Abstract
Management of plant residues plays an important role in maintaining soil quality and nutrient availability for plants and microbes. However, there is considerable uncertainty regarding the factors controlling residue decomposition and their effects on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the soil. This uncertainty is created both by the complexity of the processes involved and limitations in the methodologies commonly used to quantify GHG emissions. We therefore investigated the addition of two soil residues (durum wheat and faba bean) with similar C/N ratios but contrasting fibres, lignin and cellulose contents on nutrient dynamics and GHG emission from two contrasting soils: a low-soil organic carbon (SOC), high pH clay soil (Chromic Haploxerert) and a high-SOC, low pH sandy-loam soil (Eutric Cambisol). In addition, we compared the effectiveness of the use of an infrared gas analyser (IRGA) and a photoacoustic gas analyser (PGA) to measure GHG emissions with more conventional gas chromatography (GC). There was a strong correlation between the different measurement techniques which strengthens the case for the use of continuous measurement approaches involving IRGA and PGA analyses in studies of this type. The unamended Cambisol released 286% more CO2 and 30% more N2O than the Haploxerert. Addition of plant residues increased CO2 emissions more in the Haploxerert than Cambisol and N2O emission more in the Cambisol than in the Haploxerert. This may have been a consequence of the high N stabilization efficiency of the Haploxerert resulting from its high pH and the effect of the clay on mineralization of native organic matter. These results have implication management of plant residues in different soil types.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Find the latest articles, discoveries, and news in related topics.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Agriculture forestry and related land uses are responsible for just under 25% of global greenhouse gas emissions (IPCC 2014). Agronomic practices are recognized as key opportunities to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (particularly for N2O and CO2). The addition of plant residues to the soil from crops and cover crops is of significant importance to crop management strategies to enhance soil organic C (SOC) and soil fertility and to offset agricultural GHG emissions (Lugato et al. 2014). However, decomposition of residues will also add nitrogen (N) to the soil, and with the default N2O emission factor of 1% of the added N in the IPCC (2006) methodology, a proportional increase in estimated N2O emissions is predicted. However, IPCC predictions have been developed around limited experimental data and recent studies indicate that default emission factors may overestimate residue N2O emissions (Jeuffroy et al. 2013). GHG emission after crop residue amendment is related to both its decomposition and the microbial activity of soil and depends from several factors linked to the environment, soil proprieties and crop residue traits (Aulakh et al. 1991; Powlson et al. 2011). In particular, the GHG emission from the soil is mediated by soil porosity (Killham et al. 1993), pH (Mørkved et al. 2006), organic C and N content (Hayakawa et al. 2009), microbial community (Graf et al. 2016), texture (Chen et al. 2013), soil temperature (Kesik et al. 2006) and moisture content, all of which regulate gas production processes and emission (Skiba and Ball 2002; Rees et al. 2013). Moreover, crop residue addition to the soil can also indirectly affect GHG emissions, providing a source of readily available C and N in the soil, stimulating microbial activity (Aulakh et al. 2001; Huang et al. 2004), promoting the decomposition of native SOC and altering soil aeration, water holding capacity, oxidation and denitrification processes in the soil (Fontaine et al. 2004; Derrien et al. 2014).
With regard to the crop residue characteristics, the most important property is its C/N ratio that determines organic N dynamics in the soil (Heal et al. 1997; Baggs et al. 2003; Al-Kaisi and Yin 2005; Garcia-Ruiz and Baggs 2007). In particular, it has been shown that higher N2O emissions occur from soil after the incorporation of residues with low C/N ratio, such as legumes, rather than after cereal straw as a result of mineralization processes (Baggs et al. 2000; Huang et al. 2004; Raiesi 2006). On the contrary, low N2O emissions were reported following the application of crop residues with high C/N ratios (Gentile et al. 2008). However, it has also been shown that the incorporation of crop residues with high C/N ratios may provide the energy for the denitrification process, and this can increase N2O emissions (Sarkodie-Addo et al. 2003). Other crop residue properties can play an important role on the decomposition process influencing microbial activity, including lignin (Palm and Rowland 1997), lignin/N ratios (Curtin et al. 1998) polyphenol (Muhammad et al. 2010), water-soluble phenolic contents (Palm and Rowland 1997), percentages of soluble C and N (Cogle et al. 1989) and neutral detergent fibre (NDF). This understanding of the multiple drivers responsible for GHG emissions from crop residues is helpful in interpreting research findings. Baggs et al. (2000) found an increase of N2O emissions after lettuce incorporation into the soil due to its low C/N ratio. However, Tanveer et al. (2014) and Zou et al. (2004) observed a reduction of N2O emission after incorporation of low C/N crop residue of corn and rice straw. This apparent contradiction may be a consequence of the interaction of multiple factors controlling emission. Shan and Yan (2013), in a meta-analysis, reported that the application of canola, bean and lettuce residues increased N2O emissions more than with other kinds of crop residues. With regard to CO2 emissions, Muhammad et al. (2010) observed higher emissions in soil amended with alfalfa than with sugarcane, maize, sorghum and cotton and attributed such result to a release of more easily degradable and soluble C in alfalfa than with other crop residues. Chen et al. (2015) observed a general increase of CO2 emissions from a soil amended with different types of residues but with higher cumulative emissions in peanuts, soybean and maize than in other cereals due to their higher N and lower NDF content.
An accurate quantification of CO2 and N2O emission following return of crop residues to soils is required to develop efficient strategies to reduce the environmental impact of farming practices. Presently, static chamber methods coupled with gas chromatography (GC) analysis are the most widely technique used to quantify N2O losses in field and laboratory experiments. However, the method is time consuming and entails a wide series of operations from the manual sampling to the laboratory analysis, introducing errors and making difficult to implement high-resolution monitoring over time (Tirol-Padre et al. 2014). In order to obtain high-resolution temporal data, infrared gas analyser (IRGA) and photoacoustic gas analyser (PGA) have been used in agricultural GHG emission studies (Luo and Zhou 2006; Lawrence et al. 2009; Stackhouse et al. 2011). IRGA allows to measure CO2 fluxes using an infrared sensor, and PGA is a photoacoustic infrared multi-gas monitoring system that allows to measure simultaneously CO2, N2O and CH4. Measurement of CO2 efflux by IRGA systems is usually based on different methodologies proposed by the manufacturing companies, and there is not an internationally recognized protocol creating uncertainties in the comparison between different instruments (Mills et al. 2011). PGA has been widely used in field experiments, and several authors found a high correlation between CO2 and N2O measurements made with PGA and GC (De Klein et al. 2008; Iqbal et al. 2013). Other authors reported an overestimation of emission on the data obtained with PGA than GC (Yamulki and Jarvis 1999). Furthermore, the precision of measurement may also depend from the soil type and soil cover, which can affect the assessment of emission spatial variability. The precision of the various instruments (IRGA and PGA compared to the widely used CG) in measuring GHG emission has never been measured. However, in contrast to the GC-based methodology, these systems are able to provide a continuous measurement of the GHG emission, thus allowing to better study the trend of the emission from the soil and its relationship with agronomical management techniques and environmental variability. In addition, IRGA and PGA have not been previously directly compared.
