Abstract
Urethral duplication is a rare congenital anomaly, affecting mainly boys. Clinical presentation varies because of the different anatomical patterns of this abnormality. We report our experience in ten males affected by urethral duplication. We retrospectively reviewed the records of ten males affected by urethral duplication. Mild cases of distal type I duplications as well as “Y-type” duplication associated to anorectal malformation were excluded. Evaluation included voiding cystourethrography, retrograde urethrography, intravenous urography and urethrocystoscopy. Mean age at diagnosis was 46.7 ± 32.3 months A blind ending duplicated urethra (type I) was present in three patients, two urethras originating from a common bladder neck (type II A2) in three, an “Y-type” duplication in three and a complete bladder with incomplete urethral duplication in one. Surgical management included excision of the duplicated urethra in four patients while a displacement of the ventral urethra (in “Y-type” duplication) in perineal-scrotal or scrotal position was performed in two patients as first stage of urethral reconstruction. Good cosmetical and functional results were achieved in all six treated boys while surgical management was not required in four. Urethral duplication is often associated with genito-urinary and gastro-intestinal abnormalities. Embryology is unclear and a lot of hypotheses have been proposed. We believe that the same embryological explanation cannot be applied to all subtypes of urethral duplication. Management must be evaluated for each case. The overall prognosis is good, in spite of the presence of other severe associate congenital anomalies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Woodhouse CR, Williams DI (1979) Duplication of the lower urinary tract in children. Br J Urol 51:481–487
Vijayaraghavan SN, Nirmala AB (2004) Complete duplication of urinary bladder and urethra: prenatal sonographic features. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 24:464–466
Effmann EL, Lebowitz RL, Colodyn AH (1976) Duplication of the urethra. Radiology 119:179–85
Passerini Glazel G, Aragona F, Chiazza L, Artibani W, Rabinowitz R, Firlit CF (1988) The P.A.D.U.A. (progressive augmentation by dilatation of the urethra anterior) procedure for the treatment of severe urethral hypoplasia. J Urol 140:1247–1249
Belman AB (1992) Hypospadias and other abnormalities. In: Kelalis PP, King LP, Belman AB (eds) Clinical pediatric urology, 3rd edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 619–663
Haleblian G, Kraklau D, Wilcox D, Duffy P, Ransley P, Mushtaq I (2006) Y-type urethral duplication in the male. BJU 97:597–602
Merrot T, Weber D, Steyeart H, Alessandrini P (2002) Duplication sagitteles de l’uréthre chez l’enfant. A propos de 7 observations. Prog Urol 12:77–83
Rintala RJ, Mildh L, Lindahl H (1996) H-type anorectal malformations: incidence and clinical characteristics. J Pediatr Surg 31:559–562
Willems M, Kluth D, Lambrecht W (1996) Anorectal malformation: a new anatomic variant resembling an H-type fistula. J Pediatr Surg 31:1682–1684
Podesta ML, Medel R, Castera R, Ruarte AU (1998) Ureteral duplication in children: surgical treatment and results. J Urol 160:1830–1833
Hynes PJ, Fraher JP (2004) The development of the male genitourinary system: III. The formation of the spongiose and glandar urethra. Br J Plast Surg 57:203–214
Hynes PJ, Fraher JP (2004) The development of the male genitourinary system: II. The origin and formation of the urethral plaste. Br J Plast Surg 57:112–121
Salle JL, Sibai H, Rosenstein D, Brzezinski AE, Corcos J (2000) Urethral duplication in the male: review of 16 cases. J Urol 163:1936–1940
Wagner JR, Carr MC, Bauer SB, Colodny AH, Retik AB, Hendren WB (1996) Congenital posterior urethral perineal fistulae. A unique form of urethral duplication Urology 48:277–280
Bates DG, Lebowitz RL (1995) Congenital urethroperineal fistula. Radiology 194:501–504
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arena, S., Arena, C., Scuderi, M.G. et al. Urethral duplication in males: our experience in ten cases. Pediatr Surg Int 23, 789–794 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-007-1967-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-007-1967-x