Abstract
The aim of this work was to calculate indices of hydrolase production (Pr) and persistence (Pe) through simple arithmetical calculations. Changes in acid and alkaline phosphomonoesterase, phosphodiesterase, urease, protease, and β-glucosidase activities were monitored under controlled conditions in seven soils with a wide range of properties, in which microbial growth was stimulated by adding glucose and nitrogen. Glucose mineralization was monitored by CO2–C evolution, and microbial growth was quantified by determining the soil adenosine triphosphate (ATP) content. Hydrolase Pr and Pe indices were numerically quantified by the following relationships: Pr = H / t H and Pe = (r / H)Δt, respectively, where H indicates the peak value of each measured hydrolase activity, t H is the time of the peak value, r indicates the residual activity value, and Δt is the time interval t r − t H, where t r is the time of the residual activity value. Addition of glucose and N-stimulated soil respiration increased ATP content and stimulated the production of the measured hydrolase activities in all soils; the measured variable reached a maximum value and then decreased, returning to the value of the control soil. Apart from β-glucosidase activity, whose activity was not stimulated by glucose and N addition, the other measured hydrolase activities showed a trend that allowed us to calculate the Pr and Pe indices using the above-mentioned equations. Acid phosphomonoesterase and protease Pr values were significantly higher in soils under forest or set aside management; the alkaline phosphomonoesterase and phosphodiesterase Pr values were generally higher in the neutral and alkaline soils, and the urease Pr values showed no obvious relationships with soil pH or management. Concerning the persistence of enzyme activities, Pe values of the acid phosphomonoesterase activity were significantly higher in the acidic soils, and those of urease activity were higher in acidic soils and the Bordeaux neutral soil. No relationships were observed between Pe values of alkaline phosphomonoesterase, phosphodiesterase, or protease activities and soil pH or management. The different responses of hydrolases were discussed in relation to soil properties, microbial growth, and regulation at the enzyme molecular level.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allison SD (2005) Cheaters, diffusion and nutrients constrain decomposition by microbial enzymes in spatially structured environments. Ecol Lett 8:626–635
Allison SD, Vitousek PM (2005) Responses of extracellular enzymes to simple and complex nutrient inputs. Soil Biol Biochem 37:937–944
Balasubramanian A, Siddaramappa R, Rangaswami G (1972) Effect of organic manuring on the activities of the enzymes hydrolysing sucrose and urea and on soil aggregation. Plant Soil 37:319–328
Blackmer AM, Bremner JM (1977) Gas chromatographic analysis of soil atmosphere. Soil Sci Soc Am J 41:908–912
Browman MG, Tabatabai MA (1978) Phosphodiesterase activity of soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 42:284–290
Burns RG (1982) Enzyme activity in soil: location and a possible role in microbial ecology. Soil Biol Biochem 14:423–427
Busby S, Ebright RH (1999) Transcription activation by catabolite activator protein (CAP). J Mol Biol 293:199–213
Ciardi C, Nannipieri P (1990) A comparison of methods for measuring ATP in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 22:725–727
Clarholm M (1993) Microbial biomass P, labile P, and acid phosphatase activity in the humus layer of a spruce forest after repeated additions of fertilizers. Biol Fertil Soils 16:287–292
Dick WA, Tabatabai MA (1992) Significance and potential uses of soil enzymes. In: Metting Jr FB (ed) Soil microbial ecology. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 95–127
Dick WA, Cheng L, Wang P (2000) Soil acid and alkaline phosphatase activity as pH adjustment indicators. Soil Biol Biochem 32:1915–1919
Dilly O, Nannipieri P (2001) Response of ATP content, respiration rate and enzyme activities in an arable and a forest soil to nutrient additions. Biol Fertil Soils 34:64–72
Drobnik J (1957) Biological transformation of organic substances in soil. Pochvovednie 12:62–71
Ladd JN, Butler JHA (1972) Short-term assays of soil proteolytic enzyme activities using proteins and dipeptide derivatives as substrates. Soil Biol Biochem 4:19–30
Lahdesmaki R, Piispanen R (1988) Degradation products and the hydrolytic enzyme activities in the soil humification processes. Soil Biol Biochem 20:287–292
Landi L, Valori F, Ascher J, Renella G, Falchini L, Nannipieri P (2006) Root exudate effects on the bacterial communities, CO2 evolution, nitrogen transformations and ATP content of rhizosphere and bulk soils. Soil Biol Biochem 38:509–516
McCarty GW, Shogren DR, Bremner JM (1992) Regulation of urease production in soil by microbial assimilation of nitrogen. Biol Fertil Soils 12:261–264
Nannipieri P (1995) The potential use of soil enzymes as indicators of productivity, sustainability and pollution. In: Pankhurst CE, Doube BM, Gupta VVSR, Grace PR (eds) Soil Biota: management in sustainable farming systems. CSIRO, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, pp 238–244
Nannipieri P, Johnson RL, Paul EA (1978) Criteria for measuring microbial growth and activity in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 10:223–229
Nannipieri P, Pedrazzini F, Arcara PG, Piovanelli C (1979) Changes in amino acids, enzyme activities and biomasses during soil microbial growth. Soil Sci 127:26–34
Nannipieri P, Muccini L, Ciardi C (1983) Microbial biomass and enzyme activities: production and persistence. Soil Biol Biochem 15:679–685
Nannipieri P, Kandeler E, Ruggiero P (2001) Enzymes activities as indicators of soil microbial functional diversity. In: Dick R (ed) Enzymes in the environment: activity, ecology and applications. CSIC, Granada, Spain, p 13–21
Renella G, Landi L, Ascher J, Ceccherini MT, Pietramellara G, Nannipieri P (2006) Phosphomonoesterase production and persistence and composition of bacterial communities during plant material decomposition in soils with different pH values. Soil Biol Biochem 38:795–802
Sinsabaugh RL, Moorhead DL (1994) Resource allocation to extracellular enzyme production: a model for nitrogen and phosphorus control of litter decomposition. Soil Biol Biochem 26:1305–1311
Skujins JJ (1978) Extracellular enzymes in soil. CRC Crit Rev Microbiol 4:383–421
Soil Survey Staff (1998) Keys to soil taxonomy, 8th edn. USDA, Soil Conservation Service, Washington DC
Sparling GP (1995) The substrate-induced respiration method. In: Alef K, Nannipieri P (eds) Methods in applied soil microbiology. Academic, London, pp 397–404
Speir TW, Ross DJ (1978) Soil phosphatase and sulphatase. In: Burns RG (ed) Soil enzymes. Academic, London, pp 198–250
Tabatabai MA (1982) Soil enzymes. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of soil analysis, 2nd edn. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI, pp 907–943
Tabatabai MA, Bremner JM (1969) Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biol Biochem 1:301–307
Walkley A, Black IA (1938) An examination of Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–37
Zantua MI, Bremner JM (1976) Production and persistence of urease in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 8:369–374
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Renella, G., Szukics, U., Landi, L. et al. Quantitative assessment of hydrolase production and persistence in soil. Biol Fertil Soils 44, 321–329 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-007-0208-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-007-0208-8