Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Effectiveness of a limited invasive scalp approach in the correction of sagittal craniosynostosis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Several surgical techniques have been proposed for the correction of sagittal craniosynostosis. Extensive procedures seem to ensure the most stable long-term results and are more indicated in the older age group. Mini-invasive approaches are particularly useful in the very young infant as they are associated with a minor surgical risk. Furthermore, they are weighted by a minor cosmetic impact related to a less extended surgical scar.

Materials and methods

Data of the last 94 consecutively operated on scaphocephalic patients have been reviewed to verify the effectiveness of a personal limited-invasive approach based on four to six short linear scalp incisions vs the traditional bicoronal skin flap. The patients have been divided in two groups: (1) the control group (2000–2002): 45 children, operated on by means of a traditional bicoronal skin incision, and (2) the study group (2002–2004): 49 children, treated through four to six linear scalp incisions. The patients’ variables were comparable. The results were evaluated in terms of duration of the surgical procedure, estimated blood loss (EBL), transfusion risk, postoperative complication rate, length of hospital stay, and postoperative cephalic index and cosmetic outcome as perceived by the patients’ families.

Results

No significant differences between the two groups were found about the early and the long-term surgical results; however, about one third of the subjects of the control group complained about the visibility of the surgical scar. In the study group, a significant reduction in the duration of the operation (p < 0.0001), postoperative hospital stay (p < 0.0001), EBL (p = 0.011), transfusion risk (p = 0.018), and complication rate (p = 0.016) was observed.

Conclusion

The current trend in the management of scaphocephaly is to favor simplified surgical procedures to be performed in the younger ages prevalently. The technique here presented allows achieving a stable long-term cranial reshaping, even when performed in the very young patient. The technique can be utilized also in older subjects with results comparable to those of more extensive surgical procedures. This less invasive technique is weighted by minor complication rates and minor impact of the surgical scar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Albright AL (1985) Operative normalization of skull shape in sagittal synostosis. Neurosurgery 17:329–331

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Álvarez-Garijo JA, Cavadas PC, Vila MM, Álvarez-Llanas A (2001) Sagittal synostosis: results of surgical treatment in 210 patients. Child’s Nerv Syst 17:64–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Amm CA, Denny AD (2005) Correction of sagittal synostosis using foreshortening and lateral expansion of the cranium activated by gravity: surgical technique and postoperative evolution. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:723–735

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Barone CM, Jimenez DF (1999) Endoscopic craniectomy for early correction of craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:1965–1973

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Baumgartner JE, Teichgraeber JF, Waller AL, Grantcherova E, Gateno J, Xia JJ (2005) Microscopic approach to craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg 16:997–1005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Boop FA, Chadduck WM, Shewmake K, Teo C (1996) Outcome analysis of 85 patients undergoing the pi procedure for correction of sagittal synostosis. J Neurosurg 85:50–55

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Boop FA, Shewmake K, Chadduck WM (1996) Synostectomy versus complex cranioplasty for the treatment of sagittal synostosis. Child’s Nerv Syst 12:371–375

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cristophis P, Jünger TH, Howaldt H-P (2001) Surgical correction of scaphocephaly: experiences with a new procedure and follow-up investigations. J Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surg 29:33–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Di Rocco C, Tamburrini G, Massimi L, Caldarelli M (2003) Sagittal craniosynostosis: a new technique to reduce the impact of the surgical procedure. Chirurgia 16:143–146 (Italian)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Di Rocco C, Tamburrini G, Pietrini D (2004) Blood sparing in craniosynostosis surgery. Semin Pediatr Neurol 11:278–287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Di Rocco C (2003) How to decrease the impact of surgical scar in the correction of sagittal synostosis. Child’s Nerv Syst 19:42–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Farkas LG (ed) (1994) Anthropometry of the head and face. 2nd edn. Raven, New York, pp 3–56

  13. Fearon JA, McLaughlin EB, Rolar JC (2006) Sagittal craniosynostosis: surgical outcomes and long-term growth. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:532–541

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Friede H, Lauritzen C, Figueroa AA (1996) Roentgenencephalometric follow-up after early osteotomies in patients with scaphocephaly. J Craniophac Surg 7:96–101

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Greene CS Jr, Winston KR (1988) Treatment of scaphocephaly with sagittal craniectomy and biparietal morcellation. Neurosurgery 23:196–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hentschel S, Steinbok P, Cochrane DD, Kestle J (2002) Reduction of transfusion rates in the surgical correction of sagittal synostosis. J Neurosurg 97:503–509

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jane JA, Edgerton MT, Futrell JW, Park TS (1978) Immediate correction of sagittal synostosis. J Neurosurg 49:705–710

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jimenez D (2004) Endoscopy-assisted craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg (Pediatrics 5) 100:405–406

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jimenez DF, Barone CM, Cartwright CC, Baker L (2002) Early management of craniosynostosis using endoscopic-assisted strip craniectomies and cranial orthotic molding therapy. Pediatrics 110:97–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jimenez DF, Barone CM, McGee ME, Cartwright CC, Baker CL (2004) Endoscopy-assisted wide-vertex craniectomy, barrel stave osteotomies, and postoperative helmet molding therapy in the management of sagittal suture craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg (Pediatrics 5) 100:407–417

