Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of intravascular ultrasound findings on long-term patency after self-expanding nitinol stent implantation in the iliac artery lesion

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Heart and Vessels Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) predictors of stent patency for the coronary artery lesion have been established, little is known about IVUS predictors of stent patency for the aorto-iliac artery lesion. We analyzed 154 lesions of 122 patients who underwent stent implantation for iliac artery lesions. Quantitative and qualitative IVUS analyses were performed for pre- and post-procedural IVUS imaging in all lesions. Target lesion revascularization (TLR) was defined as clinically driven revascularization with >50 % angiographic stenosis of the target lesion. The mean follow-up period was 39 ± 16 months. TLRs were performed in 13 lesions (8.4 %). Post-procedural minimum stent area (MSA) was significantly smaller in the TLR group compared to the no-TLR group (16.0 ± 5.8 vs. 25.6 ± 8.5 mm2, p < 0.001). Stent edge dissection was frequently observed in the TLR group compared to the no-TLR group (53.8 vs. 24.1 %, p = 0.04). Multivariate analysis revealed that post-procedural MSA (OR = 0.76, p < 0.01) and stent edge dissection (OR = 10.4, p < 0.01) were independent IVUS predictors of TLR. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis identified post-procedural MSA <17.8 mm2 as the optimal cut-point for the prediction of TLR (AUC = 0.846). Post-procedural MSA and stent edge dissection could predict long-term stent patency in the iliac artery lesion. Our results propose that adequate stent enlargement without edge dissection might be important to reduce TLR in the iliac artery lesion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rowe VL, Lee W, Weaver FA, Etzioni D (2009) Pattern of treatment for peripheral arterial disease in the United States: 1996–2005. J Vasc Surg 49:910–917

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, Nehler MR, Haris KA, Fowkes FG (2007) Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of peripheral arterial disease (TASC II). J Vasc Surg 43:S1–S67

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bosch JL, Hunink MG (1997) Meta-analysis of the results of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stent placement for aortoiliac occlusive disease. Radiology 204:87–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schillinger M, Sabeti S, Loewe C, Dick P, Amighi J, Mlekusch W, Schlager O, Cejna M, Lammer J, Minar E (2006) Balloon angioplasty versus implantation of nitinol stents in the superficial femoral artery. N Engl J Med 354:1879–1888

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Leville CD, Kashyap VS, Clair DG, Bena JF, Lyden SP, Greenberg RK, O’Hara PJ, Sarac TP, Ouriel K (2006) Endovascular management of iliac artery occlusions: extending treatment to TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus class C and D patients. J Vasc Surg 43:32–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Koizumi A, Kumakura H, Kanai H, Araki Y, Kasama S, Sumino H, Ichikawa S, Kurabayashi M (2009) Ten-year patency and factors causing restenosis after endovascular treatment of iliac artery lesions. Circ J 73:860–866

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Soga Y, Iida O, Kawasaki D, Yamauchi Y, Suzuki K, Hirano K, Koshida R, Kamoi D, Tazaki J, Higashitani M, Shintani Y, Yamaoka T, Okazaki S, Suematsu N, Tsuchiya T, Miyashita Y, Shinozaki N, Takahashi H, REAL-AI investigators (2012) Contemporary outcomes after endovascular treatment for aorto-iliac artery disease. Circ J 76:2697–2704

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kudo T, Chandra FA, Ahn SS (2005) Long-term outcomes and predictors of iliac angioplasty with selective stenting. J Vasc Surg 42:466–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tobis JM, Mallery J, Mahon D, Lehmann K, Zalesky P, Griffith J, Gessert J, Moriuchi M, McRae M, Dwyer M (1991) Intravascular ultrasound imaging of human coronary arteries in vivo: analysis of tissue characterizations with comparison to in vitro histological specimens. Circulation 83:913–926

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tanaka N, Pijls NH, Koolen JJ, Botman KJ, Michels HR, Brueren BR, Peels K, Shindo N, Yamashita J, Yamashina A (2013) Assessment of optimum stent deployment by stent boost imaging: comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Heart Vessels 28:1–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Takaoka N, Tsujita K, Kaikita K, Hokimoto S, Yamanaga K, Komura N, Chitose T, Ono T, Mizobe M, Horio E, Sato K, Nakayama N, Saito M, Iwashita S, Kojima S, Tayama S, Sugiyama S, Nakamura S, Ogawa H (2014) Intravascular ultrasound morphology of culprit lesions and clinical demographics in patients with acute coronary syndrome in relation to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels at onset. Heart Vessels 29:584–595

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kasaoka S, Tobis JM, Akiyama T, Reimers B, Mario CD, Wong ND, Colombo A (1998) Angiographic and intravascular ultrasound predictors of in-stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 32:1630–1635

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cheneau E, Leborgne L, Mintz GS, Kotani J, Pichard AD, Satler LF et al (2003) Predictors of subacute stent thrombosis: results of a systematic intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 108:43–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoffmann R, Mintz GS, Mehran R, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Satler LF, Popma JJ, Wu H, Leon MB (1998) Intravascular ultrasound predictors of angiographic restenosis in lesions treated with Palmaz-Schatz stents. J Am Coll Cardiol 31:43–49

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. De Feyter PJ, Kay P, Disco C, Serruys PW (1999) Reference chart derived from post-stent-implantation intravascular ultrasound predictors of 6-month expected restenosis on quantitative coronary angiography. Circulation 100:1777–1783

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kawarada O, Higashimori A, Noguchi M, Waratani N, Yoshida M, Fujihara M, Yokoi Y, Honda Y, Fitzgerald PJ (2013) Duplex criteria for in-stent restenosis in the superficial femoral artery. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 81:E199–E205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sahara M, Kirigaya H, Oikawa Y, Yajima J, Ogasawara K, Satoh H, Nagashima K, Hara H, Nakatsu Y, Aizawa T (2003) Arterial remodeling patterns before intervention predict diffuse in-stent restenosis: an intravascular ultrasound study. J Am Coll Cardiol 42:1731–1738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD, Bailey SR, Erbel R, Fitzgerald PJ, Pinto FJ, Rosenfield K, Siegel RJ, Tuzcu EM, Yock PG (2001) American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus document on standards for acquisition, measurement and reporting of intravascular ultrasound studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:1478–1492

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tanabe K, Serruys PW, Degertekin M, Grube E, Guagliumi G, Urbaszek W, Bonnier J, Lablanche JM, Siminiak T, Nordrehaug J, Figulla H, Drzewiecki J, Banning A, Hauptmann K, Dudek D, Bruining N, Hamers R, Hoye A, Ligthart JM, Disco C, Koglin J, Russell ME, Colombo A; TAXUS II Study Group (2005) Incomplete stent apposition after implantation of paclitaxel-eluting stents or bare metal stents: insights from the randomized TAXUS II trial. Circulation 111:900–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ranke C, Creutzig A, Alexander K (1992) Duplex scanning of peripheral arteries: correlation of the peak velocity ratio with angiographic diameter reduction. Ultrasound Med Biol 18:433–440

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fitzgerald PJ, Oshima A, Hayase M, Metz JA, Bailey SR, Baim DS, Cleman MW, Deutsch E, Diver DJ, Leon MB, Moses JW, Oesterle SN, Overlie PA, Pepine CJ, Safian RD, Shani J, Simonton CA, Smalling RW, Teirstein PS, Zidar JP, Yeung AC, Kuntz RE, Yock PG (2000) Final results of the can routine ultrasound influence stent expansion (CRUISE) study. Circulation 102:523–530

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Oemrawsingh PV, Mintz GS, Schalij MJ, Zwinderman AH, Jukema JW, van der Wall EE (2003) Intravascular ultrasound guidance improves angiographic and clinical outcome of stent implantation for long coronary artery stenoses: final results of a randomized comparison with angiographic guidance (TULIP study). Circulation 107:62–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tosaka A, Soga Y, Iida O, Ishihara T, Hirano K, Suzuki K, Yokoi H, Nanto S, Nobuyoshi M (2012) Classification and clinical impact of restenosis after femoropopliteal stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol 59:16–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sonoda S, Morino Y, Ako J, Terashima M, Hassan AH, Bonneau HN, Leon MB, Moses JW, Yock PG, Honda Y, Kuntz RE, Fitzgerald PJ, SIRIUS Investigators (2004) Impact of final stent dimensions on long-term results following sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: serial intravascular ultrasound analysis from the sirius trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 43:1959–1963

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shimada Y, Kataoka T, Courtney BK, Morino Y, Bonneau HN, Yock PG, Grube E, Honda Y, Fitzgerald PJ (2006) Influence of plaque calcium on neointimal hyperplasia following bare metal and drug-eluting stent implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 67:866–869

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mosseri M, Satler LF, Pichard AD, Waksman R (2005) Impact of vessel calcification on outcomes after coronary stenting. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 6:147–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nishida T, Colombo A, Briguori C, Stankovic G, Albiero R, Corvaja N, Finci L, Di Mario C, Tobis JM (2002) Outcome of nonobstructive residual dissections detected by intravascular ultrasound following percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 89:1257–1262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Miki K, Fujii K, Fukunaga M, Kawasaki D, Shibuya M, Imanaka T, Tamaru H, Masutani M, Ohyanagi M, Masuyama T (2013) Impact of post-procedural intravascular ultrasound findings on long-term results following self-expanding nitinol stenting in superficial femoral artery lesions. Circ J 77:1543–1550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Iida O, Soga Y, Hirano K, Okamoto S, Dohi T, Uematsu M, Yokoi H, Nobuyoshi M, Muramatsu T, Fujita M, Nanto S, Nagata S (2011) Retrospective multicentre analysis of S.M.A.R.T. vs. Luminexx nitinol stent implantation for superficial femoral artery lesions (REAL SL) Registry. 5 years’ experience. Circ J 75:421–427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Buckley CJ, Arko FR, Lee S, Mettauer M, Little D, Atkins M, Manning LG, Patterson DE (2002) Intravascular ultrasound scanning improves long-term patency of iliac lesions treated with balloon angioplasty and primary stenting. J Vasc Surg 35:316–323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the staffs in the catheterization laboratory at Hyogo College of Medicine for their excellent assistance during the study.

Conflict of interest

No funding was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kojiro Miki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miki, K., Fujii, K., Fukunaga, M. et al. Impact of intravascular ultrasound findings on long-term patency after self-expanding nitinol stent implantation in the iliac artery lesion. Heart Vessels 31, 519–527 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-014-0625-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-014-0625-1

Keywords

Navigation