Skip to main content
Log in

Urethrocutaneous fistula after hypospadias repair: outcome of three types of closure techniques

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the outcomes of three surgical techniques for the closure of urethrocutaneous fistula (UCF) after hypospadias repair.

Materials and methods

Fifty-one patients (mean age 6.5 years) who underwent UCF closure between June 1998 and February 2008 were divided in to three groups depending on fistula size; group I had <2 mm and (n = 17, 33.4%), group II had 2–4 mm (n = 21, 41.2%) and group III had >4 mm or multiple fistulas (n = 13, 25.4%). Group I patients were treated by excision and simple closure. Patients in group II and III were treated with flip flap technique along with the wrapping of repaired area with scrotal dartos flap and tunneled tunica vaginalis flap (TVF), respectively.

Results

Mean surgical time was 45 min (range 30–55), 60 min (range 50–75) and 80 min (range 60–100) in three techniques, respectively. The mean follow-up was 3.5 years (range 6 months–10 years). No patient had recurrence of fistula in group III, while 2 (9.5%) and 4 (25.4%) patients in groups II and I, respectively, had recurrent UCF. No postoperative complications were encountered in the testis or the scrotum. No patient had torsion or deviation of penis.

Conclusion

Simple fistula closure carries a higher risk of recurrence even in small sized fistulas. The application of scrotal dartos or TVF for wrapping the repaired area gives excellent results and they are easy to harvest with no harmful effects on the scrotum or testis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ghali AMA, El-Malik EMA, Al-Malki T, Ibrahim AH (1999) One-stage hypospadias repair: experience with 544 cases. Eur Urol 36:436

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nuininga JE, Robert PE, Verschuren R, Feitz FJ (2005) Long-term outcome of different types of 1-stage hypospadias repair. J Urol 174:1544–1548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Demirbilek S, Kanmaz T, Aydin G, Yucesan S (2001) Outcomes of one-stage technique for proximal hypospadias repair. Urology 58:267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Uygur MC, Unal D, Tan MO, Germiyanoglu C, Erol D (2002) Factors affecting outcome of one stage anterior hypospadias repair: analysis of 422 cases. Pediatr Surg Int 18:142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shankar KR, Losty PD, Hopper M, Wong L, Rickwood AM (2002) Outcome of hypospadias fistula repair. BJU Int 89:103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Waterman BJ, Renschler T, Cartwright PC, Snow BW, de Vries CR (2002) Variables in successful repair of urethrocutaneous fistula after hypospadias surgery. J Urol 168:726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Latifoglu O, Yavuzer R, Ünal S, Cavusoglu T, Atabay K (2000) Surgical treatment of urethral fistulas following hypospadias repair. Ann Plast Surg 44:381

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Goldstein HR, Hensle TW (1981) Simplified closure of hypospadias fistulas. Urology 5:504–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Elbakry A (2001) Management of urethrocutaneous fistulae after hypospadias repair: 10 years’ experience. BJU Int 88:590–595

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Holland AJ, Abubacker M, Smith GH, Cass DT (2008) Management of urethrocutaneous fistula following hypospadias repair. Pediatr Surg Int 24(9):1047–1051

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Galtzeiler J, Belman B (1984) Results of closure of urethrocutaneous fistulas in children. J Urol 132:734–736

    Google Scholar 

  12. Santangelo K, Rushton HG, Belman AB (2003) Outcome analysis of simple, complex urethrocutaneous fistula closure using a de-epithelialized or full thickness skin advancement flap for coverage. J Urol 170:1589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cimador M, Castagnetti M, de Grazia E (2003) Urethrocutaneous fistula repair after hypospadias surgery. BJU Int 92:621

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Churchill BM, van Savage JG, Khoury AE, McLorie GA (1966) The dartos flap as an adjunct in preventing urethrocutaneous fistula in repeat hypospadias surgery. J Urol 156:2047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yamataka A, Ando K, Lane GL, Miyano T (1998) Pedicled external spermatic fascia flap for urethroplasty in hypospadias, closure of urethrocutaneous fistula. J Pediatr Surg 33:1788

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Landau EH, Gofrit ON, Meretyk S, Katz G, Golijanin D, Shenfeld OZ et al (2003) Outcome analysis of tunica vaginalis flap for the correction of recurrent urethrocutaneous fistula in children. J Urol 170:1596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Routh JC, Wolpert JJ, Reinberg Y (2006) Tunneled tunica vaginalis flap is an effective technique for recurrent urethrocutaneous fistulas following tubularized incised plate urethroplasty. J Urol 176:1578–1581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Singh RB, Pavithran NM (2004) Tunica vaginalis interposition flap in the closure of massive disruption of the neourethral tube (macro urethrocutaneous fistulae). Pediatr Surg Int 20(6):464–466

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gürdal M, Karaman MI, Kanberoğlu H, Kireççi S (2003) Tunica vaginalis reinforcement flap in reoperative Snodgrass procedure. Pediatr Surg Int 19(9–10):649–651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. S. Ansari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muruganandham, K., Ansari, M.S., Dubey, D. et al. Urethrocutaneous fistula after hypospadias repair: outcome of three types of closure techniques. Pediatr Surg Int 26, 305–308 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-009-2490-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-009-2490-z

Keywords

Navigation