Soil GHG emissions from Cambisols which occur widely in cool temperate climates have widely studied in the past whereas the effect of soil characteristics typical of the Mediterranean such as Vertisols, with their high clay content high pH and low organic carbon content, on crop residue decomposition and gaseous emissions is less known. The aims of the present study were (i) to evaluate the short-term emissions of N2O and CO2 after the addiction of two crop residues with different structural fibre compositions (either faba bean and wheat), in two soils with contrasting proprieties, a Chromic Haploxerert with a high clay content and a Eutric Cambisol with a sandy-loam texture and (ii) assess the flexibility of two systems for the high temporal resolution measurements (IRGA and PGA), to measure soil GHG emissions from soils with different emission levels in controlled conditions. Experiments were undertaken in a controlled pot setup over a short period and in the absence of plants in order to simulate the effects of crop residues between cropping cycles. These conditions avoided strong time-related variation in the emission due to the impoverishment of the ready available N pool and living plant C inputs to and mineral uptake from soil, which could have altered the emission rates.
Materials and methods
An experiment was established during 2014 in controlled environment conditions at Scotland’s Rural College (SRUC) Edinburgh. A complete randomized factorial design with three replicates was adopted. Treatments were soil Eutric Cambisol and Chromic Haploxerert (Vertisol) and the kinds of plant residue added were as follows: faba bean residue, durum wheat residue or unamended control. The Cambisol was collected at nine locations per plot from the top 20 cm at Bush Estate (lat, 55° 51′ N, long, 3° 12′ W; 199 m a.s.l.) near Edinburgh (Scotland); the Haploxerert (Vertisol) was collected at the Pietranera farm (37° 30′ N, 13° 31 E; 178 m a.s.l.) in Santo Stefano Quisquina (Sicily). Both soils were sampled in early October 2014. Soil was collected from conventional tilled experimental plots at the Bush Estate in Scotland and from conventionally tilled plots at Pietranera farm in Sicily (Table 1). At both sites, the soil was collected in plots previously cultivated with cereals (wheat in Sicily and barley in Scotland). Further information regarding the soil sampling sites is available in Vinten et al. (1992) and Amato et al. (2013), respectively. Before establishing the experiment, soil was air-dried and passed through a 2-mm mesh and visible roots and organic residues were removed and then mixed thoroughly before use; water holding capacity of both soils was measured on a weight basis. Oven-dried crop biomass of wheat (cv. Simeto) and faba bean (cv. Gemini) (see Table 2 residues traits), cultivated at Pietranera farm, was ground to pass a 1-mm screen, mixed and used as crop residues.
Pots were 10 cm in diameter and 25-cm height and were filled with 1.5 kg of soil to achieve a bulk density of 1.25 g cm−3. Crop residues were mixed with the soil at a rate of 5 g crop residue per kilogram of soil. The bottom part of the pot (15–25-cm depth) was filled with sand. Then, pots were brought to 60–70% of the water holding capacity. After each sampling, an amount of water corresponding to the evaporation losses was added to each pot and the pots were randomized inside the greenhouse. During the experiment, soil temperature was recorded using a temperature data logger (EL-USB-3, Lascar Electronics, UK).
Both CO2 and N2O soil emissions were measured three times per week, on 22 sampling occasions, by means of two different methods: an online infrared gas analyser (IRGA, EGM-4 CO2, PP system, USA) and a photoacoustic gas analyser (PGA, INNOVA 1412, LumaSense Technologies A/S, USA). Measurements were always taken between the 9:00 and the 15:00, and each time, the equipment order was reversed. The IRGA was equipped with a SRC-1 soil respiration chamber equipped with a fan, with of 10 cm of diameter and 15-cm height, sealed on top of the pot by an airtight rubber. The air from the chamber was send to the analyser at a flow rate of 0.1 l min−1. After 15 s of flushing, the chamber was placed above the pot, equilibrated for 15 s, then the CO2 concentration was measured every 5 s and the flux was calculated from the concentration increase over time until a good linear fit was obtained.
The PGA was equipped with a PVC chamber with 10 cm of diameter and 10 cm height, connected to the equipment by two small rubber pipes on the chamber top, and sealed above the pot by a rubber seal. The analyser automatically pumped ∼0.1 l min−1 of air from inside the chambers and performed the analysis with a 5-s sampling integration time and a fixed flushing time of 8 s for the chamber and 3 s for the tubing. The PGA instrument was calibrated in the lab for CO2 and N2O by the LumaSense technologies company, with a gas concentration of 3496.8 ppm for CO2 and 51.32 ppm for N2O, and its detection limits were 1.5 ppm for CO2 and 0.03 ppm for N2O. The equipment performed a built-in compensation for water and cross interferences. Before the flux measurements, the instrument analysed ambient air for about 30 min until readings for CO2 and N2O were stable. The overall time for sampling and measurement of CO2 and N2O concentration and dew-point temperature was approximately 70 s; each measurement was made every 2 min.
Gas flux measurement (CO2 from both IRGA and PGA and N2O from PGA), in two different periods during the experiment, was compared with analyses by GC in order to confirm the reliability of the instruments. CO2 and N2O emissions were measured using the static closed chamber technique (Hutchinson and Mosier 1981). A chamber of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) with 10 cm of diameter and 15-cm height and a lid with a gas sampling port was sealed above each pot for 60 min. Before and after this period, gas samples were collected in portable evacuated glass vials (Chadwick et al. 2014), transported to the lab and analysed by a GC (Agilent 7890a, Agilent Technologies Ltd., Stockport, UK) equipped with a thermal conductivity detector (TCD, detection limit for CO2 of 23.9 ppm) and an electron capture detector (ECD, detection limit for N2O of 0.074 ppm). Fluxes of CO2 and N2O were calculated from the increase in concentration in the chamber corrected for the chamber air temperature using the following relation (Jantalia et al. 2008):
where ∆C/∆t is the gas increment during the chamber closure time, V is the volume of the chamber, A is the soil area, m is the molecular weight of the gases, and Vm is the gas molar volume corrected for the ambient temperature.
The total amounts of N2O and CO2 emissions were calculated by linear interpolation between consecutive using the following equation (Cai et al. 2012):
where F is the emission flow of N2O and CO2 at the i th measurement, (t i + 1 − t i ) is the time length between two adjacent measurements, and n is the total measurement number.
Plant dry matter (oven drying), ether extract (Method 920.39, diethyl ether, traditional Soxhlet extraction), total N (Kjeldahl) and crude protein (calculated from the total N by standard Jones factor, N × 6.25) were analysed following methods described by AOAC (1995). NDF, acid detergent fibre (ADF), acid detergent lignin (ADL), cellulose and hemicellulose were analysed following the sequential method proposed by Van Soest et al. (1991) and using a Fibertec System M 1020 extractor (Foss, Höganäs). The soluble fraction was obtained by boiling 1 g of ground residues in deionized water (100 °C) for 30 min followed by extraction with a neutral detergent (EDTA and Na lauryl sulphate at 100 °C) for 60 min to obtain the NDF fraction. ADF extraction was performed by boiling the sample for 60 min in an acid detergent solution (cetyltrimethylammonium (CTAB) in H2SO4). Then, the residual detergent was removed by washing the sample with hot water. Finally, the ADF was then treated with 72% H2SO4 (w/w) for 3 h at ambient temperature and the final mass of the non-extractable fraction was considered as lignin (ADL). Cellulose was calculated as the difference between ADF and ADL while hemicellulose as the difference between NDF and ADF. Ash and ADL ash measurements were performed at 550 °C for 4 h. For each residue type, the analyses were performed in triplicate. Total C of biomasses and soils was analysed by an automated analyser (Flash 2000, Thermo Finnigan, Glasgow, UK).
At the end of the experiment, two soil samples from each pot were collected: one from the top to 5-cm depth and the other from 5- to 15-cm depth. Soil pH was measured in a 1:5 (v/v) suspension of soil in water. Dissolved organic C (DOC) content in the soil was determined by a total organic C analyser (DC-80, Rosemount Analytical, Inc. Dohrmann Division, USA) after the removal of inorganic C by acidifying the sample. Concentrations of NH4 +-N and NO3 −-N were determined from 10 g of soil extracted with 100 ml of 2 M KCl (1:5 ratio); then, the filtered extract NH4 +-N and NO3 −-N concentrations were measured by a continuous flow analysis autoanalyser (SAN SYSTEM, Skalar Analytical B.V., Netherlands).
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was undertaken using a mixed model according to the statistical design in SAS environment (SAS Institute 2008). Treatment means were separated using p differences of the LSMEANS.
Regressions between GC and IRGA, and GC and PGA, for CO2, and for CO2 and N2O, respectively, were computed. Soil CO2 emission rate measurements from IRGA and PGA were compared on the 22 sampling occasions. Comparisons were made by a regression analysis and the index of agreement (IoAd) (SAS Institute 2008; Bennett et al. 2013).
Results
The temperature inside the greenhouse during the experiment ranged from a minimum of 17 °C to the maximum of 28.5 °C, with an average of 20.5 °C, while soil temperature ranged from a maximum of 27 °C to a minimum of 20 °C with a slight decreasing trend from the start to the end of the experiment (Fig. 1). The chemical composition of the plant residues used in the present study, expressed as percentages, are reported in Table 2. The N contents of faba bean and durum wheat were comparable (1.4 vs 1.3%, respectively). With regard to the other constituents, marked differences were found between the plant residues. In particular, faba bean had higher ADF (+66%), ADL (+186%), cellulose (+60%) and NDF (+19%) than wheat and a lower content of hemicellulose (−51%) (Table 2).
Carbon and nitrogen dynamics
The Haploxerert used in the present study had a high pH (8.1) and high clay and low total C content (1.39%), whereas the Cambisol had a near neutral (6.6), low clay and high C content (2.48%). Interaction between soil and residue type for these soil properties by the end of the experiment was strong and significant (p < 0.05) (Table 3). As expected, the addition of organic residues mostly increased DOC in both the top and sub-soil layers of the Haploxerert (on average by 52.5% compared to unamended control), whereas there was no significant effect on the Cambisol.
The soil incubation, either with or without plant residue incorporation, decreased soil pH by 0.86 in the Cambisol and 0.33 in the Haploxerert. The effect of the addition of organic residues to the soil pH varied with both the soil and kind of biomass incorporated: in the Cambisol, addition of wheat residues significantly decreased pH in the top and sub-layers when compared with the unamended control whereas addition of faba bean residues did not influence soil pH. In the Haploxerert, no effects of the addition of organic residues on soil pH were found in both soil layers.
The concentration of NH4 +-N was higher in the Haploxerert than Cambisol, and this is particularly apparent in the sub-layer. The role of the addition of organic residues on soil NH4 +-N depended on the soil and kind of biomass added: addition of durum wheat residues increased soil ammonium-N in top layer of both soils (+40% in the Cambisol and +102% in the Haploxerert), whereas NH4 +-N in the soils amended with faba bean residues was similar to those of the controls. In the sub-layer of the Cambisol, the effect of the addition of the organic residues was similar to that observed in the top layer, whereas the addition of both residues strongly increased the NH4 +-N of Haploxerert compared to the unamended control (+133% in faba bean and +454% in wheat residues).
The concentration of NO3 −-N in both layers was significantly higher in the Cambisol when compared with the Haploxerert, and this occurred irrespective of the addition of organic residues. In the Cambisol, addition of faba bean residues reduced NO3 −-N more than wheat residues, especially in the sub-layer, when compared with the unamended control. In the Haploxerert, NO3 −-N in both layers did not vary with the addition of plant residues.
NH4 +-N/NO3 −-N ratio differed considerably in the different soil types: in the unamended controls, it was 6.467 in the Haploxerert and 0.006 in the Cambisol. In the latter, addition of organic residues to the soil did not influence the NH4 +-N/NO3 −-N of either the top or sub-layer. In the top layer of Haploxerert, the addition of organic residues reduced the NH4 +-N/NO3 −-N ratio, especially when faba bean residues were added. In the sub-layer, an opposite result was found, and thus, addition of organic residues increased the NH4 +-N/NO3 −-N ratio, especially when wheat residues were added.
Greenhouse gas emissions
Carbon dioxide fluxes, measured with IRGA, ranged from a minimum value of 0.11 g m−2 h−1 to a maximum value of 3.64 g m−2 h−1 (Fig. 2). For almost the entire experimental period, the Cambisol had a higher CO2 emission flux than the Haploxerert. At the beginning of the experiment, the two soils reached the maximum emission flux at the first and second days of measurement with fluxes of 3.58 g m−2 h−1 for the Cambisol and 1.42 g m−2 h−1 for the Haploxerert.
The highest CO2 fluxes were recorded in both soils amended with wheat straw whereas the lowest in the unamended controls. The differences in emission between the two soils were strong in the first 2 weeks of measurement, where the 53.8 and 46.2% of total CO2 were emitted from the Cambisol and the Haploxerert, respectively. After the first 2 weeks of measurement, the differences between the two soils reduced and the emission decreased until the end of the experimental period.
The CO2 emissions measured with PGA showed a similar trend to those acquired by IRGA. However, in the first part of the experimental period, PGA emissions were slightly higher than those observed by the IRGA, especially from the Cambisol. In the second part of the experiment, no differences between the techniques were found (Fig. 3).
Total CO2 emissions were 74% lower in the unamended Haploxerert (198 g CO2 m−2) compared to the Cambisol (765 g CO2 m−2). Addition of plant residues to the soil increased total emission to a different extent depending on the soil under study (interaction soil × residue type significant p < 0.001): in the Cambisol, addition of faba bean and wheat resulted in an increase of 24 and 88%, respectively, of the total CO2 emissions. In the Haploxerert, no differences were found between the kinds of biomass incorporated, which, on average, increased total CO2 emission by 171% compared to the unamended control (Fig. 4).
Emissions of N2O during the experiment ranged from 0.022 to 0.348 mg m−2 h−1 (Fig. 5). However, there were large differences between soils with emissions of 0.024 to 0.117 mg m−2 h−1 and from 0.022 to 0.348 mg m−2 h−1 in the Haploxerert and Cambisol, respectively. The Cambisol reached a N2O emission peak at 7 days after the beginning of the experiment, whereas the Haploxerert soil showed a continuous and constant reduction of the N2O emission from the beginning of the experiment until the end of the trial. In addition, marked differences between amended and unamended soil were observed in Cambisol during the first half of the experiment. The highest fluxes were measured in both soils amended with wheat straw. Cumulative N2O emission in the unamended controls of the Cambisol soil was 30% higher than in Haploxerert soil (85.1 and 59.9 mg N2O m−2, respectively). Crop residue addition had a different effect in each soil (interaction soil × residue type significant p < 0.001). In the Cambisol, N2O emissions in the pots amended with wheat were 159.8 mg N2O m−2 (+88% more than the control) and that of the pots amended with faba bean was 127.0 mg N2O m−2 (+49% than the control). In the Haploxerert, faba bean-added pots emitted in total 80.8 mg N2O m−2 (+35% than the control) and that added with wheat 67.2 mg N2O m−2 (+12% than the control; Fig. 6).
Comparisons of gas measurement techniques
Few differences were found for the IRGA and PGA in CO2 measurement when compared with that from the GC. The determination factor was 0.937 (y GC = 1.0534x IRGA − 0.0221 g CO2m−2 h−1) and 0.925 (y GC = 0.9887x PGA − 0.0095 g CO2m−2 h−1) for IRGA and PGA, respectively, and IoAd was 0.998 for both instruments.
With regard to the N2O measurement, the linear regression between GC and PGA showed a relatively high relationship between the results (R 2 = 0.90; (y GC = 0.8993x PGA − 0.0063 mg N2Om−2 h−1)), although PGA-N2O was, on average, 5.2% higher than the GC-N2O measurements. However, in this case, the IoAd was also 0.998.
The comparison between CO2 measurements obtained by IRGA and PGA across the entire experimental period (more than 600 measurements) showed a high correlation between the two instruments (R 2 = 0.95; IoAd = 0.996; (y IRGA = 1.0118x PGA − 0.0003 g CO2m−2 h−1). However, the cumulative CO2 emissions measured by PGA were on average 9% higher than those measured by IRGA. Differences in CO2 fluxes from the two soils were apparent from the different measurement techniques. Thus, although the overall CO2 fluxes measured by PGA were 6% higher than IRGA, such differences were up to 10% greater when the comparison was limited to the Haploxerert soil, and up to 17% when only the control plots were considered. In the Cambisol, the differences between the instruments were lower at around 5%.
Discussion
N2O and CO2 emission and soil properties
This study evaluated the effect of soil incorporation of two different plant residues on N2O and CO2 emissions. The characteristics of two soils were distinctly different, with the Cambisol having a low pH and high SOC, while the Haploxerert had a high pH and low SOC. Emissions and soil parameters varied according to both the kind of residue added and the soil type. The total CO2 and N2O emissions (measured by PGA), from the unamended Cambisol, were 249 and 40% higher than the unamended Haploxerert, respectively, suggesting large differences in biochemical and microbial activity between both soils driven by differences in soil physical and chemical properties. Moreover, the differences in CO2 emissions between the two soils followed the differences in stable C (TOC was 78% higher in the Cambisol than in Haploxerert) and readily available C (DOC in the Cambisol was double that in the Haploxerert). This latter form, although it may be preferentially utilized by soil microorganisms, can be protected by soil aggregates or adsorbed by mineral particles (Majumder and Kuzyakov 2010; Steinbeiss et al. 2008; Shi and Marschner 2014; Hadas et al. 2004). The higher CO2 emissions (per unit of carbon present in the soil) from Cambisol were nevertheless a reflection of differences in the carbon pools. Such differences suggest that the Haploxerert had a relatively low respiration rate, which may have been a consequence of protection by the higher clay content in the Haploxerert of SOC pools (Baldock and Skjemstad 2000; Krull et al. 2003; Lutzow et al. 2006; Alluvione et al. 2013; Six and Paustian 2014) and coupled with relatively low soil microbial activity due to a low free substrate availability. Another important aspect related to the clay content is its mineralogy; the Haploxerert is characterized by prominent swelling-shrinkage behaviour, which suggests that a high content of montmorillonite can slow down organic matter decomposition by absorption, interacting with soil microbes and their external enzyme activity or limiting oxygen diffusion (Vogel et al. 2015). In addition, a recent highly reliable model on SOC on the region, the Haploxerert in the present study, came from confirming that these kinds of soil (along with other Vertisols) have a high ability to stabilize the soil organic matter (Schillaci et al. 2017; Saia et al. 2017). CO2 and N2O fluxes reached a peak within the first week of incubation and were higher in the Cambisol than in the Haploxerert. The transient effects of the CO2 and N2O emission rates were likely to have resulted from increased gas diffusivity due to the soil disturbance in the establishment of the experiment and the rapid decomposition of the highly labile free organic fraction (either added or not) (Magid et al. 1999; Baggs et al. 2006). Crop residue distribution within the soil, as reported by several authors (Curtin et al. 1998; Jacinthe et al. 2002; Lian et al. 2016), stimulated and increased CO2 emissions but with different magnitudes in the two soils. In particular, the difference in CO2 emissions between soils was reduced when an organic residue (either faba bean or wheat) was added. The Cambisol emitted +88 and +152% more CO2 than the Haploxerert when faba bean and wheat residues were added, respectively. Similar differences were found for N2O emission between soils amended with organic residues. These findings are supported by research by An et al. (2015) where straw C input to the soil was more effective at stimulating microbial activity and extractable organic carbon in a low fertility soil, than in a high fertility soil, probably as a consequence of the starvation of the soil microbial community (Bastida et al. 2013) and also a possible effect of clay which increases the contact between the substrate and microorganisms. However, their experiment used a soil with a lower clay content (24.9%), and we expect that in the soil used in our study which was more rich in clay (52.5%), this effect was less important due to the absorption effects described earlier. Other studies have shown that an increasing clay content (achieved by making artificial soils) accelerated the decomposition rate of added organic matter supporting the concept that clay can have a primary role in influencing decomposition-stabilization processes in the soil regulating the nutrient availability for microorganisms, emissions and organic carbon stabilization and sequestration (Velthof et al. 2002; Six and Paustian 2014; Wei et al. 2014; Bajgai et al. 2014). Nitrous oxide emissions from the Haploxerert were affected also by soil clay content and its direct action on N immobilization processes, as observed also by Begum et al. (2014) in an experiment conducted in a same type of soil (Vertisol) with a comparable clay content (62%), closely linked to the stabilization of the organic matter and confirmed by the high NH4 +-N/NO3 −-N observed. Furthermore, as a result of the high cation exchangeable capacity of this soil (35 cmol kg−1), the addition of organic matter had no effect on the pH, whilst in the Cambisol, the wheat straw significantly reduced pH, most probably as a consequence of the nitrification process which may acidify soil due to the release of H+ ions (Van Miegroet and Cole 1984). This would have been promoted by the high degradability of wheat residues that produced a higher nitrate content in the soil and promoted gaseous emissions (both CO2 and N2O) compared to the soil where faba bean was added. In another experiment, Aye et al. (2016) using wheat and field pea, with a different C/N ratio, as residues in a soil with 29% clay found an increase in the decomposition process up to pH 7.4. However, in our experiment, although the pH of the Haploxerert was slightly higher (7.8), the lower DOC concentration and CO2 and N2O fluxes in Haploxerert suggest the lower decomposition rates that can be linked to the much higher clay content (52.5%) confirming the dominant influence of clay as a key factor in determining nutrient turnover and emissions in this soil. The original pH of the soil may have played a role in determining the magnitude of N2O emissions by the soil microbial community. As reported from Rousk et al. (2009), an acid pH at around 6 can stimulate fungal growth; fungi are recognized for not having the ability to synthesize nitrous oxide reductase and their denitrification end product is therefore N2O. Other studies have reported that fungi could contribute up to 18% of potential denitrification (Herold et al. 2012). Thus, pH differences may also have contributed to differences in N2O emissions from soils.
There was a clear correlation between CO2 and N2O emissions in both soils, although this was greater in the Cambisol, where oxygen depletion and CO2 emissions could have helped create anaerobic microsites in the soil increasing denitrification and N2O production (Gök and Ottow 1988; Aulakh et al. 1991; Begum et al. 2014; Nett et al. 2015). The mineralization rate of an organic residue added to the soil mostly depends on its C/N ratio and, to a lesser extent, to its lignin/N ratio and fibre content (Trinsoutrot et al. 2000; Nguyen and Marschner 2016; Cheng et al. 2015). However, in the present study, the difference in the C/N ratio of the residues used (38.6 in faba bean and 40.7 in wheat) does not explain the difference in soil mineral N concentration and CO2 and N2O emissions between the crop residues. Thus, it is more likely that mineralization rate of faba bean residues was lower than wheat residues due to the different lignin, acid detergent and NDF contents (+188, +66, +19%, respectively, in faba bean compared to wheat).
The incorporation of plant residues, either of wheat or faba bean, introduced contrasting effects on the NH4 +-N and NO3 −-N concentrations on each of the soils. The addition of plant residues increased the NH4 +-N concentration of the Haploxerert, but not that of the Cambisol, and such an increase was more evident when wheat residues were added. At the same time, addition of plant residues reduced the total NO3 −-N content of the Cambisol, but not that of the Haploxerert, and such an effect was more evident when faba bean residues were added. Such a result points to a net immobilization process in the soil due to consumption of N in order to decompose organic C (Corbeels et al. 2000; Jin et al. 2013). In the Haploxerert, a similar quantity of total CO2 was emitted after the addition of both crop residues, but the faba bean addition showed a slightly higher N2O emission than wheat addition treatment coupled with lower NO3 −-N content at the end of the experiment. Thus, it is likely that in this soil, which was characterized by a lower soil microbial activity, the lower mineralization of faba bean residues led to a more constant availability of labile C and N, due stimulating bacterial and fungal activity along the experiment until the end and, as consequence, denitrification in soil microsites as reported from other authors (Deenik 2006; Shah et al. 2016). By contrast, wheat residues produced a rapid flush in emission in the initial phase of the experiment and have shown at the end of the experiment higher NH4 +-N and NO3 −-N concentration into the soil suggesting other limitations. This selective activity of microbes induced by the residue composition results in readily available straw C being used more rapidly while more recalcitrant and stable compounds are decomposed more slowly (Majumder and Kuzyakov 2010). In the Cambisol, both crop residues showed the same trend in gas emissions (CO2 and N2O), due to a direct effect of residue characteristics on decomposition and N availability. The rapid mineralization of wheat resulted lower DOC and higher NH4 +-N and NO3 −-N concentrations and a reduction in pH, as described earlier. In the case of faba bean, the higher presence of recalcitrant compounds, in particular lignin, slowed down nutrient release and decreased emissions.
Comparison between gas flux measurement techniques
This study has clearly demonstrated that IRGA and PGA methodologies used to measure CO2 and N2O emissions provided data consistent with that measured by GC. The comparison of CO2 and N2O emission rates measured by IRGA and PGA was very strongly correlated with GC measurements, an observation also reported by other authors (Pumpanen et al. 2004; Iqbal et al. 2013; Nicoloso et al. 2013; Tirol-Padre et al. 2014). In particular, the same trend was observed for both gas fluxes measured in the Cambisol and Haploxerert, which were characterized by different patterns of CO2 and N2O emissions. Similar results to those observed in the present experiment were found for N2O fluxes by Iqbal et al. (2013), who reported slightly higher emissions with PGA than with GC (+5%), However, by contrast, we did not find any difference in CO2 flux measurements when comparing PGA and GC. Nicoloso et al. (2013) observed an overestimation of 18.6 and 13.6% compared PGA to GC, for CO2 and N2O, respectively; we did not find any differences between the techniques, which may have been due to the lower gas concentrations measured during our experiment. That also defined the positive effect of the compensation against water vapour and cross interference, the two main sources of interference on measurement, during the experiments.
With regard to the accuracy of CO2 emission data recorded by IRGA, if comparing our performance with those obtained from Pumpanen et al. (2004), the latter of which are based on CO2 concentration measurements, we obtained better results with very similar fluxes between IRGA and GC. The quality of data obtained from EGM-4 IRGA used in the present study was also confirmed by Mills et al. (2011), who found good similarity in soil respiration flux with a different IRGA type. However, PGA was found to have some limitations in reporting CO2 fluxes measured by IRGA in the first part of the experiment and monitoring the emissions of Haploxerert control in the later part of the experiment, showing some difficulty on measuring low and high peaks of emission producing a slight overestimation on data. At medium and low emission rates, the instrument performances were similar and this was also confirmed by GC. Taking into account the reliability of data, together with the speed of measurement and the capacity to obtain high-resolution temporal data, this study highlights the benefits of using online IRGA and PGA measurements in studies of residue decomposition. When applied in the field experiment, the short time required from IRGA and PGA to take a measurement of emission provides an opportunity to make more measurements permitting a higher spatial and temporal resolution. In the case of the PGA, the results produced had a considerable importance due to the possibility of this instrument to measure two or more gaseous compounds simultaneously (Horsley et al. 2014).
Finally, although the chamber techniques coupled with GC are considered the reference technique for the GHG monitoring, direct measurement by these devices eliminates many of the risks resulting from sampling pitfalls and sample storage that can negatively affect the measurements (Cowan et al. 2014; Tirol-Padre et al. 2014). For the specific application to GHG studies, the initial cost and maintenance can be lower than GC systems, requiring also less specialized staff to operate. The comparison of CO2 emissions rates measured by IRGA and PGA across the entire experimental period revealed, overall, that there were small differences between both methods.
Conclusions
Soil plays a major role in controlling GHG emissions to the atmosphere and is a key determinant of emissions originating from plant residues. Our study demonstrated, when comparing two different soils, how specific properties, such as clay content and pH, can significantly alter decomposition, immobilization and gaseous emissions. These results have implications for developing low-C management practices, especially under organic farming systems where residue management could be a strategy to replace mineral fertilizers and limit C footprint. In Vertisols, which are widespread, but less well understood, CO2 and N2O emissions were strongly controlled by clay content limiting emissions, promoting C sequestration and N transfer to next crop cycle. Although many studies on the decomposition of residues have focused on C/N ratios, this study highlights the importance of fibre compounds, often referred to as secondary, on determining soil CO2 and N2O emissions and as their effect can change in relation to the soil characteristics. In particular, in soil with high organic carbon contents and microbial activity such as a Cambisol, the crop residue type determined the total emission. There was a unique trend for higher emissions of both gases (CO2 and N2O) in the presence of more decomposable wheat than with recalcitrant faba bean. In Haploxerert, by contrast, the slower decomposition of crop residues resulted in a similar CO2 release from the different residues, but slightly higher N2O emissions from faba bean.
The direct comparison between IRGA and PGA and their validation with GC confirmed that these two techniques are equivalent in providing reliable data for long-term monitoring, and this occurred under various conditions (differing soil type residue addition). This result is important when considering that GC-based methodologies need a number of sample steps from gas collection, transport, sample storage and analysis, each of which can potentially add error to the measurement. In addition, GC-based methodologies are not able to provide a continuous measurement of the GHG emissions and thus are poor at quantifying temporal variability. By contrast, the high sensitivity of IRGA and PGA, range and ease of application and number of gases analysed (including water vapour) allow a better monitoring of the radiative force of the soil while eliminating many of the risks of the GC-based methodologies.
