Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Unravelling the roles of orbital forcing and oceanic conditions on the mid-Holocene boreal summer monsoons

  • Published:
Climate Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Northern Hemispheric summer monsoons were more intense during the mid-Holocene (MH ~ 6000 years ago) and coincided with a northward shift of the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) compared to the pre-industrial (PI) climate. Ancient civilizations in the Indus valley, Mesopotamia, and Egypt appear to have flourished during this period, thanks to abundant water availability. This study exploits a high-resolution variable grid global atmosphere model to understand the role of orbital forcing and ocean surface conditions in strengthening the monsoons and shifting the ITCZ northward over Africa, India, and East Asia during the MH. The combined impact of orbital forcing and sea surface temperature (SST) boundary conditions led to a change in monsoon rainfall of around 42, 30, 21, and 41% over Africa, East Asia, India, and northwest India (NWI) relative to the PI conditions. Changes in orbital parameters alone account for more than 36 and 26% of total rainfall increases in Africa and East Asia. Over the Indian subcontinent, the strengthening of monsoon was primarily a combined effect of SST and orbital forcing. In contrast, the SST boundary condition alone could explain the 39% of rainfall increase over NWI, where the Indus valley civilization once existed. Through moisture budget analysis, the study further illustrates the role of dynamic and thermodynamic factors responsible for the changes in monsoon precipitation. The enhanced monsoon resulted in a northward shift of ITCZ by around 3°N, 1.9°N, and 2.5°N over Africa, East Asia, and India, respectively, compared to its PI position. Analogous to the precipitation changes, orbital forcing mostly mediated ITCZ changes across Africa and East Asia, but the combined impact of orbital forcing and SST was responsible for the changes over India.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data and code availability

This study's observational data (GPCP) are publicly available. The outputs of the LMDZ4 paleoclimate simulations are not available in the public domain. However, upon specific request, the same can be kept available. For data analysis, we used NCAR Commanding Language (NCL: https://www.ncl.ucar.edu). The codes are not openly shared, which can be made available upon specific requests.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

LM, TPS, and RK thank the Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology (IITM) for providing the necessary facility to carry out this research. IITM is supported by the Ministry of Earth Sciences, Government of India. TPS and RK acknowledge the research support from the MoES, GOI, via the Belmont Forum project Palaeo-Constraints on Monsoon Evolution and Dynamics (PACMEDY). PB & FSRP acknowledge the JPI‐Belmont PACMEDY project. LM thanks the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, GOI (Award No: 09/625(0027)/2017-EMR-I) for the research fellowship. The LMDZ4 simulations were performed on the IITM HPC.

Funding

IITM is funded by the Ministry of Earth Sciences (MoES), Government of India (GOI). This research received funding support from the MoES, GOI, via the Belmont Forum project Palaeo-Constraints on Monsoon Evolution and Dynamics (PACMEDY). PB & FSRP are supported by the JPI‐Belmont PACMEDY project. FSRP acknowledges the financial support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (grant RGPIN­2018­04981) and the Fonds de recherche du Québec–Nature et technologies (2020­NC­268559). Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India, 09/625(0027)/2017-EMR-I, JPI‐Belmont-PACMEDY.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TPS, LM, and RK conceptualised the work. TPS and LM performed the model integrations. FSRP, PB, and RK contributed to designing the experiments. LM performed the analysis. The IPSL transient simulations were provided by PB and OM. TPS, LM, and RK wrote the initial version of the manuscript. FSRP & PB contributed to reviewing, editing, and writing the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. P. Sabin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. The authors also confirm there are no conflicts of interest/competing interests to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 5397 KB)

Appendices

Appendix-1: Moisture budget analysis

The analysis of the moisture budget is done as follows. We used a linearized formulation following Seager et al. (2010) and Seager and Naik (2012).

$$\delta P=\delta TH+\delta DY+\delta E+\delta TE+Res$$
(1)
$$\delta TH= - \frac{1}{{\rho }_{w}g}{\int }_{0}^{\overline{{P}_{s}}\left(pi\right)}\nabla . ({\overline{u}}_{Pi} \left[\delta \overline{q}\right]) dp$$
(2)
$$\delta DY = - \frac{1}{{\rho }_{w}g}{\int }_{0}^{\overline{{P}_{s}}\left(pi\right)}\nabla . (\left[\delta \overline{u}\right] {\overline{q}}_{Pi}) dp$$
(3)
$$\delta TE = - \frac{1}{{\rho }_{w}g} {\int }_{0}^{{\overline{{P}_{s}}}_{\left(Pi\right)}}\nabla . \delta \left(\overline{{u}^{^{\prime}}{q}^{^{\prime}}}\right) dp$$
(4)
$$\delta \left(.\right)={\left(.\right)}_{EXP}-{\left(.\right)}_{PI}$$
(5)

In Eq. 1, variables P and E are precipitation and evaporation from the surface. Changes in specific humidity and no changes in mean circulation is mentioned as thermodynamic (δTH) term, while changes in mean circulation and no changes in specific humidity is denoted as dynamic (δDY) terms. The change in transient eddy flux is δTE, and Res is the residual term. In Eqs. 15u is horizontal wind, q is specific humidity, p is pressure and Ps is surface pressure, ρw is the density of water, and the subscript s denote the surface values. Climatological monthly means are denoted by over bars and deviation from monthly means by primes. Subscripts EXP and PI represent the MH or the two sensitivity experiments, and the PI control experiment respectively. The terms δP, δE, δTH, and δDY are calculated by using monthly outputs, and δTE is calculated by using daily outputs. The vertical integration is conducted from the surface to the top of the atmosphere (1000–200 hPa). We have shown only δTH and δDY components from this analysis and tried to relate with δP instead of δP-E since the changes are mostly identical.

Appendix-2: Identification of ITCZ location

We followed the method used by Braconnot et al. (2007) to locate ITCZ positions. The method identifies the northern limit of latitudinal location considering the centre of gravity of precipitation, which is located to the north of the maximum precipitation for each longitude, and the mean location is defined as follows:

$$lo{c}_{ITCZ\left(lon\right)}=\frac{\sum_{y=lat\left(pr max\right)}^{3{0}^{0}N} pr\left(y\right)lat\left(y\right)}{{\sum }_{y=lat\left(pr max\right)}^{3{0}^{o}N} pr\left(y\right)}$$
(6)

Where lon() stands for longitude, lat() for the latitude at which precipitation is calculated, pr is precipitation, and pr max for maximum precipitation.

Appendix-3: Cross-equatorial atmospheric heat transport

We calculated the cross-equatorial Atmospheric Heat Transport (AHTEQ) following Donohoe and Battisti (2013), who determined the hemispheric contrast of net energy into the atmosphere from the energy budget formulation as given below.

$${\text{AHT}}_{{{\text{EQ}}}} { = }\left\langle {{\text{SW}}_{{{\text{ABS}}}} } \right\rangle - \left\langle {{\text{OLR}}} \right\rangle { + }\left\langle {{\text{SHF}}} \right\rangle - \left\langle {{\text{STOR}}_{{{\text{atmos}}}} } \right\rangle$$
(7)
$${\text{SW}}_{{{\text{ABS}}}} = {\text{SW}} \downarrow_{{{\text{TOA}}}} - {\text{SW}} \uparrow_{{{\text{TOA}}}} + {\text{SW}} \uparrow_{{{\text{SURF}}}} - {\text{SW}} \downarrow_{{{\text{SURF}}}}$$
(8)
$${\text{SHF}} = {\text{SENS}} \uparrow_{{{\text{SURF}}}} + {\text{LH}} \uparrow_{{{\text{SURF}}}} + {\text{LW}} \uparrow_{{{\text{SURF}}}} - {\text{LW}} \downarrow_{{{\text{SURF}}}}$$
(9)
$${\mathrm{STOR}}_{\mathrm{atmos}}=\frac{d}{dt}\left[\frac{1}{g}{\int }_{0}^{{P}_{s}}\left(Cp T+Lq\right) dP \right]$$
(10)

where SWABS is the shortwave radiation absorbed in the atmosphere by the direct heating of radiation from the sun, which is the sum of the upwelling and downwelling shortwave radiations at the top of the atmosphere (TOA) and the surface (SURF). The brackets indicate the spatial integral of the anomaly from the global average over the Southern Hemisphere or negative of the spatial integral over the NH. OLR is Outgoing Longwave Radiation at the TOA. SHF is the sum of the total energy flux from the surface to the atmosphere in the form of sensible heat fluxes (SENS), latent heat fluxes (LH), and long-wave fluxes (LW). STORatmos is the energy stored in the atmospheric column, where T is temperature, Cp is the specific heat capacity at constant pressure, L is the latent heat of vaporisation of water, q is specific humidity, and Ps is the surface pressure.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mudra, L., Sabin, T.P., Krishnan, R. et al. Unravelling the roles of orbital forcing and oceanic conditions on the mid-Holocene boreal summer monsoons. Clim Dyn 61, 1333–1352 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06629-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06629-y

Keywords

Navigation