Abstract
Purpose
The anatomy of the pedicle is complex and three-dimensional; however, there are basic dimensions important for possible screw placement. There are relatively few studies examining the pedicle anatomy in children. This study was performed to evaluate the feasibility of pedicle screw placement in children aged 5–16, based on key anatomic dimensions. A case illustration is also provided.
Methods
The CT scans of 102 consecutive children were studied. Patients with abnormal anatomy were excluded. The parameters of the pedicle isthmus width (W), estimation of screw length (L), and axial angle (A) were recorded for 1,632 pedicles from T10 through L5. Patients were divided into four age groups. Statistical analysis was performed evaluating the difference between males and females and of the particular anatomy at the thoracolumbar junction.
Results
The pedicles increase in both L and W from T10–T12 and from L1–L5. L1 has a consistently smaller W compared to T12 in both genders over all age ranges. Estimating a W of 4.5 mm necessary for safe screw placement, we calculate that virtually all pedicles of T12 and L3–L5 are large enough for screw placement in both genders after age 8. L4 and L5 are large enough for screw placement in both genders in the youngest age range.
Conclusions
Most of the pedicles of the lower lumbar spine and T12 are large enough to house the smallest commercially available screw. Understanding of the anatomy at the thoracolumbar junction is important, as the W of L1 is consistently smaller than T12.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00381-012-1783-z/MediaObjects/381_2012_1783_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00381-012-1783-z/MediaObjects/381_2012_1783_Fig2_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00381-012-1783-z/MediaObjects/381_2012_1783_Fig3_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00381-012-1783-z/MediaObjects/381_2012_1783_Fig4_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00381-012-1783-z/MediaObjects/381_2012_1783_Fig5_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00381-012-1783-z/MediaObjects/381_2012_1783_Fig6_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00381-012-1783-z/MediaObjects/381_2012_1783_Fig7_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Banta CJ 2nd, King AG, Dabezies EJ, Liljeberg RL (1989) Measurement of effective pedicle diameter in the human spine. Orthopedics 12:939–942
Barr SJ, Schuette AM, Emans JB (1997) Lumbar pedicle screws versus hooks. Results in double major curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22:1369–1379
Belmont PJ Jr, Klemme WR, Dhawan A, Polly DW Jr (2001) In vivo accuracy of thoracic pedicle screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:2340–2346
Berry JL, Moran JM, Berg WS, Steffee AD (1987) A morphometric study of human lumbar and selected thoracic vertebrae. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 12:362–367
Brown CA, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Geideman WM, Hasan SA, Blanke K (1998) Complications of pediatric thoracolumbar and lumbar pedicle screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23:1566–1571
Cinotti G, Gumina S, Ripani M, Postacchini F (1999) Pedicle instrumentation in the thoracic spine. A morphometric and cadaveric study for placement of screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:114–119
Ebraheim NA, Rollins JR Jr, Xu R, Yeasting RA (1996) Projection of the lumbar pedicle and its morphometric analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21:1296–1300
Ebraheim NA, Xu R, Ahmad M, Yeasting RA (1997) Projection of the thoracic pedicle and its morphometric analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22:233–238
Faraj AA, Webb JK (1997) Early complications of spinal pedicle screw. Eur Spine J 6:324–326
Ferree BA (1992) Morphometric characteristics of pedicles of the immature spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 17:887–891
Hicks JM, Singla A, Shen FH, Arlet V (2010) Complications of pedicle screw fixation in scoliosis surgery: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:E465–E470
Hou S, Hu R, Shi Y (1993) Pedicle morphology of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine in a Chinese population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18:1850–1855
Kakkos SK, Shepard AD (2008) Delayed presentation of aortic injury by pedicle screws: report of two cases and review of the literature. J Vasc Surg 47:1074–1082
Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Cho SK, Bridwell KH, Sides B, Blanke K (2004) Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hook instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:2040–2048
Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Cheh G, Riew KD (2005) Evaluation of pedicle screw placement in the deformed spine using intraoperative plain radiographs: a comparison with computerized tomography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:2084–2088