References
Al-Kaisi MM, Yin X (2005) Tillage and crop residue effects on soil carbon and carbon dioxide emission in corn-soybean rotations. J Environ Qual 34:437–445. doi:10.2134/jeq2005.0437
Alluvione F, Fiorentino N, Bertora C, Zavattaro L, Fagnano M, Chiarandà FQ, Grignani C (2013) Short-term crop and soil response to C-friendly strategies in two contrasting environments. Eur J Agron 45:114–123. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2012.09.003
Amato G, Ruisi P, Frenda AS, Di Miceli G, Saia S, Plaia A, Giambalvo D (2013) Long-term tillage and crop sequence effects on wheat grain yield and quality. Agron J 105:1317–1327. doi:10.2134/agronj2013.0019
An T, Schaeffer S, Zhuang J, Raosevich M, Li S, Li H, Wang J (2015) Dynamics and distribution of 13C-labeled straw carbon by microorganisms as affected by soil fertility levels in the black soil region of northeast China. Biol Fertil Soils 51:605–613
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) (1995) Official methods of analysis, 16th edition. Washington, DC
Aulakh MS, Walters DT, Doran JW, Francis DD, Mosier AR (1991) Crop residue type and placement effects on denitrification and mineralization. Soil Sci Soc Am J 55:1020. doi:10.2136/sssaj1991.03615995005500040022x
Aulakh MS, Khera TS, Doran JW, Bronson KF (2001) Denitrification, N2O and CO2 fluxes in rice-wheat cropping system as affected by crop residues, fertilizer N and legume green manure. Biol Fertil Soils 34:375–389. doi:10.1007/s003740100420
Aye NS, Butterfly CR, Sale PWG, Tang C (2016) Residue addition and liming history interactively enhance mineralization of native organic carbon in acid soils. Biol Fertil Soils 53:61–75
Baggs EM, Watson C, Rees RM (2000) The fate of nitrogen from incorporated cover crop and green manure residues. Nutr Cycl Agroecosystems 56:153–163. doi:10.1023/A:1009825606341
Baggs EM, Stevenson M, Pihlatie M, Regar A, Cook H, Cadisch G (2003) Nitrous oxide emissions following application of residues and fertiliser under zero and conventional tillage. Plant Soil 254:361–370. doi:10.1023/A:1025593121839
Baggs EM, Rees RM, Smith KA, Vinten AJA (2006) Nitrous oxide emission from soils after incorporating crop residues. Soil Use Manag 16:82–87. doi:10.1111/j.1475-2743.2000.tb00179.x
Bajgai Y, Kristiansen P, Hulugalle N, McHenry M (2014) Changes in soil carbon fractions due to incorporating corn residues in organic and conventional vegetable farming systems. Soil Res 52:244–252
Baldock J, Skjemstad J (2000) Role of the soil matrix and minerals in protecting natural organic materials against biological attack. Org Geochem 31:697–710. doi:10.1016/S0146-6380(00)00049-8
Bastida F, Torres IF, Hernández T, Bombach P, Richnow HH, García C (2013) Can the labile carbon contribute to carbon immobilization in semiarid soils? Priming effects and microbial community dynamics. Soil Biol Biochem 57:892–902
Begum N, Guppy C, Herridge D, Schwenke G (2014) Influence of source and quality of plant residues on emissions of N2O and CO2 from a fertile, acidic black vertisol. Biol Fertil Soils 50:499–506. doi:10.1007/s00374-013-0865-8
Bennett ND, Croke BFW, Guariso G, Guillaume JHA, Hamilton SH, Jakeman AJ, Marsili-Libelli S, Newham LTH, Norton JP, Perrin C, Pierce SA, Robson B, Seppelt R, Voinov AA, Fath BD, Andreassian V (2013) Characterising performance of environmental models. Environ Model Softw 40:1–20. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.09.011
Cai Y, Ding W, Luo J (2012) Spatial variation of nitrous oxide emission between interrow soil and interrow plus row soil in a long-term maize cultivated sandy loam soil. Geoderma 181–182:2–10. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.03.005
Chadwick DR, Cardenas L, Misselbrook TH, Smith KA, Rees RM, Watson CJ, Mcgeough KL, Williams JR, Cloy JM, Thorman RE, Dhanoa MS (2014) Optimizing chamber methods for measuring nitrous oxide emissions from plot-based agricultural experiments. Eur J Soil Sci 65:295–307. doi:10.1111/ejss.12117
Chen H, Li X, Hu F, Shi W (2013) Soil nitrous oxide emissions following crop residue addition: a meta-analysis. Glob Chang Biol 19:2956–2964. doi:10.1111/gcb.12274
Chen S, Wang Y, Hu Z, Gao H (2015) CO2 emissions from a forest soil as influenced by amendments of different crop straws: implications for priming effects. Catena 131:56–63. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2015.03.016
Cogle AL, Saffigna PG, Strong WM (1989) Carbon transformations during wheat straw decomposition. Soil Biol Biochem 21:367–372. doi:10.1016/0038-0717(89)90145-4
Corbeels M, Hofman G, Cleemput O (2000) Nitrogen cycling associated with the decomposition of sunflower stalks and wheat straw in a vertisol. Plant Soil 218:71–82. doi:10.1023/A:1014904505716
Cowan NJ, Famulari D, Levy PE, Anderson M, Bell MJ, Rees RM, Reay DS, Skiba UM (2014) An improved method for measuring soil N2O fluxes using a quantum cascade laser with a dynamic chamber. Eur J Soil Sci 65:643–652. doi:10.1111/ejss.12168
Curtin D, Selles F, Wang H, Campbell CA, Biederbeck VO (1998) Carbon dioxide emissions and transformation of soil carbon and nitrogen during wheat straw decomposition. Soil Sci Soc Am J 62:1035–1041
De Klein CAM, McTaggart P, Smith KA, Stevens RJ, Harrison R, Laughlin RJ (2008) Measurement of nitrous oxide emissions from grassland soil using photo-acoustic infra-red spectroscopy, long-path infra-red spectroscopy, gas chromatography, and continuous flow isotope-ratio mass spectrometry. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 30:1463–1477. doi:10.1080/00103629909370300
Deenik J (2006) Nitrogen mineralization potential in important agricultural soils of Hawaii. Soil and Crop Management 16:1–5
Derrien D, Plain C, Courty PE, Gelhaye L, Moerdijk-Poortvliet TCW, Thomas F, Versini A, Zeller B, Koutika LS, Boschker HTS, Epron D (2014) Does the addition of labile substrate destabilise old soil organic matter? Soil Biol Biochem 76:149–160. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.04.030
Fontaine S, Bardoux G, Benest D, Verdier B, Mariotti A, Abbadie L (2004) Mechanisms of the priming effect in a savannah soil amended with cellulose. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68:125. doi:10.2136/sssaj2004.0125
Garcia-Ruiz R, Baggs EM (2007) N2O emission from soil following combined application of fertiliser-N and ground weed residues. Plant Soil 299:263–274. doi:10.1007/s11104-007-9382-6
Gentile R, Vanlauwe B, Chivenge P, Six J (2008) Interactive effects from combining fertilizer and organic residue inputs on nitrogen transformations. Soil Biol Biochem 40:2375–2384. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.05.018
Gök M, Ottow JCG (1988) Effect of cellulose and straw incorporation in soil on total denitrification and nitrogen immobilization at initially aerobic and permanent anaerobic conditions. Biol Fertil Soils 5:317–322
Graf DRH, Zhao M, Jones CM, Hallin S (2016) Soil type overrides plant effect on genetic and enzymatic N2O production potential in arable soils. Soil Biology and Biochem 100:125–128. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.06.006
Hadas A, Kautsky L, Goek M, Kara EE (2004) Rates of decomposition of plant residues and available nitrogen in soil, related to residue composition through simulation of carbon and nitrogen turnover. Soil Biol Biochem 36:255–266. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2003.09.012
Hayakawa A, Akiyama H, Sudo S, Yagi K (2009) N2O and NO emissions from an Andisol field as influenced by pelleted poultry manure. Soil Biol Biochem 41:521–529. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.12.011
Heal OW, Anderson JM, Swift MJ (1997) Plant litter quality and decomposition: an historical overview. In: Cadisch G and Giller KE (Eds) Driven by nature: plant litter quality and decomposition. CAB International, UK, pp 3–29
Herold MB, Baggs EM, Daniell TJ (2012) Fungal and bacterial denitrification are differently affected by long-term pH amendment and cultivation of arable soil. Soil Biol Biochemist 54:25–35
Horsley A, Macleod K, Gupta R, Goddard N, Bell N (2014) Enhanced photoacoustic gas analyser response time and impact on accuracy at fast ventilation rates during multiple breath washout. PLoS One 9(6):e98487. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098487
Huang Y, Zou J, Zheng X, Wang Y, Xu X (2004) Nitrous oxide emissions as influenced by amendment of plant residues with different C:N ratios. Soil Biol Biochem 36:973–981. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.02.009
Hutchinson GL, Mosier AR (1981) Improved soil cover method for field measurement of nitrous oxide fluxes. Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:311–315. doi:10.2136/sssaj1981.03615995004500020017x
IPCC (2006) Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. 2:12. doi: http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/pdf/2_Volume2/V2_3_Ch3_Mobile_Combustion.pdf
IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Cambridge University Press
Iqbal J, Castellano MJ, Parkin TB (2013) Evaluation of photoacoustic infrared spectroscopy for simultaneous measurement of N2O and CO2 gas concentrations and fluxes at the soil surface. Glob Chang Biol 19:327–336. doi:10.1111/gcb.12021
Jacinthe PA, Lal R, Kimble JM (2002) Carbon budget and seasonal carbon dioxide emission from a central Ohio Luvisol as influenced by wheat residue amendment. Soil Tillage Res 67:147–157. doi:10.1016/S0167-1987(02)00058-2
Jantalia CP, dos Santos HP, Urquiaga S, Boddey RM, Alves BJR (2008) Fluxes of nitrous oxide from soil under different crop rotations and tillage systems in the South of Brazil. Nutr Cycl Agroecosystems 82:161–173. doi:10.1007/s10705-008-9178-y
Jeuffroy MH, Baranger E, Carrouée B, De Chezelles E, Gosme M, Hénault C, Schneider A, Cellier P (2013) Nitrous oxide emissions from crop rotations including wheat, oilseed rape and dry peas. Biogeosciences 10:1787–1797. doi:10.5194/bg-10-1787-2013
Jin VL, Haney RL, Fay PA, Polley HW (2013) Soil type and moisture regime control microbial C and N mineralization in grassland soils more than atmospheric CO2-induced changes in litter quality. Soil Biol Biochem 58:172–180. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.11.024
Kesik M, Blagodatsky S, Papen H, Butterbach-Bahl K (2006) Effect of pH, temperature and substrate on N2O, NO and CO2 production by Alcaligenes faecalis p. J Appl Microbiol 101:655–667. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02927.x
Killham K, Amato M, Ladd JN (1993) Effect of substrate location in soil and soil pore-water regime on carbon turnover. Soil Biol Biochem 25:57–62. doi:10.1016/0038-0717(93)90241-3
Krull ES, Baldock JA, Skjemstad JO (2003) Importance of mechanisms and processes of the stabilisation of soil organic matter for modelling carbon turnover. Funct Plant Biol 30:207–222. doi:10.1071/FP02085
Lawrence AF, Grant RH, Boehm MT, Heber AJ, Wolf JM, Cortus SD, Bogan BW, Ramirez-Dorronsoro JC, Diehl CA (2009) Measurements of air quality around various open area sources in US. Int J Civ Environ Eng 1:195–198
Lian T, Wang G, Yu Z, Li Y, Liu X, Jin J (2016) Carbon input from 13C-labelled soybean residues in particulate organic carbon fractions in a Mollisol. Biol Fertil Soils 52:331–339
Lugato E, Bampa F, Panagos P, Montanarella L, Jones A (2014) Potential carbon sequestration of European arable soils estimated by modelling a comprehensive set of management practices. Glob Chang Biol 20:3557–3567. doi:10.1111/gcb.12551
Luo Y, Zhou X (2006) Soil respiration and the environment. Academic Press, Burlington, 2006, Pages ix-xi, ISBN 9780120887828, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-012088782-8/50000-0
Lutzow MV, Kogel-Knabner I, Ekschmitt K, Matzner E, Guggenberger G, Marschner B, Flessa H (2006) Stabilization of organic matter in temperate soils: mechanisms and their relevance under different soil conditions—a review. Eur J Soil Sci 57:426–445. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.2006.00809.x
Magid J, Kjærgaard C, Gorissen A, Kuikman PJ (1999) Drying and rewetting of a loamy sand soil did not increase the turnover of native organic matter, but retarded the decomposition of added 14C-labelled plant material. Soil Biol Biochem 31:595–602. doi:10.1016/S0038-0717(98)00164-3
Majumder B, Kuzyakov Y (2010) Effect of fertilization on decomposition of 14C labelled plant residues and their incorporation into soil aggregates. Soil Till Res 109:94–102
Mills R, Glanville H, Mcgovern S, Emmett B, Jones DL (2011) Soil respiration across three contrasting ecosystem types: comparison of two portable IRGA systems. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 174:532–535. doi:10.1002/jpln.201000183
Mørkved PT, Dörsch P, Henriksen TM, Bakken LR (2006) N2O emissions and product ratios of nitrification and denitrification as affected by freezing and thawing. Soil Biol Biochem 38:3411–3420. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.05.015
Muhammad W, Vaughan SM, Dalal RC, Menzies NW (2010) Crop residues and fertilizer nitrogen influence residue decomposition and nitrous oxide emission from a vertisol. Biol Fertil Soils 47:15–23. doi:10.1007/s00374-010-0497-1
Nett L, Fub R, Flessa H, Fink M (2015) Emissions of nitrous oxide and ammonia from a sandy soil following surface application and incorporation of cauliflower leaf residues. J Agric Sci 153:1341–1352. doi:10.1017/S0021859615000027
Nguyen TT, Marschner P (2016) Soil respiration, microbial biomass and nutrient availability in soil after repeated addition of low and high C/N plant residues. Biol Fertil Soils 52:165–176
Nicoloso RDS, Bayer C, Denega GL, De Oliveira PAV, Higarashi MM, Corrêa JC, Lopes LDS (2013) Gas chromatography and photoacoustic spectroscopy for the assessment of soil greenhouse gases emissions. Ciência Rural 43:262–269. doi:10.1590/S0103-84782013000200012
Palm CA, Rowland AP (1997) Minimum dataset for characterization of plant quality for decomposition. Cadisch G and Giller KE (eds) Driven by nature: plant litter quality and decomposition. CAB International, UK, pp 379–392
Powlson DS, Gregory PJ, Whalley WR, Quinton JN, Hopkins DW, Whitmore AP, Hirsch PR, Goulding KWT (2011) Soil management in relation to sustainable agriculture and ecosystem services. Food Policy 36:72–87. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.11.025
Pumpanen J, Kolari P, Ilvesniemi H, Minkkinen K, Vesala T, Niinistö S, Lohila A, Larmola T, Morero M, Pihlatie M, Janssens I, Curiel J, Grünzweig JM, Reth S, Subke J, Savage K, Kutsch W, Østreng G, Ziegler W et al (2004) Comparison of different chamber techniques for measuring soil CO2 efflux. Agric For Meteorol 123:159–176
Raiesi F (2006) Carbon and N mineralization as affected by soil cultivation and crop residue in a calcareous wetland ecosystem in central Iran. Agric Ecosyst Environ 112:13–20. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2005.07.002
Rees RM, Augustin J, Alberti G, Ball BC, Boeckx P, Cantarel A, Castaldi S, Chirinda N, Chojnicki B, Giebels M, Gordon H, Grosz B, Horvath L, Juszczak R, Kasimir Klemedtsson Å, Klemedtsson L, Medinets S, Machon A, Mapanda F et al (2013) Nitrous oxide emissions from European agriculture—an analysis of variability and drivers of emissions from field experiments. Biogeosciences 10:2671–2682. doi:10.5194/bg-10-2671-2013
Rousk J, Brookes PC, Bååth E (2009) Contrasting soil pH effects on fungal and bacterial growth suggest functional redundancy in carbon mineralization. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:1589–1596
Saia S, Schillaci C, Lipani A, Fantappiè M, Märker M, Lombardo L, Matranga MG, Ferraro V, Guaitoli F, Acutis M (2017) Protection of soil from the loss of organic carbon by taking into account erosion and managing land use at varying soil type: indication from a model semiarid area. Proceedings of the Global Symposium On Soil Organic Carbon, Rome, Italy, 21–23 March 2017
Sarkodie-Addo J, Lee HC, Baggs EM (2003) Nitrous oxide emissions after application of inorganic fertilizer and incorporation of green manure residues. Soil Use Manag 19:331–339. doi:10.1079/SUM2003203
SAS Institute (2008) SAS/STAT® 9.2. User’s Guide. SAS Institute Inc Cary, Cary, NC, USA
Schillaci C, Lombardo L, Saia S, Fantappi M, Märker M, Acutis M (2017) Modelling the topsoil carbon stock of agricultural lands with the Stochastic Gradient Treeboost in a semi-arid Mediterranean region. Geoderma 286:35–45. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.10
Shah A, Lamers M, Streck T (2016) N2O and CO2 emissions from South German arable soil after amendment of manures and composts. Environ Earth Sci 75:427. doi:10.1007/s12665-015-5126-8
Shan J, Yan X (2013) Effects of crop residue returning on nitrous oxide emissions in agricultural soils. Atmos Environ 71:170–175. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.02.009
Shi A, Marschner P (2014) Drying and rewetting frequency influences cumulative respiration and its distribution over time in two soils with contrasting management. Soil Biol Biochem 72:172–179
Six J, Paustian K (2014) Aggregate-associated soil organic matter as an ecosystem property and a measurement tool. Soil Biol Biochem 68:4–9. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.06.014
Skiba U, Ball B (2002) The effect of soil texture and soil drainage on emissions of nitric oxide and nitrous oxide. Soil Use Manag 18:56–60. doi:10.1111/j.1475-2743.2002.tb00050.x
Stackhouse KR, Pan Y, Zhao Y, Mitloehner FM (2011) Greenhouse gas and alcohol emissions from feedlot steers and calves. J Environ Qual 40:899–906. doi:10.2134/jeq2010.0354
Steinbeiss S, Temperton VM, Gleixner G (2008) Mechanisms of short term soil carbon storage in experimental grasslands. Soil Biol Biochem 40:2634–2642
Tanveer SK, Zhang J, Lu X, Wen X, Wu W, Liu Y, Liao YC (2014) Effect of corn residue mulch and N fertilizer application on nitrous oxide (N2O) emission and wheat crop productivity under rain-fed condition of loess plateau China. Int J Agric Biol 16:505–512
Tirol-Padre A, Rai M, Gathala M, Sharma S, Kumar V, Sharma PC, Sharma DK, Wassmann R, Ladha J (2014) Assessing the performance of the photo-acoustic infrared gas monitor for measuring CO2, N2O, and CH4 fluxes in two major cereal rotations. Glob Chang Biol 20:287–299. doi:10.1111/gcb.12347
Trinsoutrot I, Recous S, Bentz B, Linères M, Chèneby D, Nicolardot B (2000) Biochemical quality of crop residues and carbon and nitrogen mineralization kinetics under non limiting nitrogen conditions. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:918–926. doi:10.2136/sssaj2000.643918x
Van Miegroet H, Cole DW (1984) The impact of nitrification on soil acidification and cation leaching in a red alder ecosystem. J Environ Qual 13:586–590
Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 74:3583–3597. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
Velthof GL, Kuikman PJ, Oenema O (2002) Nitrous oxide emission from soils amended with crop residues. Nutr Cycl Agroecosystems 62:249–261. doi:10.1023/A:1021259107244
Vinten AJA, Vivian BJ, Howard RS (1992) The effect of fertiliser on the nitrogen cycle of two upland arable soils of contrasting textures. In: Proceedings of the International Fertiliser Society. UK, 1992
Vogel C, Heister K, Buegger F, Tanuwidjaja I, Haug S, Schloter M, Kögel-Knabner I (2015) Clay mineral composition modifies decomposition and sequestration of organic carbon and nitrogen in fine soil fractions. Biol Fertil Soils 4:427–442
Wei X, Shao M, Gale W, Li L (2014) Global pattern of soil carbon losses due to the conversion of forests to agricultural land. Sci Rep 4:4062. doi:10.1038/srep04062
Yamulki S, Jarvis SC (1999) Automated chamber technique for gaseous flux measurements: evaluation of a photoacoustic infrared spectrometer-trace gas analyzer. J Geophys Res 104:5463–5469. doi:10.1029/1998JD100082
Zou J, Huang Y, Zong L, Zheng X, Wang Y (2004) Carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide emissions from a rice-wheat rotation as affected by crop residue incorporation and temperature. Adv Atmos Sci 21:691–698
Acknowledgments
We thank John Parker and Francesca Mazza for technical advice and support and the Scottish Government’s Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services Division, BBSRC, and MIUR—Italy PON/01_01145/1 Project—ISCOCEM for financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Badagliacca, G., Ruisi, P., Rees, R.M. et al. An assessment of factors controlling N2O and CO2 emissions from crop residues using different measurement approaches. Biol Fertil Soils 53, 547–561 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-017-1195-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-017-1195-z