) of PCPs responded to the survey. Fifty-three percent indicated that they had minimal to no exposure to pediatric urology during training. Two-thirds refer patients with retractile testes to surgical specialists. Practice setting was associated with the type of information families received about the impact of UDT on fertility and malignancy with rural practices being more likely to counsel that unilateral UDT imparted a high risk of malignancy (RR 1.5; 95 % CI 1.2, 1.9) and bilateral UDT resulted in likely infertility (RR 2.1; 95 % CI 1.5, 2.8).

Conclusions

This study underscores the need for increased evidence-based recommendations, as well as improved training and education of PCPs in the US who deal with disorders of testicular descent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berkowitz GS, Lapinski RH, Dolgin SE, Gazella JG, Bodian CA, Holzman IR (1993) Prevalence and natural history of cryptorchidism. Pediatrics 92:44–49

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Guven A, Kogan BA (2008) Undescended testis in older boys: further evidence that ascending testes are common. J Pediatr Surg 43:1700–1704

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bruijnen CJ, Vogels HD, Beasley SW (2008) Review of the extent to which orchidopexy is performed at the optimal age: implications for health services. ANZ J Surg 78:1006–1009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sinha CK, Vinay S, Kulkarni R, Nour S (2008) Delayed diagnosis for undescended testes. Indian Pediatr 45:503–504

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Golabek T, Kiely E (2010) Patterns of referral and treatment of undescended testis: a 12-year experience in a single centre. Ir J Med Sci 179:511–514

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Springer A, Huber C, Reck CA, Fengler D, Horcher E (2010) Delayed referral despite appropriate knowledge in cryptorchidism as a cause of delayed orchidopexies in Austria. Klin Padiatr 222:248–251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee PA (2005) Fertility after cryptorchidism: epidemiology and other outcome studies. Urology 66:427–431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Engeler DS, Hosli PO, John H et al (2000) Early orchiopexy: prepubertal intratubular germ cell neoplasia and fertility outcome. Urology 56:144–148

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gracia J, Sanchez J, Garcia C, Pueyo C, Ferrandez A (1998) What is the relationship between spermatozoa per milliliter at adulthood and the tubular fertility index at surgical age for patients with cryptorchidism? J Pediatr Surg 33:594–596

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hack WW, Meijer RW, Van Der Voort-Doedens LM, Bos SD, De Kok ME (2003) Previous testicular position in boys referred for an undescended testis: further explanation of the late orchidopexy enigma? BJU Int 92:293–296

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stec AA, Thomas JC, DeMarco RT, Pope JC 4th, Brock JW 3rd, Adams MC (2007) Incidence of testicular ascent in boys with retractile testes. J Urol 178:1722–1724 (discussion 4–5)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Steckler RE, Zaontz MR, Skoog SJ, Rushton HG Jr (1995) Cryptorchidism, pediatricians, and family practitioners: patterns of practice and referral. J Pediatr 127:948–951

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Capello SA, Giorgi LJ Jr, Kogan BA (2006) Orchiopexy practice patterns in New York State from 1984 to 2002. J Urol 176:1180–1183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margarett Shnorhavorian.

Appendix: Cryptorchidism and Retractile Testes Survey

Appendix: Cryptorchidism and Retractile Testes Survey

figure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shnorhavorian, M., Jacobs, M.A., Stearns, G. et al. Practice variation and clinical confusion regarding undescended testes and retractile testes among primary care respondents: a multi-regional survey study in the United States. Pediatr Surg Int 28, 635–639 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-012-3085-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-012-3085-7

Keywords

Navigation