Abstract
State-of-the-art coupled general circulation models (CGCMs) are used to predict ocean heat uptake (OHU) and sea-level change under global warming. However, the projections of different models vary, resulting in high uncertainty. Much of the inter-model spread is driven by responses to surface heat perturbations. This study mainly focuses on the response of the ocean to a surface heat flux perturbation F, as prescribed by the Flux-Anomaly-Forced Model Intercomparison Project (FAFMIP). The results of ocean model were compared with those of a CGCM with the same ocean component. On the global scale, the changes in global mean temperature, ocean heat content (OHC), and steric sea level (SSL) simulated in the OGCM are generally consistent with CGCM simulations. Differences in changes in ocean temperature, OHC, and SSL between the two models primarily occur in the Arctic and Atlantic Oceans (AA) and the Southern Ocean (SO) basins. In addition to the differences in surface heat flux anomalies between the two models, differences in heat exchange between basins also play an important role in the inconsistencies in ocean climate changes in the AA and SO basins. These discrepancies are largely due to both the larger initial value and the greater weakening change of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) in CGCM. The greater weakening of the AMOC in the CGCM is associated with the atmosphere—ocean feedback and the lack of a restoring salinity boundary condition. Furthermore, differences in surface salinity boundary conditions between the two models contribute to discrepancies in SSL changes.
摘要
耦合的大气-海洋环流模式常被用来预估全球变暖情景下海洋热吸收和由于海水热力膨胀引起的海平面高度变化。然而, 不同耦合模式对其的预估存在较大不确定性。模式间的不确定性很大一部分是由不同模式对全球变暖情景下的热通量扰动的响应不同所造成的。本文采用海洋模式及海气耦合模式对CMIP6中异常通量强迫比较试验(FAFMIP)给定的热通量扰动F的海洋响应进行了研究。结果表明海洋模式和耦合模式模拟的海水变暖均主要是由热通量扰动F所决定的。在全球尺度上, 海洋模式模拟的全球变暖情景下的海洋变化(海温变化、海洋热含量和海表高度的变化)与耦合模式模拟的基本一致。两个模式模拟的海洋变化的差异主要发生在北冰洋、大西洋以及南大洋区域。这主要是由于环流变化导致的再分布的热通量的差异所决定的。相对于海洋模式来讲, 耦合模式模拟的大西洋经向翻转环流的初始强度较大且减弱的幅度较强(约9%), 这与在耦合模式中更好地考虑大气-海洋相互作用且并未采用恢复盐度边界条件有关。
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bouttes, N., and J. M. Gregory, 2014: Attribution of the spatial pattern of CO2-forced sea level change to ocean surface flux changes. Environmental Research Letters, 9, 034004, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/034004.
Canuto, V. M., A. Howard, Y. Cheng, and M. S. Dubovikov, 2001: Ocean turbulence. Part I: One-point closure model-momentum and heat vertical diffusivities. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 31, 1413–1426, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2001)031<1413:OTPIOP>2.0.CO;2.
Canuto, V. M., A. Howard, Y. Cheng, and M. S. Dubovikov, 2002: Ocean turbulence. Part II: Vertical diffusivities of momentum, heat, salt, mass, and passive scalars. J. Phys. Oceanogr, 32, 240–264, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2002)032<0240:OTPIVD>2.0.CO;2.
Church, J. A., N. White, C. M. Domingues, D. P. Monselesan, and E. R. Miles, 2013: Sea-level and ocean heat-content change. International Geophysics, 103, 697–725, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-391851-2.00027-1.
Dai, Y. J., R. E. Dickinson, and Y. P. Wang, 2004: A two-big-leaf model for canopy temperature, photosynthesis, and stomatal conductance. J. Climate, 17, 2281–2299, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<2281:ATMFCT>2.0.CO;2.
Dong, X., and F. Xue, 2016: Phase transition of the pacific decadal oscillation and decadal variation of the East Asian summer monsoon in the 20th century. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 33(3), 330–338, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-015-5130-7.
Dong, X., T. H. Su, J. Wang, and R. P. Lin, 2014: Decadal variation of the Aleutian Low-Icelandic Low seesaw simulated by a climate system model (CAS-ESM-C). Atmos. Ocean. Sci. Lett., 7(2), 110–114, https://doi.org/10.3878/j.issn.1674-2834.13.0061.
