Abstract
The impact of moist physics on the sensitive areas identified by conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation (CNOP) is examined based on four typical heavy rainfall cases in northern China through performing numerical experiments with and without moist physics. Results show that the CNOP with moist physics identifies sensitive areas corresponding to both the lower- (850–700 hPa) and upper-level (300–100 hPa) weather systems, while the CNOP without moist physics fails to capture the sensitive areas at lower levels. The reasons for the CNOP peaking at different levels can be explained in both algorithm and physics aspects. Firstly, the gradient of the cost function with respect to initial perturbations peaks at the upper level without moist physics which results in the upper-level peak of the CNOP, while it peaks at both the upper and lower levels with moist physics which results in both the upper- and lower-level peaks of the CNOP. Secondly, the upper-level sensitive area is associated with high baroclinicity, and these dynamic features can be captured by both CNOPs with and without moist physics. The lower-level sensitive area is associated with moist processes, and this thermodynamic feature can be captured only by the CNOP with moist physics. This result demonstrates the important contribution of the initial error of lower-level systems that are related to water vapor transportation to the forecast error of heavy rainfall associated weather systems, which could be an important reference for heavy rainfall observation targeting.
摘要
本文基于中国北方四个典型暴雨个例,通过包含湿物理过程的湿过程试验和不包含湿物理过程的干过程试验,研究了湿物理过程对条件非线性最优扰动(CNOP)寻找的暴雨天气系统敏感区的影响。结果显示,湿过程CNOP找到的敏感区对应低层(850-700 hPa)和高层(300-100 hPa)的天气系统,而干过程CNOP只找到对应高层天气系统的敏感区。垂直分布显示,干、湿过程CNOP的大值集中在不同层次的原因可以从算法和物理意义两方面解释。算法方面,干过程CNOP的目标函数相对于初始扰动的梯度大值区集中在高层,使得CNOP的大值集中在高层,而湿过程CNOP的梯度大值集中在高层和低层,使得CNOP的大值区集中在高层和低层。物理意义方面,高层敏感区对应斜压性大值区,能够被干、湿过程的CNOP捕捉到,而低层敏感区对应低层湿区,只能够被湿过程CNOP捕捉到。该研究显示了与水汽输送相关的低层天气系统的初始误差对暴雨天气系统预报误差的重要贡献,这对暴雨天气系统的目标观测有重要参考价值。
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Birgin, E. G., J. E. Martínez, and M. Raydan, 2001: Algorithm 813: SPG—software for convex-constrained optimization. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 27, 340–349, https://doi.org/10.1145/502800.502803.
Bishop, C. H., B. J. Etherton, and S. J. Majumdar, 2001: Adaptive sampling with the ensemble transform Kalman filter. Part I: Theoretical aspects. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 420–436, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<0420:ASW-TET>2.0.CO;2.
Buizza, R., and A. Montani, 1999: Targeting observations using singular vectors. J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 2965–2985, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056<2965:TOUSV>2.0.CO;2.
Buizza, R., C. Cardinali, G. Kelly, and J.-N. Thépaut, 2007: The value of observations. II: The value of observations located in singular-vector-based target areas. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 133, 1817–1832, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.149.
Cardinali, C., R. Buizza, G. Kelly, M. Shapiro, and J.-N. Thépaut, 2007: The value of observations. III: Influence of weather regimes on targeting. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 133, 1833–1842, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.148.
Chen, B.-Y., 2011: Observation system experiments for typhoon nida (2004) using the CNOP method and DOTSTAR data. Atmos. Ocean. Sci. Let., 4, 118–123, https://doi.org/10.1080/16742834.2011.11446914.
Chen, Y. F., and G. Gao, 2010: An analysis to losses caused by meteorological disasters in China during 1989–2008. Meteorological Monthly, 36, 76–80, https://doi.org/10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2010.2.011. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Coutinho, M. M., B. J. Hoskins, and R. Buizza, 2004: The influence of physical processes on extratropical singular vectors. J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 195–209, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<0195:TIOPPO>2.0.CO;2.
Doyle, J. D., C. A. Reynolds, and C. Amerault, 2019: Adjoint sensitivity analysis of high-impact extratropical cyclones. Mon. Wea. Rev., 147, 4511–4532, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-19-0055.1.
Ehrendorfer, M., and R. M. Errico, 1995: Mesoscale predictability and the spectrum of optimal perturbations. J. Atmos. Sci., 52, 3475–3500, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1995)052<3475:MPATSO>2.0.CO;2.
Ehrendorfer, M., R. M. Errico, and K. D. Raeder, 1999: Singular-Vector perturbation growth in a primitive equation model with moist physics. J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 1627–1648, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056<1627:SVPGIA>2.0.CO;2.
Grell, G. A., J. Dudhia, and D. R. Stauffer, 1995: A description of the fifth-generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5). NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-398+STR, 121 pp.
Hakim, G. J., and R. D. Torn, 2008: Ensemble synoptic analysis. Meteor. Monogr., 33, 147–162, https://doi.org/10.1175/0065-9401-33.55.147.
Hamill, T. M., and C. Snyder, 2002: Using improved background-error covariances from an ensemble Kalman filter for adaptive observations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 1552–1572, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130<1552:UIBECF>2.0.CO;2.
Hoskins, B. J., and P. J. Valdes, 1990: On the existence of storm-tracks. J. Atmos. Sci., 47, 1854–1864, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1990)047<1854:OTEOST>2.0.CO;2.
Hoskins, B. J., R. Buizza, and J. Badger, 2000: The nature of singular vector growth and structure. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 126, 1565–1580, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712656601.
Huang, L., and Z. Y. Meng, 2014: Quality of the target area for metrics with different nonlinearities in a mesoscale convective system. Mon. Wea. Rev., 142, 2379–2397, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-13-00244.1.
Joseph, S., and Coauthors, 2015: North Indian heavy rainfall event during June 2013: Diagnostics and extended range prediction. Climate Dyn., 44, 2049–2065, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2291-5.
Jung, B.-J., and H. M. Kim, 2009: Moist adjoint-based forecast sensitivities for a heavy snowfall event over the Korean Peninsula on 4–5 March 2004. J. Geophys. Res., 114, D15104, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011370.
Kim, H. M., S.-M. Kim, and B.-J. Jung, 2011: Real-Time adaptive observation guidance using singular vectors for typhoon Jangmi (200815) in T-PARC 2008. Wea. Forecasting, 26, 634–649, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-10-05013.1.
Li, X. S., Y. L. Luo, and Z. Y. Guan, 2014: The persistent heavy rainfall over southern China in June 2010: Evolution of synoptic systems and the effects of the Tibetan Plateau heating. Journal of Meteorological Research, 28, 540–560, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-014-3284-3.
Li, X. Z., W. Zhou, Y. Q. Chen, and D. Chen, 2016: Detecting the origins of moisture over southeast China: Seasonal variation and heavy rainfall. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 33, 319–329, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-015-4197-5.
Liu, J. Y., and Z.-M. Tan, 2009: Mesoscale predictability of meiyu heavy rainfall. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 26, 438–450, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-009-0438-9.
Liu, J. Y., Z. M. Tan, and S. N. Gu, 2011: Flow-dependent mesoscale predictability of Meiyu heavy rainfall. Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 35, 912–926, https://doi.org/10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.2011.05.11. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Liu, S.-Y., Y.-G. Zheng, and Z.-Y. Tao, 2003: The analysis of the relationship between pulse of LLJ and heavy rain using wind profiler data. Journal of Tropical Meteorology, 9, 158–163, https://doi.org/10.3669/j:issn./1006-8775.2003.02.006.
Lorenz, E. N., 1963: Deterministic nonperiodic flow. J. Atmos. Sci., 20, 130–141, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020<0130:DNF>2.0.CO;2.
Lynch, S. L., and R. S. Schumacher, 2014: Ensemble-based analysis of the May 2010 extreme rainfall in Tennessee and Kentucky. Mon. Wea. Rev., 142, 222–239, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-13-00020.1.
Mahfouf, J.-F., and B. Bilodeau, 2007: Adjoint sensitivity of surface precipitation to initial conditions. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, 2879–2896, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3439.1.
