Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Current and perturbed climate as simulated by the second-generation Canadian Regional Climate Model (CRCM-II) over northwestern North America

  • Published:
Climate Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An updated version of the Canadian Regional Climate Model (CRCM-II) has been used to perform time-slice simulations over northwestern North America, nested in the coupled Canadian General Circulation Model (CGCM2). Both driving and driven models are integrated in a scenario of transient greenhouse gases (GHG) and aerosols. The time slices span three decades that were chosen to correspond roughly to single, double and triple current GHG concentration levels. Several enhancements have been implemented in CRCM-II since the CRCM-I climate-change simulations reported upon earlier. The larger computational domain, extending further to the west, north and south, allows for a better spin-up of weather systems as they enter the regional domain. The increased length of the simulations, from 5 to 10 years, strengthens the statistical robustness of the results. The improvements to the physical parameterisation, notably the moist convection scheme and the diagnostic cloud formulation, cure the excessive cloud cover problem present in CRCM-I, reduce the warm surface bias and prevent the occurrence of grid-point precipitation storms that occurred with CRCM-I in summer. The dynamical ocean and sea-ice components of CGCM2 that is used to provide atmospheric lateral and surface boundary conditions to CRCM-II, as well as the use of transient rather than equilibrium conditions of GHG and the inclusion of direct aerosols forcing, in both CGCM2 and CRCM-II, increase the realism of the CRCM-II climate-change simulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11.
Fig. 12.
Fig. 13.
Fig. 14.
Fig. 15.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beniston M, Rebetez M (1996) Regional behavior of minimum temperatures in Switzerland for the period 1979–1993. Theor Appl Climatol 53: 231–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Biner S, Caya D, Laprise R, Spacek L (2000) Nesting of RCMs by imposing large scales. In: Richie H (ed) Res Act Atmos Oceanic Modelling, WMO/TD – 987, Rep 30: 7.3–7.4

  • Boer GJ, McFarlane NA, Lazare M (1992) Greenhouse Gas-induced climate change simulated with the CCC second-generation General Circulation Model. J Clim 5(10): 1045–1077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boer GJ, Flato G, Reader MC, Ramsden D (2000) A transient climate change simulation with greenhouse gas and aerosol forcing: experimental design and comparison with the instrumental record for the twentieth century. Clim Dyn 16: 405–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown RD, Braaten RO (1998) Spatial and temporal variability of Canadian monthly snow depths 1946–1995. Atmos-Ocean 36: 37–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown RD, Brasnett B, Robinson D (2003) Gridded North-American monthly snow depth and snow water equivalent for GCM evaluation. Atmos-Ocean 41(1) (in press)

  • Caya D, Laprise R (1999) A semi-implicit semi-Lagrangian regional climate model: the Canadian RCM. Mon Weather Rev 127: 341–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caya A, Laprise R, Zwack P (1998) On the effect of using process splitting for implementing physical forcings in a semi-implicit semi-Lagrangian model. Mon Weather Rev 126(6): 1707–1713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen OB, Christensen JH, Machenhauer B, Botzet M (1998) Very high-resolution regional climate simulations over Scandinavia – present climate. J Clim 11: 3204–3229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen JH, Raïsänen J, Iversen T, Bjorge D, Christensen OB, Rummukainen M (2001) A synthesis of regional climate change simulations – a Scandinavian perspective. Geophys Res Lett 28: 1003–1006

    Google Scholar 

  • Cogley JG (1998) GGHYDRO – Global Hydrographic Data, Release 2.2, Trent Climate Note 98-1, Department of Geography, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada

  • Davies HC (1976) A lateral boundary formulation for multi-level prediction models. Q J R Meteorol Soc 102: 405–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Déqué MP, Marquet P, Jones RG (1998) Simulation of climate change over Europe using a global variable resolution general circulation model. Clim Dyn 14: 173–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durman CF, Gregory JM, Hassel DC, Jones RG, Murphy JM (2001) A comparison of extreme European daily precipitation simulated by a global and a regional climate model for present and future climates. Q J R Meteorol Soc 127: 1005–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flato GM, Boer GJ (2001) Warming asymmetry in climate change simulations. Geophys Res Lett 28(1): 195–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Flato GM, Hibler WDIII (1992) Modeling pack ice as a cavitating fluid. J Phys Oceanogr 22: 626–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flato GM, Boer GJ, Lee WG, McFarlane NA, Ramsden D, Reader MC, Weaver AJ (2000) The Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis global coupled model and its climate. Clim Dyn 16: 451–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox-Rabinovitz MS, Takacs LL, Govindaraju RC, Suarez MJ (2001) A variable resolution stretched grid GCM: regional climate simulation. Mon Weather Rev 129(3): 453–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frigon A, Caya D, Slivitzky M, Tremblay D (2002) Investigation of the hydrologic cycle simulated by the Canadian Regional Climate Model over the Quebec/Labrador territory. In: Beniston M (ed) Climatic change: implications for the hydrological cycle and for water management. Advances in Global Change Research vol 10. Kluwer Academic Dordrecht, pp 31–55

  • Fyfe JC, Flato GM (1999) Enhanced climate change and its detection over the Rocky Mountains. J Clim 12(1): 230–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gent PR, McWilliams JC (1990) Isopycnal mixing in ocean circulation models. J Phys Oceanogr 20: 150–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giguère M, Laprise R, Caya D, Biner S (2000) An implicit scheme for the ground energy equation in the CRCM. In: Ritchie H (ed) Research Activities in Atmospheric and Oceanic Modelling, WMO/TD 987, Rep 30, February 2000, 4.13–4.14

  • Giorgi F, McDaniel L, Shields C (1995) Analysis of variability and diurnal range of daily temperature in a nested regional climate model: comparison with observations and doubled 2 ×CO2 results. Clim Dyn 11: 193–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi F, Hurrell JW, Marinucci MR (1997) Elevation dependency of the surface climate change signal: a model study. J Clim 10: 288–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi F, Mearns LO, Shields C, McDaniel L (1998) Regional nested model simulations of present day and 2 ×CO2 climate over the central plains of the USA. Clim Change 40: 457–493

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goyette S, McFarlane NA, Flato GM (2000) Application of the Canadian Regional Climate Model to the Laurentian Great Lakes Region: implementation of a lake model. Atmos-Ocean 38: 481–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Héreil P, Laprise R (1996) Sensitivity of internal gravity wave solutions to the timestep of a semi-implicit semi-Lagrangian non-hydrostatic model. Mon Weather Rev 124(4): 972–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (1995) Climate Change 1995. The Science of climate change. Contribution of Working Group I to the second assessment report of the IPCC. Houghton, Meira Filho, Callander, Harris Kattenberg, Maskell (eds), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 572 pp

  • Jacob D, Podzun R (1997) Sensitivity studies with the regional climate model REMO. Meteorol Atmos Phys 63: 119–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones RG, Reid PA (2001) Assessing future changes in extreme precipitation over Britain using regional climate model integrations. Int J Climatol 21: 1337–1356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones RG, Murphy JM, Noguer M, Keen AB (1997) Simulation of climate change over Europe using a nested regional-climate model. II: Comparison of driving and regional model responses to a doubling of carbon dioxide. Q J R Meteorol Soc 123: 265–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juang HM, Kanamitsu M (1994) The NMC nested regional spectral model. Mon Weather Rev 122: 3–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kain JS, Fritsch JM (1990) A one-dimensional entraining/detraining plume model and application in convective parameterization. J Atmos Sci 47: 2784–2802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karl TR, Jones PD, Knight RW, Kukla G, Plummer N, Razuvayev V, Gallo KP, Lindseay J, Charlson RJ, Peterson TC (1993) A new perspective on recent global warming – asymmetric trends of daily maximum and minimum temperature. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 74: 1007–1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langner J, Rodhe H (1991) A global three-dimensional model of the tropospheric sulphur cycle. J Atmos Chem 13: 225–263

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laprise R, Caya D, Bergeron G, Giguère M (1997) The formulation of André Robert MC2 (Mesoscale Compressible Community) model. In: Lin C, Laprise R, Ritchie H (eds) The André J. Robert Memorial Volume, companion volume to Atmos-Ocean 35(1): 195–220

  • Laprise R, Caya D, Giguère M, Bergeron G, Cote H, Blanchet J-P, Boer GJ, McFarlane NA (1998) Climate and climate change in western Canada as simulated by the Canadian Regional Climate Model. Atmos-Ocean 36(2): 119–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Machenhauer B, Windelband M, Botzet M, Hesselbjerg J, Déqué M, Jones GR, Ruti PM, Visconti G (1998) Validation and analysis of regional present-day climate and climate change simulations over Europe. Max-Planck Institute of Meteorology Hamburg, Report 275, pp 87

  • McFarlane NA, Boer GJ, Blanchet J-P, Lazare M (1992) The Canadian Climate Centre second generation general circulation model and its equilibrium climate. J Clim 5: 1013–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor JJ (1997) Regional climate modelling. Meteorol Atmos Phys 63: 105–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Mearns LO, Giorgi F, McDaniel C (1995) Analysis of daily variability of precipitation in a nested regional climate model: comparison with observations and double CO2 results. Glob Planet Change 10: 55–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell JFB, Johns TC, Gregory JM, Tell SFB (1995) Climate response to increasing levels of greenhouse gases and sulfate aerosols. Nature 376: 501–504

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • New M, Hulme M, Jones P (2000) Representing twentieth-century space-time climate variability. Part II: development of 1901–96 monthly grids of terrestrial surface climate. J Clim 13: 2217–2238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pacanowski RC, Dixon K, Rosati A (1993) The GFDL modular ocean model users guide. GFDL Ocean Group Tech Rep 2. Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, USA, pp 46

  • Pan Z, Christensen JH, Arritt RW, Gutowski WJ Jr, Takle ES, Otieno F (1999) Evaluation of uncertainties in regional climate change simulations. J Geophys Res 106(D16): 17,735–17,751

    Google Scholar 

  • Paquin D, Caya D (2000) New convection scheme in the Canadian Regional Climate Model. In: Ritchie H (ed) Research Activities in Atmospheric and Oceanic Modelling WMO/TD 987, Rep 30, 7.14–7.15

  • Peixoto JP, Oort AH (1992) Physics of climate. American Institute of Physics USA, pp 520

  • Reader CM, Boer GJ (1998) The modification of greenhouse gas warming by the direct effect of sulfate aerosols. Clim Dyn 14: 593–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rummukainen M, Raïsänen J, Bringfelt B, Ullerstig A, Omstedt A, Willén U, Hansson U, Jones C (2001) A regional climate model for northern Europe: model description and results from the downscaling of two GCM control simulations. Clim Dyn 17: 339–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturm M, Holmgren J, Liston GE (1995) A seasonal snow cover classification system for local to global applications. J Clim 8: 1261–1283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takle ES, Gutowski WJ Jr, Arritt RW, Pan Z, Anderson CJ, Silva R, Caya D, Chen SC, Christensen JH, Hong SY, Juang HMH, Katzfey JJ, Lapenta MW, Laprise R, Lopez P, McGregor J, Roads JO (1999) Project to intercompare regional climate simulations (PIRCS): description and initial results. J Geophys Res 104: 19,443–19,462

    Google Scholar 

  • Whetton PH, Katzfey JJ, Hennessy KJ, Wu X, McGregor JL, Nguyen K (2001) Developing scenarios of climate change for Southeastern Australia: an example using regional climate model output. Clim Res 6: 181–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Willmott CJ, Matsuura K (1995) Smart interpolation of annually averaged air temperature in the United States. J Appl Meteorol 34: 2577–2586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willmott CJ, Matsuura K (2000) Terrestrial air temperature and precipitation: monthly and annual time series (1950–1996), Version 1.0.1, released January 31, 2000. Data available through the University of Delaware, Center for Climatic Research Web site at http://www.climate.geog.udel.edu/∼climate

Download references

Acknowledgements.

The authors want to thank their colleagues of the Canadian Regional Climate Modelling group at UQÀM, Mr Michel Giguère, Ms Hélène Côté, Mr Sébastien Biner and Dr. Pascale Martineu, for their contributions that made it possible for us to complete this work. We also thank Claude Desrochers for maintaining a user-friendly local computing environment at the Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences of UQÀM. We would like to express our gratitude to the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia, for the use of their observation analyses; the CRU 0.5° latitude–longitude gridded monthly climate data was supplied by the Climate Impacts LINK Project (UK Department of the Environment Contract EPG 1/1/16) on behalf of the CRU. We also want to thank Mr Ross D. Brown of the Meteorological Service of Canada for providing us with the North American gridded snow data in a convenient format. The collaboration of the Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis (CCCma) in Victoria BC is warmly acknowledged. The availability of Drs Francis Zwiers, George J. Boer, Norman A. McFarlane and Gregory M. Flato for discussing modelling and diagnostics issues, was kindly appreciated. Without free access to CCCma's software, CGCM2-simulated data and allocation on the super-computing facility at the Centre d'Informatique de Dorval, this project would not have been possible. This research was financially supported by the Meteorological Service of Canada (MSC), through funding of the Canadian Climatic Research Network (CRN) operated by the Canadian Institute for Climate Studies (CICS), by the Canadian National Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC), through a Strategic Project grant, by the Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences (CFCAS), and by the Université du Québec à Montréal (UQÀM).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Laprise.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Laprise, R., Caya, D., Frigon, A. et al. Current and perturbed climate as simulated by the second-generation Canadian Regional Climate Model (CRCM-II) over northwestern North America. Climate Dynamics 21, 405–421 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-003-0342-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-003-0342-4

Keywords

Navigation