Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of four precipitation distribution models used in daily stochastic models

  • Published:
Advances in Atmospheric Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stochastic weather generators are statistical models that produce random numbers that resemble the observed weather data on which they have been fitted; they are widely used in meteorological and hydrological simulations. For modeling daily precipitation in weather generators, first-order Markov chain-dependent exponential, gamma, mixed-exponential, and lognormal distributions can be used. To examine the performance of these four distributions for precipitation simulation, they were fitted to observed data collected at 10 stations in the watershed of Yishu River. The parameters of these models were estimated using a maximum-likelihood technique performed using genetic algorithms. Parameters for each calendar month and the Fourier series describing parameters for the whole year were estimated separately. Bayesian information criterion, simulated monthly mean, maximum daily value, and variance were tested and compared to evaluate the fitness and performance of these models. The results indicate that the lognormal and mixed-exponential distributions give smaller BICs, but their stochastic simulations have overestimation and underestimation respectively, while the gamma and exponential distributions give larger BICs, but their stochastic simulations produced monthly mean precipitation very well. When these distributions were fitted using Fourier series, they all underestimated the above statistics for the months of June, July and August.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apipattanavis, S., G. Podesta, B. Rajagopalan, and R. W. Katz, 2007: A semiparametric multivariate and multisite weather generator. Water Resour. Res., 43(11), W11401, doi: 10.1029/2006WR005714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardossy, A., 1997: Downscaling from GCMs to local climate through stochastic linkages. Journal of Environmental Management, 49(1), 7–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, B. C., S. P. Charles, and J. P. Hughes, 1998: Stochastic downscaling of numerical climate model simulations. Environmental Modelling & Software, 13(3–4), 325–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buishand, T. A., 1978: Some remarks on use of daily rainfall models. J. Hydrol., 36(3–4), 295–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceo, R., and R. D. Stern, 1982: Fitting models to daily rainfall data. J. Appl. Meteor., 21(7), 1024–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, T. G., 1997: Stochastic models for daily rainfall in the Western Pacific. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 43(3–6), 351–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gyasi-Agyei, Y., and S. M. Parvez Bin Mahbub, 2007: A stochastic model for daily rainfall disaggregation into fine time scale for a barge region. J. Hydrol., 347(3–4), 358–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, J. W., and T. Mavromatis, 2001: Correcting low-frequency variability bias in stochastic weather generators. Agriculatural and Forest Meteorology, 109(4), 297–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R. W., and M. B. Parlange, 1996: Mixtures of stochastic processes: Application to statistical downscaling. Climate Research, 7(2), 185–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R. W., and M. B. Parlange, 1998: Overdispersion phenomenon in stochastic modeling of precipitation. J. Climate, 11(4), 591–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R. W., and X. G. Zheng, 1999: Mixture model for overdispersion of precipitation. J. Climate, 12(8), 2528–2537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kou, X. J., J. P. Ge, Y. Wang, and C. J. Zhang, 2007: Validation of the weather generator CLIGEN with daily precipitation data from the Loess Plateau, China. J. Hydrol., 347(3–4), 347–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, C. W., 1981: Stochastic simulation of daily precipitation, temprature, and solar-radiation. Water Resour. Res., 17(1), 182–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roldan, J., and D. A. Woolhiser, 1982: Stochastic daily precipitation models.1. A comparison of occurrence processes. Water Resour. Res., 18(5), 1451–1459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sansom, J., 1998: A hidden Markov model for rainfall using breakpoint data. J. Climate, 11(1), 42–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, G., 1978: Estimating dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilks, D. S., 1989: Conditioning stochastic daily precipitation models on total monthly precipitation. Water Resour. Res., 25(6), 1429–1439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilks, D. S., 1992: Adapting stochastic weather generation algorithms for climate change studies. Climatic Change, 22(1), 67–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilks, D. S., 1998: Multisite generalization of a daily stochastic precipitation generation model. J. Hydrol., 210(1–4), 178–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilks, D. S., 1999: Interannual variability and extremevalue characteristics of several stochastic daily precipitation models. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 93(3), 153–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolhiser, D. A., and G. Pegram, 1979: Maximum likelihood estimation of Fourier coefficients to describe seasonal-variations of parameters in stochastic daily precipitation models. J. Appl. Meteor., 18(1), 34–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolhiser, D. A., and J. Roldan, 1982: Stochastic daily precipitation models. 2. A comparison of distributions of amounts. Water Resour. Res., 18(5), 1461–1468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J. D., and S. L. Wang, 2001: Incorporating stochastic weather generators into studies on climate impacts: Methods and uncertainties. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 18(5), 937–949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, X. G., and R. W. Katz, 2008: Mixture model of generalized chain-dependent processes and its application to simulation of interannual variability of daily rainfall. J. Hydrol., 349(1–2), 191–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wanchang Zhang  (张万昌).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Zhang, W., Shao, Y. et al. A comparison of four precipitation distribution models used in daily stochastic models. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 28, 809–820 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-010-9180-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-010-9180-6

Key words

Navigation