Skip to main content
Log in

A multi-model analysis of the resolution influence on precipitation climatology in the Gulf Stream region

  • Published:
Climate Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using climate simulations from coupled and uncoupled general circulation models, this study investigates the influence of horizontal resolution in both atmospheric and oceanic model components on the mean precipitation over the Gulf Stream (GS) region. For this purpose, three sets of model experiments are analyzed. The first two examine the effects of increasing horizontal resolution of an atmospheric general circulation model (AGCM) gradually from 100 to 10 km under fixed oceanic settings. Specifically, the AGCM is either forced with prescribed observed sea surface temperature (SST) (the first case) or coupled to a non-eddy-resolving ocean general circulation model (OGCM) at a fixed horizontal resolution near 100 km (the second case). The third set of experiments examines the effects of the oceanic resolution with a pair of long-term simulations by another coupled ocean–atmosphere general circulation model (CGCM), in which the OGCM is run respectively at non-eddy-resolving (100 km) and eddy-resolving (10 km) resolutions, while the AGCM resolution remains fixed at 50 km for both runs. In general, all simulations qualitatively reproduce the gross features of the mean GS precipitation and its annual cycle. At similar AGCM resolutions, the uncoupled models produce a GS rain band that is more realistic in both structure and strength compared to the coupled models with non-eddy-resolving oceans. This is because the prescribed observed SST better represents the gradient near the oceanic front than the non-eddy-resolving OGCMs simulate. An increase from the baseline AGCM resolution produces enhanced climatological GS precipitation, both large-scale and convective, with the latter more tightly confined to the oceanic front. The enhancement, however, is moderate and further increases in resolution achieves diminishing results. On the other hand, an increase in oceanic resolution from non-eddy-resolving to eddy resolving scheme results in more consistent simulations with observations in both intensity and structure of the rain band. The major increase is in the convective precipitation near the much-tightened SST gradient associated with the oceanic front. Therefore, the intensity improvement caused by oceanic resolution increases is more effective than that from atmospheric resolution increases. Further analyses show that the improvement of Gulf Stream precipitation climatology due to model horizontal resolution increases can be understood in terms of the atmospheric surface pressure adjustment to the sharper SST gradient near the oceanic front, which leads to stronger atmospheric surface convergence and upper level divergence. The associated ascending motion contributes to the precipitation band located in the Gulf Stream.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barsugli JJ, Battisti DS (1998) The basic effects of atmosphere–ocean thermal coupling on mid-latitude variability. J Atmos Sci 55:477–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brankovic C, Gregory D (2001) Impact of horizontal resolution on seasonal integrations. Clim Dyn 18:123–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brayshaw DJ, Hoskins B, Blackburn M (2008) The storm track response to idealized SST perturbations in an aqua- planet GCM. J Atmos Sci 65:2842–2860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown AR (2004) Resolution dependence of orographic torques. Quart J R Meteor Soc 130:3029–3046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan FO, Hecht MW, Smith RD (2007) Resolution convergence and sensitivity studies with North Atlantic circulation models. Part I: the western boundary current system. Ocean Model 16:141–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan FO, Tomas R, Dennis JM, Chelton DB, Loeb NG, McClean JL (2010) Frontal-scale air–sea interaction in high-resolution coupled climate models. J Clim 23:6277–6291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chassignet EP, Marshall DP (2008) Gulf Stream separation in numerical ocean models. Ocean modeling in an eddying regime. Geophys Monogr 177:39–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Chelton DB (2005) The impact of SST specification on ECMWF surface wind stress fields in the Eastern Tropical Pacific. J Clim 18:530–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chelton DB, Wentz FJ (2005) Global microwave satellite observations of sea surface temperature for numerical weather prediction and climate research. Bull Am Meteor Soc 86:1097–1115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chelton DB, Xie SP (2010) Coupled ocean-atmosphere interaction at oceanic mesoscales. Oceanography 23(4):52–69. doi:10.5670/oceanog.2010.05

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig A, Vertenstein M, Jacob R (2011) A new flexible coupler for earth system modeling developed for CESM4 and CESM1. Int J High Perf Comput Appl 26:31–42. doi:10.1177/1094342011428141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankignoul C (1985) Sea surface temperature anomalies, planetary waves, and air-sea feedback in the middle latitudes. Rev Geophys 23:357–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gent PR et al (2010) Improvements in a half-degree atmosphere/land version of the CCSM. Clim Dyn 34:819–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hack JJ, Caron JM, Danabasoglu G, Oleson KW, Bitz C, Truesdale JE (2006) CCSM–CAM3 climate simulation sensitivity to changes in horizontal resolution. J Clim 19:2267–2289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hand R, Keenlyside N, Omrani NE, Latif M (2014) Simulated response to inter-annual SST variations in the Gulf Stream region. Clim Dyn 42:715–731. doi:10.1007/s00382-013-1715-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huffman GJ, Adler RF, Bolvin DT, Nelkin EJ (2010) The TRMM multi-satellite precipitation analysis (TMPA), in Satellite Rainfall Applications for Surface Hydrology, 3-22. Hossain F, Gebremichael M (Eds) Springer ISBN 978-90-481- 2914-0

  • Jung T et al (2012) High-resolution global climate simulations with the ECMWF model in Project Athena: experimental design, model climate, and seasonal forecast skill. J Clim 25:3155–3172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiehl JT, Gent PR (2004) The community climate system model, Version 2. J Clim 17:3666–3682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinter JL III et al (2013) Revolutionizing climate modeling with Project Athena: a multi-institutional, international collaboration. Bull Am Meteor Soc 94:231–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirtman BP et al (2012) Impact of ocean model resolution on CCSM climate simulations. Clim Dyn 39:1303–1328. doi:10.1007/s00382-012-1500-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi C, Sugi M (2004) Impact of horizontal resolution on the simulation of the Asian summer monsoon and tropical cyclones in the JMA global model. Clim Dyn 23:165–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin SJ, Rood RB (1997) An explicit flux-form semi-Lagrangian shallow water model on the sphere. Quart J R Meteor Soc 123:2477–2498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindzen RS, Nigam RS (1987) On the role of sea surface temperature gradients in forcing low level winds and convergence in the tropics. J Atmos Sci 44:2418–2436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madec G (2008) NEMO reference manual, ocean dynamics component: NEMO-OPA. Preliminary version. IPSL Note du Pole de modélisation 27

  • May W, Roeckner E (2001) A time-slice experiment with the ECHAM4 AGCM at high resolution: the impact of horizontal resolution on annual mean climate change. Clim Dyn 17:407–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minobe S, Kuwano-Yoshida A, Komori N, Xie SP, Small RJ (2008) Influence of the Gulf Stream on the troposphere. Nature 452:206–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minobe S, Kuwano-Yoshida A, Miyashita M, Tokinaga H, Xie SP (2010) Atmospheric response to the Gulf Stream: seasonal variations. J Clim 23:3699–3719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molteni F, Stockdale T, Balmaseda M, Balsamo G, Buizza R, Ferranti L, Magnusson L, Mogensen K, Palmer T, Vitart F (2011) The new ECMWF seasonal forecast system (System 4). ECMWF Technical Memorandum 656

  • Nakamura H, Sampe T, Tanimoto Y, Shimpo A (2004) Observed associations among storm tracks, jet streams, and mid-latitude oceanic fronts. Earth’s Climate: The Ocean-Atmosphere Interaction. Geophys Monogr 147:329–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Navarra A, Gualdi S, Masina S, Behera S, Luo JJ, Masson S, Guilyardi E, Delecluse P, Yamagata T (2008) Atmospheric horizontal resolution affects tropical climate variability in coupled models. J Clim 21:730–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill LW, Chelton DB, Esbensen SK, Wentz FJ (2005) High-resolution satellite measurements of the atmospheric boundary layer response to SST variations along the Agulhas Return Current. J Clim 18:2706–2723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope V, Stratton R (2002) The processes governing horizontal resolution sensitivity in a climate model. Clim Dyn 19:211–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner NA, Parker DE, Horton EB, Folland CK, Alexander LV, Powell DP, Kent EC, Kaplan A (2003) Global analyses of sea surface temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late nineteenth century. J Geophys Res 108:4407. doi:10.1029/2002JD002670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds RW, Rayner NA, Smith TM, Stokes DC, Wang W (2002) An improved in situ and satellite SST analysis for climate. J Clim 15:1609–1625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds RW, Smith TM, Liu C, Chelton DB, Casey KS, Schlax MG (2007) Daily high-resolution blended analyses for sea surface temperature. J Clim 20:5473–5496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampe T, Hisashi N, Atsushi G, Wataru O (2010) Significance of a midlatitude SST frontal zone in the formation of a storm track and an eddy-driven westerly jet. J Clim 23:1793–1814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider N, Qiu B (2015) The atmospheric response to weak sea surface temperature fronts. J Atmos Sci 72:3356–3377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small RJ, Tomas RA, Bryan FO (2014) Storm track response to ocean fronts in a global high-resolution climate model. Clim Dyn 43:805–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song Q, Cornillon P, Hara T (2006) Surface wind response to oceanic fronts. J Geophys Res 111:C12006. doi:10.1029/2006JC003680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song Q, Chelton DB, Esbensen SK, Thum N, O’Neill LW (2009) Coupling between sea surface temperature and low-level winds in mesoscale numerical models. J Clim 22:146–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweet WR, Fett R, Kerling J, Violette PL (1981) Air-sea interaction effects in the lower troposphere across the north wall of the Gulf Stream. Mon Wea Rev 109:1042–1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiébaux J, Rogers E, Wang W, Katz B (2003) A new high-resolution blended real-time global sea surface temperature analysis. Bul Am Meteorol Soc 84:645–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uppala S et al (2005) The ERA-40 Re-Analysis. Quart J R Meteor Soc 131:2961–3012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wai M, Stage SA (1989) Dynamical analysis of marine atmospheric boundary layer structure near the Gulf Stream oceanic front. Quart J R Meteor Soc 115:29–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner TT, Lakhtakia MN, Doyle JD, Pearson RA (1990) Marine atmospheric boundary layer circulations forced by Gulf Stream sea surface temperature gradients. Mon Wea Rev 118:309–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wettstein JJ, Wallace JM (2010) Observed patterns of month-to-month storm track variability and their relationship to the background flow. J Atmos Sci 67:1420–1437. doi:10.1175/2009JAS3194.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie SP (2004) Satellite observations of cool ocean-atmosphere interaction. Bull Am Meteor Soc 85:195–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu J (2015) ENSO prediction in Project Minerva: sensitivity to Atmospheric Horizontal Resolution and Ensemble Size. J Clim 28:2080–2095

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

XF, BH and JK are supported by Grants from NSF (AGS-1338427), NOAA (NA14OAR4310160), and NASA (NNX14AM19G). BK is supported from NSF (OCE-1419569; OCE-1154986) and ONR (N000141310844, N000141410088). We are grateful for the Athena and Minerva projects to provide climate simulations and hindcasts used in this study. XF and BH also thank Dr. C. Stan for many useful guidance and suggestions on this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bohua Huang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feng, X., Huang, B., Kirtman, B.P. et al. A multi-model analysis of the resolution influence on precipitation climatology in the Gulf Stream region. Clim Dyn 48, 1685–1704 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3167-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3167-7

Keywords

Navigation