Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Validation of non-stationary precipitation series for site-specific impact assessment: comparison of two statistical downscaling techniques

  • Published:
Climate Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Statistical downscaling (SD) methods have become a popular, low-cost and accessible means of bridging the gap between the coarse spatial resolution at which climate models output climate scenarios and the finer spatial scale at which impact modellers require these scenarios, with various different SD techniques used for a wide range of applications across the world. This paper compares the Generator for Point Climate Change (GPCC) model and the Statistical DownScaling Model (SDSM)—two contrasting SD methods—in terms of their ability to generate precipitation series under non-stationary conditions across ten contrasting global climates. The mean, maximum and a selection of distribution statistics as well as the cumulative frequencies of dry and wet spells for four different temporal resolutions were compared between the models and the observed series for a validation period. Results indicate that both methods can generate daily precipitation series that generally closely mirror observed series for a wide range of non-stationary climates. However, GPCC tends to overestimate higher precipitation amounts, whilst SDSM tends to underestimate these. This infers that GPCC is more likely to overestimate the effects of precipitation on a given impact sector, whilst SDSM is likely to underestimate the effects. GPCC performs better than SDSM in reproducing wet and dry day frequency, which is a key advantage for many impact sectors. Overall, the mixed performance of the two methods illustrates the importance of users performing a thorough validation in order to determine the influence of simulated precipitation on their chosen impact sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnell NW, Hudson DA, Jones RG (2003) Climate change scenarios from a regional climate model: estimating change in runoff in southern Africa. J Geophys Res 108:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrough PA, McDonnell RA (1998) Principles of geographical information systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  • Busuioc A, von Storch H, Schnur R (1999) Verification of GCM-generated regional seasonal precipitation for current climate and of statistical downscaling estimates under changing climate conditions. J Clim 12:258–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Brissette FP, Leconte R (2012a) Coupling statistical and dynamical methods for spatial downscaling of precipitation. Clim Change 114:509–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Brissette FP, Leconte R (2012b) Downscaling of weather generator parameters to quantify the hydrological impacts of climate change. Clim Res 51(3):185–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Brissette FP, Leconte R (2014a) Assessing regression-based statistical approaches for downscaling precipitation over North America. Hydrol Process 28:3482–3504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Zhang XC, Brissette FP (2014b) Assessing scale effects for statistically downscaling precipitation with GPCC model. Int J Climatol 34:708–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins M, Knutti R, Arblaster J, Dufresne J-L, Fichefet T, Friedlingstein P, Gao X, Gutowski WJ, Johns T, Krinner G, Shongwe M, Tebaldi C, Weaver AJ, Wehner M (2013) Long-term climate change: projections, commitments and irreversibility. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Corte-Real J, Zhang X, Wang X (1995) Downscaling GCM information to regional scales: a non-parametric multivariate regression approach. Clim Dyn 11:413–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane RG, Hewitson BC (1998) Doubled CO2 precipitation changes for the Susquehanna Basin: downscaling from the GENESIS General Circulation Model. Int J Climatol 18:65–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford T, Betts NL, Favis-Mortlock DT (2007) GCM grid-box choice and predictor selection associated with statistical downscaling of daily precipitation over Northern Ireland. Clim Res 34:145–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Nieto J, Wilby RL (2005) A comparison of statistical downscaling and climate change factor methods: impacts of low flows in the river Thames, United Kingdom. Clim Change 69:245–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dibike YB, Coulibaly P (2005) Hydrological impact of climate change in the Saguenay watershed: comparison of downscaling methods and hydrologic models. J Hydrol 307:145–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo Y, Senior MJ (2006) Climate model simulation of point rainfall frequency characteristics. J Hydrol Eng. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann DL, Klein Tank AMG, Rusticucci M, Alexander LV, Brönnimann S, Charabi Y, Dentener FJ, Dlugokencky EJ, Easterling DR, Kaplan A, Soden BJ, Thorne PW, Wild M, Zhai PM (2013) Observations: atmosphere and surface. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Hashmi MZ, Shamseldin AY, Melville BW (2011) Comparison of SDSM and LARS-WG for simulation and downscaling of extreme precipitation events in a watershed. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 25(4):475–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haylock MR, Cawley GC, Harpham C, Wilby RL, Goodess CM (2006) Downscaling heavy precipitation over the United Kingdom: a comparison of dynamical and statistical methods and their future scenarios. Int J Climatol 26:1397–1415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellström C, Chen D, Achberger C, Räisänen J (2001) Comparison of climate change scenarios for Sweden based on statistical and dynamical downscaling of monthly precipitation. Clim Res 19:45–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera S, Fita L, Fernandez J, Gutierrez JM (2010) Evaluation of the mean and extreme precipitation regimes from the ENSEMBLES regional climate multimodel simulations over Spain. J Geophys Res. doi:10.1029/2010JD013936