Dong, X., R. P. Lin, J. Zhu, and Z. T. Lu, 2016: Evaluation of ocean data assimilation in CAS-ESM-C: Constraining the SST field. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 33, 795–807, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-016-5234-8.
Dong, X., and Coauthors, 2021a: CAS-ESM2.0 model datasets for the CMIP6 Ocean Model Intercomparison Project Phase 1 (OMIP1). Adv. Atmos. Sci., 38(2), 307–316, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-020-0150-3.
Dong, X., F. Zheng, R. P. Lin, H. P. Yang, J. Zhu, M. J. Du, and H. Luo, 2021b: A reasonable mean dynamic topography state on improving the ability of assimilating the altimetry observations into a coupled climate system model: An example with CAS-ESM-C. J. Geophys. Res., 126(2), e2020JC016760, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC016760.
Du, M. J., F. Zheng, J. Zhu, R. P. Lin, H. P. Yang, and Q. L. Chen, 2020: A new ensemble-based approach to correct the systematic ocean temperature bias of CAS-ESM-C to improve its simulation and data assimilation abilities. J. Geophys. Res., 125, e2020JC016406, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC016406.
Garuba, O. A., and B. A. Klinger, 2016: Ocean heat uptake and inter-basin transport of passive and redistributive surface heating. J. Climate, 29, 7507–7527, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0138.1.
Garuba, O. A., and B. A. Klinger, 2018: The role of individual surface flux components in the passive and active ocean heat uptake. J. Climate, 31, 6157–6173, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0452.1.
Gent, P. R., and J. C. McWilliams, 1990: Isopycnal mixing in ocean circulation models. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 20, 150–155, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1990)020<0150:IMI-OCM>2.0.CO;2.
Gregory, J. M., and Coauthors, 2005: A model intercomparison of changes in the Atlantic thermohaline circulation in response to increasing atmospheric CO2 concentration. Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L12703, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023209.
Gregory, J. M., and Coauthors, 2016: The Flux-Anomaly-Forced Model Intercomparison Project (FAFMIP) contribution to CMIP6: Investigation of sea-level and ocean climate change in response to CO2 forcing. Geoscientific Model Development, 9, 3993–4017, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3993-2016.
Griffies, S. M., and Coauthors, 2009: Coordinated ocean-ice reference experiments (COREs). Ocean Modelling, 26(1–2), 1–46, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2008.08.007.
Huber, M. B., and L. Zanna, 2017: Drivers of uncertainty in simulated ocean circulation and heat uptake. Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 1402–1413, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071587.
Hunke, E. C., and W. H. Lipscomb, 2008: CICE: The Los Alamos sea ice model documentation and software user’s manual, version 4. 0. Los Alamos National Laboratory Tech. Rep. LA-CC-06-012, 76pp.
Ji, D., and Coauthors, 2014: Description and basic evaluation of Beijing Normal University Earth System Model (BNU-ESM) version 1. Geoscientific Model Development, 7, 2039–2064, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2039-2014.
Jin, J. B., and Coauthors, 2021: CAS-ESM2.0 model datasets for the CMIP6 Flux-Anomaly-Forced Model Intercomparison Project (FAFMIP). Adv. Atmos. Sci., 38(2), 296–306, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-020-0188-2.
Jin, J. B., Q. C. Zeng, L. Wu, H. L. Liu, and M. H. Zhang, 2017: Formulation of a new ocean salinity boundary condition and impact on the simulated climate of an oceanic general circulation model. Science China Earth Sciences, 60, 491–500, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-016-9004-4.
Kajtar, J. B., A. Santoso, M. Collins, A. S. Taschetto, M. H. England, and L. M. Frankcombe, 2021: CMIP5 intermodel relationships in the baseline Southern Ocean climate system and with future projections. Earth’s Future, 9, e2020EF001873, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001873.
Kuhlbrodt, T., and J. M. Gregory, 2012: Ocean heat uptake and its consequences for the magnitude of sea level rise and climate change. Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L18608, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052952.
Large, W. G., and S. G. Yeager, 2004: Diurnal to decadal global forcing for ocean and sea-ice models: The data sets and flux climatologies. NCAR/TN-460+STR, CGD Division of the National Center for Atmospheric Research, https://doi.org/10.5065/D6KK98Q6.
Lin, R. P., J. Zhu, and F. Zheng, 2016: Decadal shifts of East Asian summer monsoon in a climate model free of explicit GHGs and aerosols. Scientific Reports, 6, 38546, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38546.
Lin, R. P., J. Zhu, and F. Zheng, 2019: The application of the SVD method to reduce coupled model biases in seasonal predictions of rainfall. J. Geophy. Res., 124, 11837–11849, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029927.
Liu, H. L., P. F. Lin, Y. Q. Yu, and X. H. Zhang, 2012: The baseline evaluation of LASG/IAP climate system ocean model (LICOM) version 2.0. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 26, 318–329, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-012-0305-y.
Lyu, K., X. B. Zhang, and J. A. Church, 2020: Regional dynamic sea level simulated in the CMIP5 and CMIP6 models: Mean biases, future projections, and their linkages. J. Climate, 33(15), 6377–6398, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-1029.1.
Marshall, J., K. C. Armour, J. R. Scott, Y. Kostov, U. Hausmann, D. Ferreira, T. G. Shepherd, and C. M. Bitz, 2014: The ocean’s role in polar climate change: Asymmetric Arctic and Antarctic responses to greenhouse gas and ozone forcing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, 372, 20130040, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2013.0040.
Pacanowski, R. C., 1995: MOM 2 Documentation, user’s guide and reference manual. GFDL Ocean Tech. Rep. No.3, 232 pp.
Rahmstorf, S., and A. Ganapolski, 1999: Long-term global warming scenarios computed with an efficient coupled climate model. Climatic Change, 43, 353–367, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005474526406.
Sen Gupta, A., A. Santoso, A. S. Taschetto, C. C. Ummenhofer, J. Trevena, and M. H. England, 2009: Projected changes to the southern hemisphere Ocean and sea ice in the IPCC AR4 climate models. J. Climate, 22, 3047–3078, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2827.1.
Su, T. H., F. Xue, H. C. Sun, and G. Q. Zhou, 2015: The El Niño-Southern Oscillation cycle simulated by the climate system model of Chinese Academy of Sciences. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 34(1), 55–65, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-015-0596-9.
Todd, A., and Coauthors, 2020: Ocean-only FAFMIP: Understanding regional patterns of ocean heat content and dynamic sea level change. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 12, e2019MS002027, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS002027.
Walsh, J. E., W. L. Chapman, and F. Fetterer, 2015: Updated 2016. Gridded Monthly Sea Ice Extent and Concentration, 1850 Onwards, Version 1.1, National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC).
Winton, M., S. M. Griffies, B. L. Samuels, J. L. Sarmiento, and T. L. Frölicher, 2013: Connecting changing ocean circulation with changing climate. J. Climate, 26, 2268–2278, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00296.1.
Xie, P., and G. K. Vallis, 2012: The passive and active nature of ocean heat uptake in idealized climate change experiments. Climate Dyn., 38, 667–684, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-011-1063-8.
Zhang, H., and Coauthors, 2020: Description and climate simulation performance of CAS-ESM version 2. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 12, e2020MS002210, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002210.
Zhang, H., M. H. Zhang, and Q. C. Zeng, 2013: Sensitivity of simulated climate to two atmospheric models: Interpretation of differences between dry models and moist models. Mon. Wea. Rev., 141, 1558–1576, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00367.1.
Acknowledgements
The constructive suggestions and comments from the two anonymous reviewers and Editor are highly appreciated. This work is jointly supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDA19020202), Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. ZDBS-LY-DQC010), the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDB42000000) and the open fund of State Key Laboratory of Satellite Ocean Environment Dynamics, Second Institute of Oceanography (Grant No. QNHX2017). Xiao DONG was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41706028). The simulations were performed on the supercomputers provided by Earth System Science Numerical Simulator Facility (EarthLab).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Article Highlights
• The ocean response to prescribed heat-flux perturbation in an ocean model and its corresponding coupled model is investigated.
• The OHU, DSL simulated in the OGCM are generally consistent with CGCM simulations on the global scale.
• Differences in changes in ocean temperature, OHC, and SSL between the two models primarily occur in AA and SO basins.
Electronic Supplementary Material to
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jin, J., Dong, X., He, J. et al. Ocean Response to a Climate Change Heat-Flux Perturbation in an Ocean Model and Its Corresponding Coupled Model. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 39, 55–66 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-1167-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-1167-y
Key words
- ocean heat uptake
- Atlantic meridional overturning circulation
- ocean general circulation model
- coupled general circulation model