Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is there an indication for ETV in young infants in aetiologies other than isolated aqueduct stenosis?

  • Focus Session
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The objective was to determine whether endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) has a role in the management of obstructive hydrocephalus in aetiologies other than idiopathic aqueduct stenosis (AS) in infants.

Materials and methods

In addition to reviewing the literature, we performed a retrospective analysis of our endoscopy database, which was established in 1998, and analysed the outcome results of all cases of ETV in those under 1 year of age which were performed between 1998 and 2003. We included cases of idiopathic AS in the outcome analysis as a benchmark of successful outcome. Successful outcome was assessed by resolution of the presenting clinical features and shunt freedom.

Results

Aetiologies that were identified included, in addition to idiopathic AS, suprasellar arachnoid cysts, AS in association with post-haemorrhagic hydrocephalus (PHH), post-infectious hydrocephalus (PIH), tumour-related hydrocephalus and a heterogenous group including Dandy–Walker malformation and other developmental anomalies. Suprasellar arachnoid cysts had a 100% outcome success. Idiopathic AS had a 50% outcome success and the successful outcome of PHH cases was poor at 18%. A statistical analysis revealed no effect of age at the time of ETV on the outcome in the aetiological groups.

Conclusions

The definitive initial neurosurgical management of suprasellar arachnoid cysts causing significant hydrocephalus is ETV, whereas that for PHH and PIH is probably that of a ventriculo-peritoneal shunt placement. We speculate that there may be a sub-group of AS cases, termed pure or idiopathic AS, which have a higher rate of successful outcome that may be durable from a younger age. The role of repeat ETV is controversial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boschert J, Hellwig D, Krauss JK (2003) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy for shunt dysfunction in occlusive hydrocephalus: long-term follow up and review. J Neurosurg 98:1032–1039

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Buxton N, Macarthur D, Mallucci C, Punt J, Vloeberghs M (1998) Neuroendoscopy in the premature population. Childs Nerv Syst 14:649–652

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Buxton N, Macarthur D, Mallucci C, Punt J, Vloeberghs M (1998) Neuroendoscopic third ventriculostomy in patients less than one year old. Pediatr Neurosurg 29:73–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cinalli G (1999) Alternatives to shunting. Childs Nerv Syst 15:718–731

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cinalli C, de Divitiis E, Maggi G (2004) The international study group on neuroendoscopy (ISGNE). Childs Nerv Syst 20:775–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Drake JM (1993) Ventriculostomy for treatment of hydrocephalus. Neurosurg Clin N Am 4:657–666

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Goumnerova LC, Frim DM (1997) Treatment of hydrocephalus with third ventriculocisternostomy: outcome and CSF flow patterns. Pediatr Neurosurg 27:149–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Griffith HB (1975) Technique of fontanelle and presutural ventriculoscopy and endoscopic ventricular surgery in infants. Childs Brain 1:359–363

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hellwig D, Grotenhuis JA, Tirakotai W, Riegel T, Schulte DM, Bauer BL, Bertalanffy H (2005) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy for obstructive hydrocephalus. Neurosurg Rev 28:1–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Iantosca MR, Hader WJ, Drake JM (2004) Results of endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Neurosurg Clin N Am 15:67–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Javadpour M, Mallucci C, Brodbelt A, Golash A, May P (2001) The impact of endoscopic third ventriculostomy on the management of newly diagnosed hydrocephalus in infants. Pediatr Neurosurg 35:131–135

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Javadpour M, Mallucci C (2004) The role of neuroendoscopy in the management of tectal gliomas. Childs Nerv Syst 20:852–857

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jones RF, Stening WA, Brydon M (1990) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Neurosurgery 26:86–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Koch D, Grunert P, Filippi R, Hopf N (2002) Re-ventriculostomy for treatment of obstructive hydrocephalus in cases of stoma dysfunction. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 45:158–163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Koch D, Wagner W (2004) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in infants less than 1 year of age: which factors influence the outcome? Childs Nerv Syst 20:405–411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lespinasse VL (1943) Davis neurological surgery, 2nd edn. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, p 442

    Google Scholar 

  17. O’Brien DF, Javadpour M, Collins DR, Spennato P, Mallucci CL (2005) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy: an outcome analysis of primary cases and procedures performed after ventriculo-peritoneal shunt malfunction. J Neurosurg 103(Suppl 5):393–400

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rekate HL (2004) Selecting patients for endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Neurosurg Clin N Am 15:39–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ruggiero C, Cinalli G, Spennao P, Aliberti F, Cianciulli C, Trischitta V, Maggi G (2004) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the treatment of hdrocephalus in posterior fossa tumours in children. Childs Nerv Syst 20:828–833

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sainte-Rose C, Chumas P (1996) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Tech Neurosurg 1:176–184

    Google Scholar 

  21. Siomin V, Weiner H, Wisoff J, Cinalli G, Pierre-Kahn A, Sainte-Rose A, Abbott R, Elran H, Beni-Adani L, Ouaknine G, Constantini S (2001) Repeat endoscopic third ventriculostomy: is it worth trying? Childs Nerv Syst 17:551–555

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Siomin V, Cinalli G, Grotenhuis A, Golash A, Oi S, Kothbauer K, Weiner H, Roth J, Beni-Adani L, Pierre-Kahn A, Takahashi Y, Mallucci C, Abbott R, Wisoff J, Constantini S (2002) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in patients with cerebrospinal fluid infection and/or hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 97:519–524

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Conor L. Mallucci.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O’Brien, D.F., Seghedoni, A., Collins, D.R. et al. Is there an indication for ETV in young infants in aetiologies other than isolated aqueduct stenosis?. Childs Nerv Syst 22, 1565–1572 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-006-0192-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-006-0192-6

Keywords

Navigation