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins RW, Mo KC, Schubert SC (1996) The moisture budget of the central United States as evaluated in the NCEP/NCAR and the NASA/DAO reanalyses. Mon Wea Rev 124:939–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huth R (2005) Downscaling of humidity variables: a search for suitable predictors and predictands. Int J Climatol 25:243–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalnay E, Kanamitsu M, Kistler R, Collins W, Deaven D, Gandin L, Iredell M, Saha S, White G, Woollen J, Zhu Y, Leetmaa A, Reynolds B, Chelliah M, Ebisuzaki W, Higgins W, Janowiak J, Mo KC, Ropelewski C, Wang J, Jenne R, Joseph D (1996) The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77:437–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karl TR, Wang WC, Schlesinger ME, Knight RW, Portman D (1990) A method of relating General Circulation Model simulated climate to the observed local climate. Part I: seasonal statistics. J Clim 3:1053–1079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan MS, Coulibaly P, Dibike Y (2006) Uncertainty analysis of statistical downscaling methods. J Hydrol 319:357–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidson JW, Thompson CS (1998) A comparison of statistical and model-based downscaling techniques for estimating local climate variations. J Clim 11:735–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilsby CG, Cowpertwait PSP, O’Connell PE, Jones PD (1998) Predicting rainfall statistics in England and Wales using atmospheric circulation variables. Int J Climatol 18:523–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenderink G (2010) Exploring metrics of extreme daily precipitation in a large ensemble of regional climate model simulations. Clim Res 44:151–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu ZF, Xu ZX, Charles SP, Fu GB, Liu L (2011) Evaluation of two statistical downscaling models for daily precipitation over and arid basin in China. Int J Climatol 31:2006–2020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machguth H, Paul F, Kotlarski S, Hoelze M (2009) Calculating distributed glacier mass balance for the Swiss Alps from regional climate model output: a methodical description and interpretation of the results. J Geophys Res Atmos 114. doi:10.1029/2009JD011775

  • Maraun D, Wetterhall F, Ireson AM, Chandler RE, Kendon EJ, Widmann M, Brienen S, Rust HW, Sauter T, Themebl M, Venema VKC, Chun KP, Goodess CM, Jones RG, Onof C, Vrac M, Thiele-Eich L (2010) Precipitation downscaling under climate change. Recent developments to bridge the gap between dynamical models and the end user. Rev Geophys. doi:10.1029/2009RG000314

  • Martin E, Timbal B, Brun E (1997) Downscaling of general circulation model outputs: simulation of the snow climatology of the French Alps and sensitivity to climate change. Clim Dyn 13:45–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer EP, Hidalgo HG (2007) Utility of daily vs. monthly large-scale climate data: an intercomparison of two statistical downscaling methods. Hydrol Earth Syst Svci Dis 4:3413–3440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mearns LO, Giorgi F, Whetton P, Pabon D, Hulme M, Lal M (2003) Guidelines for use of climate scenarios developed from Regional Climate Model experiments. Technical Report. The IPCC Data Distribution Centre, Norwich, UK, pp 38