Meng, X. F., Y. G. Sun, Sarina, H. M. Yuan, and Hasi, 2013: Correlation between eastward developing of Hetao cyclone and the severe rainstorm in Beijing on 21 July 2012. Meteorological Monthly, 39, 1542–1549, https://doi.org/10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2013.12.002. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Molteni, F., R. Buizza, T. N. Palmer, and T. Petroliagis, 1996: The ECMWF ensemble prediction system: Methodology and validation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 122, 73–119, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712252905.
Montani, A., A. J. Thorpe, R. Buizza, and P. Undén, 1999: Forecast skill of the ECMWF model using targeted observations during FASTEX. Quat. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125, 3219–3240, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712556106.
Mu, M., and W. S. Duan, 2003: A new approach to studying ENSO predictability: Conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation. Chinese Science Bulletin, 48, 1045–1047, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03184224.
Mu, M., H.-L. Wang, and F.-F. Zhou, 2007: A preliminary application of conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation to adaptive observation. Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 31, 1102–1112, https://doi.org/10.3878/j.sssn.1006-9895.2007.06.06. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Ni, Y. Q., X. J. Zhou, R. H. Zhang, P. Y. Wang, and Q. J. Yi, 2006: Experiments and studies for heavy rainfall in southern China. Journal of Applied Meteorological Science, 17, 690–704, https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-7313.2006.06.007. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Palmer, T. N., R. Gelaro, J. Barkmeijer, and R. Buizza, 1998: Singular vectors, metrics, and adaptive observations. J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 633–653, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1998)055<0633:SVMAAO>2.0.CO;2.
Qi, L. B., and J. Xu, 2018: Rethink on short range forecast of the 9 July severe rainstorm in northern Henan. Meteorological Monthly, 44, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2018.01.001. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Reynolds, C. A., and T. E. Rosmond, 2003: Nonlinear growth of singular-vector-based perturbations. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 129, 3059–3078, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.02.193.
Reynolds, C. A., J. D. Doyle, F. M. Ralph, and R. Demirdjian, 2019: Adjoint sensitivity of North Pacific atmospheric river forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 147, 1871–1897, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-18-0347.1.
Schumacher, R. S., 2011: Ensemble-based analysis of factors leading to the development of a multiday warm-season heavy rain event. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 3016–3035, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-10-05022.1.
Sippel, J. A., and F. Q. Zhang, 2010: Factors affecting the predictability of hurricane Humberto (2007). J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 1759–1778, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAS3172.1.
Sun, J. H., Y. C. Zhang, R. X. Liu, S. M. Fu, and F. Y. Tian, 2019: A review of research on warm-sector heavy rainfall in China. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 36, 1299–1307, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-019-9021-1.
Wang, C.-C., J. C.-S. Hsu, G. T.-J. Chen, and D.-I. Lee, 2014a: A study of two propagating heavy-rainfall episodes near Taiwan during SoWMEX/TiMREX IOP-8 in June 2008. Part II: Sensitivity tests on the roles of synoptic conditions and topographic effects. Mon. Wea. Rev., 142, 2644–2664, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-13-00330.1.
Wang, J. Y., C. G. Cui, X. F. Wang, and W. J. Cui, 2014b: Analysis on water vapor transport and budget of the severe torrential rain over Beijing region on 21 July 2012. Meteorological Monthly, 40, 133–145, https://doi.org/10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2014.02.001. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Wang, Q., and M. Mu, 2017: Application of conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation to target observations for high-impactocean-atmospheric environmental events. Data Assimilation for Atmospheric, Oceanic and Hydrologic Applications (Vol. III), S. K. Park and L. Xu, Eds., Springer International Publishing, 513–526, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43415-5_23.
Xu, J., Y. Chen, J. Sun, S. Yang, Z. Zong, T. Chen, C. Fang, and J. Sheng, 2012: Observation analysis of Beijing extreme flooding event 21 July 2012. Weather Forecast Review, 4, 9–19. (in Chinese)
Yu, H. Z., and Z. Y. Meng, 2016: Key synoptic-scale features influencing the high-impact heavy rainfall in Beijing, China, on 21 July 2012. Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography, 68, 31045, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v68.31045.
Yu, H. Z., H. L. Wang, Z. Y. Meng, M. Mu, X.-Y. Huang, and X. Zhang, 2017: A WRF-based tool for forecast sensitivity to the initial perturbation: The conditional nonlinear optimal perturbations versus the first singular vector method and comparison to MM5. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 34, 187–206, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-15-0183.1.
Zhang, F., C. Snyder, and R. Rotunno, 2002: Mesoscale predictability of the “surprise” snowstorm of 24–25 January 2000. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 1617–1632, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130<1617:MPOTSS>2.0.CO;2.
Zhang, F., C. Snyder, and R. Rotunno, 2003: Effects of moist convection on mesoscale predictability. J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 1173–1185, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469/2003/060<1173:EOMCOM>2.0.CO;2.
Zhang, F. Q., A. M. Odins, and J. W. Nielsen-Gammon, 2006: Mesoscale predictability of an extreme warm-season precipitation event. Wea. Forecasting, 21, 149–166, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF909.1.
Zhang, G. C., 2006: Prevention and mitigation of the meteorological disasters-The world meteorological day, 2006. Meteorological Monthly, 32, 3–5, https://doi.org/10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2006.03.001. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Zhang, M. R., and Z. Y. Meng, 2018: Impact of synoptic-scale factors on rainfall forecast in different stages of a persistent heavy rainfall event in South China. J. Geophy. Res., 123, 3574–3593, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD028155.
Zhang, X. B., Y. L. Luo, Q. L. Wan, W. Y. Ding, and J. X. Sun, 2016a: Impact of assimilating wind profiling radar observations on convection-permitting quantitative precipitation forecasts during SCMREX. Wea. Forecasting, 31, 1271–1292, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-15-0156.1.
Zhang, Y. J., F. Q. Zhang, D. J. Stensrud, and Z. Y. Meng, 2016b: Intrinsic predictability of the 20 May 2013 tornadic thunderstorm event in Oklahoma at storm scales. Mon. Wea. Rev., 144, 1273–1298, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0105.1.
Zhou, F. F., and H. Zhang, 2014: Study of the schemes based on CNOP method to identify sensitive areas for typhoon targeted observations. Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 38, 261–272, https://doi.org/10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.2013.13129. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Zhu, B. L., W. T. Lin, and Y. Zhang, 2009: Impacts of initial perturbations on prediction of a heavy rain in South China. Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 33, 1333–1347, https://doi.org/10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.2009.06.18. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Zhu, H. F., D. Y. Wang, Z. Y. Guan, Y. Liu, and Y. F. Fu, 2007: Effects of different initial fields on GRAPES numerical prediction. Journal of Meteorological Research, 21, 496–506.
Zou, X. L., F. Vandenberghe, M. Pondeca, and Y.-H. Kuo, 1997: Introduction to adjoint techniques and the MM5 adjoint modeling system. NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN2435+STR, 110 pp.
Acknowledgements
This paper is dedicated to Dr. Fuqing ZHANG. Dr. Fuqing ZHANG made tremendous contributions to atmospheric dynamics, predictability, and ensemble-based data assimilation. He developed a widely accepted conceptual model of multiscale multistage error growth in which moist processes impact atmospheric predictability at increasingly larger scales, and for the first time demonstrated that upscale growth of small-scale, small-amplitude initial condition errors through moist convection may fundamentally limit the predictability of severe weather at mesoscale and beyond. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 42030604, 41875051, and 41425018). The global analysis data used in this study are the National Centers for Environmental Prediction Final Operational Global Analysis (NCEP FNL), available at https://rda.ucar.edu/datasets/ds083.2/. Precipitation data were provided by the National Meteorological Information Center of China Meteorological Administration (http://data.cma.cn/en/?r=data/detail&dataCode=A.0012.0001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Article Highlights
• With moist physics, CNOP identifies both the upper-level and lower-level sensitive areas. Without moist physics, CNOP only identifies the upper-level sensitive area.
• The gradient of the cost function with respect to initial perturbations peaks at the upper levels without moist physics, while it peaks at both upper and lower levels with moist physics.
• The upper-level sensitive area is associated with high baroclinicity, and the lower-level sensitive area is associated with moist processes.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yu, H., Meng, Z. The Impact of Moist Physics on the Sensitive Area Identification for Heavy Rainfall Associated Weather Systems. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 39, 684–696 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-0278-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-0278-9