Skip to main content
Log in

On misspecification of the dispersion matrix in mixed linear models

  • Note
  • Published:
Statistical Papers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The general mixed linear model can be written y =  + Zu + e, where β is a vector of fixed effects, u is a vector of random effects and e is a vector of random errors. In this note, we mainly aim at investigating the general necessary and sufficient conditions under which the best linear unbiased estimator for \({\varvec \varrho}({\varvec l}, {\varvec m}) = {\varvec l}{\varvec '}{\varvec \beta}+{\varvec m}{\varvec '}{\varvec u}\) is also optimal under the misspecified model. In addition, we offer approximate conclusions in some special situations including a random regression model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Battese GE, Harter RM, Fuller WA (1988) An error-components model for prediction of county crop area using survey and satellite data. J Am Stat Assoc 83: 28–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhimasankaram P, Sengupta D (1996) The linear zero functions approach to linear models. Sankhyā, Ser B 58: 338–351

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Das K, Jiang J, Rao JNK (2004) That BLUP is a good thing: the estimation of random effects. Ann Stat 32: 818–840

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dempster AP, Rubin DB, Tsutakawa RK (1981) Estimation in covariance component models. J Am Stat Assoc 76: 341–353

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fay RE, Herriot RA (1979) Estimates of income for small places: an application of James–Stein procedures to census data. J Am Stat Assoc 74: 269–277

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Harville DA (1976) Extension of the Gauss–Markov Theorem to include the estimation of random effects. Ann Stat 4: 384–395

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Harville DA, Jeske DR (1992) Mean squared error of estimation or prediction under a general linear model. J Am Stat Assoc 87: 724–731

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson CR (1975) Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. Biometrics 31: 423–447

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Isotalo J, Puntanen S (2006) Linear prediction sufficiency for new observations in the general Gauss– Markov model. Commun Stat A 35: 1011–1023

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Peixoto JL (1993) Four equivalent definitions of reparametrizations and restrictions in linear model. Commun Stat Theory Methods 22: 283–299

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad NGN, Rao JNK (1990) The estimation of the mean square error of small-area estimators. J Am Stat Assoc 85: 163–171

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rao CR, Toutenburg H (1995) Linear models: least squares and alternatives. Springer-Verlag, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson GK (1991) That BLUP is a good thing: the estimation of random effects. Stat Sci 6: 15–51

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tian Y, Wiens DP (2006) On equality and proportionality of ordinary least squares, weighted least squares and best linear unbiased estimators in the general linear model. Stat Probab Lett 76: 1265–1272

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian-Ying Rong.

Additional information

This research was partially supported by Grants HGQ0637 and HGQN0725 from Huaiyin Institute of Technology. The second author was supported the “Green & Blue Project” Program for 2008 to Cultivate Young Core Instructors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rong, JY., Liu, XQ. On misspecification of the dispersion matrix in mixed linear models. Stat Papers 51, 445–453 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-009-0213-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-009-0213-0

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

Navigation