Skip to main content
Log in

Urethral duplication in males: our experience in ten cases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Urethral duplication is a rare congenital anomaly, affecting mainly boys. Clinical presentation varies because of the different anatomical patterns of this abnormality. We report our experience in ten males affected by urethral duplication. We retrospectively reviewed the records of ten males affected by urethral duplication. Mild cases of distal type I duplications as well as “Y-type” duplication associated to anorectal malformation were excluded. Evaluation included voiding cystourethrography, retrograde urethrography, intravenous urography and urethrocystoscopy. Mean age at diagnosis was 46.7 ± 32.3 months A blind ending duplicated urethra (type I) was present in three patients, two urethras originating from a common bladder neck (type II A2) in three, an “Y-type” duplication in three and a complete bladder with incomplete urethral duplication in one. Surgical management included excision of the duplicated urethra in four patients while a displacement of the ventral urethra (in “Y-type” duplication) in perineal-scrotal or scrotal position was performed in two patients as first stage of urethral reconstruction. Good cosmetical and functional results were achieved in all six treated boys while surgical management was not required in four. Urethral duplication is often associated with genito-urinary and gastro-intestinal abnormalities. Embryology is unclear and a lot of hypotheses have been proposed. We believe that the same embryological explanation cannot be applied to all subtypes of urethral duplication. Management must be evaluated for each case. The overall prognosis is good, in spite of the presence of other severe associate congenital anomalies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Woodhouse CR, Williams DI (1979) Duplication of the lower urinary tract in children. Br J Urol 51:481–487

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Vijayaraghavan SN, Nirmala AB (2004) Complete duplication of urinary bladder and urethra: prenatal sonographic features. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 24:464–466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Effmann EL, Lebowitz RL, Colodyn AH (1976) Duplication of the urethra. Radiology 119:179–85

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Passerini Glazel G, Aragona F, Chiazza L, Artibani W, Rabinowitz R, Firlit CF (1988) The P.A.D.U.A. (progressive augmentation by dilatation of the urethra anterior) procedure for the treatment of severe urethral hypoplasia. J Urol 140:1247–1249

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Belman AB (1992) Hypospadias and other abnormalities. In: Kelalis PP, King LP, Belman AB (eds) Clinical pediatric urology, 3rd edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 619–663

  6. Haleblian G, Kraklau D, Wilcox D, Duffy P, Ransley P, Mushtaq I (2006) Y-type urethral duplication in the male. BJU 97:597–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Merrot T, Weber D, Steyeart H, Alessandrini P (2002) Duplication sagitteles de l’uréthre chez l’enfant. A propos de 7 observations. Prog Urol 12:77–83

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rintala RJ, Mildh L, Lindahl H (1996) H-type anorectal malformations: incidence and clinical characteristics. J Pediatr Surg 31:559–562

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Willems M, Kluth D, Lambrecht W (1996) Anorectal malformation: a new anatomic variant resembling an H-type fistula. J Pediatr Surg 31:1682–1684

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Podesta ML, Medel R, Castera R, Ruarte AU (1998) Ureteral duplication in children: surgical treatment and results. J Urol 160:1830–1833

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hynes PJ, Fraher JP (2004) The development of the male genitourinary system: III. The formation of the spongiose and glandar urethra. Br J Plast Surg 57:203–214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hynes PJ, Fraher JP (2004) The development of the male genitourinary system: II. The origin and formation of the urethral plaste. Br J Plast Surg 57:112–121

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Salle JL, Sibai H, Rosenstein D, Brzezinski AE, Corcos J (2000) Urethral duplication in the male: review of 16 cases. J Urol 163:1936–1940

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wagner JR, Carr MC, Bauer SB, Colodny AH, Retik AB, Hendren WB (1996) Congenital posterior urethral perineal fistulae. A unique form of urethral duplication Urology 48:277–280

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bates DG, Lebowitz RL (1995) Congenital urethroperineal fistula. Radiology 194:501–504

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salvatore Arena.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arena, S., Arena, C., Scuderi, M.G. et al. Urethral duplication in males: our experience in ten cases. Pediatr Surg Int 23, 789–794 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-007-1967-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-007-1967-x

Keywords

Navigation