Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Randomized comparison between 2-link cell design biolimus A9-eluting stent and 3-link cell design everolimus-eluting stent in patients with de novo true coronary bifurcation lesions: the BEGIN trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Heart and Vessels Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The appropriate stent platform for treating coronary bifurcation lesions (CBLs) remains controversial. Previous bench tests have demonstrated the superiority of a 2-link cell design to 3-link cell design for creating inter-strut dilation at the side branch ostium. This randomized multicenter prospective BEGIN trial compared the biodegradable polymer-based biolimus A9-eluting stent (2-link BES) with the durable polymer-based cobalt chromium everolimus-eluting stent (3-link EES) in 226 patients with de novo CBLs. Patients with true bifurcations, defined as > 50% stenosis in the main vessel and side branch (SB) and an SB diameter > 2.25 mm, were enrolled. Guide wire re-crossing to the distal cell (near the carina) in the jailed SB and final kissing inflation were recommended. The SB angiographic endpoint was < 50% stenosis diameter. Left-main CBLs (13.5% vs. 13.0%) and 2-stent technique (30.6% vs. 22.6%) rates were similar. The primary endpoints (minimum lumen diameter at the SB ostium measured at an independent core laboratory at the 8-month follow-up) were comparable (1.64 ± 0.50 mm vs. 1.63 ± 0.51 mm, p = 0.976). There was no significant difference in composite outcomes of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target vascular revascularization at 12 months (7.4% vs. 8.0%, p = 0.894). Two-link BES and 3-link EES showed similar 8-month angiographic and 1-year clinical outcomes for true CBLs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Louvard Y, Thomas M, Dzavik V, Hildick-Smith D, Galassi AR, Pan M, Burzotta F, Zelizko M, Dudek D, Ludman P, Sheiban I, Lassen JF, Darremont O, Kastrati A, Ludwig J, Iakovou I, Brunel P, Lansky A, Meerkin D, Legrand V, Medina A, Lefevre T (2008) Classification of coronary artery bifurcation lesions and treatments: time for a consensus! Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 71:175–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Natsuaki M, Morimoto T, Furukawa Y, Nakagawa Y, Kadota K, Yamaji K, Ando K, Shizuta S, Shiomi H, Tada T, Tazaki J, Kato Y, Hayano M, Abe M, Tamura T, Shirotani M, Matsuda M, Takahashi M, Ishii K, Tanaka M, Aoyama T, Doi O, Hattori R, Kato M, Suwa S, Takizawa A, Takatsu Y, Shinoda E, Eizawa H, Takeda T, Lee JD, Inoko M, Ogawa H, Hamasaki S, Horie M, Nohara R, Kambara H, Fujiwara H, Mitsudo K, Nobuyoshi M, Kita T, Kimura T (2014) Late adverse events after implantation of sirolimus-eluting stent and bare-metal stent: long-term (5–7 years) follow-up of the coronary revascularization demonstrating outcome study-Kyoto registry cohort-2. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 7:168–179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Costa RA, Mintz GS, Carlier SG, Lansky AJ, Moussa I, Fujii K, Takebayashi H, Yasuda T, Costa JR Jr, Tsuchiya Y, Jensen LO, Cristea E, Mehran R, Dangas GD, Iyer S, Collins M, Kreps EM, Colombo A, Stone GW, Leon MB, Moses JW (2005) Bifurcation coronary lesions treated with the “crush” technique: an intravascular ultrasound analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:599–605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Burzotta F, Trani C, Todaro D, Mariani L, Talarico GP, Tommasino A, Giammarinaro M, Niccoli G, Porto I, Leone AM, Mongiardo R, Mazzari MA, Schiavoni G, Crea F (2011) Prospective randomized comparison of sirolimus- or everolimus-eluting stent to treat bifurcated lesions by provisional approach. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 4:327–335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee JM, Hahn JY, Kang J, Park KW, Chun WJ, Rha SW, Yu CW, Jeong JO, Jeong MH, Yoon JH, Jang Y, Tahk SJ, Gwon HC, Koo BK, Kim HS (2015) Differential prognostic effect between first- and second-generation drug-eluting stents in coronary bifurcation lesions: patient-level analysis of the Korean bifurcation pooled cohorts. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 8:1318–1331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Murasato Y, Iwasaki K, Yamamoto T, Yagi T, Hikichi Y, Suematsu Y, Yamamoto T (2014) Optimal kissing balloon inflation after single-stent deployment in a coronary bifurcation model. EuroIntervention 10:934–941

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hikichi Y, Umezu M, Node K, Iwasaki K (2017) Reduction in incomplete stent apposition area caused by jailed struts after single stenting at left main bifurcation lesions: micro-CT analysis using a three-dimensional elastic bifurcated coronary artery model. Cardiovasc Interv Ther 32:12–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nakao F, Okamura T, Suetomi T, Yamada J, Nakamura T, Ueda T, Oda T, Kanemoto M, Ikeda Y, Fujii T, Yano M (2016) Differences of side branch jailing between left main-left anterior descending artery stenting and left main-left circumflex artery stenting with Nobori biolimus-eluting stent. Heart Vessels 31:1895–1903

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pan M, Burzotta F, Trani C, Medina A, Suarez de Lezo J, Niccoli G, Romero M, Porto I, Mazuelos F, Leone AM, Martin P, Coluccia V, Suarez de Lezo J, Ojeda S, Crea F (2014) Three-year follow-up of patients with bifurcation lesions treated with sirolimus- or everolimus-eluting stents: SEAside and CORpal cooperative study. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 67:797–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pan M, Medina A, Suarez de Lezo J, Romero M, Segura J, Martin P, Suarez de Lezo J, Hernandez E, Mazuelos F, Ojeda S (2012) Randomized study comparing everolimus- and sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with bifurcation lesions treated by provisional side-branch stenting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 80:1165–1170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Costopoulos C, Latib A, Naganuma T, Sticchi A, Ferrarello S, Regazzoli D, Chieffo A, Figini F, Carlino M, Montorfano M, Naim C, Kawaguchi M, Gerasimou A, Giannini F, Godino C, Colombo A (2014) Comparison of abluminal biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents and durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in the treatment of coronary bifurcations. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 83:889–895

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lam MK, Sen H, van Houwelingen KG, Lowik MM, van der Heijden LC, Kok MM, de Man FH, Linssen GC, Tandjung K, Doggen CJ, von Birgelen C (2015) Three-year clinical outcome of patients with bifurcation treatment with second-generation Resolute and Xience V stents in the randomized TWENTE trial. Am Heart J 169:69–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Orvin K, Carrie D, Richardt G, Desmet W, Assali A, Werner G, Ikari Y, Fujii K, Goicolea J, Dangoisse V, Manari A, Saito S, Wijns W, Kornowski R (2016) Comparison of sirolimus eluting stent with bioresorbable polymer to everolimus eluting stent with permanent polymer in bifurcation lesions: results from CENTURY II trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 87:1092–1100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Guerin P, Pilet P, Finet G, Goueffic Y, N’Guyen JM, Crochet D, Tijou I, Pacaud P, Loirand G (2010) Drug-eluting stents in bifurcations: bench study of strut deformation and coating lesions. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 3:120–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Natsuaki M, Kozuma K, Morimoto T, Kadota K, Muramatsu T, Nakagawa Y, Akasaka T, Igarashi K, Tanabe K, Morino Y, Ishikawa T, Nishikawa H, Awata M, Abe M, Okada H, Takatsu Y, Ogata N, Kimura K, Urasawa K, Tarutani Y, Shiode N, Kimura T (2013) Biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent: a randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 62:181–190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Natsuaki M, Kozuma K, Morimoto T, Kadota K, Muramatsu T, Nakagawa Y, Akasaka T, Igarashi K, Tanabe K, Morino Y, Ishikawa T, Nishikawa H, Awata M, Abe M, Okada H, Takatsu Y, Ogata N, Kimura K, Urasawa K, Tarutani Y, Shiode N, Kimura T (2015) Final 3-year outcome of a randomized trial comparing second-generation drug-eluting stents using either biodegradable polymer or durable polymer: NOBORI biolimus-eluting versus XIENCE/PROMUS everolimus-eluting stent trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 8

  17. Niemela M, Kervinen K, Erglis A, Holm NR, Maeng M, Christiansen EH, Kumsars I, Jegere S, Dombrovskis A, Gunnes P, Stavnes S, Steigen TK, Trovik T, Eskola M, Vikman S, Romppanen H, Makikallio T, Hansen KN, Thayssen P, Aberge L, Jensen LO, Hervold A, Airaksinen J, Pietila M, Frobert O, Kellerth T, Ravkilde J, Aaroe J, Jensen JS, Helqvist S, Sjogren I, James S, Miettinen H, Lassen JF, Thuesen L (2011) Randomized comparison of final kissing balloon dilatation versus no final kissing balloon dilatation in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions treated with main vessel stenting: the Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study III. Circulation 123:79–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yu CW, Yang JH, Song YB, Hahn JY, Choi SH, Choi JH, Lee HJ, Oh JH, Koo BK, Rha SW, Jeong JO, Jeong MH, Yoon JH, Jang Y, Tahk SJ, Kim HS, Gwon HC (2015) Long-term clinical outcomes of final kissing ballooning in coronary bifurcation lesions treated with the 1-stent technique: results from the COBIS II registry (Korean coronary bifurcation stenting registry). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 8:1297–1307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Steigen TK, Maeng M, Wiseth R, Erglis A, Kumsars I, Narbute I, Gunnes P, Mannsverk J, Meyerdierks O, Rotevatn S, Niemela M, Kervinen K, Jensen JS, Galloe A, Nikus K, Vikman S, Ravkilde J, James S, Aaroe J, Ylitalo A, Helqvist S, Sjogren I, Thayssen P, Virtanen K, Puhakka M, Airaksinen J, Lassen JF, Thuesen L (2006) Randomized study on simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: the Nordic bifurcation study. Circulation 114:1955–1961

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yamawaki M, Murasato Y, Kinoshita Y, Fujii K, Fujino Y, Shinke T, Takeda Y, Yamada S, Shimada Y, Tsukahara R, Muramatsu T, Suzuki T (2016) Mechanism of residual lumen stenosis at the side branch ostium after final kissing balloon inflation: a volumetric intracoronary ultrasound study of coronary bifurcation lesions. J Interv Cardiol 29:188–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Okamura T, Nagoshi R, Fujimura T, Murasato Y, Yamawaki M, Ono S, Serikawa T, Hikichi Y, Norita H, Nakao F, Sakamoto T, Shinke T, Shite J (2018) Impact of guidewire recrossing point into stent jailed side branch for optimal kissing balloon dilatation: core lab 3D optical coherence tomography analysis. EuroIntervention 13:e1785–e1793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nagoshi R, Okamura T, Murasato Y, Fujimura T, Yamawaki M, Ono S, Serikawa T, Hikichi Y, Nakao F, Sakamoto T, Shinke T, Kijima Y, Kozuki A, Shibata H, Shite J (2018) Feasibility and usefulness of three-dimensional optical coherence tomography guidance for optimal side branch treatment in coronary bifurcation stenting. Int J Cardiol 250:270–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ruiz-Salmeron RJ, Valenzuela LF, Perez I, Fuentes M, Rodriguez-Leiras S, Vizcaino M, Carrascosa C, Marcos F (2013) Approach to coronary bifurcation lesions using the everolimus-eluting stent: comparison between a simple strategy and a complex strategy with T-stenting. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 66:636–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Koo BK, Kang HJ, Youn TJ, Chae IH, Choi DJ, Kim HS, Sohn DW, Oh BH, Lee MM, Park YB, Choi YS, Tahk SJ (2005) Physiologic assessment of jailed side branch lesions using fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:633–637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the late Dr. Kazuaki Mitsudo for proposing and providing valuable advice about this study as well as all collaborators of the BEGIN trial for their support.

Funding

This study was supported by a funding from Terumo, Tokyo, Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masahiro Yamawaki.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 15 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yamawaki, M., Muramatsu, T., Ashida, K. et al. Randomized comparison between 2-link cell design biolimus A9-eluting stent and 3-link cell design everolimus-eluting stent in patients with de novo true coronary bifurcation lesions: the BEGIN trial. Heart Vessels 34, 1297–1308 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-019-01368-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-019-01368-3

Keywords

Navigation