Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Improving a subgrid runoff parameterization scheme for climate models by the use of high resolution data derived from satellite observations

  • Published:
Climate Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study it is shown that the availability of a very high resolution dataset of land surface characteristics leads to the improvement of a surface runoff parameterization scheme. The improved parameterization scheme was developed for application in global and regional climate models and is a further development of the Arno scheme that is widely used in climate models. Here, surface runoff is computed as infiltration excess from a "bucket" type reservoir which takes the subgrid variability of soil saturation within a model gridbox into account. Instead of prescribing a distribution of subgrid scale soil water capacities as in the original Arno scheme, the array of high resolution soil water capacities taken from a global 1 km dataset of land surface parameters is used to obtain individual fractional saturation curves for each model gridbox. From each saturation curve, the three parameters (a shape parameter describing the shape of the subgrid distribution of soil water capacities, subgrid minimum and maximum soil water capacity) required in the modified formulation of the scheme are derived via optimization. As in the original Arno scheme applied in the ECHAM general circulation model and the REMO regional climate model, topography variations will influence the distribution of saturated subgrid areas within a model gridbox. At most gridboxes the net effect of these changes is such that more runoff is produced for high soil water contents and less runoff for low soil water contents. A validation of simulated discharge computed with a simplified land surface scheme applied to reanalysis data of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts and a hydrological discharge model has shown that these changes lead to a more realistic simulation of the annual cycle of discharge for several catchments. In particular this could be shown for the Yangtze Kiang and Amur catchments where adequate input data are available.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11.
Fig. 12.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bauer H, Heise E, Pfaendtner J, Renner V, Schmidt P (1983) Entwicklung und Erprobung eines ökonomischen Erdbodenmodells zur Vorhersage von Oberflächenparametern im Rahmen eines Klimamodells. Final report for contract CLI-001-80-D (B), DWD, Offenbach, Germany

  • Bergström S (1992) The HBV model – its structure and applications. Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Rep 4, Norrköping, Sweden

  • Beven K, Kirkby MJ (1979) A physically based variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrol Sci Bull 24: 43–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliss NB, Olsen LM (1996) Development of a 30-arc-second digital elevation model of South America. In: Pecora Thirteen, human interactions with the environment – perspectives from space. Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA, August 20–22

  • Chebotarev AI (1977) Compendium of meteorology v II: Part 1 – general hydrology. World Meteorological Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland, No. 364, p 23

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen JH, Christensen OB, Lopez P, van Meijgaard E, Botzet M (1996) The HIRHAM 4 regional atmospheric climate model. Danish Meteorological Institute, Sci Rep 96-4, Copenhagen, Denmark

  • Christensen JH, Christensen OB, Schulz J-P, Hagemann S, Botzet M (2001) High resolution physiographic data set for HIRHAM 4: an application to 50 km horizontal resolution domain covering Europe. Danish Meteorological Institute, Tech Rep 01-15 4, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  • Cogley JG (1987, 1991, 1994) GGHYDRO – Global hydrographic data, release 2.1. Department of Geography, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada

  • Cox PM, Betts RA, Jones CD, Spall SA, Totterdell IJ (2000) Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model. Nature 408: 184–187

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ducharne A, Laval K, Polcher J (1998) Sensitivity of the hydrological cycle to the parametrization of soil hydrology in a GCM. Clim Dyn 14: 307–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dümenil L, Todini E (1992) A rainfall-runoff scheme for use in the Hamburg climate model. In: Kane JP (ed) Advances in theoretical hydrology – a tribute to James Dooge. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 129–157

  • Dümenil Gates L, Hagemann S, Golz C (2000) Observed historical discharge data from major rivers for climate model validation. Max-Planck-Institute for Meteorology Rep 307, Hamburg, Germany

  • Dunne KA, Wilmott CJ (1996) Global distribution of plant-extractable water capacity of soil. Int J Climatol 16: 841–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eidenshink JC, Faundeen JL (1994) The 1 km AVHRR global land data set: first stages in implementation. Int J Remote Sens 15: 3443–3462

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedlingstein P, Bopp L, Ciais P, Dufresne J-L, Fairhead L, LeTreut H, Monfray P, Orr J (2001) Positive feedback between future climate change and the carbon cycle. Geophys Res Lett 28: 1543–1546

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson JK, Kållberg P, Uppala S, Hernandez A, Nomura A, Serrano E (1997) Era description. ECMWF Re-Analysis Project Rep Ser 1, Reading, UK

  • Habets F, Saulnier G (2001) Subgrid runoff parameterization. Phys Chem Earth (B) 26: 455-459

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagemann S (2002) An improved land surface parameter dataset for global and regional climate models. Max-Planck-Institute for Meteorology Rep 336, Hamburg, Germany. (Report available electronically from: http://www.mpimet.mpg.de/en/web/science/a_reports.php)

  • Hagemann S, Dümenil L (1998) A parameterization of the lateral waterflow for the global scale. Clim Dyn 14: 17–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagemann S, Botzet M, Dümenil L, Machenhauer B (1999) Derivation of global GCM boundary conditions from 1 km land use satellite data. Max-Planck-Institute for Meteorology Rep 289, Hamburg, Germany. (Report available electronically from: http://www.mpimet.mpg.de/en/web/science/a_reports_archive.php?actual=1999)

  • Hagemann S, Dümenil Gates L (2001) Validation of the hydrological cycle of ECMWF and NCEP reanalyses using the MPI hydrological discharge model. J Geophys Res 106: 1503–1510

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagemann S, Botzet M, Dümenil Gates L, Machenhauer B (2000) Impact of new global land surface parameter fields on ECHAM T42 climate simulations. In: Ritchie H (ed) Research activities in atmospheric and oceanic modelling, Report 30 WMO/TD 987, WMO, Geneva, Switzerland

  • Hagemann S, Botzet M, Machenhauer B (2001) The summer drying problem over south-eastern Europe: sensitivity of the limited area model HIRHAM4 to improvements in physical parameterization and resolution. Phys Chem Earth (B) 26: 391–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob D (2001) A note to the simulation of the annual and inter-annual variability of the water budget over the Baltic Sea drainage basin. Meteorol Atmos Phys 77: 61–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleidon A, Heimann M (1998) A method of determining rooting depth from a terrestrial biosphere model and its impacts on the global water- and carbon cycle. Global Change Biol 4 (3): 275–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koster RD, Suarez M, Ducharne A, Stieglitz M, Kumar P (2000) A catchment-based approach to modeling land surface processes in a GCM – Part 1: model structure. J Geophys Res 105: 24,809–24,822

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang X (1994) A two-layer variable infiltration capacity land surface representation for general circulation models. Water Resources Series Tech Rep 140, Seattle, Washington

  • Lotsch A, Tian Y, Friedl MA, Myneni R.B (2003) Land cover mapping in support of LAI/FPAR retrievals from EOS-MODIS and MISR: classification methods and sensitivities to errors. Int J Remote Sens, (in press)

  • Loveland TR, Reed BC, Brown JF, Ohlen DO, Zhu J, Yang L, Merchant JW (2000) Development of a global land cover characteristics database and IGBP DISCover from 1-km AVHRR Data. Int J Remote Sens 21: 1303–1330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manabe S (1969) Climate and ocean circulation: I. The atmospheric circulation and the hydrology of the earth's surface. Mon Weather Rev 97: 739–774

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews E, Fung I (1987) Methane emissions from natural wetlands: global distribution, area and environmental characteristics of sources. Global Biogeochem Cycles 1: 61–86

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • New M, Hulme M, Jones P (2000) Representing twentieth-century space-time climate variability. Part II: development of 1901–96 monthly grids of terrestrial surface climate. J Clim 13: 2217–2238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson JS (1994a) Global ecosystem framework-definitions. USGS EROS Data Center Internal Report, Sioux Falls, SD, USA

  • Olson JS (1994b) Global ecosystem framework-translation strategy. USGS EROS Data Center Internal Report, Sioux Falls, SD, USA

  • Patterson KA (1990) Global distributions of total and total-available soil water-holding capacities. Master's thesis, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA

  • Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (1989) Numerical recipes (FORTRAN). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

  • Rechid D (2001) Untersuchung zur Parameterisierung von Landoberflächen im regionalen Klimamodell REMO. Diploma Thesis, Max-Planck-Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, and Geographisches Institut, Universität Hannover, Germany

  • Roeckner E, Arpe K, Bengtsson L, Brinkop S, Dümenil L, Esch M, Kirk E, Lunkeit F, Ponater M, Rockel B, Sausen R, Schlese U, Schubert S, Windelband M (1992) Simulation of the present-day climate with the ECHAM model: impact of model physics and resolution. Max-Planck-Institute for Meteorology Rep 93, Hamburg, Germany

  • Roeckner E, Arpe K, Bengtsson L, Christoph M, Claussen M, Dümenil L, Esch M, Giorgetta M, Schlese U, Schulzweida U (1996) The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM-4: model description and simulation of present-day climate. Max-Planck-Institute for Meteorology Rep 218, Hamburg, Germany

  • Rudolf B, Hauschild H, Rüth W, Schneider U (1996) Comparison of raingauge analyses, satellite-based precipitation estimates and forecast model results. Adv Space Res 7: 53–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ronda RJ, van den Hurk BJJM, Holtslag AAM (2000) Spatial heterogeneity of the soil moisture content and its impact on surface flux densities and near-surface meteorology. J Hydrometeorol 3: 556–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh VP (1988) Hydrologic systems vol 1, Rainfall-runoff-modeling. Prentice Hall, Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ, USA

  • Singh VP (1989) Hydrologic systems vol. 2, watershed modeling. Prentice Hall, Eagle wood Cliffs, NJ, USA

  • Stamm JF, Wood EF, Lettenmaier DP (1994) Sensitivity of a GCM simulation of global climate to the representation of land surface hydrology. J Clim 7: 1218–1239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warrilow DA, Sangster AB, Slingo A (1986) Modelling of land surface processes and their influence on European climate, Meteorological Office. Met O 20 Tech Note DCTN 38, Bracknell, UK

  • Wetzel PJ, Liang X, Irannejad P (1996) Modeling the vadose zone liquid water fluxes: infiltration, runoff, drainage, interflow. Global Planet Change 13: 57–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigmosta MS, Vail L, Lettenmaier DP (1994) A distributed hydrology-vegetation model for complex terrain. Water Resource Res 30: 1665–1679

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie P, Arkin P (1997) Global precipitation: a 17-year monthly analysis based on gauge observations, satellite estimates and numerical model outputs. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 78: 2539–2558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao RJ (1977) Flood forecasting method for humid regions of China. East China College of Hydraulic Engineering, Nanjing, China

Download references

Acknowledgements.

We would like to thank Daniela Jacob and Lennart Bengtsson who supported the task of improving the Arno scheme, and Beate Müller who programmed an earlier version of the Fortran source code of the improved Arno scheme. We appreciated the help of Sven Kotlarski with the visualization of the subgrid capacity distributions.

Author information

Author notes

  1. L. D. Gates

    Present address: Earth Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, Mailstop 90-1116, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA,

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Bundesstr. 55, 20146 Hamburg, Germany

    S. Hagemann & L. D. Gates

Authors
  1. S. Hagemann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. L. D. Gates
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Hagemann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hagemann, S., Gates, L.D. Improving a subgrid runoff parameterization scheme for climate models by the use of high resolution data derived from satellite observations. Climate Dynamics 21, 349–359 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-003-0349-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-003-0349-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation