Abstract
A biofilter made using volcanic pumice soil from a landfill in Taupo, New Zealand has been found to mitigate CH4 emissions from New Zealand dairy effluent ponds. However, the biofilter after drying out following almost 5 years of use removed little or no CH4. Furthermore, H2S present in the biogas (from the dairy effluent ponds) had increased the acidity (pH) in the soil biofilter from 5.2 to 3.72 during this 5-year period. In this study, we adjusted the soil moisture to 60 % water-holding capacity (WHC) and investigated the CH4-oxidising capacity of a reconstituted acidic soil biofilter operating at low pH (3.72) and characterised the abundance and diversity of methane-oxidising bacteria (MOB) using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and terminal-restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP). The acidic soil biofilter achieved a maximum CH4 removal rate of 30.3 g m–3 h–1. Both types I and II MOB communities, along with some uncultured novel MOB strains or species in the biofilter column, were present. Among these, Methylocapsa-like type II methanotrophs were significantly more prominent than the other MOB. Other MOB, Methylococcus (type I), Methylobacter/Methylomonas/Methylosarcina (type I) genera, Methylosinus and Methylocystis (type II), were least abundant. During the 90-day study, the population of Methylocapsa-like MOB increased 4-fold, demonstrating the ability of these soil microorganisms to grow under acidic pH conditions in the biofilter, whereas the populations of type I MOB remained stable, and the populations of type II MOB (except Methylocapsa) decreased. Our results indicated that (i) a soil biofilter can effectively regain efficiency if sufficient moisture levels are maintained, regardless of the soil acidity; (ii) changes in the MOB population did not compromise the capacity of the volcanic pumice soil to oxidise CH4; (iii) the more acidic environment (pH 3.72) tends to favour the growth and activity of acid loving Methylocapsa-like MOB while being detrimental to the growth of Methylobacter/Methylocystis/Methylococcus group of MOB; and (iv) novel species or strains of uncultured Methylomicrobium / Methylosarcina/Methylobacter (type I MOB) could be present in the soil biofilter. This study has revealed the MOB population changes in the biofilter with acidification did not compromise its capacity to oxidise CH4 demonstrating that soil biofilter can operate effectively under acidic conditions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adrian H, Luke C, Frenzel P (2011) Recovery of methanotrophs from disturbance: population dynamics, evenness and functioning. ISME J 5:750–758
Blakemore LC, Searle PL, Daly BK (1987) Methods for chemical analysis of soils, New Zealand Soil Bureau Scientific report, p. 103
Cabrera ML, Beare MH (1993) Alkaline persulfate oxidation for determining total nitrogen in microbial biomass extracts. Am Soc Agron 57:1007–1012
Chang CY, Tung HH, Tseng IC, Wu JH, Liu YF, Lin HM (2010) Dynamics of methanotrophic communities in tropical alkaline landfill upland soil. Appl Soil Ecol 46:192–199
Chen Y, Dumont MG, Cébron A, Murrell JC (2007) Identification of active methanotrophs in a landfill cover soil through detection of expression of 16S rRNA and functional genes. Environ Microbiol 9:2855–2869
Craggs R, Park J, Heubeck S (2008) Methane emissions from anaerobic ponds on a piggery and a dairy farm in New Zealand. Austr Exp Agric 48:142–146
Dedysh SN, Dunfeld PF, Derakshani M, Stubner S, Heyer J, Liesack W (2003) Differential detection of type II methanotrophic bacteria in acidic peatlands using newly developed 16S rRNA-targeted fuorescent oligonucleotide probes. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 43:299–308
Delmont TO, Francioli D, Jacquesson S, Laoudi S, Nesme MJ, Ceccherini MT, Nannipieri P, Simonet P, Vogel TM (2014) Microbial community development and unseen diversity recovery in inoculated sterile soil. Biol Fertil Soils 50:1069–1076
Dunbar J, Ticknor LO, Kuske CR (2000) Assessment of microbial diversity in four southwestern United States soils by 16S rRNA gene terminal restriction fragment analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:2943–2950
EPA (2014) Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990–2012, EPA 430-R-14-003 ed. Office of Atmospheric Programs, Climate Change Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
Hanson RS, Hanson TE (1996) Methanotrophic bacteria. Microbiol Rev 60:439–471
Henneberger R, Mosberger CL, Schroth MH (2011) Structure and function of methanotrophic communities in a landfill-cover soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 81:52–65
IPCC (2013) Climate Change 2013 The physical science basis. Working group I contribution to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 1535.
Juan AA, Julie SS (1986) Microbial conversion of methane into poly-β-hydroxybutyrate (PHB): growth and intracellular product accumulation in a type II methanotroph. J Ferment Technol 64:271–278
Knief C, Lipski A, Dunfield PF (2003) Diversity and activity of methanotrophic bacteria in different upland soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:6703
Kolb S, Knief C, Stubner S, Conrad R (2003) Quantitative detection of methanotrophs in soil by novel pmoA-targeted real-time PCR assays. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:2423–2439
Laubach J, Guieysse B, Pratt C, Shilton A, Chung M, Heubeck S, Park J, Craggs R, Woodward B, Weerden TVD (2015) Review of greenhouse gas emissions from the storage and land application of farm dairy effluent. New Zeal J Agr Res 58:203–233
Lee C, Lee S, Shin SG, Hwang S (2008) Real-time PCR determination of rRNA gene copy number: absolute and relative quantification assays with Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 78:371–376
MfE (2014) New Zealand’s greenhouse gas inventory 1990–2012. Ministry for the Environment, Wellington, p 498
Moon KE, Lee SY, Lee SH, Ryu HW, Cho KS (2010) Earthworm cast as a promising filter bed material and its methanotrophic contribution to methane removal. J Hazard Mater 176:131–138
Nikiema J, Girard M, Brzezinski R, Heitz M (2009) Biofiltration of methane using an inorganic filter bed: influence of inlet load and nitrogen concentration. Can J Civ Eng 36:1903–1910
Pratt C, Walcroft AS, Tate KR, Ross DJ, Roy R, Reid MH, Veiga PW (2012) Biofiltration of methane emissions from a dairy farm effluent pond. Agric Ecosyst Environ 152:33–39
Pratt C, Deslippe J, Tate KR (2013) Testing a biofilter cover design to mitigate dairy effluent pond methane emissions. Environ Sci Technol 44:526–532
Ruo H, Wooller MJ, Pohlman JW, Quensen J, Tiedje JM, Leighb MB (2012) Shifts in identity and activity of methanotrophs in arctic lake sediments in response to temperature changes. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:4715–4723
Scheutz C, Kjeldsen P, Bogner JE, Visscher AD, Gebert J, Hilger HA, Huber HM, Spokas K (2009) Microbial methane oxidation processes and technologies for mitigation of landfill gas emissions. Waste Manag Res 27:409–455
Tate KR (2015) Soil methane oxidation and land-use change—from process to mitigation. Soil Biol Biochem 80:260–272
Tate KR, Ross DJ, Saggar S, Hedley CB, Dando J, Singh BK, Lambie SM (2007) Methane uptake in soils from Pinus radiata plantations, a reverting shrubland and adjacent pastures: effects of land-use change, and soil texture, water and mineral nitrogen. Soil Biol Biochem 39:1437–1449
Tate KR, Walcroft AS, Pratt C (2012) Varying atmospheric methane concentrations affect soil methane oxidation rates and methanotroph populations in pasture, an adjacent pine forest, and a landfill. Soil Biol Biochem 52:75–81
Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS (1987) An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol Biochem 19:703–707
Whittenbury R, Phillips KC, Wilkinson JF (1970) Enrichment, isolation and some properties of methane-utilizing bacteria. J Gen Microbiol 6:205–218
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Landcare Research for the Des Ross Memorial Scholarship to the senior author and for research facilities for this study; Adrian Walcroft, Peter Berben and Thilak Palmada for technical help; Donna Giltrap for help with statistical analysis; Neha Jha for the internal review; Anne Austin for the editing; and Massey University for providing access to the Roche light cycler machine for qPCR analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Syed, R., Saggar, S., Tate, K. et al. Does acidification of a soil biofilter compromise its methane-oxidising capacity?. Biol Fertil Soils 52, 573–583 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-016-1103-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-016-1103-y