Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction and minimization of blast-induced ground vibration using two robust meta-heuristic algorithms

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During blasting operations in open pit mines, most of the blast energy (approximately 40%) is wasted due to ground vibration. This phenomenon causes damages to the surrounding structures and pit slope. Therefore, prediction of ground vibration with an appropriate degree of accuracy is important to identify safety area of blasting. In this paper, in the first step, a predictive equation based on gene expression programming (GEP) was developed to estimate ground vibrations of blasting operations conducted in Gol-E-Gohar iron mine. For this aim, 115 blasting operations were identified and the most effective parameters on peak particle velocity (PPV), i.e., burden, spacing, stemming, hole-depth, hole-diameter, powder factor, maximum charge per delay and distance from the blast face were collected from the mine. Capability of the developed GEP model was compared with a non-linear multiple regression (NLMR) model and five conventional equations. The obtained results revealed that the developed GEP model is more efficient compared to the other models in predicting PPV. In the second step, to optimize the GEP predictive model, cuckoo optimization algorithm (COA) was employed and proposed. To do this, several strategies were defined and then several optimized blasting patterns were determined for each strategy. It was found that by developing the COA model, a significant reduction can be happened in PPV values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bhandari S (1997) Engineering rock blasting operations. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  2. Singh J, Verma AK, Banka H, Singh TN, Maheshwar S (2016) A study of soft computing models for prediction of longitudinal wave velocity. Arabian J Geosci 9(3):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Verma AK, Singh TN (2011) Intelligent systems for ground vibration measurement: a comparative study. Eng Comput 27:225–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lopez JC, Lopez JE (1995) Drilling and blasting of rocks. AA Balkema, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  5. Singh TN, Singh R, Singh B, Sharma LK, Singh R, Ansari MK (2016) Investigations and stability analyses of Malin village landslide of Pune district, Maharashtra, India. Natl Hazards Online. doi:10.1007/s11069-016-2241-0

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sharma LK, Umrao RK, Singh R, Ahmad M, Singh TN (2016) Geotechnical characterization of road cut hill slope forming unconsolidated geo-materials: a case study, Geotech Geol Eng. doi:10.1007/s10706-016-0093-8

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yonghun J, Chungin L (2002) Application of neural networks to prediction of powder factor and peak particle velocity in tunnel blasting. Int Soc Explos Eng 2:67–76

    Google Scholar 

  8. Monjezi M, Baghestani M, Faradonbeh RS, Saghand MP, Armaghani DJ (2016) Modification and prediction of blast-induced ground vibrations based on both empirical and computational techniques. Eng Comput 32:717–728. doi:10.1007/s00366-016-0448-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wyllie DC, Mah C (2004) Rock slope engineering. Taylor & Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gokhale BV (2010) Rotary drilling and blasting in large surface mines. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Khandelwal M, Armaghani DJ, Faradonbeh RS, Yellishetty M, Majid MZA, Monjezi M (2016) Classification and regression tree technique in estimating peak particle velocity caused by blasting. Eng Comput. doi:10.1007/s00366-016-0455-0

    Google Scholar 

  12. New BM (1986) Ground vibration caused by civil engineering works. Transport and Road Research Laboratory Research Report. No. RR 53

  13. Bureau of Indian Standard (1973) Criteria for safety and design of structures subjected to underground blast ISI Bull IS-6922

  14. Verma AK, Singh TN (2012) Comparative analysis of intelligent algorithms to correlate strength and petrographic properties of some schistose rocks. Eng Comput 28(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Iphar M, Yavuz M, Ak H (2008) Prediction of ground vibrations resulting from the blasting operations in an open-pit mine by adaptive neurofuzzy inference system. Environ Geol 56:97–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Singh TN, Singh V (2005) An intelligent approach to prediction and control ground vibration in mines. Geotech Geol Eng 23:249–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Duvall WI, Petkof B (1959) Spherical propagation of explosion of generated strain pulses in rocks. USBM, RI-5483

  18. Davies B, Farmer IW, Attewell PB (1964) Ground vibrations from shallow sub-surface blasts. Engineer 217:553–559

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ambrasey NR, Hendron AJ (1968) Dynamic behavior of rock masses. In: Stagg KG, Zienkiewicz OC (eds) Rock mechanics in engineering practices. Wiley, New York, pp 203–207

    Google Scholar 

  20. Langefors U, Kihlstrom B (1973) The modern technique of rock blasting, Second edn. Wiley, New York, p 405

    Google Scholar 

  21. Criteria for Safety and Design of Structures Subjected to Underground Blast (1973) Indian Standards Institute. ISI Bulletin IS-6922

