Abstract
A set of microphysics equations is scaled based on the convective length and velocity scales. Comparisons are made among the dynamical transport and various microphysical processes. From the scaling analysis, it becomes apparent which parameterized microphysical processes present off-scaled influences in the integration of the set of microphysics equations.
The variabilities of the parameterized microphysical processes are also studied using the approach of a controlled parameter space. Given macroscopic dynamic and thermodynamic conditions in different regions of convective storms, it is possible to analyze and compare vertical profiles of these processes. Bulk diabatic heating profiles for a cumulus convective updraft and downdraft are also derived from this analysis.
From the two different angles, the scale analysis and the controlled-parameter space approach can both provide an insight into and an understanding of microphysics parameterizations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Braun, S. A., and R. A. Houze Jr., 1995a: Diagnosis of hydrometeor profiles from area-mean vertical velocity data. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc, 121, 23–53.
Braun, S. A., and R. A. Houze Jr., 1995b: Melting and freezingin a mesoscale convective system. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc, 121,55–77.
Braun, S. A., and R. A. Houze Jr., 1996: The heat budget of amidlatitude squall line and implications for potential vorticity production. J. Atmos. Sci., 53, 1217–1240.
Browning, G. L., and H. O. Kreiss, 1986: Scaling and computation ofsmooth atmospheric motions. Tellus, 38A, 295–313.
Cotton, W. R., and R. A. Anthes, 1989: Storm and Cloud Dynamics. Academic Press, 883 pp.
Fletcher, N. H., 1962: The Physics of Rainclouds. Cambridge University Press, 386pp.
Gallus, W. A., Jr., and R. H. Johnson, 1991: Heat and moisture budgets of an intense midlatitude squall line. J. Atmos. Sci., 48, 122–146.
Grell, G. A., J. Dudhia, and D. R. Stauffer, 1995: A description ofthe fifth-generation Penn State / NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5). NCAR Technical Note, NCAR/ TN-398+STR, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, 138pp.
Heymsfield, A. J., D. N. Johnson, and J. E. Dye, 1978: Observations of moist adiabatic ascent in northeast Colorado cumulus congestus clouds. J. Atmos. Sci., 35, 1689–1703.
Houze, R. A., Jr., 1989: Observed structure of mesoscale convective systems and implications for large-scale heating. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 115, 425–461.
Johnson, R. H., 1976: The role of convective-scale downdrafts in cumulus and synoptic-scale interactions. J. Atmos. Sci., 33, 1890–1910.
Johnson, R. H., 1984: Partitioning tropical heat and moisture budgets into cumulus and mesoscale components: Implications for cumulus parameterization. Mon. Wea. Rev., 112, 1590–1601.
Kessler, E., III, 1969: On the distribution and continuity of water substance in atmospheric circulations. Meteor. Monogr., No. 32, Amer. Meteor. Soc, 84pp.
Lin, Y.-L., R. D. Farley, and H. D. Orville, 1983: Bulk parameterization of the snow field in a cloud model. J. Climate Appl. Meteor., 22, 1065–1092.
Lu, C., and G. L. Browning, 2000: On discontinuous forcing generating rough initial conditions in 4DVAR data assimilation. J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 1646–1656.
Marshall, J. S., and W. M. Palmer, 1948: The distribution of raindrops with size. J. Meteor., 5, 165–166.
McCumber, M., W. K. Tao, J. Simpson, R. Penc, and S. -T. Soong, 1991: Comparison of ice-phase microphysical parameterization schemes using numerical simulations of tropical convection. J. Appl. Meteor., 30,985–1004.
Meyers, M. P., P. J. DeMott, and W. R. Cotton, 1992: New primary ice-nucleation parameterizations in an explicit cloud model. J. Appl. Meteor., 31, 708–721.
Murray, F. W., 1967: On the computation of saturation vapor pressure. J: Appl. Meteor., 6, 203–204.
Orville, H. D., and F. J. Kopp, 1977: Numerical simulation of the life history of a hailstorm. J. Atmos. Sci., 34, 1596–1618.
Pielke, R. A., 1984: Mesoscale Meteorological Modeling. Academic Press, 612pp.
Rutledge, S. A., and P. V. Hobbs, 1983: The mesoscale and microscale structure and organization of clouds and precipitation in midlatitude cyclones. VIII: A model for the “ seeder-feeder” process in warm-frontal rainbands. J. Atmos. Sci., 40,1185–1206.
Rutledge, S. A., and P. V. Hobbs, 1984: The mesoscale and microscale structure and organization of clouds and precipitation in midlatitude cyclones. XII: A diagnostic modeling study of precipitation development in narrow cold-frontal rainbands. J. Atmos. Sci., 41, 2949–2972.
Schultz, P., 1995: An explicit cloud physics parameterization for operational numerical weather prediction. Mon. Wea. Rev., 123,3331–3343.
Snook, J. S., J. M. Cram, and J. M. Schmidt, 1995: LAPS / RAMS: A nonhydrostatic mesoscale numerical modeling system configured for operational use. Tellus, 47A, 864–875.
Sundqvist, H., 1978: A parameterization scheme for non-convective condensation including prediction of cloud water content. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc, 104, 677–690.
Sundqvist, H., E. Berge, and J. E. KristjBnsson, 1989: Condensation and cloud studies with a mesoscale numerical weather prediction model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 117, 1641–1657.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lu, C., Schultz, P. & Browning, G.L. Scaling the microphysics equations and analyzing the variability of hydrometeor production rates in a controlled parameter space. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 19, 619–650 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-002-0004-1
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-002-0004-1