Skip to main content
Log in

Selective dorsal rhizotomy in cerebral palsy to improve functional abilities: evaluation of criteria for selection

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) on functional abilities in a well-defined group of ambulatory children with spastic diplegia.

Methods

Nine children were selected for SDR (mean age 65 months, range 43–82 months). Gross motor function was measured with the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-88). Self-care was assessed with the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) and gait pattern was measured with the Edinburgh Visual Gait Score (EGS). There were nine single-case research designs with a 12-month follow-up after surgery.

Results

After 12 months the mean improvement in the total GMFM-88 scores was 8.8%. On an individual level, all patients improved significantly in comparison with baseline. Functional skills and care-giver assistance measured with the PEDI showed significant improvement. Improvement in gait was also found; in particular, better initial contact and heel-lift resulted in an increased EGS.

Conclusion

In this well-defined group of ambulatory children SDR had a small but significant positive effect on gross motor function, self-care and gait pattern.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams J, Cahan LD, Perry J, Beeler LM (1995) Foot contact pattern following selective dorsal rhizotomy. Pediatr Neurosurg 23:76–81

    Google Scholar 

  2. Backman CL, Harris SR (1999) Case studies, single-subject research, and N of 1 randomized trials: comparisons and contrasts. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 78:170–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Becher JG, Lankhorst GJ, van Bennekom CAM, Vogelaar TW (1999) Measurement of the effect of a bolus dose of intrathecal baclofen by a repetitive movement test. J Neurol 246:1080–1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Damiano DL, Quinlivan JM, Owen BF, Payne P, Nelson KC, Abel MF (2002) What does the Ashworth scale really measure and are instrumented measures more valid and precise? Dev Med Child Neurol 44:112–118

    Google Scholar 

  5. Feldman AB, Haley SM, Coryell J (1990) Concurrent and construct validity of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory. Phys Ther 70:602–610

    Google Scholar 

  6. Graubert C, Song KM, McLaughling JF, Bjornson KF (2000) Changes in gait at 1 year post-selective dorsal rhizotomy: results of a prospective randomised study. J Pediatr Orthop 20:496–500

    Google Scholar 

  7. Haley SM, Coster WJ, Ludlow LH, Haltiwanger JT, Andrellos PJ (1982) Pediatric evaluation of disability inventory (PEDI): version 1. Development, standardization and administration manual. New England Center Hospital, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  8. Harlaar J, Redmeijer RA, Tump P, Peters R, Hautus E (2000) The SYBAR system: integrated recording and display of video, EMG, and force plate data. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 32:11–16

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kazdin AE (1982) Single-care research design: methods for clinical and applied settings. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. McLaughlin JF, Bjornson KF, Astley SJ, Graubert C, Hays RM, Roberts TS, Price R, Temkin N (1998) Selective dorsal rhizotomy: efficacy and safety in an investigator-masked randomised clinical trial. Dev Med Child Neurol 40:220–232

    Google Scholar 

  11. McLaughlin JF, Bjornson K, Temkin N, Steinbok P, Wright V, Reiner A, Roberts R, Drake J, O’Donnell M, Rosenbaum P, Barber J, Ferrel A (2002) Selective dorsal rhizotomy: meta-analysis of three randomized controlled trials. Dev Med Child Neurol 44:17–25

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mittal S, Farmer JP, Al-Atassi B, Gibis J, Kennedy E, Galli C, Courchesnes G, Poulin C, Cantin MA, Benaroch TE (2002) Long-term functional outcome after selective posterior rhizotomy. J Neurosurg 97:315–325

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nordmark E, Jarnlo G, Hägglund G (2000) Comparison of the gross motor function measure and paediatric evaluation of disability inventory in assessing motor function in children undergoing selective dorsal rhizotomy. Dev Med Child Neurol 42:245–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pandyan AD, Johnson GR (1999) A review of the properties and limitations of the Ashworth and modified Ashworth scales as measures of spasticity. Clin Rehabil 13:373–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Read HS, Hazlewood ME, Hillman SJ, Prescott RJ, Robb JE (2003) Edinburgh Visual Gait Score for use in cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Orthop 23:296–301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Russell DJ, Rosenbaum PL, Cadman DT, Gowland C, Hardy S, Jarvis S (1989) The gross motor function measure: a means to evaluate the effects of physical therapy. Dev Med Child Neurol 31:341–352

    Google Scholar 

  17. Steinbok P, Reiner AM, Beauchamp R, Armstrong TW, Chochrane DD, Kestle J (1997) A randomised clinical trial to compare selective posterior rhizotomy plus physiotherapy with physiotherapy alone in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 39:178–184

    Google Scholar 

  18. Thomas SS, Aiona MD, Pierce R, Piatt JH (1996) Gait changes in children with spastic diplegia after selective dorsal rhizotomy. J Pediatr Orthop 16:747–752

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wichers MJ, van der Schouw YT, Moons KG, Stam HJ, van Nieuwenhuizen O (2001) Prevalence of cerebral palsy in the Netherlands (1977–1988). Eur J Epidemiol 17:527–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wright FV, Sheil EMH, Drake JM, Wedge JH, Naumann S (1998) Evaluation of selective dorsal rhizotomy for the reduction of spasticity in cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled trial. Dev Med Child Neurol 40:239–247

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was financed by the Dr. W.M. Phelps Stichting in The Netherlands (project number 96.044). We thank Dr. R.L.M. Strijers, clinical neurophysiologist, for his collaboration in preparation and assistance during surgery.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petra E. M. van Schie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Schie, P.E.M., Vermeulen, R.J., van Ouwerkerk, W.J.R. et al. Selective dorsal rhizotomy in cerebral palsy to improve functional abilities: evaluation of criteria for selection. Childs Nerv Syst 21, 451–457 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-004-1105-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-004-1105-1

Keywords

Navigation