  • Mo KC, Higgins RW (1996) Large-scale atmospheric moisture transport as evaluated in the NCEP/NCAR and the NASA/DAO reanalyses. J Clim 9:1531–1545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullan DJ (2013) Soil erosion under the impacts of future climate change: assessing the statistical significance of future changes and the potential on-site and off-site problems. Catena 109:234–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullan DJ, Favis-Mortlock DT, Fealy R (2012a) Addressing key limitations associated with modelling soil erosion under the impacts of future climate change. Agric For Meteorol 156:18–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullan DJ, Fealy R, Favis-Mortlock DT (2012b) Developing site-specific future temperature scenarios for Northern Ireland: addressing key issues employing a statistical downscaling approach. Int J Climatol 32(13):2007–2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy J (1999) An evaluation of statistical and dynamical techniques for downscaling local climate. J Clim 12:2256–2284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy J (2000) Predictions of climate change over Europe using statistical and dynamical downscaling techniques. Int J Climatol 20:489–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nearing MA (1998) Why soil erosion models over-predict small soil losses and under-predict large soil losses. Catena 32:15–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicks AD, Lane LJ (1989) Chapter 2: weather generator. In: Lane LJ, Nearing MA (eds) USDAWater Erosion Prediction Project: Hillslope Profile Version. NSERL Report No. 2. USDA-ARS National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory, West Lafayette, IN

  • Nicks AD, Lane LJ, Gander GA (1995) Chapter 2: weather generator. In: Flanagan DC, Nearing MA (eds) USDA—Water Erosion Prediction Project: Hillslope Profile and Watershed Model Documentation. NSERL Report No. 10. USDA-ARS National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory, West Lafayette, IN

  • O’Hare G, Sweeney J, Wilby RL (2005) Weather, climate, and climate change: human perspectives. Prentice Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield F (2005) Environmental change: key issues and alternative approaches. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg EA, Keys PW, Booth DB, Harley D, Burkey J, Steinemann AC, Lettenmaier DP (2010) Precipitation extremes and the impacts of climate change on stormwater infrastructure in Washington State. Clim Change 102:319–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidli J, Frei C, Vidale PL (2006) Downscaling from GCM precipitation: a benchmark for dynamical and statistical downscaling methods. Int J Climatol 26:679–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidli J, Goodess CM, Frei C, Haylock MR, Hundecha Y, Ribalaygua J, Schmith T (2007) Statistical and dynamical downscaling of precipitation: an evaluation and comparison of scenarios for the European Alps. J Geophys Res Atmos 112. doi:10.1029/2005JDO07026

  • Schoof JT, Shin DW, Cocke S, LaRow TE, Lim Y-K, O’Brien JJ (2009) Dynamically and statistically downscaled seasonal temperature and precipitation hindcast ensembles for the southeastern USA. Int J Climatol 29:243–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert S, Henderson-Sellers A (1997) A statistical model to downscale local daily temperature extremes from synoptic-scale atmospheric circulation patterns in the Australian region. Clim Dyn 13:223–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semenov MA (2007) Development of high-resolution UKCIP02-based climate change scenarios in the UK. Agric For Meteorol 144:127–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solman S, Nuñez M (1999) Local estimates of global climate change: a statistical downscaling approach. Int J Climatol 19:835–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Themeßl MJ, Gobiet A, Leuprecht A (2010) Empirical statistical downscaling and error correction of daily precipitation from regional climate models. Int J Climatol 31:1531–1544

    Google Scholar 

  • Timbal B, McAvaney BJ (2001) An analogue-based method to downscale surface air temperature: application for Australia. Clim Dyn 17:947–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timbal B, Dufour A, McAvaney B (2003) An estimate of future climate change for western France using a statistical downscaling technique

  • Trigo RM, Palutikof JP (2001) Precipitation scenario over Iberia: a comparison between direct GCM output and different downscaling techniques. J Clim 14:4422–4446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Roosmalen L, Christensen JH, Butts MB, Jensen KH, Refsgaard JC (2010) An intercomparison of regional climate model data for hydrological impact studies in Denmark. J Hydrol 380:406–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Storch H, Zorita E, Cubasch U (1993) Downscaling of global climate change estimates to regional scales: an application to Iberian rainfall in wintertime. J Clim 6:1161–1171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Storch H, Hewitson B, Mearns L (2000) Review of empirical downscaling techniques. Regional climate development under global warming. In: Iversen T, Hoiskar BAK (eds) General Technical Report No. 4. Conf. Proceedings RegClim Spring Meeting Jevnaker, Torbjornrud, Norway, pp 29–46

  • Wetterhall F, Bárdossy A, Chen D, Halldin S, Xu C (2007a) Daily precipitation-downscaling techniques in three Chinese regions. Water Resour Res 42:W11423. doi:10.1029/2005WR004573

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetterhall F, Halldin S, Xu CY (2007b) Seasonality properties of four statistical-downscaling methods in central Sweden. Theoret Appl Climatol 87:123–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widmann M, Bretherton CS (2000) Validation of mesoscale precipitation in the NCEP Reanalysis using a new gridcell dataset for the Northwestern United States. J Clim 13:1936–1950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widmann M, Bretherton CS, Salathé EP Jr (2003) Statistical precipitation downscaling over the Northwestern United States using numerically simulated precipitation as a predictor. J Clim 16:799–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilby RL (1998) Statistical downscaling of daily precipitation using daily airflow and teleconnection indices. Clim Res 10:163–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilby RL, Dawson CW (2007) SDSM 4.2- a decision support tool for the assessment of regional climate change impacts, Version 4.2 User Manual. Lancaster University: Lancaster/Environment Agency of England and Wales

  • Wilby RL, Dawson CW (2013) The Statistical DownScaling Model: insights from one decade of application. Int J Climatol 33(7):1707–1719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilby RL, Harris I (2006) A framework for assessing uncertainties in climate change impacts: low flow scenarios for the River Thames, UK. Water Resourc Res 42(2):W02419.1–W02419.10

  • Wilby RL, Wigley TML (2000) Precipitation predictors for downscaling: observed and general circulation model relationships. Int J Climatol 20:641–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilby RL, Wigley TML, Conway D, Jones PD, Hewitson BC, Main J, Wilks DS (1998) Statistical downscaling of general circulation model output: a comparison of methods. Water Resour Res 34:2995–3008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilby RL, Hay LE, Leavesley GH (1999) A comparison of downscaled and raw GCM output: implications for climate change scenarios in the San Juan River basin, Colorado. J Hydrol 225:67–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilby RL, Dawson CW, Barrow EM (2002) SDSM-A decision support tool for the assessment of regional climate change impacts. Environ Model Softw 17:145–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilby RL, Charles SP, Zorita E, Timbal B, Whetton P, Mearns OL (2004) Guidelines for the use of Climate scenarios developed from Statistical downscaling methods. http://ipcc-ddc.cru.uea.ac.uk/guidelines/dgm_no2_v1_09_2004.pdf

  • Wilks DS (1992) Adapting stochastic weather generation algorithms for climate change studies. Clim Change 22:67–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilks DS (1999) Multisite downscaling of daily precipitation with a stochastic weather generator. Clim Res 11:125–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood AW, Leung LR, Sridhar V, Lettenmaier DP (2004) Hydrologic implications of dynamical and statistical approaches to downscaling climate model outputs. Clim Change 62:189–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X-C (2005) Spatial downscaling of global climate model output for site-specific assessment of crop production and soil erosion. Agric For Meteorol 135:215–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X-C (2007) A comparison of explicit and implicit spatial downscaling of GCM output for soil erosion and crop production assessments. Clim Change 84:337–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X-C (2012) Verifying a temporal disaggregation method for generating daily precipitation of potentially non-stationary climate change for site-specific impact assessment. Int J Climatol 33:326–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X-C, Chen J, Garbrecht JD, Brissette FP (2012) Evaluation of a weather generator-based method for statistically downscaling non-stationary climate scenarios for impact assessment at a point scale. Trans ASABE 55(5):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zorita E, von Storch H (1999) The analog method as a simple statistical downscaling technique: comparison with more complicated methods. J Clim 12:2474–2489

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Dr Bofu Yu from Griffith University, Australia, for providing daily precipitation data for Cataract Dam and Port Macquarie stations and to Dr Alfredo Borges de Campos from Universidade Federal de Goias, Brazil, for precipitation data for Campinas station. Thanks must also go to Prof. Rob Wilby and Dr Christian Dawson for use of their SDSM model and to NOAA for the availability of predictor variables.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donal Mullan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mullan, D., Chen, J. & Zhang, X.J. Validation of non-stationary precipitation series for site-specific impact assessment: comparison of two statistical downscaling techniques. Clim Dyn 46, 967–986 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2626-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2626-x

Keywords

Navigation