Lehman RA Jr, Lenke LG, Keeler KA, Kim YJ, Cheh G (2007) Computed tomography evaluation of pedicle screws placed in the pediatric deformed spine over an 8-year period. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:2679–2684
Li B, Jiang B, Fu Z, Zhang D, Wang T (2004) Accurate determination of isthmus of lumbar pedicle: a morphometric study using reformatted computed tomographic images. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:2438–2444
Liljenqvist U, Hackenberg L, Link T, Halm H (2001) Pullout strength of pedicle screws versus pedicle and laminar hooks in the thoracic spine. Acta Orthop Belg 67:157–163
Misenhimer GR, Peek RD, Wiltse LL, Rothman SL, Widell EH Jr (1989) Anatomic analysis of pedicle cortical and cancellous diameter as related to screw size. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 14:367–372
Mulpuri K, Perdios A, Reilly CW (2007) Evidence-based medicine analysis of all pedicle screw constructs in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:S109–S114
O’Brien MF, Lenke LG, Mardjetko S, Lowe TG, Kong Y, Eck K, Smith D (2000) Pedicle morphology in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: is pedicle fixation an anatomically viable technique? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:2285–2293
Olsewski JM, Simmons EH, Kallen FC, Mendel FC, Severin CM, Berens DL (1990) Morphometry of the lumbar spine: anatomical perspectives related to transpedicular fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:541–549
Ranade A, Samdani AF, Williams R, Barne K, McGirt MJ, Ramos G, Betz RR (2009) Feasibility and accuracy of pedicle screws in children younger than eight years of age. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:2907–2911
Robertson PA, Stewart NR (2000) The radiologic anatomy of the lumbar and lumbosacral pedicles. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:709–715
Rose PS, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Mulconrey DS, Cronen GA, Buchowski JM, Schwend RM, Sides BA (2009) Pedicle screw instrumentation for adult idiopathic scoliosis: an improvement over hook/hybrid fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:852–857, discussion 858
Ruf M, Harms J (2002) Pedicle screws in 1- and 2-year-old children: technique, complications, and effect on further growth. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:E460–E466
Senaran H, Yazici M, Karcaaltincaba M, Alanay A, Acaroglu RE, Aksoy MC, Ariyurek M, Surat A (2002) Lumbar pedicle morphology in the immature spine: a three-dimensional study using spiral computed tomography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:2472–2476
Sokolic J, Sosa T, Ugljen R, Biocina B, Simunic S, Slobodnjak Z (1991) Extrinsic erosion of the descending aorta by a vertebral fixator. Tex Heart Inst J 18:136–139
Suk SI, Lee CK, Kim WJ, Chung YJ, Park YB (1995) Segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20:1399–1405
Vaccaro AR, Rizzolo SJ, Allardyce TJ, Ramsey M, Salvo J, Balderston RA, Cotler JM (1995) Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Part I: morphometric analysis of the thoracic vertebrae. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1193–1199
Vaccaro AR, Rizzolo SJ, Balderston RA, Allardyce TJ, Garfin SR, Dolinskas C, An HS (1995) Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Part II: an anatomical and radiographic assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1200–1206
Viswanathan A, Relyea K, Whitehead WE, Curry DJ, Luerssen TG, Jea A (2008) Pneumothorax complicating “in-out-in” thoracic pedicle screw placement for kyphotic deformity correction in a child. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2:379–384
Wegener B, Birkenmaier C, Fottner A, Jansson V, Durr HR (2008) Delayed perforation of the aorta by a thoracic pedicle screw. Eur Spine J 17(Suppl 2):S351–S354
Yilmaz G, Demirkiran G, Ozkan C, Daglioglu K, Pekmezci M, Alanay A, Yazici M (2009) The effect of dilation of immature pedicles on pullout strength of the screws: Part 2: in vivo study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:2378–2383
Zindrick MR, Wiltse LL, Doornik A, Widell EH, Knight GW, Patwardhan AG, Thomas JC, Rothman SL, Fields BT (1987) Analysis of the morphometric characteristics of the thoracic and lumbar pedicles. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 12:160–166
Zindrick MR, Knight GW, Sartori MJ, Carnevale TJ, Patwardhan AG, Lorenz MA (2000) Pedicle morphology of the immature thoracolumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:2726–2735
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shaikh, K.A., Bennett, G.M., White, I.K. et al. Computed-tomography-based anatomical study to assess feasibility of pedicle screw placement in the lumbar and lower thoracic pediatric spine. Childs Nerv Syst 28, 1743–1754 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-012-1783-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-012-1783-z