Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Valve exchange towards an adjustable differential pressure valve with gravitational unit, clinical outcome of a single-center study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Overdrainage in children is a long-term problem for shunted patients which might lead to chronic anatomical changes. In order to prevent these problems, valve exchange is performed on a regular basis in patients without hydrostatic units towards a valve with both an adjustable and a gravitational unit. The clinical outcome of these patients is reported in a retrospective study.

Methods

Between 2009 and 2014, the in-house database was analyzed for patients who received a valve exchange towards an adjustable differential pressure valve with gravitational unit. The study protocol included the patients shunt history, image analysis for ventricular width, and necessity of revision surgery after valve exchange. A questionnaire was sent to the patients in order to ask for their subjective experience for symptom changes and treatment experience.

Results

Forty-six patients were identified (26 girls, mean age 11.8 ± 6.1 years) with a mean follow-up of 36.3 ± 15 months. The ventricular width did increase after valve exchange as measured in frontal and occipital horn ratio (0.364 ± 0.032 vs. 0.402 ± 0.09, p = 0.0017). Of the patients suffering from acute symptoms, 89% improved after treatment. The shunt and valve survival rates were 88 and 95%, respectively, after 12 months. Comparing the total amount of revisions before and after valve exchange, a significant reduction was seen in total but a no significant difference was analyzed in amount of revisions to time ratio.

Conclusion

Valve exchange might be cautiously decided if patients seem to perform clinically well. In our study, we were able to show that the strategy of valve exchange to prevent chronic overdrainage is well tolerated and seem to improve patient’s clinical outcome in terms of ventricular width, symptom relieve, and revision rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Drake JM, Kestle JR, Tuli S (2000) CSF shunts 50 years on—past, present and future. Childs Nerv Syst 16:800–804

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Boockvar JA, Loudon W, Sutton LN (2001) Development of the Spitz-Holter valve in Philadelphia. J Neurosurg 95:145–147

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Browd SR, Gottfried ON, Ragel BT, Kestle JR (2006a) Failure of cerebrospinal fluid shunts: part II: overdrainage, loculation, and abdominal complications. Pediatr Neurol 34:171–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rekate HL (2008) Shunt-related headaches: the slit ventricle syndromes. Childs Nerv Syst 24:423–430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Freimann FB, Sprung C (2012) Shunting with gravitational valves—can adjustments end the era of revisions for overdrainage-related events?: clinical article. J Neurosurg 117:1197–1204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gruber RW, Roehrig B (2010) Prevention of ventricular catheter obstruction and slit ventricle syndrome by the prophylactic use of the Integra antisiphon device in shunt therapy for pediatric hypertensive hydrocephalus: a 25-year follow-up study. J Neurosurg Pediatr 5:4–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Faulhauer K, Schmitz P (1978) Overdrainage phenomena in shunt treated hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir 45:89–101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pudenz RH, Foltz EL (1991) Hydrocephalus: overdrainage by ventricular shunts. A review and recommendations. Surg Neurol 35:200–212

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Thomale UW, Gebert AF, Haberl H, Schulz M (2013a) Shunt survival rates by using the adjustable differential pressure valve combined with a gravitational unit (proGAV) in pediatric neurosurgery. Childs Nerv Syst 29:425–431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Browd SR, Ragel BT, Gottfried ON, Kestle JR (2006b) Failure of cerebrospinal fluid shunts: part I: obstruction and mechanical failure. Pediatr Neurol 34:83–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cinalli G, Sainte-Rose C, Kollar EM et al (1998) Hydrocephalus and craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg 88:209–214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gruber R, Jenny P, Herzog B (1984) Experiences with the anti-siphon device (ASD) in shunt therapy of pediatric hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 61:156–162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. O’Hayon BB, Drake JM, Ossip MG, Tuli S, Clarke M (1998) Frontal and occipital horn ratio: a linear estimate of ventricular size for multiple imaging modalities in pediatric hydrocephalus. Pediatr Neurosurg 29:245–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kulkarni AV, Drake JM, Armstrong DC, Dirks PB (1999) Measurement of ventricular size: reliability of the frontal and occipital horn ratio compared to subjective assessment. Pediatr Neurosurg 31:65–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jamous M, Sood S, Kumar R, Ham S (2003) Frontal and occipital horn width ratio for the evaluation of small and asymmetrical ventricles. Pediatr Neurosurg 39:17–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gebert AF, Schulz M, Haberl H, Thomale UW (2013) Adjustments in gravitational valves for the treatment of childhood hydrocephalus—a retrospective survey. Childs Nerv Syst 29:2019–2025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rohde V, Haberl EJ, Ludwig H, Thomale UW (2009) First experiences with an adjustable gravitational valve in childhood hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg Pediatr 3:90–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sprung C, Schlosser HG, Lemcke J et al (2010) The adjustable proGAV shunt: a prospective safety and reliability multicenter study. Neurosurgery 66:465–474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Toma AK, Tarnaris A, Grieve JP, Watkins LD, Kitchen ND (2010) Adjustable shunt valve-induced magnetic resonance imaging artifact: a comparative study. J Neurosurg 113:74–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tuli S, Drake J, Lawless J, Wigg M, Lamberti-Pasculli M (2000) Risk factors for repeated cerebrospinal shunt failures in pediatric patients with hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 92:31–38

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Thomale UW, Knitter T, Schaumann A et al (2013b) Smartphone-assisted guide for the placement of ventricular catheters. Childs Nerv Syst 29:131–139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Reinprecht A, Dietrich W, Bertalanffy A, Czech T (1997) The Medos Hakim programmable valve in the treatment of pediatric hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst 13:588–593 discussion 93-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zemack G, Bellner J, Siesjo P, Stromblad LG, Romner B (2003) Clinical experience with the use of a shunt with an adjustable valve in children with hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 98:471–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ahn ES, Bookland M, Carson BS, Weingart JD, Jallo GI (2007) The strata programmable valve for shunt-dependent hydrocephalus: the pediatric experience at a single institution. Childs Nerv Syst 23:297–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pediatric Neurosurgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany

    S. Alavi, M. Schulz, A. Schaumann, K. Schwarz & Ulrich W. Thomale

Authors
  1. S. Alavi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Schulz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Schaumann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. K. Schwarz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ulrich W. Thomale
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulrich W. Thomale.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

UWT received lecture honorarium from Aesculap and Miethke companies and has performed consultant activities for Miethke company.

AS received lecture honorarium from Aesculap. All other authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alavi, S., Schulz, M., Schaumann, A. et al. Valve exchange towards an adjustable differential pressure valve with gravitational unit, clinical outcome of a single-center study. Childs Nerv Syst 33, 759–765 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-017-3387-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-017-3387-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation