Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Long term outcome of Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy for the management of childhood spasticity—functional improvement and complications

  • Focus Session
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) for the management of lower extremity spasticity is a surgical technique that has existed since the 1900s. While much evidence supports its efficaciousness in reducing tone in the short term, limited information exists detailing the long-term outcome and evolution over time of patients undergoing SDR.

Methods

All publications with 10 years or more of outcome data on patients undergoing SDR were identified from Medline and Embase databases using the search term “Rhizotmy.” Only publications that were in English included patients with cerebral palsy under the age of 21 and discussed SDR for lower extremity spasticity were included. Case reports, reviews without primary data, or publications not accessible online were excluded from the review.

Results

A total of 2128 publications were initially identified, of which 19 papers describing 1054 patients fit inclusion and exclusion criteria. GMFCS in most patients improved or remained stable over time after surgery, although durability of improvement and final outcome was dependent on initial functional status. Tone was noted to also substantially improve although a small proportion required additional oral or injectable pharmacologic agents and an even smaller proportion required baclofen pumps. Upper extremity function was also noted to improve substantially after SDR. A significant number of patients were independent for activities of daily living and were engaged in secondary education or gainful employment. A significant proportion of patients still required orthopedic surgery to the lower extremities after SDR, although the incidence of spinal deformity was not observed to be substantially elevated over that of natural history.

Conclusion

SDR offers substantial improvements to a number of domains beyond pure tone reduction. These changes are durable over time, although patient selection is crucial in identifying those patients that will have the most benefit. Long-term follow-up is in important in this population given the potential need for further interventions that still exist in many patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ailon T, Beauchamp R, Miller S, Mortenson P, Kerr JM, Hengel AR, Steinbok P (2015) Long-term outcome after selective dorsal rhizotomy in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Childs Nerv Syst 31:415–423

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aisen ML, Kerkovich D, Mast J, Mulroy S, Wren TA, Kay RM, Rethlefsen SA (2011) Cerebral palsy: clinical care and neurological rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol 10:844–852

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. An KJ, Joung YS, Sung KW, Kim J-H (2013) Health-related quality of life and cognitive functioning at on- and off-treatment periods in children aged between 6-13 years old with brain tumors: a prospective longitudinal study. Yonsei Med J 54:306–314

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Aquilina K, Graham D, Wimalasundera N (2015) Selective dorsal rhizotomy: an old treatment re-emerging. Arch Dis Child 100:798–802

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bolster EAM, van Schie PEM, Becher JG, van Ouwerkerk WJR, Strijers RLM, Vermeulen RJ (2013) Long-term effect of selective dorsal rhizotomy on gross motor function in ambulant children with spastic bilateral cerebral palsy, compared with reference centiles. Dev Med Child Neurol 55:610–616

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Carpentieri SC, Meyer EA, Delaney BL, Victoria ML, Gannon BK, Doyle JM, Kieran MW (2003) Psychosocial and behavioral functioning among pediatric brain tumor survivors. J Neuro-Oncol 63:279–287

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chicoine MR, Park TS, Kaufman BA (1997) Selective dorsal rhizotomy and rates of orthopedic surgery in children with spastic cerebral palsy. J Neurosurg 86:34–39

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Crom DB, Li Z, Brinkman TM, Hudson MM, Armstrong GT, Neglia J, Ness KK (2014) Life satisfaction in adult survivors of childhood brain tumors. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs 31:317–326

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Daunter AK, Kratz AL, Hurvitz EA (2017) Long-term impact of childhood selective dorsal rhizotomy on pain, fatigue, and function: a case-control study. Dev Med Child Neurol 59:1089–1095

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Dudgeon BJ, Libby AK, McLaughlin JF, Hays RM, Bjornson KF, Roberts TS (1994) Prospective measurement of functional changes after selective dorsal rhizotomy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75:46–53

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dudley RW, Parolin M, Gagnon B, Saluja R, Yap R, Montpetit K, Ruck J, Poulin C, Cantin MA, Benaroch TE, Farmer JP (2013) Long-term functional benefits of selective dorsal rhizotomy for spastic cerebral palsy. J Neurosurg Pediatr 12:142–150

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gigante P, McDowell MM, Bruce SS, Chirelstein G, Chiriboga CA, Dutkowsky J, Fontana E, Hyman J, Kim H, Morgan D, Pearson TS, Roye BD, Roye DP, Ryan P, Vitale M, Anderson RCE (2013) Reduction in upper-extremity tone after lumbar selective dorsal rhizotomy in children with spastic cerebral palsy. J Neurosurg Pediatr 12:588–594

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gunn ME, Mört S, Arola M, Taskinen M, Riikonen P, Möttönen M, Lähteenmäki PM (2015) Quality of life and late-effects among childhood brain tumor survivors: a mixed method analysis. Psycho-oncology

  14. Gutknecht SM, Schwartz MH, Munger ME (2015) Ambulatory children with cerebral palsy do not exhibit unhealthy weight gain following selective dorsal rhizotomy. Dev Med Child Neurol 57:1070–1075

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hanna SE, Rosenbaum PL, Bartlett DJ, Palisano RJ, Walter SD, Avery L, Russell DJ (2009) Stability and decline in gross motor function among children and youth with cerebral palsy aged 2 to 21 years. Dev Med Child Neurol 51:295–302

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hicdonmez T, Steinbok P, Beauchamp R, Sawatzky B (2005) Hip joint subluxation after selective dorsal rhizotomy for spastic cerebral palsy. J Neurosurg 103:10–16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Houle AM, Vernet O, Jednak R, Pippi Salle JL, Farmer JP (1998) Bladder function before and after selective dorsal rhizotomy in children with cerebral palsy. J Urol 160:1088–1091

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hurvitz EA, Marciniak CM, Daunter AK, Haapala HJ, Stibb SM, McCormick SF, Muraszko KM, Gaebler-Spira D (2013) Functional outcomes of childhood dorsal rhizotomy in adults and adolescents with cerebral palsy. J Neurosurg Pediatr 11:380–388

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Josenby AL, Wagner P, Jarnlo GB, Westbom L, Nordmark E (2012) Motor function after selective dorsal rhizotomy: a 10-year practice-based follow-up study. Dev Med Child Neurol 54:429–435

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kuhlthau KA, Pulsifer MB, Yeap BY, Rivera Morales D, Delahaye J, Hill KS, Ebb D, Abrams AN, Macdonald SM, Tarbell NJ, Yock TI (2012) Prospective study of health-related quality of life for children with brain tumors treated with proton radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol 30:2079–2086

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Langerak NG, Lamberts RP, Fieggen AG, Peter JC, Peacock WJ, Vaughan CL (2007) Selective dorsal rhizotomy: long-term experience from Cape Town. Childs Nerv Syst 23:1003–1006

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Langerak NG, Lamberts RP, Fieggen AG, Peter JC, van der Merwe L, Peacock WJ, Vaughan CL (2008) A prospective gait analysis study in patients with diplegic cerebral palsy 20 years after selective dorsal rhizotomy. J Neurosurg Pediatr 1:180–186

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Langerak NG, Lamberts RP, Fieggen AG, Peter JC, Peacock WJ, Vaughan CL (2009) Functional status of patients with cerebral palsy according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health model: a 20-year follow-up study after selective dorsal rhizotomy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 90:994–1003

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Langerak NG, Hillier SL, Verkoeijen PP, Peter JC, Fieggen AG, Vaughan CL (2011) Level of activity and participation in adults with spastic diplegia 17-26 years after selective dorsal rhizotomy. J Rehabil Med 43:330–337

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Langerak NG, Tam N, Vaughan CL, Fieggen AG, Schwartz MH (2012) Gait status 17-26 years after selective dorsal rhizotomy. Gait Posture 35:244–249

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Loewen P, Steinbok P, Holsti L, MacKay M (1998) Upper extremity performance and self-care skill changes in children with spastic cerebral palsy following selective posterior rhizotomy. Pediatr Neurosurg 29:191–198

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lundkvist A, Hagglund G (2006) Orthopaedic surgery after selective dorsal rhizotomy. J Pediatr Orthop B 15:244–246

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. McFall J, Stewart C, Kidgell V, Postans N, Jarvis S, Freeman R, Roberts A (2015) Changes in gait which occur before and during the adolescent growth spurt in children treated by selective dorsal rhizotomy. Gait Posture 42:317–322

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mittal S, Farmer JP, Al-Atassi B, Gibis J, Kennedy E, Galli C, Courchesnes G, Poulin C, Cantin MA, Benaroch TE (2002) Long-term functional outcome after selective posterior rhizotomy. J Neurosurg 97:315–325

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mittal S, Farmer JP, Al-Atassi B, Montpetit K, Gervais N, Poulin C, Cantin MA, Benaroch TE (2002) Impact of selective posterior rhizotomy on fine motor skills. Long-term results using a validated evaluative measure. Pediatr Neurosurg 36:133–141

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nordmark E, Josenby AL, Lagergren J, Andersson G, Strömblad L-G, Westbom L (2008) Long-term outcomes five years after selective dorsal rhizotomy. BMC Pediatr 8:54

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Novacheck TF, Gage JR (2007) Orthopedic management of spasticity in cerebral palsy. Childs Nerv Syst 23:1015–1031

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. O'Brien DF, Park TS, Puglisi JA, Collins DR, Leuthardt EC, Leonard JR (2005) Orthopedic surgery after selective dorsal rhizotomy for spastic diplegia in relation to ambulatory status and age. J Neurosurg 103:5–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ou C, Kent S, Miller S, Steinbok P (2010) Selective dorsal rhizotomy in children: comparison of outcomes after single-level versus multi-level laminectomy technique. Can J Neurosci Nurs 32:17–24

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Oudenhoven LM, van der Krogt MM, Romei M, van Schie PEM, van de Pol LA, van Ouwerkerk WJR, Harlaar J, Buizer AI (2019) Factors associated with long-term improvement of gait after selective dorsal rhizotomy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 100:474–480

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Park TS, Johnston JM (2006) Surgical techniques of selective dorsal rhizotomy for spastic cerebral palsy. Technical note. Neurosurg Focus 21:e7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Park SK, Yang DJ, Heo JW, Kim JH, Park SH, Uhm YH (2016) Study on the quality of life of children with cerebral palsy. J Phys Ther Sci 28:3145–3148

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Park TS, Edwards C, Liu JL, Walter DM, Dobbs MB (2017) Beneficial effects of childhood selective dorsal rhizotomy in adulthood. Cureus 9:e1077

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Park TS, Liu JL, Edwards C, Walter DM, Dobbs MB (2017) Functional outcomes of childhood selective dorsal rhizotomy 20 to 28 years later. Cureus 9:e1256

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Peter JC, Hoffman EB, Arens LJ (1993) Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis after five-level lumbosacral laminectomy for selective posterior rhizotomy in cerebral palsy. Childs Nerv Syst 9:285–287 discussion 287-288

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Pidgeon TS, Ramirez JM, Schiller JR (2015) Orthopaedic management of spasticity. R I Med J (2013) 98: 26–31

  42. Reynolds MR, Ray WZ, Strom RG, Blackburn SL, Lee A, Park TS (2011) Clinical outcomes after selective dorsal rhizotomy in an adult population. World Neurosurg 75:138–144

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Romei M, Oudenhoven LM, van Schie PEM, van Ouwerkerk WJR, van der Krogt MM, Buizer AI (2018) Evolution of gait in adolescents and young adults with spastic diplegia after selective dorsal rhizotomy in childhood: a 10 year follow-up study. Gait Posture 64:108–113

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Rutz E, Brunner R (2013) Management of spinal deformity in cerebral palsy: conservative treatment. J Child Orthop 7:415–418

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Salame K, Ouaknine GE, Rochkind S, Constantini S, Razon N (2003) Surgical treatment of spasticity by selective posterior rhizotomy: 30 years experience. Isr Med Assoc J 5:543–546

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Silva S, Nowicki P, Caird MS, Hurvitz EA, Ayyangar RN, Farley FA, Vanderhave KL, Hensinger RN, Craig CL (2012) A comparison of hip dislocation rates and hip containment procedures after selective dorsal rhizotomy versus intrathecal baclofen pump insertion in nonambulatory cerebral palsy patients. J Pediatr Orthop 32:853–856

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Steinbok P (2001) Outcomes after selective dorsal rhizotomy for spastic cerebral palsy. Childs Nerv Syst 17:1–18

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Steinbok P, Schrag C (1998) Complications after selective posterior rhizotomy for spasticity in children with cerebral palsy. Pediatr Neurosurg 28:300–313

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Steinbok P, Langill L, Cochrane DD, Keyes R (1992) Observations on electrical stimulation of lumbosacral nerve roots in children with and without lower limb spasticity. Childs Nerv Syst 8:376–382

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Subramanian N, Vaughan CL, Peter JC, Arens LJ (1998) Gait before and 10 years after rhizotomy in children with cerebral palsy spasticity. J Neurosurg 88:1014–1019

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Tedroff K, Lowing K, Jacobson DN, Astrom E (2011) Does loss of spasticity matter? A 10-year follow-up after selective dorsal rhizotomy in cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 53:724–729

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Tedroff K, Lowing K, Astrom E (2015) A prospective cohort study investigating gross motor function, pain, and health-related quality of life 17 years after selective dorsal rhizotomy in cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 57:484–490

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. van Schie PE, Schothorst M, Dallmeijer AJ, Vermeulen RJ, van Ouwerkerk WJ, Strijers RL, Becher JG (2011) Short- and long-term effects of selective dorsal rhizotomy on gross motor function in ambulatory children with spastic diplegia. J Neurosurg Pediatr 7:557–562

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Westbom L, Lundkvist Josenby A, Wagner P, Nordmark E (2010) Growth in children with cerebral palsy during five years after selective dorsal rhizotomy: a practice-based study. BMC Neurol 10:57

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Wright FV, Sheil EM, Drake JM, Wedge JH, Naumann S (1998) Evaluation of selective dorsal rhizotomy for the reduction of spasticity in cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled tria. Dev Med Child Neurol 40:239–247

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albert Tu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no personal, financial, or institutional interest in any of the drugs, materials, or devices described in this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tu, A., Steinbok, P. Long term outcome of Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy for the management of childhood spasticity—functional improvement and complications. Childs Nerv Syst 36, 1985–1994 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-020-04747-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-020-04747-8

Keywords

Navigation