Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Isoelectric focusing of β-glucosidase humic-bound activity in semi-arid Mediterranean soils under management practices

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biology and Fertility of Soils Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Changes in β-glucosidase enzyme–humic complexes and conventional parameters (pH, total organic C, total N, water-soluble C, and bulk density) were studied in an almond-cropped soil prone to erosion under a rehabilitation practice. The experimental plan included three soil slopes (0%, 2%, and 6%) and two type of fertilization (organic and mineral), with sampling of rhizosphere and inter-row soils. The enzyme humic complexes were extracted by pyrophosphate, purified by ultrafiltration of the organic extracts on molecular mass exclusion membranes (mol wt > 104) and fractionated by isoelectric focusing technique (IEF). The IEF on polyacrylamide rod gels with a restricted pH gradient ranging between 6.0 and 4.0 gave five humic bands on the basis of the little differences of their electric charges (pI). Under both organic and mineral fertilization, β-glucosidase activity bound to the fractionated humic substances, especially in the pH range 4.5–4.2 of the rhizosphere soil, was higher than that of the inter-row soil. This also occurred in 6% slope where the enzyme activity was lower than in soil with lower slopes. The higher number of the β-glucosidase active humic bands in rhizosphere than inter-row soil, particularly for the 0% slope, may be due to the presence of humic molecules capable of preserving the enzyme molecules in the active form, other than to the higher microbial activity synthesizing and releasing the tested enzymes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison Steven D (2006) Soil minerals and humic acids alter enzyme stability: implications for ecosystem processes. Biogeochem 3:361–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandick AK, Dick RP (1999) Field management effects on soil enzyme activities. Soil Biol Biochem 31:1471–1479

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benik S, Wilson B, Biesboer D, Hansen B, Stenlund D (2003) Performance of erosion control products on a highway embankment. Trans ASAE 46:1113–1119

    Google Scholar 

  • Benitez E, Sainz H, Nogales R (2005) Hydrolytic enzyme activities of extracted humic substances during the vermicomposting of a lignocellulosic olive waste. Bioresource Technol 96:785–790

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benitez E, Nogales R, Campos M, Ruano F (2006) Biochemical variability of olive orchard soils under different management systems. Appl Soil Ecol 32:221–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benítez E, Nogales R, Masciandaro G, Ceccanti B (2000) Isolation by isoelectric focusing of humic urease complexes from earthworm (Eisenia fetida)-processed sewage sludges. Biol Fertil Soils 31:489–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake GR, Hartge KH (1986) Bulk density. In: Klute, A. (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods, 2nd edn. Agron. Monogr. 9. ASA–SSA, Madison, WI, pp 363–375

  • Bonmati M, Ceccanti B, Nannipieri P (1998) Protease extraction from soil by sodium pyrophosphate and chemical characterization of the extracts. Soil Biol Biochem 30:2113–2125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burns RG (1982) Enzyme activity in soil: location and a possible role in microbial ecology. Soil Biol Biochem 14:423–427

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Busto MD, Perez-Mateos M (2000) Characterization of β-d-glucosidase extracted from soil fractions. Eur J Soil Sci 51:193–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Canali S, Trinchera A, Pinzari F, Benedetti A (1998) Study of compost maturity by means of humification parameters and isoelectrofocusing technique. In: Proceedings of the Transaction of the 16th World Congress of Soil Science. Montpellier, France, 20–26 August, Paper no. 778 (CD-ROM)

  • Canali S, Trinchera A, Di Bartolomeo E, Nisini L, Benedetti A, Intrigliolo F (2002) Soil fertility comparison among organic and conventional managed citrus orchards in Sicily. Transactions of the 17th world congress of soil science, Bangkok, Thailand, 14–21 August. Paper no. 1197 (CD-ROM)

  • Caravaca F, Barea JM, Roldan A (2002) Synergistic influence of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and organic amendment on Pistacia lenticulus L. seedlings afforested in a degraded soil. Soil Biol Biochem 34:1139–1145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ceccanti B, Masciandaro G (2003) Stable humus-enzyme nucleus: the last barrier against soil desertification. In: Lobo MC, Ibanez JJ (eds) Preserving soil quality and soil biodiversity—the role of surrogate indicators. CSIC-IMIA, Madrid, pp 77–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccanti B, Nannipieri P (1979) Concerning the reliability of the isoelectric focusing technique to separate the soil humic substances. In: Frigerio A, Renoz L (eds) Rec Dev Chrom and Electr. Elsevier, Amsterdam, vol 10, pp 225–232

  • Ceccanti B, Nannipieri P, Cervelli S, Sequi P (1978) Fractionation of humus–urease complexes. Soil Biol Biochem 10:39–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ceccanti B, Alcaniz-Baldellou JM, Gispert-Negrell M, Gassiot-Matas M (1986) Characterization of organic matter from two different soils by pyrolysis–gas chromatography and isoelectric focusing. Soil Sci 142:83–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ceccanti B, Bonmati-Pont M, Nannipieri P (1989) Microdetermination of protease activity in humic bands of different sizes after analytical isoelectic focusing. Biol Fertil Soils 7:202–206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ceccanti B, Doni S, Macci C, Cercignani G, Masciandaro G (2008) Characterization of stable humic–enzyme complexes of different soil ecosystems through analytical isoelectric focusing technique (IEF). Soil Biol Biochem 40:2174–2177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Q, Ma W, Cai Q (2008) The relative importance of soil crust and slope angle in runoff and soil loss: a case study in the hilly areas of the Loess Plateau, North China. GeoJ 71:117–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciavatta C, Govi M (1993) Use of insoluble polyvinylpyrrolidone and isoelectric focusing in the study of humic substances in soils and organic wastes. J Chromatogr 643:261–270

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia C, Hernandez T, Costa F, Ceccanti B, Masciandaro G, Calcinai M (1993) Evaluation of the organic matter of raw and composted municipal wastes. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 39:99–108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia C, Hernandez T, Costa F (1997) Potential use of dehydrogenase activity as an index of microbial activity in degraded soils. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 12:123–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Gianfreda L, DeCristofaro A, Rao MA, Violante A (1995) Kinetic behavior of synthetic organo- and organo-mineral-urease complexes. Soil Sci Soc Am J 59:811–815

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Govi M, Ciavatta C, Gessa C (1994) Evaluation of the stability of the organic matter in slurries, sludges and composts using humification parameters and isoelectric focusing. In: Senesi S, Miano TM (eds) Humic substances in the global environment and implications on human health. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 1311–1316

    Google Scholar 

  • Grego S, D’Annibale A, Luna M, Badalucco L, Nannipieri P (1990) Multiple forms of synthetic pronase–phenolic copolymers. Soil Biol Biochem 22:721–724

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hayano K, Katami A (1977) Extraction of β-glucosidase activity from pea field soil. Soil Biol Biochem 9:349–351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hayano K, Tubaki K (1985) Origin and properties of β-glucosidase activity of a tomato-field. Soil Biol Biochem 17:553–557

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Horner JD, Gosz JR, Cates RG (1988) The role of carbonbased plant secondary metabolites in decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Am Nat 132:869–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Indorante SJ, Follmer LR, Hammer RD, Koenig PG (1990) Particle-size analysis by a modified pipette procedure. Soil Sci Soc Am J 54:560–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lähdesmäki P, Piispanen R (1992) Soil enzymology: role of protective colloid systems in the preservation of exoenzyme activities in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 24:1173–1177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manns HR, Maxwell CD, Emery RJN (2007) The effect of ground cover or initial organic carbon on soil fungi, aggregation, moisture and organic carbon in one season with oat (Avena sativa) plots. Soil Till Res 96:83–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masciandaro G, Ceccanti B (1999) Assessing soil quality in different agro-ecosystems through biochemical and chemical structural properties of humic substances. Soil Till Res 51:129–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nannipieri P (1994) The potential use of enzymes as indicators of productivity, sustainability and pollution. In: Pankhurst CE, Doube BM, Gupta VVSR, Grace PR (eds) Soil biota: management in sustainable farming systems. CSIRO, East Melbourne, pp 238–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Nannipieri P, Ceccanti B, Cervelli S, Sequi P (1974) Use of 0.1 M pyrophosphate to extract urease from a podzol. Soil Biol Biochem 6:359–362

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nannipieri P, Ceccanti B, Bianchi D (1988) Characterization of humus phosphatase complexes extracted from soil. Soil Biol Biochem 20:683–691

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nannipieri P, Sequi P, Fusi P (1996) Humus and enzyme activity. In: Piccolo A (ed) Humic substances in terrestrial ecosystems. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 293–328

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Newman EI (1985) The rhizosphere: carbon sources and microbial populations. In: Fitter AH, Atkinson D, Read DJ, Usher MB (eds) Ecological interactions in soil. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 107–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Palm CA, Rowland AP (1997) A minimum dataset for characterization of plant quality for decomposition. In: Cadish G, Giller KE (eds) Driven by nature plant litter quality and decomposition. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 379–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual JA, Hernandez T, Garcia C, Ayuso M (1998) Enzymatic activities in an arid soil amended with urban organic wastes: laboratory experiment. Bioresource Technol 64:131–138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Persyn R, Glanville T, Richard T, Laflen J, Dixon P (2004) Environmental effects of applying composted organics to new highway embankments. Part 1. Interrill runoff and erosion. Trans ASAE 47:463–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Perucci P (1992) Enzyme activity and microbial biomass in a field soil amended with municipal refuse. Biol Fertil Soils 14:54–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Piccolo A, Conte P, Scheunert I, Paci M (1998) Atrazine interactions with soil humic substances of different molecular structure. J Environ Qual 27:1333–1724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggiero P, Radogna VM (1988) Humic acid–tyrosinase interactions as a model of soil humic–enzyme complex. Soil Biol Biochem 20:353–359

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saviozzi A, Levi-Minzi R, Cardelli R, Riffaldi R (2001) A comparison of soil quality in adjacent cultivated, forest and native grassland soils. Plant Soil 233:251–259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soane BD (1990) The role of organic matter in soil compatibility: a review of some practical aspects. Soil Till Res 16:179–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabatabai MA, Bremner JM (1969) Use of ρ-nitrophenol phosphate in assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biol Biochem 1:301–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yeomans JC, Bremner JM (1988) A rapid and precise method for routine determination of organic carbon in soil. Soil Sci Plant Anal 19:1467–1476

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The study was carried out in the framework of the EU project “Soil Protection in Mediterranean Areas Through Cultivation of New Varieties of Almond Tree” ALMOND PRO-SOIL (LIFE 05-E-000288 2005/2008).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Ecosystem Study -National Research Council (CNR), Via Moruzzi 1, 56124, Pisa, Italy

    Serena Doni, Cristina Macci, Haiyan Chen, Grazia Masciandaro & Brunello Ceccanti

Authors
  1. Serena Doni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cristina Macci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Haiyan Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Grazia Masciandaro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Brunello Ceccanti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Serena Doni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Doni, S., Macci, C., Chen, H. et al. Isoelectric focusing of β-glucosidase humic-bound activity in semi-arid Mediterranean soils under management practices. Biol Fertil Soils 48, 183–190 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-011-0615-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-011-0615-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation