Abstract
This paper presents a comprehensive review and comparison of five computational methods for Bayesian model selection, based on MCMC simulations from posterior model parameter distributions. We apply these methods to a well-known and important class of models in financial time series analysis, namely GARCH and GARCH-t models for conditional return distributions (assuming normal and t-distributions). We compare their performance with the more common maximum likelihood-based model selection for simulated and real market data. All five MCMC methods proved reliable in the simulation study, although differing in their computational demands. Results on simulated data also show that for large degrees of freedom (where the t-distribution becomes more similar to a normal one), Bayesian model selection results in better decisions in favor of the true model than maximum likelihood. Results on market data show the instability of the harmonic mean estimator and reliability of the advanced model selection methods.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bauwens, L. and Lubrano, M., (1998). Bayesian inference on GARCH models using Gibbs sampler, Econometrics Journal 1: 23–46.
Bollerslev, T., (1986). A generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity, Journal of Econometrics 31: 307–327.
Bollerslev, T., Engle, R. and Nelson, D., (1994). ARCH models, in R. Engle and D. McFadden (eds), Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 4, Elsevier Science B. V., Amsterdam.
Carlin, B. and Louis, T., (1996). Bayes and Empirical Bayes Methods for Data Analysis, Chapman&Hall, London.
Chib, S., (1995). Marginal likelihood from the Gibbs output, Journal of the American Statistical Association 90 (432): 1313–1321.
Chib, S. and Jeliazkov, I. (2001). Marginal likelihood from the Metropolis- Hastings output, Journal of the American Statistical Association 96(453): 270–281.
Frühwirth-Schnatter, S., (1995). Bayesian model discrimination and Bayes factor for linear Gaussian state space models, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, series B 57: 237–246.
Frühwirth-Schnatter, S. (2004). Estimating marginal likelihoods for mixture and Markov switching models using bridge sampling techniques, The Econometrics Journal 7: 143–167.
Gelfand, A. and Dey, D., (1994). Bayesian model choice: Asymptotic and exact calculations, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B 56: 501–514.
Gelfand, A. and Smith, A., (1990). Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities, Journal of the American Statistical Association 85: 398–409.
Gelman, A. and Rubin, D., (1992). Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences (with discussion), Statistical Science 7: 457–511.
Geweke, J. (1992). Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to the calculation of posterior moments, in J. Bernardo, J. Berger, A. Dawid and A. Smith (eds), Bayesian Statistics, Vol. 4, Oxford University Press, pp. 169–193.
Geweke, J., (1993). Bayesian treatment of the independent Student-t linear model, Journal of Applied Econometrics 8: 19–40.
Geweke, J. (1995). Bayesian comparison of econometric models. Working Papers 532, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
Green, P., (1995). Reversible jump MCMC computation and Bayesian model determination, Biometrika 82: 711–732.
Hastings, W., (1970). Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications, Biometrika 57: 97–109.
Jaffreys, H., (1961). Theory of Probability, 3rd edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Kass, R. and Raftery, A., (1995). Bayes factor, Journal of the American Statistical Association 90: 773–792.
Kaufmann, S. and Frühwirth-Schnatter, S. (2002). Bayesian analysis of switching ARCH models, Journal of Time Series Analysis 23(4): 425–458.
Kim, S., Shephard, N. and Chib, S., (1998). Stochastic volatility: Likelihood inference and comparison with ARCH models, Review of Economic Studies 65: 361–393.
Kleibergen, F. and van Dijk, H., (1993). Non-stationarity in GARCH models: a Bayesian analysis, Journal of Applied Econometrics 8: 41–61.
Lavine, M. and Scherrish, M., (1999). Bayes factors: What they are and what they are not, The American Statistician 53: 119–122.
Meng, X. and Wong, W., (1996). Simulating ratios of normalizing constants via a simple identity, Statistical Sinica 6: 831–860.
Miazhynskaia, T., Frühwirth-Schnatter, S. and Dorffner, G. (2004). Bayesian testing for non-linearity in volatility modeling, Technical report, Austrian Research Institute for Artificial Intelegence.
Müller, P. and Pole, A., (1998). Monte Carlo posterior integration in GARCH models, Sankhya—The Indian Journal of Statistics 60: 127–144.
Nakatsuma, T. (2000). Bayesian analysis of ARMA-GARCH models: a Markov chain sampling approach, Journal of Econometrics 95: 57–69.
Newton, M. and Raftery, A., (1994). Approximate Bayesian inference by the weighted likelihood bootstrap, Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B 56: 1–48.
Raftery, A. and Lewis, S. (1992). How many iterations in the Gibbs sampler, in J. Bernardo, J. Berger, A. Dawid and A. Smith (eds), Bayesian Statistics, Vol. 4, Oxford University Press, pp. 763–773.
Schwarz, G., (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model, The Annals of Statistics 6: 461–464.
Shephard, N., (1996). Statistical aspects of ARCH and stochastic volatility, in D. Cox, D. V. Hinkley and O. E. Barndorff-Nielsen (eds), Time Series Models in Econometrics, Finance and Other Fields, London: Chapman & Hall, pp. 1–67.
Tierney, L., (1994). Markov chains for exploring posterior distributions, Annals of Statistics 21: 1701–1762.
Vrontos, I., Dellaportas, P. and Politis, D. (2000). Full Bayesian inference for GARCH and EGARCH models, Journal of Business & Economic Statistic 18(2):187–198.
Wasserman, L. (1997). Bayesian model selection and model averaging, Technical report, Statistics Department, Carnegie Mellon University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miazhynskaia, T., Dorffner, G. A comparison of Bayesian model selection based on MCMC with an application to GARCH-type models. Statistical Papers 47, 525–549 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-006-0305-z
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-006-0305-z