Abstract
Dynamical downscaling with high-resolution regional climate models may offer the possibility of realistically reproducing precipitation and weather events in climate simulations. As resolutions fall to order kilometers, the use of explicit rather than parametrized convection may offer even greater fidelity. However, these increased resolutions both allow and require increasingly complex diagnostics for evaluating model fidelity. In this study we focus on precipitation evaluation and analyze five 2-month-long dynamically downscaled model runs over the continental United States that employ different convective and microphysics parameterizations, including one high-resolution convection-permitting simulation. All model runs use the Weather Research and Forecasting Model driven by National Center for Environmental Prediction reanalysis data. We show that employing a novel rainstorm identification and tracking algorithm that allocates essentially all rainfall to individual precipitation events (Chang et al. in J Clim 29(23):8355–8376, 2016) allows new insights into model biases. Results include that, at least in these runs, model wet bias is driven by excessive areal extent of individual precipitating events, and that the effect is time-dependent, producing excessive diurnal cycle amplitude. This amplified cycle is driven not by new production of events but by excessive daytime enlargement of long-lived precipitation events. We further show that in the domain average, precipitation biases appear best represented as additive offsets. Of all model configurations evaluated, convection-permitting simulations most consistently reduced biases in precipitation event characteristics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler RF, Huffman GJ, Chang A, Ferraro R, Xie PP, Janowiak J, Rudolf B, Schneider U, Curtis S, Bolvin D et al (2003) The Version-2 Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) monthly precipitation analysis (1979–present). J Hydrometeorol 4(6):1147–1167
Andrys J, Lyons TJ, Kala J (2015) Multidecadal evaluation of WRF downscaling capabilities over Western Australia in simulating rainfall and temperature extremes. J Appl Meteorol 54(2):370–394
Awan NK, Truhetz H, Gobiet A (2011) Parameterization-induced error characteristics of MM5 and WRF operated in climate mode over the alpine region: an ensemble-based analysis. J Clim 24(12):3107–3123
Baldwin ME, Kain JS, Lakshmivarahan S (2005) Development of an automated classification procedure for rainfall systems. Mon Weather Rev 133(4):844–862
Berenguer M, Surcel M, Zawadzki I, Xue M, Kong F (2012) The diurnal cycle of precipitation from continental radar mosaics and numerical weather prediction models. Part II: Intercomparison among numerical models and with nowcasting. Mon Weather Rev 140(8):2689–2705
Bosilovich MG, Chen J, Robertson FR, Adler RF (2008) Evaluation of global precipitation in reanalyses. J Appl Meteorol 47(9):2279–2299
Bryan GH, Morrison H (2012) Sensitivity of a simulated squall line to horizontal resolution and parameterization of microphysics. Mon Weather Rev 140(1):202–225
Bukovsky MS, Gochis DJ, Mearns LO (2013) Towards assessing narccap regional climate model credibility for the North American Monsoon: current climate simulations. J Clim 26(22):8802–8826
Chan SC, Kendon EJ, Fowler HJ, Blenkinsop S, Ferro CA, Stephenson DB (2013) Does increasing the spatial resolution of a regional climate model improve the simulated daily precipitation? Clim Dyn 41(5–6):1475–1495
Chang W, Stein ML, Wang J, Kotamarthi VR, Moyer EJ (2016) Changes in spatiotemporal precipitation patterns in changing climate conditions. J Clim 29(23):8355–8376
Chen F, Dudhia J (2001) Coupling an advanced land surface-hydrology model with the Penn State—NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: model implementation and sensitivity. Mon Weather Rev 129(4):569–585
Clark AJ, Gallus WA Jr, Chen TC (2007) Comparison of the diurnal precipitation cycle in convection-resolving and non-convection-resolving mesoscale models. Mon Weather Rev 135(10):3456–3473
Clark AJ, Gallus WA Jr, Xue M, Kong F (2009) A comparison of precipitation forecast skill between small convection-allowing and large convection-parameterizing ensembles. Weather Forecast 24(4):1121–1140
Clark AJ, Bullock RG, Jensen TL, Xue M, Kong F (2014) Application of object-based time-domain diagnostics for tracking precipitation systems in convection-allowing models. Weather Forecast 29(3):517–542
Crétat J, Pohl B (2012) How physical parameterizations can modulate internal variability in a regional climate model. J Atmos Sci 69(2):714–724
Dai A (2006) Precipitation characteristics in eighteen coupled climate models. J Clim 19(18):4605–4630
