Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of resolving the diurnal cycle in an ocean–atmosphere GCM. Part 1: a diurnally forced OGCM

  • Published:
Climate Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The diurnal cycle is a fundamental time scale in the climate system, at which the upper ocean and atmosphere are routinely observed to vary. Current climate models, however, are not configured to resolve the diurnal cycle in the upper ocean or the interaction of the ocean and atmosphere on these time scales. This study examines the diurnal cycle of the tropical upper ocean and its climate impacts. In the present paper, the first of two, a high vertical resolution ocean general circulation model (OGCM), with modified physics, is developed which is able to resolve the diurnal cycle of sea surface temperature (SST) and current variability in the upper ocean. It is then validated against a satellite derived parameterization of diurnal SST variability and in-situ current observations. The model is then used to assess rectification of the intraseasonal SST response to the Madden–Julian oscillation (MJO) by the diurnal cycle of SST. Across the equatorial Indo-Pacific it is found that the diurnal cycle increases the intraseasonal SST response to the MJO by around 20%. In the Pacific, the diurnal cycle also modifies the exchange of momentum between equatorially divergent Ekman currents and the meridionally convergent geostrophic currents beneath, resulting in a 10% increase in the strength of the Ekman cells and equatorial upwelling. How the thermodynamic and dynamical impacts of the diurnal cycle effect the mean state, and variability, of the climate system cannot be fully investigated in the constrained design of ocean-only experiments presented here. The second part of this study, published separately, addresses the climate impacts of the diurnal cycle in the coupled system by coupling the OGCM developed here to an atmosphere general circulation model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson SP, Weller RA, Lukas RB (1996) Surface buoyancy forcing and the mixed layer of the western pacific warm pool: observations and 1D model results. J Clim 9:3056–3085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernie DJ, Woolnough SJ, Slingo JM, Guilyardi E (2005) Modelling diurnal and intraseasonal variability of the ocean mixed layer. J Clim 18(8):1190–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernie DJ, Woolnough SJ, Guilyardi E, Slingo JM, Madec G, Cole J (2007) Impact of resolving the diurnal cycle in an ocean–atmosphere GCM. Part 2: diurnally coupled CGCM. Clim Dyn (submitted)

  • Blade I, Hartmann DL (1993) Tropical intraseasonal oscillations in a simple model. J Atmos Sci 50:2922–2939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanke B, Delecluse P (1993) Variability of the tropical Atlantic ocean simulated by a general circulation model with two different mixed-layer physics. J Phys Oceanogr 23:1363–1388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briscoe MG, Weller RA (1984) Preliminary results from the long-term upper ocean study LOTUS. Dyn Atmos Oceans 8:243–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayson CA, Weitlich D (2007) Variability of tropical diurnal sea surface temperature. J Clim 20:334–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman VW (1905) On the effect of the earths rotation on ocean currents. Ark Mat Astron Fys 2(11):1–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaspar P, Grégoris Y, Lefevre JM (1990) A simple Eddy kinetic energy model for simulations of the oceanic vertical mixing: tests at station papa and long-term upper ocean study site. J Geophys Res 95(C5):16179–16193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentemann CL, Donlon CJ, Stuart-Menteth A, Wentz FJ (2003) Diurnal signals in satellite sea surface temperature measurments. Geophys Res Lett 30(3):1140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inness PM, Slingo JM (2003) Simulation of Madden–Julian oscillation in a coupled general circulation model. Part 1: comparison with observations and an atmosphere-only GCM. J Clim 16:345–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inness PM, Slingo JM, Guilyardi E, Cole J (2003) Simulation of Madden–Julian oscillation in a coupled general circulation model. Part 2: the role of the basic state. J Clim 16:365–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jerlov NG (1976) Marine optics. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RH., Rickenbach TM, Rutledge SA, Ciesielski PE, Schubert WH (1999) Trimodal characteristics of troical convection. J Clim 12:2397–2418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawai Y, Kawamura H (2002) Evaluation of the diurnal warming of sea surface temperature using satellite derived marine meteorological data. J Oceanogr 58:805–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawai Y, Kawamura H (2003) Validation of daily amplitude of sea surface temperature evaluated with a parametric model using satellite data. J Oceanogr 59:637–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilpatrick KA, Podesta GP, Evans R.(2001) Overview of the NOAA/NASA advanced very high resolution radiometer Pathfinder algorithm for sea surface temperature and associated matchup database. J Geophys Res106(C5):9179–9198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Large WG, McWilliams JC, Doney SC (1994) Oceanic vertical mixing: a review and a model with a non-local boundry layer parameterization. Rev Geophys 32:363–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy M, Estublier A, Madec G (2001) Choice of an advection scheme for biogeochemical models. Geophys Res Lett 28(19):3725–3728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madec G, Delecluse P, Crepon M, Chartier M (1991) A three-dimensional numerical study of deep-water formation in the northwestern Mediterranean sea. J Phys Oceanogr 21(9):1349–1371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madec G, Delecluse P, Imbard M, Lévy C (1998) OPA 8.1 ocean general circulation model reference manual. Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace (IPSL), Paris, No. 11

  • Mellor G, Blumberg A (2004) Wave breaking and ocean surface layer thermal response. J Phys Oceanogr 34:693–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellor GL, Yamada T (1974) A hierarchy of turbulence closure models for planetary boundary layers. J Atmos Sci 31(1482):1791–1806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellor GL, Yamada, T (1982) Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems. Rev Geophys Space Phys 20:851–875

    Google Scholar 

  • Morel A, Antoine D (1994) Heating rate within the upper ocean in relation to its bio optical state. J Phys Oceanogr 24(7):1652–1665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price JF, Sundermeyer MA (1999) Stratified Ekman layers. J Geophys Res 104(C9):20467–20494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price JF, Weller RA, Pinkel (1986) Diurnal cycling: observations and models of the upper ocean response to diurnal heating, cooling, and wind mixing. J Geophys Res 91(C7):8411–8427

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajendran K, Kitoh A (2006) Modulation of tropical intraseasonal oscillations by ocean–atmosphere coupling. J Clim 19:366–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds R, Rayner N, Smith T, Stokes D, Wang W (2002) An improved in-situ and satellite SST analysis for climate. J Clim 15(30):1609–1625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roullet G, Madec G (2000) Salt conservation, free surface, and varying levels: a new formulation for ocean general circulation models. J Geophys Res 105(C10):23927–23942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons AJ, Gibson JK (2000) The ERA-40 project plan. ERA-40 project rep. European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forcasting, UK

  • Slingo JM, Inness P, Neale R, Woolnough S, Yang G-Y (2003) Scale interactions on diurnal to seasonal timescales and their relevance to model systematic errors. Ann Geophys 46(1):139–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Stommel H, Saunders W, Simmons W, Cooper J (1969) Observations of the diurnal thermocline. Deep Sea Res 16

  • Stuart-Menteth AC, Robinson IS, Challenor PG (2003) A global study of diurnal warming using satellite-derived sea surface temperature. J Geophys Res 108(C5):3155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward B (2006) Near-surface ocean temperature. J Geophys Res 111(C5):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster PJ, Lukas R (1992) TOGA COARE: the coupled ocean–atmosphere response experiment. Bull Am Meteor Soc 73(9):1377–1416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster PJ, Clayson CA, Curry JA (1996) Clouds, radiation, and the diurnal cycle of sea surface temperature in the tropical western Pacific. J Clim 9:1712–1730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wentz FJ, Gentemann CL, Smith DK, Chelton DB (2000) Satellite measurements of sea-surface temperature through clouds. Science 288(5467):847–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wijffels S, Firing E, Bryden H (1994) Direct Observations of the Ekman balence at 10N in the Pacific. J Phys Oceanogr 24:1666–1679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolnough SJ, Vitart F, Balmaseda MA (2007) The role of the ocean in the Madden-Julian Oscillation: implications for MJO prediction. Q J R Meteorol Soc 133:117–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Dong M, Gualdi S, Hendon H, Maloney ED, Marshall A, Sperber K, Wang W (2006) Simulations of the Madden-Julian Oscillation in four pair of coupled and uncoupled global models. Clim Dyn 27(6):573–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for helpful discussions with Rowan Sutton and Pascale Delecluse as well as technical support from Jeff Cole D. Bernie and S. Woolnough were supported by NERC through grant NER/A/S/2000/1283. D. Bernie and G. Madec also acknowledge the support of the EU FP6 MERSEA project for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. J. Bernie.

