Skip to main content
Log in

Monitoring motor function during resection of tumours in the lower brain stem and fourth ventricle

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Even in the days of modern microsurgery, the removal of a brain stem lesion remains a surgical challenge. Especially when operating on children, the prognosis is directly related to the radicality of the resection; however, a radical resection is often associated with surgical morbidity. Intraoperative neuromonitoring could help to minimise the surgical morbidity, but few studies have been performed to clarify the value of this monitoring. We investigated a prospective series of 21 patients with lesions involving the brain stem for the prognostic value and benefits of neuromonitoring.

Methods

We performed intraoperative neuromonitoring of cranial nerve function by electromyography (EMG) and motor evoked potential (MEP). The results were correlated with postoperative neurological deficits.

Conclusions

There is a good correlation between intraoperative neurophysiological events and postoperative neurological deficits in patients with lesions of the brain stem. In general, transient, prolonged, spontaneous activity in EMG is associated with a transient paresis of the respective muscle, whereas a permanent spontaneous activity is associated with a permanent deficit. Intraoperative neuromonitoring reliably predicts postoperative neurological function in patients with tumours of the lower brain stem and fourth ventricle. This neuromonitoring guides the neurosurgeon in the operation and may decrease surgical morbidity. We recommend using monitoring of MEP and EMG of the lower cranial nerves in surgery on all patients with lesions involving the lower brain stem and fourth ventricle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pollack IF, Gerszten PC, Martinez AJ, Lo KH, Shultz B, Albright AL, Janosky J, Deutsch M (1995) Intracranial ependymomas of childhood: long-term outcome and prognostic factors. Neurosurgery 37:655–666 (discussion 666–667)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lang J Jr, Ohmachi N, Lang J Sr (1991) Anatomical landmarks of the rhomboid fossa (floor of the 4th ventricle), its length and its width. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 113:84–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fahlbusch R, Strauss C (1991) Zur chirurgischen Bedeutung von cavernösen Hämangiomen des Hirnstammes. Zentralbl Neurochir 52:25–32

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Radtke RA, Erwin CW, Wilkins RH (1989) Intraoperative brainstem auditory evoked potentials: significant decrease in postoperative morbidity. Neurology 39:187–191

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Prass RL, Luders H (1986) Acoustic (loudspeaker) facial electromyographic monitoring: part 1. Evoked electromyographic activity during acoustic neuroma resection. Neurosurgery 19:392–400

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Prass RL, Kinney SE, Hardy RW Jr, Hahn JF, Luders H (1987) Acoustic (loudspeaker) facial EMG monitoring: II. Use of evoked EMG activity during acoustic neuroma resection. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 97:541–551

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sala F, Krzan MJ, Deletis V (2002) Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in pediatric neurosurgery: why, when, how? Childs Nerv Syst 18:264–287

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Moeller A (1995) Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring. Harwood, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  9. Deletis V, Shils J (2002) Neurophysiology in neurosurgery — a modern intraoperative approach. Academic, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  10. Legatt AD (2002) Mechanisms of intraoperative brainstem auditory evoked potential changes. J Clin Neurophysiol 19:396–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shchekut’ev GA, Lubnin A, Barkalaia DE, Sogomonian SA (1994) Monitoring of short latent evoked potentials during brain stem surgery. Anesteziol Reanimatol (5):48–52

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fahlbusch R, Strauss C, Huk W, Rockelein G, Kompf D, Ruprecht KW (1990) Surgical removal of pontomesencephalic cavernous hemangiomas. Neurosurgery 26:449–456 (discussion 456–457)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wiedemayer H, Fauser B, Sandalcioglu IE, Schafer H, Stolke D (2002) The impact of neurophysiological intraoperative monitoring on surgical decisions: a critical analysis of 423 cases. J Neurosurg 96:255–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Strauss C, Romstock J, Nimsky C, Fahlbusch R (1993) Intraoperative identification of motor areas of the rhomboid fossa using direct stimulation. J Neurosurg 79:393–399 (comment)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Morota N, Deletis V, Lee M, Epstein FJ (1996) Functional anatomic relationship between brain-stem tumors and cranial motor nuclei. Neurosurgery 39:787–793 (discussion 793–794)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Morota N, Deletis V, Epstein FJ, Kofler M, Abbott R, Lee M, Ruskin K (1995) Brain stem mapping: neurophysiological localization of motor nuclei on the floor of the fourth ventricle. Neurosurgery 37:922–929 (discussion 929–930)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Katsuta T, Morioka T, Fujii K, Fukui M (1993) Physiological localization of the facial colliculus during direct surgery on an intrinsic brain stem lesion. Neurosurgery 32:861–863 (comment 863)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Grabb PA, Albright AL, Sclabassi RJ, Pollack IF (1997) Continuous intraoperative electromyographic monitoring of cranial nerves during resection of fourth ventricular tumors in children. J Neurosurg 86:1–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Eisner W, Schmid UD, Reulen HJ, Oeckler R, Olteanu-Nerbe V, Gall C, Kothbauer K (1995) The mapping and continuous monitoring of the intrinsic motor nuclei during brain stem surgery. Neurosurgery 37:255–265

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pechstein U, Cedzich C, Nadstawek J, Schramm J (1996) Transcranial high-frequency repetitive electrical stimulation for recording myogenic motor evoked potentials with the patient under general anesthesia. Neurosurgery 39:335–343 (discussion 343–344)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yokoh A, Sugita K, Kobayashi S (1983) Intermittent versus continuous brain retraction. An experimental study. J Neurosurg 58:918–923

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. May DM, Jones SJ, Crockard HA (1996) Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring in cervical surgery: identification of pre- and intraoperative risk factors associated with neurological deterioration. J Neurosurg 85:566–573

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Szalay EA, Carollo JJ, Roach JW (1986) Sensitivity of spinal cord monitoring to intraoperative events. J Pediatr Orthop 6:437–441

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Moller AR (1995) Evaluating the benefits of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. Harwood, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vera Van Velthoven.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gläsker, S., Pechstein, U., Vougioukas, V.I. et al. Monitoring motor function during resection of tumours in the lower brain stem and fourth ventricle. Childs Nerv Syst 22, 1288–1295 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-006-0101-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-006-0101-z

Keywords

Navigation