Skip to main content
Log in

Treatment strategy when using intraoperative peritoneal lavage for perforated appendicitis in children: a preliminary report

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We attempt to quantify the amount of peritoneal irrigation required to significantly decrease the intraperitoneal bacteria in children with perforated appendicitis, as no ideal volume of peritoneal lavage has yet been determined. A series of 11 children who were operated on for peritonitis caused by perforated appendicitis were reviewed retrospectively. All children were treated with our treatment protocol that included intraoperative peritoneal lavage using a large volume of saline. Peritoneal fluid samples were taken before and after peritoneal lavage and then were cultured to determine the colony counts. Twenty of 24 bacteria were available for evaluation of the changes in the flora counts. We found 85% of species to be resistant to peritoneal lavage when 3–5 l of saline per square meter of body surface area (l/m2) were used. In contrast, 5.8±1.54 l/m2 of peritoneal lavage fluid was necessary to completely eradicate the intraperitoneal bacterial flora. The residual bacteria showed a greater decrease when lavage fluid in excess of 6 l/m2 was used. Although this is only a preliminary report, these findings could be used to justify a true prospective randomized trial in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1a, b

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cervantes-Sanchez CR, Gutierrez-Vega R, Vazquez-Carpizo JA, Clark P, Athie-Gutierrez C (2000) Syringe pressure irrigation of subdermic tissue after appendectomy to decrease the incidence of postoperative wound infection. World J Surg 24:38–41, discussion 41–42

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Curran TJ, Muenchow SK (1993) The treatment of complicated appendicitis in children using peritoneal drainage: results from a public hospital. J Pediatr Surg 28:204–208

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Haecker FM, Berger D, Schumacher U, Friess D, Schweizer P (2000) Peritonitis in childhood: aspects of pathogenesis and therapy. Pediatr Surg Int 16:182–188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hunt JL (1982) Generalized peritonitis. To irrigate or not to irrigate the abdominal cavity. Arch Surg 117:209-212

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kokoska ER, Silen ML, Tracy TF, Jr., Dillon PA, Cradock TV, Weber TR (1998) Perforated appendicitis in children: risk factors for the development of complications. Surgery 124:619–625, discussion 625–626

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lund DP, Murphy EU (1994) Management of perforated appendicitis in children: a decade of aggressive treatment. J Pediatr Surg 29:1130–1133, discussion 1133–1134

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Meller JL, Reyes HM, Loeff DS, Federer L, Hall JR (1991) One-drug versus two-drug antibiotic therapy in pediatric perforated appendicitis: a prospective randomized study. Surgery 110:764–767, discussion 767–768

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Minervini S, Bentley S, Youngs D, Alexander-Williams J, Burdon DW, Keighley MR (1980) Prophylactic saline peritoneal lavage in elective colorectal operations. Dis Colon Rectum 23:392-394

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Neilson IR, Laberge JM, Nguyen LT, Moir C, Doody D, Sonnino RE, Youssef S, Guttman FM (1990) Appendicitis in children: current therapeutic recommendations. J Pediatr Surg 25:1113–1116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ohno Y, Kanematsu T (1998) Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for intestinal obstruction in children: an exceptional experience in a compromised child. J Pediatr Surg 33:1543–1545

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schein M, Gecelter G, Freinkel W, Gerding H, Becker PJ (1990) Peritoneal lavage in abdominal sepsis. A controlled clinical study. Arch Surg 125:1132–1135

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sugimoto K, Hirata M, Takishima T, Ohwada T, Shimazu S, Kakita A (1994) Mechanically assisted intraoperative peritoneal lavage for generalized peritonitis as a result of perforation of the upper part of the gastrointestinal tract. J Am Coll Surg 179:443–448

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sugimoto K, Hirata M, Kikuno T, Takishima T, Maekawa K, Ohwada T (1995) Large-volume intraoperative peritoneal lavage with an assistant device for treatment of peritonitis caused by blunt traumatic rupture of the small bowel. J Trauma 39: 689–692

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Surana R, Puri P (1994) Primary wound closure after perforated appendicitis in children. Br J Surg 81:440

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Toki A, Ogura K, Horimi T, Tokuoka H, Todani T, Watanabe Y, Uemura S, Urushihara N, Noda T, Sato Y, et al. (1995) Peritoneal lavage versus drainage for perforated appendicitis in children. Surg Today 25:207–210

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Mr. Brian Quinn for reading this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasuharu Ohno.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ohno, Y., Furui, J. & Kanematsu, T. Treatment strategy when using intraoperative peritoneal lavage for perforated appendicitis in children: a preliminary report. Ped Surgery Int 20, 534–537 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-004-1210-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-004-1210-y

Keywords

Navigation