Appendices

Appendix A: Creation of diurnal forcing data

1.1 Reconstruction of diurnal cycle of short wave fluxes

(The IDL code for the following reconstruction of the diurnal cycle of SWF is available from the author on request.)

Daily mean data contains no information about the diurnal cycle of atmospheric convection or cloud cover. Consequently the reconstructed diurnal cycle of SWF is assumed to be simply be a scaling of the idealized top of atmosphere (TOA) incident SWF. If f is the function of the TOA SWF and t is time of day the basic assumption made can be expressed as:

$${{\rm SWR}_{{\rm rec}} {\left(t \right)} = S^{*} f{\left(t \right)}}$$
(2)

where SWFrec (t ) is reconstructed diurnal cycle of SWF and S * is scaling factor. The value of S * must be such that:

$${S^{*} {\int\limits_{\rm dawn}^{\rm dusk} {f{\left(t \right)}{\rm d}t =\overline{{\rm SWF}} _{{\rm obs}} {\rm nspd}}}}$$
(3)

where an over-bar represents a daily mean and nspd = 86,400 is the number of seconds per day. Reconstruction of the diurnal cycle of SWF (SWFrec (t )) will therefore require the determination of f(t), its analytical integral and the limits of this integral so that S * can be found by solving Eq. 3. A discrete version of Eq. 2 will then be used to reconstruct the diurnal cycle.

1.2 Diurnal cycle of top of atmosphere short wave fluxes

From some simple geometry the diurnal cycle of the top of atmosphere SWF can be derived as:

$${f{\left({\phi, \theta, \delta, {\rm dss},t} \right)} = S_{0} {\left[{\sin {\left(\phi \right)} \sin {\left({\delta {\left({\rm dss}\right)}} \right)} + \cos {\left(\phi \right)} \cos {\left({\delta{\left({\rm dss} \right)}} \right)} \cos {\left({H_{A}{\left({t,\theta} \right)}} \right)}} \right]}}$$
(4)

where ϕ is latitude, θ longitude, δ declination of the earths orbit which is a function of dss the number of days since the winter solstice (21st December), S 0 TOA solar constant and H A , the “hour angle”, is the angle due to the daily rotation of the earth. Here ϕ, θ, δ and H A are all expressed in radians and that t refers to the time of day, in units of days, in the reference frame of the ERA-40 reanalysis (i.e., UTZ) and so will range from 0 to 1. Consequently:

$${H_{A} = {\left({\theta + 2\pi t - \pi} \right)}}$$
(5)

and

$${\delta = {\left[{{\left({\frac{{- 23.5}}{{360}} 2\pi} \right)} \cos {\left({\frac{{\rm dss}}{{\rm dpy}} 2\pi} \right)}} \right]}}$$
(6)

where dpy is number of days per year. The values in round brackets are to convert declination into radians and express the time of year as a fraction from 0 to 1.

Combining Eqs. 4, 5 and 6 gives a description of the diurnal cycle of the TOA SWF which depends upon longitude, latitude, time of day and time of year. However, this formulation will also produce negative values and so, as will be seen subsequently, care must be taken only to evaluate positive parts of f(t) especially when considering its integral.

