Skip to main content
Log in

Measurement of pediatric testicular volume with Prader orchidometer: comparison of different hands

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Measurement of testicular volume is a more readily available method of estimating spermatogenesis in adolescence. Traditionally, testicular volumes have been measured with different type of orchidometers or calipers. The most widely used orchidometer is the Prader orchidometer introduced in 1966. This type of orchidometer, a graded series of ellipsoid beads on a string, is used for testicular volume measurement, which is a useful index of puberty in male in order to evaluate male growth and development. Although it is more practical and inexpensive compared with ultrasonography, this instrument has been questioned in regard to its objectiveness in different hands. We designed a prospective clinical study to investigate the correlation between testicular size measurements of three different clinical investigators by using Prader orchidometer. A total of 100 testes in 50 boys with a mean age of 6.4 years (range 1–15 years) who presented to Urology and Pediatrics outpatient clinics of our hospital without urogenital complaints were enrolled to this study. The volumes of each testis were measured independently using Prader orchidometer by three different clinical investigators (A, B and C). Each investigator repeated testicular volume measurements blinded to measurements obtained by others. The measured volumes were recorded separately. Statistical analysis of the results was performed using Pearson’s correlation (r) to determine the correlation of orchidometer measurements between the examiners. All statistical analyses and power calculations were performed using computer software. Mean testicular volumes measured by three examiners A, B and C were 4.01±3.79 ml (SD) (2–18 ml), 3.66±3.46 ml (SD) (1–18 ml) and 3.86±3.54 ml (SD) (1–18 ml), respectively. The statistical correlation between the measurements of investigator A and B, A and C, and B and C showed a high correlation {r=0.954 (P<0.01), r=0.964 (P<0.01), and r=0.979 (P<0.01)}, respectively. In the present study, it was shown that testicular size measurement by using Prader orchidometer gives good correlation in different examiners’ hands and it is an objective and reliable method in pediatric urological practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Takihara H, Cosentino MJ, Sakatoku J, Cockett ATK (1987) The significance of testicular size measurement in andrology—correlation of testicular size with testicular function. J Urol 137:416–419

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Daniel WA, Feinstein RA, Howard-Peebles P, Boxley WD (1982) Testicular volumes of adolescents. J Pediatr 101:1010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Prader A (1966) Testicular size: assessment and clinical importance. Triangle 7:240

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Takihara H, Sakatoku J, Fujii M et al (1983) Significance of testicular size measurements in andrology: a new orchidometer and its clinical application. Fertil Steril 39:836

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lambert B (1951) The frequency of mumps and mumps orchitis and the consequences for sexuality and fertility. Acta Genet Stat Med 2(suppl 1):1

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cendron M, Huff DS, Keating MA, Snyder HMcC, Duckett JW (1993) Anatomical, morphological and volumetric analysis: a review of 759 cases of testicular maldescent. J Urol 149:570

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rivkees SA, Hall DA, Boepple PA, Crawford JD (1987) Accuracy and reproducibility of clinical measures of testicular volume. J Pediatr 110:914

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Behre HM, Nashan D, Nieschlag E (1989) Objective measurement of testicular volume by ultrasonography: evaluation of the tecnique and comparison with orchidometer estimates. Int J Androl 12:395

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Costabile RA, Skoog S, Radowich M (1992) Testicular volume assessment in the adolescent with a varicocele. J Urol 147:1348

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Paltiel HJ, Diamond DA, Di Canzio J et al (2002) Testicular volume: comparison of orchidometer and US measurements in dogs. Radiology 222(1):114–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Al Salim A, Murchison PJT, Rana A, Elton RA, Hargreave TB (1995) Evaluation of testicular volume by three orchidometers compared with ultrasonographic measurements. Br J Urol 76:632–635

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Diamond DA, Paltiel HJ, Dicanzio J, Zurakowski D, Bauer SB et al (2000) Comparative assessment of pediatric testicular volume: orchidometer versus ultrasound. J Urol 164:1111–1114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Taskinen S, Taavitsainen M, Wikström S (1996) Measurement of testicular volume: comparison of 3 different methods. J Urol 155:930–933

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cayan S, Akbay E, Bozlu M, Doruk E et al (2002) Diagnosis of pediatric varicoceles by physical examination and ultrasonography and measurement of the testicular volume: using the prader orchidometer versus ultrasonography. Urol Int 69(4):293–296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Matsuo N, Anzo M, Sato S, Ogata T, Kamimaki T (2000) Testicular volume in Japanese boys up to the age of 15 years. Eur J Pediatr 159(11):843–845

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chipkevitch E, Nishimura RT, Tu DG, Galea-Rojas M (1996) Clinical measurement of testicular volume in adolescents: comparison of the reliability of 5 methods. J Urol 156(6):2050–2053

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Carlsen E, Andersen AG, Buchreitz L et al (2000) Inter-observer variation in the results of the clinical andrological examination including estimation of testicular size. Int J Androl 23(4):248–253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cevdet Kaya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karaman, M.I., Kaya, C., Caskurlu, T. et al. Measurement of pediatric testicular volume with Prader orchidometer: comparison of different hands. Ped Surgery Int 21, 517–520 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-005-1470-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-005-1470-1

Keywords

Navigation