Skip to main content
Log in

Quantitative assessment of hydrolase production and persistence in soil

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biology and Fertility of Soils Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this work was to calculate indices of hydrolase production (Pr) and persistence (Pe) through simple arithmetical calculations. Changes in acid and alkaline phosphomonoesterase, phosphodiesterase, urease, protease, and β-glucosidase activities were monitored under controlled conditions in seven soils with a wide range of properties, in which microbial growth was stimulated by adding glucose and nitrogen. Glucose mineralization was monitored by CO2–C evolution, and microbial growth was quantified by determining the soil adenosine triphosphate (ATP) content. Hydrolase Pr and Pe indices were numerically quantified by the following relationships: Pr = H / t H and Pe = (r / Ht, respectively, where H indicates the peak value of each measured hydrolase activity, t H is the time of the peak value, r indicates the residual activity value, and Δt is the time interval t r − t H, where t r is the time of the residual activity value. Addition of glucose and N-stimulated soil respiration increased ATP content and stimulated the production of the measured hydrolase activities in all soils; the measured variable reached a maximum value and then decreased, returning to the value of the control soil. Apart from β-glucosidase activity, whose activity was not stimulated by glucose and N addition, the other measured hydrolase activities showed a trend that allowed us to calculate the Pr and Pe indices using the above-mentioned equations. Acid phosphomonoesterase and protease Pr values were significantly higher in soils under forest or set aside management; the alkaline phosphomonoesterase and phosphodiesterase Pr values were generally higher in the neutral and alkaline soils, and the urease Pr values showed no obvious relationships with soil pH or management. Concerning the persistence of enzyme activities, Pe values of the acid phosphomonoesterase activity were significantly higher in the acidic soils, and those of urease activity were higher in acidic soils and the Bordeaux neutral soil. No relationships were observed between Pe values of alkaline phosphomonoesterase, phosphodiesterase, or protease activities and soil pH or management. The different responses of hydrolases were discussed in relation to soil properties, microbial growth, and regulation at the enzyme molecular level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison SD (2005) Cheaters, diffusion and nutrients constrain decomposition by microbial enzymes in spatially structured environments. Ecol Lett 8:626–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison SD, Vitousek PM (2005) Responses of extracellular enzymes to simple and complex nutrient inputs. Soil Biol Biochem 37:937–944

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balasubramanian A, Siddaramappa R, Rangaswami G (1972) Effect of organic manuring on the activities of the enzymes hydrolysing sucrose and urea and on soil aggregation. Plant Soil 37:319–328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmer AM, Bremner JM (1977) Gas chromatographic analysis of soil atmosphere. Soil Sci Soc Am J 41:908–912

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Browman MG, Tabatabai MA (1978) Phosphodiesterase activity of soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 42:284–290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burns RG (1982) Enzyme activity in soil: location and a possible role in microbial ecology. Soil Biol Biochem 14:423–427

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Busby S, Ebright RH (1999) Transcription activation by catabolite activator protein (CAP). J Mol Biol 293:199–213

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ciardi C, Nannipieri P (1990) A comparison of methods for measuring ATP in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 22:725–727

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clarholm M (1993) Microbial biomass P, labile P, and acid phosphatase activity in the humus layer of a spruce forest after repeated additions of fertilizers. Biol Fertil Soils 16:287–292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dick WA, Tabatabai MA (1992) Significance and potential uses of soil enzymes. In: Metting Jr FB (ed) Soil microbial ecology. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 95–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick WA, Cheng L, Wang P (2000) Soil acid and alkaline phosphatase activity as pH adjustment indicators. Soil Biol Biochem 32:1915–1919

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dilly O, Nannipieri P (2001) Response of ATP content, respiration rate and enzyme activities in an arable and a forest soil to nutrient additions. Biol Fertil Soils 34:64–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drobnik J (1957) Biological transformation of organic substances in soil. Pochvovednie 12:62–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd JN, Butler JHA (1972) Short-term assays of soil proteolytic enzyme activities using proteins and dipeptide derivatives as substrates. Soil Biol Biochem 4:19–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lahdesmaki R, Piispanen R (1988) Degradation products and the hydrolytic enzyme activities in the soil humification processes. Soil Biol Biochem 20:287–292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Landi L, Valori F, Ascher J, Renella G, Falchini L, Nannipieri P (2006) Root exudate effects on the bacterial communities, CO2 evolution, nitrogen transformations and ATP content of rhizosphere and bulk soils. Soil Biol Biochem 38:509–516

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCarty GW, Shogren DR, Bremner JM (1992) Regulation of urease production in soil by microbial assimilation of nitrogen. Biol Fertil Soils 12:261–264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nannipieri P (1995) The potential use of soil enzymes as indicators of productivity, sustainability and pollution. In: Pankhurst CE, Doube BM, Gupta VVSR, Grace PR (eds) Soil Biota: management in sustainable farming systems. CSIRO, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, pp 238–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Nannipieri P, Johnson RL, Paul EA (1978) Criteria for measuring microbial growth and activity in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 10:223–229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nannipieri P, Pedrazzini F, Arcara PG, Piovanelli C (1979) Changes in amino acids, enzyme activities and biomasses during soil microbial growth. Soil Sci 127:26–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nannipieri P, Muccini L, Ciardi C (1983) Microbial biomass and enzyme activities: production and persistence. Soil Biol Biochem 15:679–685

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nannipieri P, Kandeler E, Ruggiero P (2001) Enzymes activities as indicators of soil microbial functional diversity. In: Dick R (ed) Enzymes in the environment: activity, ecology and applications. CSIC, Granada, Spain, p 13–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Renella G, Landi L, Ascher J, Ceccherini MT, Pietramellara G, Nannipieri P (2006) Phosphomonoesterase production and persistence and composition of bacterial communities during plant material decomposition in soils with different pH values. Soil Biol Biochem 38:795–802

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sinsabaugh RL, Moorhead DL (1994) Resource allocation to extracellular enzyme production: a model for nitrogen and phosphorus control of litter decomposition. Soil Biol Biochem 26:1305–1311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skujins JJ (1978) Extracellular enzymes in soil. CRC Crit Rev Microbiol 4:383–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff (1998) Keys to soil taxonomy, 8th edn. USDA, Soil Conservation Service, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparling GP (1995) The substrate-induced respiration method. In: Alef K, Nannipieri P (eds) Methods in applied soil microbiology. Academic, London, pp 397–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Speir TW, Ross DJ (1978) Soil phosphatase and sulphatase. In: Burns RG (ed) Soil enzymes. Academic, London, pp 198–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabatabai MA (1982) Soil enzymes. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of soil analysis, 2nd edn. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI, pp 907–943

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabatabai MA, Bremner JM (1969) Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biol Biochem 1:301–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walkley A, Black IA (1938) An examination of Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zantua MI, Bremner JM (1976) Production and persistence of urease in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 8:369–374

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giancarlo Renella.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Renella, G., Szukics, U., Landi, L. et al. Quantitative assessment of hydrolase production and persistence in soil. Biol Fertil Soils 44, 321–329 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-007-0208-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-007-0208-8

Keywords

Navigation