1.3 Analytical form and limits of integrated diurnal cycle of short wave fluxes

The integral of f(t) is required to solve Eq. 3. Making the assumption that the declination (δ) is constant over any single (i.e., dss is constant) day and rewriting Eq. 3 for a single day as:

$${f{\left({\phi, \theta, t} \right)} = {\left({A + B \cos{\left({C + D\,t} \right)}} \right)}}$$
(7)

where

$${\begin{aligned} A &= \sin {\left(\phi \right)} \sin{\left(\delta \right)} \\ B &= \cos {\left(\phi \right)} \cos{\left(\delta \right)} \\ C &= {\left({\theta - \pi} \right)} \\ D & =2\pi \\ \end{aligned}}$$
(8)

has the advantage that Eq. 7 can be integrated analytically to give:

$${{\int\limits_{\rm dawn}^{\rm dusk} {f{\left({\phi, \theta, t} \right)}\partial t ={\left[{A\,t + \frac{{B \sin {\left({C + D\,t} \right)}}}{D}}\right]}}}^{{\rm dusk}}_{{\rm dawn}}}.$$
(9)

All that now remains is to determine the limits of Eq. 9 such that Eq. 3 can be solved to find S *. By solving Eq. 7 for f(t) = 0

$${\frac{{\cos ^{{- 1}} (\tfrac{{- A}}/{B}) - C}}{D} = t_{x}}$$
(10)

the solution, t x , gives a time which the SWF will be zero i.e., either dawn or dusk. To determine which of these t x represents the differential (Eq. 7) with respect to t is taken at t = t x . A positive result indicating that t x  = dawn:

$${\begin{aligned} - B\,D \sin {\left({C + D\,t_{x}} \right)} > 0& \Rightarrow \quad {{t_{x} = {\rm dawn}}} \\ - B\, D\, \sin {\left({C +D\,t_{x}} \right)} < 0 &\Rightarrow \quad {{t_{x} = {\rm dusk}}} \\\end{aligned}}.$$
(11)

Now that either dawn or dusk has been found, the other limit can easily be found as the previous assumption that δ is constant over the course of a day produces a diurnal cycle which is symmetrical in time around midday (t md). Therefore the difference in time between midday and either dawn or dusk allows one to easily find the other limit for Eq. 9 as t md is solely a function of longitude:

$${t_{{\rm md}} = 0.5 - \frac{\theta}{2}}.$$
(12)

However Eq. 10 only has a solution when there is a distinct day and night, so at high latitudes where there is either 24 h of day or night then |A| > |B| and Eq. 10 has no solution. If this is the case, then A < B implies 24 h of night and so the integral in Eq. 8 is zero. Conversely A > B implies a 24 h day and Eq. 8 should be integrated over the entire day by using the upper and lower limits of 1 and 0, respectively, in Eq. 9.

By using Eqs. 7, 8a–d, 9, 10,11a, b and 12 the limits of Eq. 9 can thus be found and this integral substituted into Eq. 3 to solve for S *.

1.4 Reconstruction of discrete diurnal cycle

Analytically, having solved Eq. 3 for S * the solution of Eq. 2 with Eq. 7 is trivial. However, to conserve \({\overline{{\rm SWF}} _{{\rm obs}}}\) in a reconstructed diurnal cycle over nts discrete steps requires that:

$${S^{*} {\int\limits_{\rm dawn}^{\rm dusk} {f{\left(t \right)}\partial t =S^{*}}} {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{\rm nts} {{\left({{\int\limits_{t_{i} -\raise 0.5ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle {\Delta t}$}\kern-0.1em/\kern-0.15em\lower0.25ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle 2$}}^{t_{i}+ \raise0.5ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle {\Delta t}$}\kern-0.1em/\kern-0.15em\lower0.25ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle 2$}}{f{\left(t \right)}\partial t}}} \right)}}} = \overline{{\rm SWF}} _{{\rm obs}} {\rm nspd}}.$$
(13)

However at each time, t i , Eq. 13 is not necessarily true as:

$${f{\left({t_{i}} \right)} \Delta t \ne {\int\limits_{t_{i} -\raise0.5ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle {\Delta t}$}\kern-0.1em/\kern-0.15em\lower0.25ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle 2$}}^{t_{i}+ \raise0.5ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle {\Delta t}$}\kern-0.1em/\kern-0.15em\lower0.25ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle 2$}}{f{\left(t \right)}}}\partial t}$$
(14)

where nts is required number of time steps per day, Δt length of the time step and t i time at the centre of each time step. Figure 10 shows graphically the significance of Eq. 14: the value of the analytical solution at t = t i (red squares) is not the same as the mean value of the analytic solution over a time step (black line). Consequently, the discrete solution for the reconstructed diurnal cycle should be calculated as

$${\rm SWF_{{\rm rec}} {\left({t_{i}} \right)} = \frac{{S^{*} {\int\limits_{t_{i}- \raise0.5ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle {\Delta t}$}\kern-0.1em/\kern-0.15em\lower0.25ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle 2$}}^{t_{i}+ \raise0.5ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle {\Delta t}$}\kern-0.1em/\kern-0.15em\lower0.25ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle 2$}}{f{\left(t \right)}\partial t}}}}{{\Delta t}}}.$$
(15)

(Note that care should be taken not to integrate over any period where f(t) < 0). Using Eq. 15 rather than Eq. 2 will ensure that the following is satisfied and the reconstruction of the diurnal cycle conserves the total flux.

$${\frac{{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{\rm nts} {\rm SWF_{{\rm rec}} {\left({t_{i}}\right)}}}}}{{\rm nts}} = \overline{{\rm SWF}} _{{\rm rec}} = \overline{{\rm SWF}}_{{\rm obs}}}.$$
(16)
Fig. 10
figure 10

Schematic to show graphically the implication of Eqs. 13 and 14; the mean value of the discrete solution is not the same as the analytic solution

Appendix B: List of acronyms

AGCM:

Atmospheric general circulation model

B05:

Bernie et al. 2005

CGCM:

Coupled general circulation model

Dsst:

Diurnal variability of SST

ERA-40:

ECMWF re-analysis

FHDC:

Forced OGCM experiments with high vertical resolution and a diurnal cycle of fluxes

FHDM:

Forced OGCM experiments with high vertical resolution and daily mean fluxes

GCM:

General circulation model

GM04:

Gentemann et al. 2003

HRES:

High vertical Resolution

IMET:

Improved meteorological instrumenT

KPP:

K-profile parameterisation [a first order turbulence closure vertical mixing scheme (Large et al. 1994)]

LOCEAN:

Laboratoire d’Océanographie et de Climatologie par l’Expérimentation et l’Analyse Numérique (formerly LODYC)

LODYC:

Laboratoire d’Océanographie Dynamique et de Climatologie

LOTUS:

Long-term upper ocean study

MB04:

Mellor and Blumberg 2004

MJO:

Madden–Julian oscillation

OGCM:

Ocean general circulation model

ORCA2:

Two degree configuration of the OPA OGCM

OPA:

“Océan Parallélisé”. Ocean model developed at (LODYC) in Paris (Madec et al. 1998)

PF:

PathFinder

PS99:

Price and Sundermeyer 1999

SST:

Sea surface temperature

SWF:

Short wave flux

TKE:

Turbulent kinetic energy [a prognostic kurbulent kinetic energy vertical mixing scheme (Gaspar et al. 1990)]

TOA:

Top of atmosphere

TOGA-COARE:

Tropical ocean–global atmosphere-coupled ocean atmosphere response experiment

TRMM:

Tropical rainfall measurment mission

TVD:

Total variance dissipation

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bernie, D.J., Guilyardi, E., Madec, G. et al. Impact of resolving the diurnal cycle in an ocean–atmosphere GCM. Part 1: a diurnally forced OGCM. Clim Dyn 29, 575–590 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-007-0249-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-007-0249-6

Keywords

Navigation