Abstract
Background
Neural tube defects (NTDs) can be divided into two main groups, one being open NTDs wherein visible neural tissue and cerebrospinal fluid leakage are present and the other, closed NTDs without exposed neural tissue and no drainage of CSF.
Methods
This communication is devoted to open NTDs that can be further subdivided into myelomeningoceles, myeloschisis, and hemimyelomeningoceles.
Results
Common to all these is the loss of CSF during fetal development that leads to an extensive malformation of the central nervous system with hydrocephalus being a frequent feature.
Conclusion
The only known difference between a newborn with myelomeningocele versus a newborn with myeloschisis is the initial presence (myelomeningocele) or absence (myeloschisis) of a cystic component with the overall clinical picture the same for these two forms of open neural tube defects.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
McLone DG, Knepper PA (1989) The cause of Chiari II malformation: a unified theory. Pediatr Neurosci 15:1–12
Dias MS, McLone DG (2008) Myelomeningocele. In: Albright AL, Pollack IF, Adelson PD (eds) Principles and Practice of Pediatric Neurosurgery. Thieme, New York, pp 341–342
Bowman RM, McLone DG (2010) Neurosurgical management of spina bifida: research issues. Dev Disabil Res Rev 16:82–87
McLone DG (1998) Care of the neonate with a myelomeningocele. Neurosurg Clin N Am 9:111–120
Tarcan T, Onol FF, Ilker Y, Alpay H, Simşek F, Ozek M (2006) The timing of primary neurosurgical repair significantly affects neurogenic bladder prognosis in children with myelomeningocele. J Urol 176:1161–1165
Miller PD, Pollack IF, Pang D, Albright AL (1996) Comparison of simultaneous versus delayed ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion in children undergoing myelomeningocele repair. J Child Neurol 11:370–372
Oktem IS, Menkü A, Ozdemir A (2008) When should ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement be performed in cases with myelomeningocele and hydrocephalus? Turk Neurosurg 18:387–391
Peach B (1965) Arnold–Chiari Malformation: Anatomic Features of 20 cases. Arch Neurol 12:613–621
Stevenson KL (2004) Chiari Type II malformation: past, present, and future. Neurosurg Focus 16:E5
Cinalli G, Sainte-Rose C, Chumas P, Zerah M, Brunelle F, Lot G, Pierre-Kahn A, Renier D (1999) Failure of third ventriculostomy in the treatment of aqueductal stenosis in children. J Neurosurg 90:448–454
Marlin AE (2004) Management of hydrocephalus in the patient with myelomeningocele: an argument against third ventriculostomy. Neurosurg Focus 16:E4
Adzick NS, Thom EA, Spong CY, Brock JW, Burrows PK, Johnson MP, Howell LJ, Farrell JA, Dabrowiak ME, Sutton LN, Gupta N, Tulipan NB, D'Alton ME, Farmer DL, Investigators M (2011) A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele. N Engl J Med 364:993–1004
Williams H (2011) Questioning the rationale and conduct of the management of myelomeningocele study. Med Hypotheses 77:101–105
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jeelani, Y., McComb, J.G. Congenital hydrocephalus associated with myeloschisis. Childs Nerv Syst 27, 1585–1588 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-011-1560-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-011-1560-4