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kaiser G (1988) Sagittal synostosis—its clinical significance and the results of three different methods of craniectomy. Child’s Nerv Syst 4:223–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Komuro Y, Ynai A, Hayashi A, Nakanishi H, Miyajima M, Arai H (2005) Cranial reshaping employing distraction and contraction in the treatment of sagittal synostosis. Br J Plast Surg 58:196–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lajeunie E, Le Merrer M, Bonaiti-Pellie C, Marchac D, Renier D (1996) Genetic study of scaphocephaly. Am J Med Genet 62:282–285

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Longatti PL, Paccagnella F, Agostani S, Nieri A, Carteri A (1991) Autologous hemodonation in the corrective surgery of craniostenosis. Child’s Nerv Syst 7:40–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Marchac D, Renier D, Broumand S (1994) Timing of treatment for craniosynostosis and faciocraniosynostosis: a 20-year experience. Br J Plast Surg 40:211–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Marsh JL, Jenny A, Galic M, Picker S, Vannier MW (1991) Surgical management of sagittal synostosis. A quantitative evaluation of two techniques. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2:629–640

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. McCarthy JG, Glasberg SB, Cutting CB, Epstein FJ, Grayson BH, Ruff G, Thorne CH, Wisoff J, Zide BM (1995) Twenty-year experience with early surgery for craniosynostosis. I. Isolated craniofacial synostosis-results and unsolved problems. Plast Reconstr Surg 96:272–283

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Meneghini L, Zadra N, Aneloni V, Matrangolo S, Faggin R, Giusti F (2003) Erythropoietin therapy and acute preoperative normovolaemic haemodilution in infants undergoing craniosynostosis surgery. Paediatr Anaesth 13:392–396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Panchal J, Marsh J, Park TS, Kaufman B, Pilgram T, Huang SH (1999) Sagittal craniosynostosis outcome assessment for two methods and timings of intervention. Plast Reconstr Surg 103:1574–1584

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Persing J, Bahbler W, Winn HR, Jane J, Rodeheaver G (1981) Age as a critical factor in the success of surgical correction of scaphocephaly. J Neurosurg 54:601–606

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Persing J (2004) Endoscopy-assisted craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg (Pediatrics 5) 100:403–404

    Google Scholar 

  32. Renier D, Lajeunie E, Arnaud E, Marchac D (2000) Management of craniosynostoses. Child’s Nerv Syst 16:645–658

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ririe DG, David LR, Glazier SS, Smith TE, Argenta LC (2003) Surgical advancement influences perioperative care: a comparison of two surgical techniques for sagittal craniosynostosis repair. Anest Analg 97:699–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Shillito J Jr (1992) A plea for early operations for craniosynostosis. Surg Neurol 37:182–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sloan GM, Wells KC, Raffel C, McComb JG (1997) Surgical treatment of craniosynostosis: outcome analysis of 250 consecutive patients. Pediatrics 100:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Steinbok P, Heran N, Hickdonmez T, Cochrane DD, Price A (2004) Minimizing blood transfusions in the surgical correction of coronal and metopic craniosynostosis. Child’s Nerv Syst 20:445–452

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tullous MW, Henry MN, Wang PTH, Vollmer DG, Auber AE, Mancuso PA (2001) Multiple-revolution spiral osteotomy for cranial reconstruction. J Neurosurg 94:671–678

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Velardi F, Di Chirico A, Di Rocco C, Fundarò C, Genovese O, Rendeli C, Menichella G, Serafini R, Piastra M, Viola L, Pietrini D, Pusateri A, Stoppa F (1998) “No Allogenic Blood Transfusion” protocol for the surgical correction of craniosynostoses. II. Clinical application. Child’s Nerv Syst 14:732–739

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Velardi F, Di Chirico A, Di Rocco C, Fundarò C, Serafini R, Piastra M, Viola L, Pietrini D, Pusateri A, Stoppa F (1998) “No Allogenic Blood Transfusion” protocol for the surgical correction of craniosynostoses. I. Rationale. Child’s Nerv Syst 14:722–731

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Weinzweig J, Baker SR, Whitaker LA, Sutton LN, Barlett SP (2002) Delayed cranial vault reconstruction for sagittal synostosis in older children: an algorithm for tailoring the reconstructive approach to the craniofacial deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:397–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pediatrc Neurosurgery, Catholic University Medical School, Rome, Italy

    Luca Massimi, Gianpiero Tamburrini, Massimo Caldarelli & Concezio Di Rocco

  2. Institute of Neurosurgery, Catholic University Medical School, L.go A. Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy

    Luca Massimi

Authors
  1. Luca Massimi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gianpiero Tamburrini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Massimo Caldarelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Concezio Di Rocco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Massimi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Massimi, L., Tamburrini, G., Caldarelli, M. et al. Effectiveness of a limited invasive scalp approach in the correction of sagittal craniosynostosis. Childs Nerv Syst 23, 1389–1401 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-007-0472-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-007-0472-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation