Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Soil organic carbon stock assessment for the different cropland land uses in Italy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biology and Fertility of Soils Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this work was to quantify the soil organic C (SOC) stock in the top 30 cm of mineral soil for the whole Italian territory, according to the different land use types of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) cropland category (arable land, agroforestry, vineyards, olive groves, orchards and rice fields), as a basis for future land use scenarios and to address mitigation policy at country level. A database for SOC stock was created with the data from the national project denominated SIAS and partly from regional map reports. All data were referred to the year 2000 since they were derived from surveys conducted from 1995 to 2005. The data were stratified according to the Italian climatic regions, the landscape position and the IPCC cropland subcategories. Taking into account the uncertainty in the estimate, the mean SOC stock values of the different subcategories show significant differences (p < 0.05) among climatic regions and landscapes, ranging from 41.9 ± 15.9 Mg C ha−1 in the vineyards to 63.3 ± 27.9 Mg C ha−1 in the rice fields. Generally, a small decrease of the SOC stock from the temperate regions toward the Mediterranean ones is observed. Taking into account the mean value of each subcategory and the country area they occupied in 2000, the total C stored in the upper 30 cm of soil was estimated at 490.0 ± 121.7 Tg C. The resulting estimate represents the 17% of the value reported by another study for the soil of the whole country down to 50 cm depth, suggesting the importance of preserving this large C pool. Considering the cropland category as a whole, the estimated mean SOC stock is 52.1 ± 17.4 Mg C ha−1, similar to that reported for other European countries, 50–60 Mg C ha−1. In conclusion, the assessment of the mean SOC stock of the different cropland land uses, landscape position and climate regions could notably help when assessing the impact of different agricultural practices and future stock change evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrouays D, Deslais W, Badeau V (2001) The carbon content of topsoil and its geographical distribution in France. Soil Use Manag 17:7–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyer L, Sieling K, Pingpank K (1999) The impact of a low humus level in arable soils on microbial properties, soil organic matter quality and crop yield. Biol Fertil Soil 28:156–161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen BT (1989) Askov 1984–1989: research on animal manure and mineral fertilizers, Proceedings of the Sanborn Field Centennial, 27 June 1989, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO. pp. 23–48

  • Costantini EAC, Barbetti R, L'Abate G (2007) Soils of Italy: status, problems and solutions. In: Zdruli P, Trisorio Liuzzi G (eds) Status of Mediterranean soil resources: actions needed to support their sustainable use. Mediterranean Conference Proceedings, Tunis, Tunisia. IAM Bari, Italy, pp 165–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellmer F, Peschke H, Köhn W, Chmielewski FM, Baumecker M (2000) Tillage and fertilizing effects on sandy soils. Review and selected results of long-term experiments at Humboldt-University Berlin. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 163:267–272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fantappiè M, L'Abate G, Costantini EAC (2010) Factors influencing soil organic carbon stock variations in Italy during the last three decades. In: Zdruli P, Pagliai M, Kapur S, Cano AF (eds) Land degradation and desertification: assessment, mitigation and remediation., pp 435–465. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-8657-0_34

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Finke P, Hartwich R, Dudal R, Ibanez J, Jamagne M, King D, Montanarella L, Yassoglu N (1998) Georeferenced soil database for Europe. Manual of procedures. Version 1.0. ESB-JRCSAI. European Commission. EUR 18092 EN. pp. 184

  • Freibauer A, Rounsevell MDA, Smith P, Verhagen J (2004) Carbon sequestration in the agricultural soils of Europe. Geoderma 122:1–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gardi C, Sconosciuto F (2007) Evaluation of carbon stock variation in Northern Italian soils over the last 70 years. Sustain Sci 2:237–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2000) Good practice guidance and uncertainty management in national greenhouse gas inventories. In: Penman J, Kruger D, Galbally I, Hiraishi T, Buruhani N, Emmanuel S, Buendia L, Hoppaus R, Martinsen T, Meijer J, Miwa K, Tanabe K (eds) IPCC/OECD/IEA/IGES, Hayama, Japan

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2003) Good practice guidance for land use, land use change and forestry. In: Penman J, Gytarsky M, Hiraishi T, Krug T, Kruger D, Pipatti R, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K, Wagner F (eds) IPCC/OECD/IEA/IGES, Hayama, Japan

  • ISO 14235 (1998) Soil quality-determination of organic carbon by sulfochromic oxidation

  • ISPRA (Institute for Environmental Protection and Research) (2010) Italian greenhouse gases inventory 1990–2006, National Inventory Report 2008. ISPRA, Rapporti 113/2010

  • ISTAT (2010) Agricoltura e ambiente. L'indagine 2007 sulla struttura e le produzioni delle aziende agricole. Informazioni n. 2 Roma 2010. pp 71

  • Janssens IA, Freibauer A, Ciais P, Smith P, Nabuurs GJ, Folberth G, Schlamadinger B, Hutjes RWA, Ceulemans R, Schulze E-D, Valentini R, Dolman AJ (2003) Europe's terrestrial biosphere absorbs 7 to 12% of European anthropogenic CO2 emissions. Science 300:1538–1542

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Janssens IA, Freibauer A, Schlamadinger B, Ceulemans R, Ciais P, Dolman AJ, Heimann M, Nabuurs GJ, Smith P, Valentini R, Schulze ED (2005) The carbon budget of terrestrial ecosystems at country-scale—a European case study. Biogeosciences 2:15–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Körschens M, Weigel A, Schulz E (1998) Turnover of soil organic matter (SOM) and long-term balances—tools for evaluating sustainable productivity of soils. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 161:409–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (1999) Soil management and restoration for C sequestration to mitigate the accelerated greenhouse effect. Prog Environ Sci 1:307–326

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lugato E, Paustian K, Giardini L (2007) Modelling soil carbon dynamics in two long-term experiments of north-eastern Italy. Agr Ecosyst Environ 120:423–432

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lugato E, Zuliani M, Alberti G, Delle Vedove G, Gioli B, Miglietta F, Peressotti A (2010) Application of DNDC biogeochemistry model to estimate greenhouse gas emission from Italian agricultural areas at high spatial resolution. Agr Ecosyst Environ 139:546–556

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin MP, Watterbach M, Smith P, Meersmans J, Jolivet C, Boulonne L, Arrouays D (2010) Spatial distribution of soil organic carbon stocks in France. Biogeosci Discuss 7:8409–8443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morari F, Lugato E, Berti A, Giardini L (2006) Long term effects of recommended management practices on soil carbon changes and sequestration in north-eastern Italy. Soil Use Manag 22:71–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murillo JCR (2001) Organic carbon content under different types of land use and soil in peninsular Spain. Biol Fertil Soil 33:53–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieder R, Richter J (2000) C and N accumulation in arable soils of West Germany and its influence on the environment—developments 1970 to 1998. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 163:65–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rusco E, Filippi N, Marchetti M, Montanarella L (2003) Carta ecopedologica d'Italia. EUR 20774 IT, EC

  • Sinanet (2009) Rete del sistema Informativo Nazionale Ambientale. http://www.sinanet.isprambiente.it/it. Cited 13 August 2009

  • Sleutel S, De Neve S, Hofman G, Boeckx P, Beheydt D, Van Cleemput O, Mestdagh I, Lootens P, Carlier L, Van Camp N, Verbeeck H, Vande Walle I, Samson R, Lust N, Lemeur R (2003) Carbon stock changes and carbon sequestration potential of Flemish cropland soils. Glob Chang Biol 9:1193–1203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sleutel S, De Neve S, Singier B, Hofman G (2006) Organic C levels in intesively managed arable soils—long term regional trends and characterization of fractions. Soil Use Manag 22:188–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith WN, Desjardins RL, Patty E (2000a) The net flux of carbon from agricultural soils in Canada 1970–2010. Glob Chang Biol 6:557–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith P, Powlson DS, Smith JU, Falloon P, Coleman K (2000b) Meeting Europe's climate change commitments: quantitative estimates of the potential for carbon mitigation by agriculture. Glob Chang Biol 6:525–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith P, Smith JU, Powlson DS (2001). Soil Organic Matter Network (SOMNET): 2001 model and experimental metadata. GCTE report 7, second edition, GCTE Focus 3, Wallingford, Oxon, pp 223

  • Tedeschi V, Lumicisi A (2006) L'attuazione del Protocollo di Kyoto nel settore forestale: il punto sulla situazione attuale e le prospettive future. Forest 3:3–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triberti L, Nastri A, Giordani G, Comellini F, Baldoni G, Toderi G (2008) Can mineral and organic fertilization help sequestrate carbon dioxide in cropland? Eur J Agron 29:13–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • UNFCCC (1998) Document FCCC/CP/1997/7/Add1. Report of the conference of the parties on its third session, held at Kyoto from 1 to 11 December 1997. Addendum. Part 2: action taken by the conference of the parties. United Nations, Geneva. pp 60. At: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/cop3/07a01.pdf

  • UNFCCC (2002) Decision 14/CP.7. Pp. 54–67. In: FCCC/CP/2001/13/Add.1. Report of the conference of the parties on its seventh session, held in Marrakech from 29 October to 10 November 2001. Addendum. Part 2: action taken by the conference of the parties. United Nations, Geneva. pp 69. At: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/cop7/13a01.pdf

  • Ungaro F, Staffilani F, Tarocco P (2010) Assessing and mapping topsoil organic carbon stock at regional scale: a scorpan kriging approach conditional on soil map delineations and land use. Land Degrad Dev 21:565–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Meirvenne M, Pannier J, Hofman G, Louwagie G (1996) Regional characterization of the long-term change in soil organic carbon under intensive agriculture. Soil Use Manag 12:86–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vleeshouwers LM, Verhagen A (2002) Carbon emission and sequestration by agricultural land use: a model study for Europe. Glob Chang Biol 8:519–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Lützow M, Kögel-Knabner I (2009) Temperature sensitivity of soil organic matter decomposition—what do we know. Biol Fertil Soil 46:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining organic carbon in soils: effect of variations in digestion conditions and of inorganic soil constituents. Soil Sci 63:251–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work benefited from the financial contribution of the “FISR Carboitaly project”, funded by the Italian Ministry for University and Research. A special acknowledgement is for the SIAS project coordinators for making available all the SOC stock data for different Italian regions and to Lugato E. for his precious suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tommaso Chiti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chiti, T., Gardin, L., Perugini, L. et al. Soil organic carbon stock assessment for the different cropland land uses in Italy. Biol Fertil Soils 48, 9–17 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-011-0599-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-011-0599-4

Keywords

Navigation