Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Carbon input from 13C-labeled crops in four soil organic matter fractions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biology and Fertility of Soils Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study quantified the fate of new carbon (C) in four crop sequences (lentil–wheat, canola–wheat, pea–wheat, and continuous wheat). Lentil–wheat and continuous wheat were grown in intact soil cores from a Brown Chernozem (BCz) and canola–wheat, pea–wheat, and continuous wheat in cores from a Dark Brown Chernozem (DBCz). In the first growing cycle, plants were pulse-labeled with 13C-CO2. Soil 13C pools were measured once after the labeled growing cycle to quantify root biomass contribution to soil organic matter (SOM) in a single cycle and again after a second growing cycle to quantify the fate of labeled root and shoot residues. 13C was quantified in four SOM fractions: very light (VLF), light (LF), heavy (HF), and water extractable organic matter (WEOM). For BCz lentil, BCz wheat, DBCz canola, DBCz pea, and DBCz wheat in the labeling year, root-derived C estimates were 838, 572, 512, 397, and 418 mg of C per kg soil, respectively. At the end of the second growing cycle, decreases in root-derived C were greater in the VLF, which lost 62 to 95 % of its labeled 13C, than the LF (lost 21 to 56 %) or HF (lost 20 to 47 %). Root-derived C in WEOM increased 38 to 319 %. On DBCz, even though wheat and pea produced less aboveground biomass than canola, they generated similar amounts of SOC by fraction indicating that their residues were more efficiently stabilized into the soil than canola residues. Combining 13C repeat-pulse labeling and SOM fractionation methods allowed new insights into C dynamics under different crop sequences and soil types. This combination of methods has great potential to improve our understanding of soil fertility and SOM stabilization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AAFC:

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

C:

Carbon

BCz:

Brown Chernozem

DBCz:

Dark Brown Chernozem

HF:

Heavy fraction

LF:

Light fraction

VLF:

Very light fraction

SOC:

Soil organic carbon

SOM:

Soil organic matter

WEOM:

Water extractable organic matter

References

  • Bortolon ESO, Mielniczuk J, Tornquist CG, Lopes F, Giasson E, Bergamaschi H (2012) Potential use of century model and GIS to evaluate the impact of agriculture on regional soil organic carbon stocks. Rev Bras Cienc Solo 36:831–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell CA, Souster W (1982) Loss of organic matter and potentially mineralizable nitrogen from Saskatchewan soils due to cropping. Can J Soil Sci 62:651–656

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell CA, Zentner RP, Selles F, Biederbeck VO, Leyshon AJ (1992) Comparative effects of grain lentil wheat and monoculture wheat on crop production, N-economy and N-fertility in a Brown Chernozem. Can J Plant Sci 72:1091–1107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chantigny MH, Angers DA, Kaiser K, Kalbitz K (2007) Extraction and characterization of dissolved organic matter. In: Carter MR, Gregorich EG (eds) Soil sampling and methods of analysis. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 617–636

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotrufo MF, Wallenstein MD, Boot CM, Denef K, Paul E (2013) The Microbial Efficiency-Matrix Stabilization (MEMS) framework integrates plant litter decomposition with soil organic matter stabilization: do labile plant inputs form stable soil organic matter? Glob Change Biol 19:988–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dungait JAJ, Hopkins DW, Gregory AS, Whitmore AP (2012) Soil organic matter turnover is governed by accessibility not recalcitrance. Glob Change Biol 18:1781–1796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evert R, Franklin R, Esau K (2006) Esau's plant anatomy: meristems, cells, and tissues of the plant body—their structure, function and development. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Franzluebbers AJ (2010) Achieving soil organic carbon sequestration with conservation agricultural systems in the Southeastern United States. Soil Sci Soc Am J 74:347–357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gan YT, Campbell CA, Janzen HH, Lemke R, Liu LP, Basnyat P, McDonald CL (2009a) Root mass for oilseed and pulse crops: growth and distribution in the soil profile. Can J Plant Sci 89:883–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gan YT, Campbell CA, Janzen HH, Lemke RL, Basnyat P, McDonald CL (2009b) Carbon input to soil from oilseed and pulse crops on the Canadian Prairies. Agr Ecosyst Environ 132:290–297

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gan YT, Liu LP, Cutforth H, Wang XY, Ford G (2011) Vertical distribution profiles and temporal growth patterns of roots in selected oilseeds, pulses and spring wheat. Crop Pasture Sci 62:457–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregorich EG, Beare MH (2007) Physically uncomplexed organic matter. In: Carter MR, Gregorich EG (eds) Soil sampling and methods of analysis. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 607–616

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregorich EG, Beare MH, Mckim UF, Skjemstad JO (2006) Chemical and biological characteristics of physically uncomplexed organic matter. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:975–985

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Judd WS, Campbell CS, Kellog EA, Sterens SPF (1999) Plant systematics: a phylogenetic approach. Sinauer Association xvi, Sunderland

  • Lal R (2005) World crop residues production and implications of its use as a biofuel. Environ Int 31:575–584

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke RL, VandenBygaart AJ, Campbell CA, Lafond GP, Grant B (2010) Crop residue removal and fertilizer N: effects on soil organic carbon in a long-term crop rotation experiment on a Udic Boroll. Agr Ecosyst Environ 135:42–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke RL, Zhong Z, Campbell CA, Zentner R (2007) Can pulse crops play a role in mitigating greenhouse gases from north American agriculture? Agron J 99:1719–1725

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liang BC, McConkey BG, Schoenau J, Curtin D, Campbell CA, Moulin AP, Lafond GP, Brandt SA, Wang H (2003) Effect of tillage and crop rotations on the light fraction organic carbon and carbon mineralization in Chernozemic soils of Saskatchewan. Can J Soil Sci 83:65–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu LP, Gan YT, Bueckert R, Van Rees K (2011) Rooting systems of oilseed and pulse crops. II: Vertical distribution patterns across the soil profile. Field Crop Res 122:248–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macias F, Arbestain MC (2010) Soil carbon sequestration in a changing global environment. Mitig Adapt Strat Gl 15:511–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Version 2.8.1. http://www.R-project.org.

  • Rasse DP, Rumpel C, Dignac MF (2005) Is soil carbon mostly root carbon? Mechanisms for a specific stabilisation. Plant Soil 269:341–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Russell RS, Ellis FB (1968) Estimation of the distribution of plant roots in soils. Nature 217:582–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sangster A, Knight D, Farrell R, Bedard-Haughn A (2010) Repeat-pulse (CO2)-C-13 labeling of canola and field pea: implications for soil organic matter studies. Rapid Commun Mass Sp 24:2791–2798

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt MWI, Torn MS, Abiven S, Dittmar T, Guggenberger G, Janssens IA, Kleber M, Kogel-Knabner I, Lehmann J, Manning DAC, Nannipieri P, Rasse DP, Weiner S, Trumbore SE (2011) Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property. Nature 478:49–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith J, Gottschalk P, Bellarby J, Chapman S, Lilly A, Towers W, Bell J, Coleman K, Nayak D, Richards M, Hillier J, Flynn H, Wattenbach M, Aitkenhead M, Yeluripati J, Farmer J, Milne R, Thomson A, Evans C, Whitmore A, Falloon P, Smith P (2010) Estimating changes in Scottish soil carbon stocks using ECOSSE. I. Model description and uncertainties. Clim Res 45:179–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff (2010) Keys to soil taxonomy, 11th edn. USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Sollins P, Homann P, Caldwell BA (1996) Stabilization and destabilization of soil organic matter: mechanisms and controls. Geoderma 74:65–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockmann U, Adams MA, Crawford JW, Field DJ, Henakaarchchi N, Jenkins M, Minasny B, McBratney AB, de Courcelles V, Singh K, Wheeler I, Abbott L, Angers DA, Baldock J, Bird M, Brookes PC, Chenu C, Jastrow JD, Lal R, Lehmann J, O’Donnell AG, Parton WJ, Whitehead D, M. Z (2013) The knowns, known unknowns and unknowns of sequestration of soil organic carbon. Agr Ecosyst Environ 164:80–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stumborg C, Schoenau JJ, Malhi SS (2007) Nitrogen balance and accumulation pattern in three contrasting prairie soils receiving repeated applications of liquid swine and solid cattle manure. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys 78:15–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subedi KD, Ma BL, Liang BC (2006) New method to estimate root biomass in soil through root-derived carbon. Soil Biol Biochem 38:2212–2218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • TaiWen Y, XiaoRong C, WenYu Y, DaBing X, GaoQiong F (2010) Root exudates and nitrogen uptake of wheat in wheat/maize/soybean relay cropping system. Acta Agron Sinica 36:477–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Lutzow M, Kogel-Knabner I, Ekschmitt K, Matzner E, Guggenberger G, Marschner B, Flessa H (2006) Stabilization of organic matter in temperate soils: mechanisms and their relevance under different soil conditions—a review. Eur J Soil Sci 57:426–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wichern F, Mayer J, Joergensen RG, Muler T (2007) Rhizodeposition of C and N in peas and oats after C-13-N-15 double labelling under field conditions. Soil Biol Biochem 39:2527–2537

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu M, Lou Y, Sun X, Wang W, Baniyamuddin M, Zhao K (2011) Soil organic carbon active fractions as early indicators for total carbon change under straw incorporation. Biol Fertil Soils 47:745–752

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan ZY, Chen HYH (2010) Fine root biomass, production, turnover rates, and nutrient contents in boreal forest ecosystems in relation to species, climate, fertility, and stand age: literature review and meta-analyses. Crit Rev Plant Sci 29:204–221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann M, Leifeld J, Schmidt MWI, Smith P, Fuhrer J (2007) Measured soil organic matter fractions can be related to pools in the RothC model. Eur J Soil Sci 58:658–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was funded by the Pulse Research Network (PURENet)—part of the Agricultural Bioproducts Innovation Program (ABIP) of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC)—and the Saskatchewan Pulse Growers. We would like to thank the scientists and staff at the AAFC Scott and Swift Current Research Farms, the Stable Isotope Laboratory, and the lab and field assistants L. Barber, H. Crossman, A. DeBusschere, J. Hnatowich, H. Konschuh, and M. MacDonald.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Bedard-Haughn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Comeau, L.P., Lemke, R.L., Knight, J.D. et al. Carbon input from 13C-labeled crops in four soil organic matter fractions. Biol Fertil Soils 49, 1179–1188 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-013-0816-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-013-0816-4

Keywords

Navigation