Skip to main content
Log in

New recommended designs for screening either qualitative or quantitative factors

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Statistical Papers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

By the affine resolvable design theory, there are 68 non-isomorphic classes of symmetric orthogonal designs involving 13 factors with 3 levels and 27 runs. This paper gives a comprehensive study of all these 68 non-isomorphic classes from the viewpoint of the uniformity criteria, generalized word-length pattern and Hamming distance pattern, which provides some interesting projection and level permutation behaviors of these classes. Selecting best projected level permuted subdesigns with \(3\le k\le 13\) factors from all these 68 non-isomorphic classes is discussed via these three criteria with catalogues of best values. New recommended uniform minimum aberration and minimum Hamming distance designs are given for investigating either qualitative or quantitative \(4\le k\le 13\) factors, which perform better than the existing recommended designs in literature and the existing uniform designs. A new efficient technique for detecting non-isomorphic designs is given via these three criteria. By using this new approach, in all projections into \(1\le k\le 13\) factors we classify each class from these 68 classes to non-isomorphic subclasses and give the number of isomorphic designs in each subclass. Close relationships among these three criteria and lower bounds of the average uniformity criteria are given as benchmarks for selecting best designs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angelopoulos P, Evangelaras H, Koukouvinos C (2009) Model identification using 27 runs three level orthogonal arrays. J Appl Stat 36:33–38

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Sun DX, Wu CFJ (1993) A catalogue of two-level and three-level fractional factorial designs with small runs. Int Stat Rev 61:131–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Qi ZF, Zhou YD (2015) Constructing uniform designs under mixture discrepancy. Stat Probab Lett 97:76–82

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Clark JB, Dean AM (2001) Equivalence of fractional factorial designs. Stat Sin 11:537–547

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dey A, Mukerjee R (1999) Fractional factorial plans. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elsawah AM (2017a) A closer look at de-aliasing effects using an efficient foldover technique. Statistics 51(3):532–557

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Elsawah AM (2017b) A powerful and efficient algorithm for breaking the links between aliased effects in asymmetric designs. Aust NZ J Stat 59(1):17–41

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Elsawah AM (2017c) Constructing optimal router bit life sequential experimental designs: new results with a case study. Commun Stat Simul Comput. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2017.1397164

  • Elsawah AM (2018) Choice of optimal second stage designs in two-stage experiments. Comput Stat 33(2):933–965

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Elsawah AM, Qin H (2015a) Mixture discrepancy on symmetric balanced designs. Stat Probab Lett 104:123–132

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Elsawah AM, Qin H (2015b) A new strategy for optimal foldover two-level designs. Stat Probab Lett 103:116–126

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Elsawah AM, Qin H (2016) Asymmetric uniform designs based on mixture discrepancy. J Appl Stat 43(12):2280–2294

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Elsawah AM, Fang KT (2018) A catalog of optimal foldover plans for constructing U-uniform minimum aberration four-level combined designs. J Appl Stat. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2018.1545013

  • Evangelaras H, Koukouvinos C, Dean AM, Dingus CA (2005) Projection properties of certain three level orthogonal arrays. Metrika 62:241–257

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Evangelaras H, Koukouvinos C, Lappas E (2007) 18-run nonisomorphic three level orthogonal arrays. Metrika 66:31–37

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fang KT, Zhang A (2004) Minimum aberration Majorization in non-isomorphic saturated asymmetric designs. J Stat Plan Inference 126:337–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang KT, Tang Y, Yin JX (2008) Lower bounds of various criteria in experimental designs. J Stat Plan Inference 138:184–195

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fang KT, Ke X, Elsawah AM (2017) Construction of uniform designs via an adjusted threshold accepting algorithm. J Complex 43:28–37

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fries A, Hunter WG (1980) Minimum aberration \(2^{k-p}\) designs. Technometrics 8:601–608

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hall M Jr (1961) Hadamard matrix of order 16. Jet Propuls Lab Res Summ 1:21–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedayat AS, Sloane NJ, Stufken J (1999) Orthogonal arrays: theory and application. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hickernell FJ (1998a) A generalized discrepancy and quadrature error bound. Math Comput 67:299–322

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hickernell FJ (1998b) Lattice rules: how well do they measure up? In: Hellekalek P, Larcher G (eds) Random and quasi-random point sets. Lecture notes in statistics, vol 138. Springer, New York, pp 109-166

  • Lam C, Tonchev VD (1996) Classification of affine resolvable \(2-(27, 9, 4)\) designs. J Stat Plan Inference 56:187–202

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ma CX, Fang KT (2001) A note on generalized aberration in fractional designs. Metrika 53:85–93

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ma CX, Fang KT, Lin DKJ (2001) On isomorphism of factorial designs. J Complex 17:86–97

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sartono B, Goos P, Schoen ED (2012) Classification of three-level strength-3 arrays. J Stat Plan Inference 142(4):794–809

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sun DX, Wu CFJ (1993) Statistical properties of Hadamard matrices of order 16. In: Kuo W (ed) Quality through engineering design. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 169–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang B, Deng LY (2001) Minimum \(G_2\)-aberration for nonregular fractional factorial designs. Ann Stat 27:1914–1926

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tang Y, Xu H (2013) An effective construction method for multi-level uniform designs. J Stat Plan Inference 143:1583–1589

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tang Y, Xu H (2014) Permuting regular fractional factorial designs for screening quantitative factors. Biometrika 101(2):333–350

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tang Y, Xu H, Lin DKJ (2012) Uniform fractional factorial designs. Ann Stat 40:891–907

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Fang KT (1981) A note on uniformdistribution and experimental design. Chin Sci Bull 26:485–489

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu H (2005) A datalogue of three-level regular fractiional factorial designs. Metrika 62:259–281

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Xu H, Wu CFJ (2001) Generalized minimum aberration for asymmetrical fractional factorial designs. Ann Stat 29:549–560

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Xu H, Zhang J, Tang Y (2014) Level permutation method for constructing uniform designs under the wrap-around \(L_2\)-discrepancy. J Complex 30:46–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Yang G-J, Su Y-J (2018) Lower bound of a verage centered \(L_2\)-discrepancy for U-type designs. Commun Stat Theory Methods. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2017.1422761

  • Zhou YD, Xu H (2014) Space-filling fractional factorial designs. J Am Stat Assoc 109(507):1134–1144

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou YD, Fang KT, Ning JH (2013) Mixture discrepancy for quasi-random point sets. J Complex 29:283–301

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors greatly appreciate valuable comments and suggestions of the referees and the Associate Editor that significantly improved the paper. The authors greatly appreciate the kind support of Prof. Ping He during this work. This work was partially supported by the UIC Grants (Nos. R201409, R201712, R201810 and R201912) and the Zhuhai Premier Discipline Grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kai-Tai Fang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (pdf 221 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elsawah, A.M., Fang, KT. & Ke, X. New recommended designs for screening either qualitative or quantitative factors. Stat Papers 62, 267–307 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-019-01089-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-019-01089-9

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation