Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quantifying the AMOC feedbacks during a 2×CO2 stabilization experiment with land-ice melting

  • Published:
Climate Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The response of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) to an increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration is analyzed using the IPSL-CM4 coupled ocean–atmosphere model. Two simulations are integrated for 70 years with 1%/year increase in CO2 concentration until 2×CO2, and are then stabilized for further 430 years. The first simulation takes land-ice melting into account, via a simple parameterization, which results in a strong freshwater input of about 0.13 Sv at high latitudes in a warmer climate. During this scenario, the AMOC shuts down. A second simulation does not include this land-ice melting and herein, the AMOC recovers after 200 years. This behavior shows that this model is close to an AMOC shutdown threshold under global warming conditions, due to continuous input of land-ice melting. The analysis of the origin of density changes in the Northern Hemisphere convection sites allows an identification as to the origin of the changes in the AMOC. The processes that decrease the AMOC are the reduction of surface cooling due to the reduction in the air–sea temperature gradient as the atmosphere warms and the local freshening of convection sites that results from the increase in local freshwater forcing. Two processes also control the recovery of the AMOC: the northward advection of positive salinity anomalies from the tropics and the decrease in sea-ice transport through the Fram Strait toward the convection sites. The quantification of the AMOC related feedbacks shows that the salinity related processes contribute to a strong positive feedback, while feedback related to temperature processes is negative but remains small as there is a compensation between heat transport and surface heat flux in ocean–atmosphere coupled model. We conclude that in our model, AMOC feedbacks amplify land-ice melting perturbation by 2.5.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cubasch U et al (2001) Third assessment report of climate change, chap 8. Intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 572

  • Delworth T, Manabe S, Stouffer R (1993) Interdecadal variations of the thermohaline circulation in a coupled Ocean–Atmosphere model. J Climate 6:1993–2011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fichefet T, Poncin C, Goosse H, Huybrechts P, Jansses I, Treut HL (2003) Implication of changes in freshwater flux from the Greenland ice sheet for the climate of the 21st century. Geophys Res Lett 30:1911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forster P, Taylor K (2006) Climate forcings and climate sensitivities diagnosed from coupled climate model integrations. J Climate 19:6181–6194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganachaud A, Wunsch C (2000) Improved estimates of global ocean circulation, heat transport and mixing from hydrographic data. Nature 407:453–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory JM et al (2005) A model intercomparison of changes in the Atlantic thermohaline circulation in response to increasing atmospheric CO2 concentration. Geophys Res Lett 32:L12703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory J, Saenko O, Weaver A (2003) The role of the Atlantic freshwater balance in the hysteresis of the meridional overturning circulation. Clim Dyn 21:707–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilyardi E (2006) El Nino-mean state-seasonal cycle interactions in a multi-model ensemble. Clim Dyn 26:329–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen J, Lacis A, Rind D, Russell G, Stone P, Fung I, Ruedy R, Lerner J (1984) Climate sensitivity: analysis of feedback mechanisms. Clim Process Clim Sensitivity 29:130–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu A, Meehl G, Washington W, Dai A (2004) Response of the Atlantic thermohaline circulation to increased atmospheric CO2 in a coupled model. J Climate 17:4267–4279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes T, Weaver A (1994) Multiple equilibria of an asymetric 2-basin ocean model. J Phys Oceanogr 24:619–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jungclaus J, Haak H, Esch M, Roeckner E, Marotzke J (2006) Will Greenland melting halt the thermohaline circulation? Geophys Res Let 33: Art. No. L17708

  • Latif M, Roeckner E, Mikolajewicz U, Voss R (2000) Tropical stabilisation of the thermohaline circulation in a greenhouse warming simulation. J Clim 13:1809–1813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marti O, et al. (2005) The new IPSL climate system model: IPSL-CM4. Note du pôle de modélisation n 26. ISSN 1288-1619, 88 pp, http://www.dods.ipsl.jussieu.fr/omamce/IPSLCM4/DocIPSLCM4/

  • Meehl GA, Washington WM, Arblaster JM, Bettge TW, Strand WG (2000) Anthropogenic forcing and decadal climate variability in sensitivity experiments of twentieth- and twenty-first-century climate. J Clim 13:3728–3744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parizek BR, Alley RB (2004) Implications of increased Greenland surface melt under globalwarming scenarios: ice-sheet simulations. Quat Sci Rev 23:1013–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overpeck J, Otto-Bliesner B, Miller G, Muhs D, Alley R, Kiehl J (2006) Paleoclimatic evidence for future ice-sheet instability and rapid sea-level rise. Science 311:1747–1750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahmstorf S (1996) On the freshwater forcing and the transport of the Atlantic thermohaline circulation. Clim Dyn 12:799–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahmstorf S et al (2005) Thermohaline circulation hysteresis: a model intercomparison. Geophys Res Let 32: Art. No. L23605

  • Ridley J, Huybrechts P, Gregory J, Lowe J (2005) Elimination of the Greenland ice sheet in a high CO2 climate. J Climate 18:3409–3427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stommel H (1961) Thermohaline convection with two stable regimes of flow. Tellus 13:224–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stouffer R et al (2006) Investigating the causes of the response of the thermohaline circulation to past and future climate changes. J Climate 19:1365–1387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stouffer R, Manabe S (1999) Response of a coupled ocean–atmosphere model to increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide: sensitivity to the rate of increase. J Climate 12:2224–2237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straub D (1996) An inconsistency between two classical models of the ocean buoyancy driven circulation. Tellus A 48:477–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swingedouw D, Braconnot P, Marti O (2006) Sensitivity of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation to the melting from Northern glaciers in climate change experiments. Geophys Res Lett 33:L07711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swingedouw D, Braconnot P, Delecluse P, Guilyardi E, Marti O (2007) The impact of global freshwater forcing on the thermohaline circulation: adjustment of North Atlantic convection sites in a CGCM. Clim Dyn 28:291–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe R, Gregory J, Johns T, Wood R, Mitchell J (2001) Mechanisms determining the atlantic thermohaline circulation response to greenhouse gas forcing in a non-flux-adjusted coupled climate model. J Climate pp 3102–3116

  • Vellinga M, Wood R, Gregory J (2002) Processes governing the recovery of a perturbed thermohaline circulation in HadCM3. J Climate 15:764–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voss R, Mikolajewicz U (2001) Long-term climate changes due to increased CO2 concentration in the coupled atmosphere–ocean general circulation model ECHAM3/LSG. Clim Dyn 17

  • Wood RA, Keen AB, Mitchell JFB, Gregory JM (1999) Changing spatial structure of the thermohaline circulation in response to atmospheric CO2 forcing in a climate model. Nature 399:572–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Neelin J (1993) Sea-ice interaction with the thermohaline circulation. Geophys Res Lett 20:217–220

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Alessandro Tagliabue who kindly proofread the manuscript. We gratefully acknowledge the constructive comments from Ron Stouffer and two other anonymous reviewers. The coupled simulations were carried out on the NEC SX6 of the Centre de Calcul de Recherche et Technologie (CCRT). This work was supported by the Commissariat a l’Energie Atomique (CEA), and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS). It is a contribution to the European project ENSEMBLES (Project No GOCE-CT-2003-505539).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Swingedouw.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Swingedouw, D., Braconnot, P., Delecluse, P. et al. Quantifying the AMOC feedbacks during a 2×CO2 stabilization experiment with land-ice melting. Clim Dyn 29, 521–534 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-007-0250-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-007-0250-0

Keywords

Navigation