Abstract
The changes in cardiac function that occur after pericardiocentesis are unclear. An understanding of the effect of pericardiocentesis on right ventricular (RV) and left ventricular (LV) function is clinically important. This study was performed to assess RV and LV function with echocardiography before and after pericardiocentesis. In total, 19 consecutive patients who underwent pericardiocentesis for more than moderate pericardial effusion were prospectively enrolled from August 2015 to October 2017. Comprehensive transthoracic echocardiography was performed before, immediately after (within 3 h), and 1 day after pericardiocentesis to investigate the changes in RV and LV function. The mean age of all patients was 72.6 ± 12.2 years. No pericardiocentesis-related complications occurred during the procedure, but one patient died of right heart failure 8 h after pericardiocentesis. After pericardiocentesis, RV inflow and outflow diameters increased (p < 0.05 versus values before pericardiocentesis), and the parameters of RV function (tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, tricuspid lateral annular systolic velocity, fractional area change, and RV free wall longitudinal strain) significantly decreased (p < 0.001 versus values before pericardiocentesis). These abnormal values or RV dysfunction remained 1 day after pericardiocentesis (p > 0.05 versus values immediately after pericardiocentesis). Conversely, no parameters of LV function changed after pericardiocentesis. Of 19 patients, 13 patients showed RV dysfunction immediately after pericardiocentesis and 6 patients did not. RV free wall longitudinal strain before pericardiocentesis in patients with post-procedural RV dysfunction was reduced compared to those without post-procedural RV dysfunction ( − 18.9 ± 3.6 versus − 28.4 ± 6.3%; p = 0.005). The area under the curve values for prediction of post-procedural RV dysfunction was 0.910 for RV free wall longitudinal strain. The occurrence of RV dysfunction after pericardiocentesis should be given more attention, and pre-procedural RV free wall longitudinal strain may be a predictor of post-procedural RV dysfunction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sunday R, Robinson LA, Bosek V (1999) Low cardiac output complicating pericardiectomy for pericardial tamponade. Ann Thorac Surg 67:228–231
Anguera I, Paré C, Perez-Villa F (1997) Severe right ventricular dysfunction following pericardiocentesis for cardiac tamponade. Int J Cardiol 59:212–214
Kuroda M, Amano M, Enomoto S, Miyake M, Kondo H, Tamura T, Kaitani K, Izumi C, Nakagawa Y (2016) Severe right ventricular and tricuspid valve dysfunction after pericardiocentesis. J Med Ultrason (2001) 43:533–536
Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Goldstein SA, Kuznetsova T, Lancellotti P, Muraru D, Picard MH, Rietzschel ER, Rudski L, Spencer KT, Tsang W, Voigt JU (2015) Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 28:1–39.e14
Manyari DE, Kostuk WJ, Purves P (1983) Effect of pericardiocentesis on right and left ventricular function and volumes in pericardial effusion. Am J cardiol 52:159–162
Chamoun A, Cenz R, Mager A, Rahman A, Champion C, Ahmad M, Birnbaum Y (2003) Acute left ventricular failure after large volume pericardiocentesis. Clin Cardiol 26:588–590
Armstrong WF, Feigenbaum H, Dillon JC (1984) Acute right ventricular dilation and echocardiographic volume overload following pericardiocentesis for relief of cardiac tamponade. Am Heart J 107:1266–1270
Geffroy A, Beloeil H, Bouvier E, Chaumeil A, Albaladejo P, Marty J (2004) Prolonged right ventricular failure after relief of cardiac tamponade. Can J Anaesth 51:482–485
Smiseth OA, Frais MA, Kingma I, White AV, Knudtson ML, Cohen JM, Manyari DE, Smith ER, Tyberg JV (1986) Assessment of pericardial constraint: the relation between right ventricular filling pressure and pericardial pressure measured after pericardiocentesis. J Am Coll Cardiol 7:307–314
Homsi M, Mahenthiran J, Vaz D, Sawada SG (2007) Reduced right ventricular systolic function in constrictive pericarditis indicates myocardial involvement and persistent right ventricular dysfunction and symptoms after pericardiectomy. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 20:1417.e1–7
Levine HD (1973) Myocardial fibrosis in constrictive pericarditis. Electrocardiographic and pathologic observations. Circulation 48:1268–1281
Dosios T, Theakos N, Angouras D, Asimacopoulos P (2003) Risk factors affecting the survival of patients with pericardial effusion submitted to subxiphoid pericardiostomy. Chest 124:242–246
Ditchey R, Engler R, LeWinter M, Pavelec R, Bhargava V, Covell J, Moores W, Shabetai R (1981) The role of the right heart in acute cardiac tamponade in dogs. Circ Res 48:701–710
Grose R, Greenberg M, Steingart R, Cohen MV (1982) Left ventricular volume and function during relief of cardiac tamponade in man. Circulation 66:149–155
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Amano, M., Izumi, C., Baba, M. et al. Occurrence of right ventricular dysfunction immediately after pericardiocentesis. Heart Vessels 35, 69–77 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-019-01456-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-019-01456-4