Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prediction of building damage induced by tunnelling through an optimized artificial neural network

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ground surface movement due to tunnelling in urban areas imposes strains to the adjacent buildings through distortion and rotation, and may consequently cause structural damage. The methods of building damage estimation are generally based on a two-stage procedure in which ground movement in the greenfield condition is estimated empirically, and then, a separate method based on structural mechanic principles is used to assess the damage. This paper predicts the building damage based on a model obtained from artificial neural network and a particle swarm optimization algorithm. To develop the model, the input and output parameters were collected from Line No. 2 of the Karaj Urban Railway Project in Iran. Accordingly, two case studies of damaged buildings were used to assess the ability of this model to predict the damage. Comparison with the measured data indicated that the model achieved the satisfactory results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Skempton AW, MacDonald DH (1956) The allowable settlement of buildings. Proc Inst Civ Eng 5(3):727–768

    Google Scholar 

  2. Charles JA, Skinner HD (2004) Settlement and tilt of low-rise buildings. Geotechn Eng 157:65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Burland JB, Wroth CP (1974) Settlement of buildings and associated damage. In: Proc conference settlement of structures. Pentech Press, London, pp 611–654

  4. Boscardin MD, Cording JC (1989) Response to excavation-induced settlement. J Geotech Eng 115(1):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Boone SJ (1996) Ground-movement-related building damage. J Geotech Eng 122(11):886–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boone SJ, Westland J, Nusink R (1999) Comparative evaluation of building responses to an adjacent braced excavation. Can Geotech J 36:210–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Finno RJ, Voss FT, Rossow E, Tanner Blackburn J (2005) Evaluating damage potential in buildings affected by excavations. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131:1199–1210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Netzel H (2009) Building response due to ground movements. IOS Press, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  9. Namazi E, Mohamad H (2013) Potential damage assessment in buildings undergoing tilt. Proc Inst Civil Eng Geotech Eng 166(4):365–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Namazi E, Mohamad H (2013) Assessment of building damage induced by three-dimensional ground movements. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 139(4):608–618. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Potts DM, Addenbrooke TI (1997) A structure’s influence on tunnelling-induced ground movements. Proc ICE-Geotech Eng 125(2):109–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Son M, Cording EJ (2005) Estimation of building damage due to excavation-induced ground movements. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131:162–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Son M, Cording EJ (2007) Evaluation of building stiffness for building response analysis to excavation-induced ground movements. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 133:995–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Franzius JN, Potts DM, Burland JB (2006) The response of the surface structure to tunnel construction. Proc ICE Geotech Eng 159(1): 3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dimmock PS, Mair RJ (2008) Effect of building stiffness on tunnelling-induced ground movement. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 23(4):438–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Farrell RP, Mair RJ, Sciotti A, Pigorini A, Ricci M (2012) The response of buildings to tunnelling: a case study. Geotechnical aspects of underground construction in soft ground. In: Proceedings of the 7th international symposium on geotechnical aspects of underground construction in soft ground, pp 877–885

  17. Sharma LK, Vishal V, Singh TN (2017) Predicting CO2 permeability of bituminous coal using statistical and adaptive neuro-fuzzy analysis. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 42:216–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sharma LK, Vishal V, Singh TN (2017) Developing novel models using neural networks and fuzzy systems for the prediction of strength of rocks from key geomechanical properties. Measurement 102:158–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Singh R, Umrao RK, Ahmad M, Ansari MK, Sharma LK, Singh TN (2017) Prediction of geomechanical parameters using soft computing and multiple regression approach. Measurement 99:108–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hasanipanah M, Armaghani DJ, Amnieh HB, Majid MZA, Tahir MM (2017) Application of PSO to develop a powerful equation for prediction of flyrock due to blasting. Neural Comput Appl 28(1):1043–1050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hasanipanah M, Amnieh HB, Arab H, Zamzam MS (2016) Feasibility of PSO-ANFIS model to estimate rock fragmentation produced by mine blasting. Neural Comput Appl 1–10

  22. Taheri K, Hasanipanah M, Golzar SB, Majid MZA (2017) A hybrid artificial bee colony algorithm-artificial neural network for forecasting the blast-produced ground vibration. Eng Comput 33(3):689–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mokfi T, Shahnazar A, Bakhshayeshi I, Derakhsh AM, Tabrizi O (2018) Proposing of a new soft computing-based model to predict peak particle velocity induced by blasting. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-018-0578-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Singh TN, Singh V (2005) An intelligent approach to prediction and control ground vibration in mines. Geotech Geol Eng 23(3):249–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sharma LK, Singh R, Umrao RK, Sharma KM, Singh TN (2017) Evaluating the modulus of elasticity of soil using soft computing system. Eng Comput 33(3):497–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Singh TN, Verma AK (2012) Comparative analysis of intelligent algorithms to correlate strength and petrographic properties of some schistose rocks. Eng Comput 28(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim CY, Bae GJ, Hong SW, Park CH, Moon HK, Shin HS (2001) Neural network based prediction of ground surface settlements due to tunnelling. Comput Geotech 28(6):517–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Boubou R, Emeriault F, Kastner R (2010) Artificial neural network application for the prediction of ground surface movements induced by shield tunnelling. Can Geotech J 47:1214–1233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Adoko AC, Wu L (2012) Estimation of convergence of a high-speed railway tunnel in weak rocks using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) approach. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 4(1):11–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rafiai H, Moosavi M (2012) An approximate ANN-based solution for convergence of lined circular tunnels in elasto-plastic rock masses with anisotropic stresses. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 27:52–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Liou SW, Wang CM, Huang YF (2009) Integrative discovery of multifaceted sequence patterns by frame-relayed search and hybrid PSO-ANN. J Univers Comput Sci 15(4):742–764

    Google Scholar 

  32. McCulloch WS, Pitts W (1943) A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull Math Biophys 5:115–133

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Rosenblatt F (1959) The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychol Rev 65:386–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hopfield JJ, Tank DW (1986) Computing with neural circuits: a model. Science 233:625–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Basheer IA, Hajmeer M (2000) Artificial neural networks: fundamentals, computing, design, and application. J Microbiol Methods 43:3–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hornik K, Stinchcombe M, White H (1989) Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Netw 2:359–366

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Kennedy J, Eberhart R (1995) Particle swarm optimization. In: IEEE international conference on neural networks perth, Australia 1942–1948

  38. Shi Y, Eberhart RC (1998) A modified particle swarm optimizer. In: Proceedings of IEEE international congress on evolutionary computation, pp 69–73

  39. Poli R, Kennedy J, Blackwell T (2007) Particle swarm optimization: an overview. Swarm Intell 1:33–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Bansal JC, Singh PK, Saraswat M, Verma A, Jadon SS, Abraham A (2011) Inertia weight strategies in particle swarm optimization. In: Third world congress on nature and biologically inspired computing. IEEE, pp 640–647

  41. Hajihassani M, Armaghani DJ, Sohaei H, Mohamad ET, Marto A (2014) Prediction of airblast-overpressure induced by blasting using a hybrid artificial neural network and particle swarm optimization. Appl Acoust 80:57–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Schmidt B (1969) Settlements and ground movements associated with tunnelling in soil PhD Thesis, University of Illinois

  43. Peck RB (1969) Deep excavations and tunnelling in soft ground. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering state of the art, pp 225–290

  44. O’Reilly MP, New BM (1982) Settlements above tunnels in the United Kingdom-their magnitude and prediction. Tunnelling 82. The Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, London, pp 55–64

    Google Scholar 

  45. Breth H, Chambosse G (1974) Settlement behavior of buildings above subway tunnels in Frankfurt clay. In: Proceedings of the conference on settlement of structures, London, pp 329–336

  46. Frischmann WW, Hellings JE, Gittoes S, Snowden C (1994) Protection of the mansion house against damage caused by ground movements due to the docklands light railway extension. In: Proceedings of the ICE-geotechnical engineering, vol 107, No 2, pp 65–76

  47. Mair RJ, Taylor RN (2001) Settlement predictions for Neptune, Murdoch, and Clegg Houses and adjacent masonry walls building response to tunnelling—case studies from construction of the Jubilee line extension, London. Vol 1 projects and methods. In: Burland JB, Standing JR, Jardine FM (eds) CIRIA SP200, pp 217–228

  48. Burland JB, Broms BB, de Mello VFB (1977) Behavior of foundations and structures. In: State-of-the-art report proc 9th int conf on soil mech and found engr, vol II, Tokyo, pp 495–546

  49. Clerc M, Kennedy J (2002) The particle swarm-explosion, stability, and convergence in a multi-dimensional complex space. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(1):58–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Diamantidis NA, Karlis D, Giakoumakis EA (2000) Unsupervised stratification of cross-validation for accuracy estimation. Artif Intell 116(1):1–16

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moosazadeh, S., Namazi, E., Aghababaei, H. et al. Prediction of building damage induced by tunnelling through an optimized artificial neural network. Engineering with Computers 35, 579–591 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-018-0615-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-018-0615-5

Keywords

Navigation