Dai A, Trenberth KE (2004) The diurnal cycle and its depiction in the Community Climate System Model. J Clim 17(5):930–951
Davis C, Brown B, Bullock R (2006a) Object-based verification of precipitation forecasts. Part I: methodology and application to mesoscale rain areas. Mon Weather Rev 134(7):1772–1784
Davis C, Brown B, Bullock R (2006b) Object-based verification of precipitation forecasts. Part II: application to convective rain systems. Mon Weather Rev 134(7):1785–1795
Done J, Davis CA, Weisman M (2004) The next generation of NWP: explicit forecasts of convection using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. Atmos Sci Lett 5(6):110–117
Fosser G, Khodayar S, Berg P (2015) Benefit of convection permitting climate model simulations in the representation of convective precipitation. Clim Dyn 44(1–2):45–60
Gao J, Hou W, Xue Y, Wu S (2015) Validating the dynamic downscaling ability of WRF for East Asian summer climate. Theor Appl Climatol 128(1–2):1–13
Gao Y, Leung LR, Zhao C, Hagos S (2017) Sensitivity of US summer precipitation to model resolution and convective parameterizations across gray zone resolutions. J Geophys Res Atmos 122(5):2714–2733
Giorgi F, Mearns LO (1999) Introduction to special section: regional climate modeling revisited. J Geophys Res-Atmos 104(D6):6335–6352
Gochis DJ, Shuttleworth WJ, Yang ZL (2002) Sensitivity of the modeled North American monsoon regional climate to convective parameterization. Mon Weather Rev 130(5):1282–1298
Grell GA, Dévényi D (2002) A generalized approach to parameterizing convection combining ensemble and data assimilation techniques. Geophys Res Lett 29(14):38-1–38-4
Hong SY, Lim JOJ (2006) The WRF single-moment 6-class microphysics scheme (WSM6). J Korean Meteorol Soc 42(2):129–151
Husak GJ, Michaelsen J, Funk C (2007) Use of the gamma distribution to represent monthly rainfall in Africa for drought monitoring applications. Int J Climatol 27(7):935–944
Jankov I, Gallus WA Jr, Segal M, Shaw B, Koch SE (2005) The impact of different WRF model physical parameterizations and their interactions on warm season MCS rainfall. Weather Forecast 20(6):1048–1060
Kain JS (2004) The Kain-Fritsch convective parameterization: an update. J Appl Meteorol 43(1):170–181
Kala J, Andrys J, Lyons TJ, Foster IJ, Evans BJ (2015) Sensitivity of WRF to driving data and physics options on a seasonal time-scale for the southwest of Western Australia. Clim Dyn 44(3–4):633–659
Kanamitsu M, Ebisuzaki W, Woollen J, Yang SK, Hnilo J, Fiorino M, Potter G (2002) NCEP-DOE AMIP-II reanalysis (r-2). Bull Am Meteorol Soc 83(11):1631–1643
Liang XZ, Li L, Dai A, Kunkel KE (2004) Regional climate model simulation of summer precipitation diurnal cycle over the united states. Geophys Res Lett 31(24):L24208
Lin Y, Mitchell KE (2005) The NCEP stage II/IV hourly precipitation analyses: development and applications. In: 19th conference on hydrology, Citeseer
McMillen JD, Steenburgh WJ (2015) Impact of microphysics parameterizations on simulations of the 27 October 2010 Great Salt Lake—effect snowstorm. Weather Forecast 30(1):136–152
McNeall D, Challenor P, Gattiker J, Stone E (2013) The potential of an observational data set for calibration of a computationally expensive computer model. Geosci Model Dev 6(5):1715–1728
Mlawer EJ, Taubman SJ, Brown PD, Iacono MJ, Clough SA (1997) Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave. J Geophys Res Atmos 102(D14):16663–16682
Morrison H, Curry J, Khvorostyanov V (2005) A new double-moment microphysics parameterization for application in cloud and climate models. Part I: description. J Atmos Sci 62(6):1665–1677
Murthy CR, Gao B, Tao AR, Arya G (2015) Automated quantitative image analysis of nanoparticle assembly. Nanoscale 7(21):9793–9805
Noh Y, Cheon W, Hong S, Raasch S (2003) Improvement of the k-profile model for the planetary boundary layer based on large eddy simulation data. Bound Layer Meteorol 107(2):401–427
Pieri AB, von Hardenberg J, Parodi A, Provenzale A (2015) Sensitivity of precipitation statistics to resolution, microphysics, and convective parameterization: a case study with the high-resolution WRF climate model over Europe. J Hydrometeorol 16(4):1857–1872
Pollard D, Chang W, Haran M, Applegate P, DeConto R (2016) Large ensemble modeling of the last deglacial retreat of the west antarctic ice sheet: comparison of simple and advanced statistical techniques. Geosci Model Dev 9(5):1697–1723
Prein A, Gobiet A, Suklitsch M, Truhetz H, Awan N, Keuler K, Georgievski G (2013) Added value of convection permitting seasonal simulations. Clim Dyn 41(9–10):2655–2677
Racherla P, Shindell D, Faluvegi G (2012) The added value to global model projections of climate change by dynamical downscaling: a case study over the continental us using the GISS-ModelE2 and WRF models. J Geophys Res Atmos. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018091
