Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of Bayesian model selection based on MCMC with an application to GARCH-type models

  • Articles
  • Published:
Statistical Papers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive review and comparison of five computational methods for Bayesian model selection, based on MCMC simulations from posterior model parameter distributions. We apply these methods to a well-known and important class of models in financial time series analysis, namely GARCH and GARCH-t models for conditional return distributions (assuming normal and t-distributions). We compare their performance with the more common maximum likelihood-based model selection for simulated and real market data. All five MCMC methods proved reliable in the simulation study, although differing in their computational demands. Results on simulated data also show that for large degrees of freedom (where the t-distribution becomes more similar to a normal one), Bayesian model selection results in better decisions in favor of the true model than maximum likelihood. Results on market data show the instability of the harmonic mean estimator and reliability of the advanced model selection methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bauwens, L. and Lubrano, M., (1998). Bayesian inference on GARCH models using Gibbs sampler, Econometrics Journal 1: 23–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollerslev, T., (1986). A generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity, Journal of Econometrics 31: 307–327.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bollerslev, T., Engle, R. and Nelson, D., (1994). ARCH models, in R. Engle and D. McFadden (eds), Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 4, Elsevier Science B. V., Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlin, B. and Louis, T., (1996). Bayes and Empirical Bayes Methods for Data Analysis, Chapman&Hall, London.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chib, S., (1995). Marginal likelihood from the Gibbs output, Journal of the American Statistical Association 90 (432): 1313–1321.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chib, S. and Jeliazkov, I. (2001). Marginal likelihood from the Metropolis- Hastings output, Journal of the American Statistical Association 96(453): 270–281.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Frühwirth-Schnatter, S., (1995). Bayesian model discrimination and Bayes factor for linear Gaussian state space models, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, series B 57: 237–246.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Frühwirth-Schnatter, S. (2004). Estimating marginal likelihoods for mixture and Markov switching models using bridge sampling techniques, The Econometrics Journal 7: 143–167.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, A. and Dey, D., (1994). Bayesian model choice: Asymptotic and exact calculations, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B 56: 501–514.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, A. and Smith, A., (1990). Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities, Journal of the American Statistical Association 85: 398–409.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, A. and Rubin, D., (1992). Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences (with discussion), Statistical Science 7: 457–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geweke, J. (1992). Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to the calculation of posterior moments, in J. Bernardo, J. Berger, A. Dawid and A. Smith (eds), Bayesian Statistics, Vol. 4, Oxford University Press, pp. 169–193.

  • Geweke, J., (1993). Bayesian treatment of the independent Student-t linear model, Journal of Applied Econometrics 8: 19–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geweke, J. (1995). Bayesian comparison of econometric models. Working Papers 532, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.

  • Green, P., (1995). Reversible jump MCMC computation and Bayesian model determination, Biometrika 82: 711–732.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hastings, W., (1970). Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications, Biometrika 57: 97–109.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffreys, H., (1961). Theory of Probability, 3rd edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kass, R. and Raftery, A., (1995). Bayes factor, Journal of the American Statistical Association 90: 773–792.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, S. and Frühwirth-Schnatter, S. (2002). Bayesian analysis of switching ARCH models, Journal of Time Series Analysis 23(4): 425–458.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., Shephard, N. and Chib, S., (1998). Stochastic volatility: Likelihood inference and comparison with ARCH models, Review of Economic Studies 65: 361–393.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kleibergen, F. and van Dijk, H., (1993). Non-stationarity in GARCH models: a Bayesian analysis, Journal of Applied Econometrics 8: 41–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavine, M. and Scherrish, M., (1999). Bayes factors: What they are and what they are not, The American Statistician 53: 119–122.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Meng, X. and Wong, W., (1996). Simulating ratios of normalizing constants via a simple identity, Statistical Sinica 6: 831–860.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Miazhynskaia, T., Frühwirth-Schnatter, S. and Dorffner, G. (2004). Bayesian testing for non-linearity in volatility modeling, Technical report, Austrian Research Institute for Artificial Intelegence.

  • Müller, P. and Pole, A., (1998). Monte Carlo posterior integration in GARCH models, Sankhya—The Indian Journal of Statistics 60: 127–144.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nakatsuma, T. (2000). Bayesian analysis of ARMA-GARCH models: a Markov chain sampling approach, Journal of Econometrics 95: 57–69.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Newton, M. and Raftery, A., (1994). Approximate Bayesian inference by the weighted likelihood bootstrap, Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B 56: 1–48.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Raftery, A. and Lewis, S. (1992). How many iterations in the Gibbs sampler, in J. Bernardo, J. Berger, A. Dawid and A. Smith (eds), Bayesian Statistics, Vol. 4, Oxford University Press, pp. 763–773.

  • Schwarz, G., (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model, The Annals of Statistics 6: 461–464.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Shephard, N., (1996). Statistical aspects of ARCH and stochastic volatility, in D. Cox, D. V. Hinkley and O. E. Barndorff-Nielsen (eds), Time Series Models in Econometrics, Finance and Other Fields, London: Chapman & Hall, pp. 1–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, L., (1994). Markov chains for exploring posterior distributions, Annals of Statistics 21: 1701–1762.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Vrontos, I., Dellaportas, P. and Politis, D. (2000). Full Bayesian inference for GARCH and EGARCH models, Journal of Business & Economic Statistic 18(2):187–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, L. (1997). Bayesian model selection and model averaging, Technical report, Statistics Department, Carnegie Mellon University.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miazhynskaia, T., Dorffner, G. A comparison of Bayesian model selection based on MCMC with an application to GARCH-type models. Statistical Papers 47, 525–549 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-006-0305-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-006-0305-z

Key words

Navigation