  22. Roy PP (1993) Putting ground vibration predictors into practice. Colliery Guard 241:63–67

    Google Scholar 

  23. Singh TN, Verma AK (2010) Sensitivity of total charge and maximum charge per delay on ground vibration. Geomat Natl Hazards Risk 1(3):259–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sharma LK, Singh R, Umrao RK, Sharma KM, Singh TN (2016) Evaluating the modulus of elasticity of soil using soft computing system. Eng Comput. doi:10.1007/s00366-016-0486-6

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shirani Faradonbeh R, Armaghani DJ, Majid MA, Tahir MM, Murlidhar BR, Monjezi M, Wong HM (2016) Prediction of ground vibration due to quarry blasting based on gene expression programming: a new model for peak particle velocity prediction. Int J Environ Sci Technol 13(6):1453–1464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hasanipanah M, Monjezi M, Shahnazar A, Armaghani DJ, Farazmand A (2015) Feasibility of indirect determination of blast induced ground vibration based on support vector machine. Measurement 75:289–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Khandelwal M, Singh TN (2009) Prediction of blasting induced ground vibration using artificial neural network. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46:1214–1222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mohamed MT (2011) Performance of fuzzy logic and artificial neural network in prediction of ground and air vibrations. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 48:845–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Verma AK, Maheshwar S (2014) Comparative study of intelligent prediction models for pressure wave velocity. J Geosci Geomat 2(3):130–138

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mollahasani A, Alavi AH, Gandomi AH (2011) Empirical modeling of plate load test moduli of soil via gene expression programming. Comput Geotech 38(2):281–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yang Y et al (2013) A new approach for predicting and collaborative evaluating the cutting force in face milling based on gene expression programming. J Netw Comput Appl 36(6):1540–1550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Yassin MA, Alazba A, Mattar MA (2016) Artificial neural networks versus gene expression programming for estimating reference evapotranspiration in arid climate. Agric Water Manag 163:110–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ozbek A, Unsal M, Dikec A (2013) Estimating uniaxial compressive strength of rocks using genetic expression programming. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 5(4):325–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Çanakcı H, Baykasoğlu A, Güllü H (2009) Prediction of compressive and tensile strength of Gaziantep basalts via neural networks and gene expression programming. Neural Comput Appl 18(8):1031–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Dindarloo SR, Siami-Irdemoosa E (2015) Estimating the unconfined compressive strength of carbonate rocks using gene expression programming. Eur J Sci Res 135(3):309–316

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ahangari K, Moeinossadat SR, Behnia D (2015) Estimation of tunnelling-induced settlement by modern intelligent methods. Soils Found 55(4):737–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Khandelwal M, Armaghani DJ, Faradonbeh RS, Ranjith PG, Ghoraba S (2016) A new model based on gene expression programming to estimate air flow in a single rock joint. Environ Earth Sci 75(9):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Dindarloo SR (2015) Peak particle velocity prediction using support vector machines: a surface blasting case study. J South Afr Inst Min Metall 115(7):637–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: an introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (second edition: MIT Press, 1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Koza JR. Genetic programming: on the programming of computers by means of natural selection. MIT Press, Cambridge

  41. Ferreira C (2001) Gene expression programming: a new adaptive algorithm for solving problems. Complex Syst 13(2):87–129

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Teodorescu L, Sherwood D (2008) High energy physics event selection with gene expression programming. Comput Phys Commun 178:409–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Khandelwal M, Faradonbeh RS, Monjezi M, Armaghani DJ, Majid, M.Z.B.A., Yagiz S (2016) Function development for appraising brittleness of intact rocks using genetic programming and non-linear multiple regression models. Eng Comput. doi:10.1007/s00366-016-0452-3

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ferreira C (2006) Gene expression programming: mathematical modeling by an artificial intelligence, 2nd edn. Springer, Germany (478 pp)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Güllü H (2012) Prediction of peak ground acceleration by genetic expression programming and regression: a comparison using likelihood-based measure. Eng Geol 141:92–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kayadelen C (2011) Soil liquefaction modeling by genetic expression programming and neuro-fuzzy. Expert Syst Appl 38:4080–4087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Rajabioun R (2011) Cuckoo optimization algorithm. Appl Soft Comput 11(8):5508–5518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Balochian S, Ebrahimi E (2013) Parameter optimization via cuckoo optimization algorithm of fuzzy controller for liquid level control. J Eng 2013:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Kaydani H, Mohebbi A (2013) A comparison study of using optimization algorithms and artificial neural networks for predicting permeability. J Petrol Sci Eng 112:17–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Mellal MA, Adjerida S, Williamsb EJ (2013) Optimal selection of obsolete tools in manufacturing systems using cuckoo optimization algorithm. Chem Eng 33:355–360

    Google Scholar 

  51. Ghasemi E, Ataei M, Hashemolhosseini H (2013) Development of a fuzzy model for predicting ground vibration caused by rock blasting in surface mining. J Vib Control 19(5):755–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Jahed Armaghani D, Hajihassani M, Mohamad ET, Marto A, Noorani SA (2014) Blasting-induced flyrock and ground vibration prediction through an expert artificial neural network based on particle swarm optimization. Arab J Geosci 7(12):5383–5396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Hajihassani M, Jahed Armaghani D, Monjezi M, Mohamad ET, Marto A (2015) Blast-induced air and ground vibration prediction: a particle swarm optimization-based artificial neural network approach. Environ Earth Sci 74:2799–2817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Hajihassani M, Jahed Armaghani D, Marto A, Tonnizam Mohamad E (2015) Ground vibration prediction in quarry blasting through an artificial neural network optimized by imperialist competitive algorithm. Bull Eng Geol Environ 74:873–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Monjezi M, Ghafurikalajahi M, Bahrami A (2011) Prediction of blast-induced ground vibration using artificial neural networks. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 26:46–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Middleton GV (2000) Data analysis in the earth sciences using MATLAB®. Prentice Hall, USA

    Google Scholar 

  57. Tiryaki B (2008) Predicting intact rock strength for mechanical excavation using multivariate statistics, artificial neural networks, and regression trees. Eng Geol 99(1):51–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. https://help.xlstat.com/customer/en/portal/articles/2062047. Accessed July 2016

  59. Sayadi AR, Khalesi MR, Borji MK (2014) A parametric cost model for mineral grinding mills. Miner Eng 55:96–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Sayadi AR, Lashgari A, Paraszczak JJ (2012) Hard-rock LHD cost estimation using single and multiple regressions based on principal component analysis. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 27(1):133–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Kaiser HF (1974) An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 39(1):31–36

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  62. GEPSOFT (2006) GeneXproTools. Version 4.0, http://www.gepsoft.com/. Accessed July 2016

  63. Faradonbeh RS, Armaghani DJ, Monjezi M (2016) Development of a new model for predicting flyrock distance in quarry blasting: a genetic programming technique. Bull Eng Geol Environ. doi:10.1007/s10064-016-0872-8

    Google Scholar 

  64. Tripathy A, Singh TN, Kundu J (2015) Prediction of abrasiveness index of some Indian rocks using soft computing methods. Measurement 68:302–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Liang M, Mohamad ET, Faradonbeh RS, Armaghani DJ, Ghoraba S (2016) Rock strength assessment based on regression tree technique. Eng Comput 32(2):343–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Kamari A, Arabloo M, Shokrollahi A, Gharagheizi F, Mohammadi A (2015) Rapid method to estimate the minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) in live reservoir oil systems during CO2 flooding. Fuel 153:310–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Hosseinzadeh M, Hemmati Sarapardeh A (2014) Toward a predictive model for estimating viscosity of ternary mixtures containing ionic liquids. J Mol Liq 200:340–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Chen G, Fu K, Liang Z, Sema T, Li C, Tontiwachwuthikul P, Idem R (2014) The genetic algorithm based back propagation neural network for MMP prediction in CO 2-EOR process. Fuel 126:202–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Konya CJ, Walter EJ (1990) Surface blast design. Prentice-Hall, USA

    Google Scholar 

  70. Hudaverdi T (2012) Application of multivariate analysis for prediction of blast-induced ground vibrations. Soil Dynam Earthq Eng 43:300–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Hudaverdi T, Kuzu C, Fisne A (2012) Investigation of the blast fragmentation using the mean fragment size and fragmentation index. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 56:136–145

    Google Scholar 

  72. Ash RL (1963) The mechanics of the rock breakage (part 1). Pit Quarry 56(2):98–100

    Google Scholar 

  73. Roy PP (2005) Rock blasting: effects and operations. CRC, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to extend their gratitude to Gol-E-Gohar iron mine management for his appreciable cooperation in measuring field data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masoud Monjezi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Faradonbeh, R.S., Monjezi, M. Prediction and minimization of blast-induced ground vibration using two robust meta-heuristic algorithms. Engineering with Computers 33, 835–851 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-017-0501-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-017-0501-6

Keywords

Navigation