Rajeevan M, Kesarkar A, Thampi S, Rao T, Radhakrishna B, Rajasekhar M (2010) Sensitivity of WRF cloud microphysics to simulations of a severe thunderstorm event over southeast India. Ann Geophys Atmos Hydrol Sp Sci 28:603
Randall DA, Dazlich DA (1991) Diurnal variability of the hydrologic cycle in a general circulation model. J Atmos Sci 48(1):40–62
Ratna SB, Ratnam J, Behera S, Ndarana T, Takahashi K, Yamagata T et al (2014) Performance assessment of three convective parameterization schemes in WRF for downscaling summer rainfall over South Africa. Clim Dyn 42(11–12):2931–2953
Richardson CW (1981) Stochastic simulation of daily precipitation, temperature, and solar radiation. Water Resour Res 17(1):182–190
Sansó B, Forest C (2009) Statistical calibration of climate system properties. J R Stat Soc Ser C (Appl Stat) 58(4):485–503
Schneider T, Lan S, Stuart A, Teixeira J (2017) Earth system modeling 2.0: a blueprint for models that learn from observations and targeted high-resolution simulations. Geophys Res Lett 44(24):12396–12417
Stern R, Coe R (1984) A model fitting analysis of daily rainfall data. J R Stat Soc Ser A 147(1):1–34
Wang J, Kotamarthi VR (2014) Downscaling with a nested regional climate model in near-surface fields over the contiguous United States. J Geophys Res Atmos 119(14):8778–8797
Wang J, Swati F, Stein ML, Kotamarthi VR (2015) Model performance in spatiotemporal patterns of precipitation: new methods for identifying value added by a regional climate model. J Geophys Res Atmos 120(4):1239–1259
Wang Y, Leung LR, McGregor JL, Lee DK, Wang WC, Ding Y, Kimura F (2004) Regional climate modeling: progress, challenges, and prospects. J Meteorol Soc Jpn Ser II 82(6):1599–1628
Warner TT, Hsu HM (2000) Nested-model simulation of moist convection: the impact of coarse-grid parameterized convection on fine-grid resolved convection. Mon Weather Rev 128(7):2211–2231
Woolhiser DA, Pegram G (1979) Maximum likelihood estimation of Fourier coefficients to describe seasonal variations of parameters in stochastic daily precipitation models. J Appl Meteorol 18(1):34–42
Xu J, Small EE (2002) Simulating summertime rainfall variability in the North American monsoon region: the influence of convection and radiation parameterizations. J Geophys Res Atmos 107(D23):ACL 22-1–ACL 22-17
Xue Y, Janjic Z, Dudhia J, Vasic R, De Sales F (2014) A review on regional dynamical downscaling in intraseasonal to seasonal simulation/prediction and major factors that affect downscaling ability. Atmos Res 147:68–85
Yang H, Wang B (2012) Reduction of systematic biases in regional climate downscaling through ensemble forcing. Clim Dyn 38(3–4):655–665
Yu E, Wang H, Gao Y, Sun J (2011) Impacts of cumulus convective parameterization schemes on summer monsoon precipitation simulation over China. Acta Mete Sin 25:581–592
Zhang L, Wu P, Zhou T, Roberts MJ, Schiemann R (2016) Added value of high resolution models in simulating global precipitation characteristics. Atmos Sci Lett 17(12):646–657
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Bill Collins, Peter Caldwell, Matthew Huber, Robert Jacob, Andreas Prein, and the participants in the 2016 GEWEX Convection-Permitting Climate Modeling Workshop for many helpful comments and suggestions. Christopher Callahan assisted with preparation of figures and diurnal cycle analysis. This work was conducted as part of the Research Network for Statistical Methods for Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences (STATMOS), supported by NSF awards 1106862, 1106974, and 1107046, and the Center for Robust Decision-making on Climate and Energy Policy (RDCEP), supported by the NSF Decision Making under Uncertainty program award 0951576. Additional support was provided by the University of Cincinnati TAFT Research Center and computing resources were provided by the University of Chicago Research Computing Center.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This paper is a contribution to the special issue on Advances in Convection-Permitting Climate Modeling, consisting of papers that focus on the evaluation, climate change assessment, and feedback processes in kilometer-scale simulations and observations. The special issue is coordinated by Christopher L. Castro, Justin R. Minder, and Andreas F. Prein.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chang, W., Wang, J., Marohnic, J. et al. Diagnosing added value of convection-permitting regional models using precipitation event identification and tracking. Clim Dyn 55, 175–192 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4294-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4294-0